J.M. Butler

Trends in the outcomes for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer : An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to examine the outcomes of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) over time and to determine if any trends were present with respect to the publication of significant clinical trials. We assembled a cohort of 6271 patients aged 21 years and older with LS-SCLC diagnosed from 1983 to 1998 and followed through 2005. Potential covariates included patient age at diagnosis, sex, race, year of diagnosis, laterality, tumor size, and location (upper lobe, middle lobe, lower lobe, or main bronchus). In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, African American race, and main bronchus location were all associated with a statistically significant increase in the mortality hazard. When compared to patients diagnosed in 1983-1987 who did not receive radiotherapy, the hazard for mortality was significantly reduced for patients diagnosed in 1988-1992 regardless of whether they received radiotherapy (HR=0.59; CI 0.52-0.65; p<0.0001) or not (HR=0.67; CI 0.60-0.75; p<0.0001). Patients who were diagnosed in 1993-1998 and received radiotherapy had similarly improved survival (HR=0.53; CI 0.47-0.58; p<0.0001), which was better than patients from the same time era who did not receive radiotherapy (HR=0.77; CI 0.69-0.85; p<0.0001). In conclusion, the survival for patients with LS-SCLC has improved over time. Many factors are likely involved, however we believe that part of this improvement was the result of clinical trials which investigated and subsequently defined chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care. In order to continue to improve clinical outcomes, clinical trials investigating new treatment paradigms are needed.

Phase la/lb Chemo-Radiation Trial of Gemcitabine and Dose-Escalated Thoracic Radiation in Patients with Stage III A/B Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction The safety of dose-escalated thoracic radiation concurrent with gemcitabine in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer has not been studied. Patients and Materials The maximal tolerated dose of 35 mg/m 2 twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent standard thoracic radiation was established in a previous phase Ia trial. In this study, a second patient cohort (phase Ib) received twice-weekly gemcitabine concurrent with three-dimensional dose-escalated thoracic radiation (60-74 Gy) after two cycles of induction chemotherapy: gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2 ) day 1 and 8 and carboplatin (area under the curve 5.0-5.5) day 1 every 21 days. Results Twenty-three patients were entered in the phase Ib portion of this trial. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity was primarily thrombocytopenia (22%) and neutropenia (26%). Grade III/IV esophageal toxicities occurred in 17% of patients, and grade III radiation pneumonitis/dyspnea was observed in 7 of 23 patients. The median and 2-year survival for phase Ib patients were 17.4 months and 32%, respectively. The overall 1- and 2-year survival for all 39 patients (16 phase Ia, 23 phase Ib) was 69% and 32%, respectively. Conclusions Combining 74-Gy thoracic radiation and concurrent gemcitabine is feasible, but the use of this regimen should be limited to the confines of a clinical trial. A randomized phase II trial through the Cancer and Leukemia Group B is underway to further evaluate the efficacy of this regimen.