J. S. Kissel
Louisiana State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. S. Kissel.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2008
L. Blackburn; L. Cadonati; S. Caride; S. Caudill; S. Chatterji; N. Christensen; J. Dalrymple; S. Desai; A. Di Credico; Gregory Ely; J. Garofoli; L. M. Goggin; G. González; R. Gouaty; C. Gray; A. M. Gretarsson; D. Hoak; T. Isogai; E. Katsavounidis; J. S. Kissel; Sergey Klimenko; R. A. Mercer; S. R P Mohapatra; S. Mukherjee; F. J. Raab; K. Riles; P. R. Saulson; R. Schofield; P. Shawhan; J. Slutsky
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) glitch group is part of the LIGO detector characterization effort. It consists of data analysts and detector experts who, during and after science runs, collaborate for a better understanding of noise transients in the detectors. Goals of the glitch group during the fifth LIGO science run (S5) included (1) offline assessment of the detector data quality, with focus on noise transients, (2) veto recommendations for astrophysical analysis and (3) feedback to the commissioning team on anomalies seen in gravitational wave and auxiliary data channels. Other activities included the study of auto-correlation of triggers from burst searches, stationarity of the detector noise and veto studies. The group identified causes for several noise transients that triggered false alarms in the gravitational wave searches; the times of such transients were identified and vetoed from the data generating the LSC astrophysical results.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2010
E. Goetz; R. L. Savage Jr.; J. Garofoli; G. González; E. Hirose; P. Kalmus; K. Kawabe; J. S. Kissel; M. Landry; Brian O'Reilly; X. Siemens; A. Stuver; M. Sung
We describe three fundamentally different methods we have applied to calibrate the test mass displacement actuators to search for systematic errors in the calibration of the LIGO gravitational-wave detectors. The actuation frequencies tested range from 90 Hz to 1 kHz and the actuation amplitudes range from 10−6 m to 10−18 m. For each of the four test mass actuators measured, the weighted mean coefficient over all frequencies for each technique deviates from the average actuation coefficient for all three techniques by less than 4%. This result indicates that systematic errors in the calibration of the responses of the LIGO detectors to differential length variations are within the stated uncertainties.