Janki Patel
University of California, San Diego
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Janki Patel.
Hepatology | 2017
Parambir S. Dulai; Siddharth Singh; Janki Patel; Meera Soni; Larry J. Prokop; Zobair M. Younossi; Giada Sebastiani; Mattias Ekstedt; Hannes Hagström; Patrik Nasr; Per Stål; Vincent K.W. Wong; Stergios Kechagias; Rolf Hultcrantz; Rohit Loomba
Liver fibrosis is the most important predictor of mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Quantitative risk of mortality by fibrosis stage has not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to quantify the fibrosis stage–specific risk of all‐cause and liver‐related mortality in NAFLD. Through a systematic review and meta‐analysis, we identified five adult NAFLD cohort studies reporting fibrosis stage–specific mortality (0‐4). Using fibrosis stage 0 as a reference population, fibrosis stage–specific mortality rate ratios (MRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all‐cause and liver‐related mortality were estimated. The study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. Included were 1,495 NAFLD patients with 17,452 patient years of follow‐up. Compared to NAFLD patients with no fibrosis (stage 0), NAFLD patients with fibrosis were at an increased risk for all‐cause mortality, and this risk increased with increases in the stage of fibrosis: stage 1, MRR = 1.58 (95% CI 1.19‐2.11); stage 2, MRR = 2.52 (95% CI 1.85‐3.42); stage 3, MRR = 3.48 (95% CI 2.51‐4.83); and stage 4, MRR = 6.40 (95% CI 4.11‐9.95). The results were more pronounced as the risk of liver‐related mortality increased exponentially with each increase in the stage of fibrosis: stage 1, MRR = 1.41 (95% CI 0.17‐11.95); stage 2, MRR = 9.57 (95% CI 1.67‐54.93); stage 3, MRR = 16.69 (95% CI 2.92‐95.36); and stage 4, MRR = 42.30 (95% CI 3.51‐510.34). Limitations of the study include an inability to adjust for comorbid conditions or demographics known to impact fibrosis progression in NAFLD and the inclusion of patients with simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without fibrosis in the reference comparison group. Conclusion: The risk of liver‐related mortality increases exponentially with increase in fibrosis stage; these data have important implications in assessing the utility of each stage and benefits of regression of fibrosis from one stage to another. (Hepatology 2017;65:1557‐1565).
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology | 2016
Janki Patel; Ricki Bettencourt; Jeffrey Cui; Joanie Salotti; Jonathan Hooker; Archana Bhatt; Carolyn Hernandez; Phirum Nguyen; H. Aryafar; Mark A. Valasek; William Haufe; Catherine A. Hooker; Lisa Richards; Claude B. Sirlin; Rohit Loomba
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton-density-fat-fraction (MRI-PDFF) has been shown to be a noninvasive, accurate and reproducible imaging-based biomarker for assessing steatosis and treatment response in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) clinical trials. However, there are no data on the magnitude of MRI-PDFF reduction corresponding to histologic response in the setting of a NASH clinical trial. The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare the magnitude of MRI-PDFF reduction between histologic responders versus histologic nonresponders in NASH patients. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of the MOZART trial, which included 50 patients with biopsy-proven NASH randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg/day orally or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary aim was to perform a head-to-head comparative analysis of histologic responders [defined as a ⩾2-point reduction in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) without worsening fibrosis] versus nonresponders, and the corresponding quantitative change in liver fat content measured via MRI-PDFF. Results: Of the 35 patients who underwent paired liver biopsy and MRI-PDFF assessment at the beginning and end of treatment, 10 demonstrated a histologic response. Compared with histologic nonresponders, histologic responders had a statistically significant reduction in MRI-PDFF of −4.1% ± 4.9 versus −0.6 ± 4.1 (p < 0.04) with a mean relative percent change of −29.3% ± 33.0 versus +2.0% ± 24.0 (p < 0.004), respectively. Conclusions: Utilizing paired MRI-PDFF and liver histology data, we demonstrate that a relative reduction of 29% in liver fat on MRI-PDFF is associated with a histologic response in NASH. After external validation by independent research groups, these results can be incorporated into designing future NASH clinical trials, especially those utilizing change in hepatic fat quantified by MRI-PDFF, as a treatment endpoint.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2015
Elizabeth C. Verna; Janki Patel; Ricki Bettencourt; Phirum Nguyen; Carolyn Hernandez; Mark A. Valasek; T. Kisselva; David A. Brenner; Rohit Loomba
Pentraxin‐2 (PTX‐2), a serum protein, inhibits inflammation and fibrosis, and recombinant PTX‐2 is being tested as an anti‐fibrotic agent.
Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research | 2018
Janki Patel; Niraj Patel; Denise Kalmaz
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the sixth most common cancer in men and the eighth most common cancer in women in the United States, with an estimated 65,150 new cases diagnosed in 2013 [1]. RCC’s classic presenting triad of hematuria, flank pain and palpable abdominal mass are only present in about 9 percent of patients and often, RCC is found incidentally on imaging. At diagnosis, about 16% of cases have evidence of disease in lymph nodes and 16% with distant metastases [2]. Typical sites for metastasis include lungs, bone, liver, and brain, [3] whereas intestinal metastasis is rare [4]. It is important for gastroenterologists to acknowledge the possibility of presence of metastases during endoscopy in these patients. In this case series, we present three patients with history of renal cell carcinoma with gastrointestinal metastases.
Gastroenterology | 2015
Elizabeth C. Verna; Janki Patel; Ricki Bettencourt; Tatiana Kisseleva; David A. Brenner; Phirum Nguyen; Carolyn Hernandez; Rohit Loomba
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2011
Lynlee Wolfe; Neha Trivedi; Janki Patel; Megan Farrell; Gladys A. Ramos; Dolores H. Pretorius; David Schrimmer
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2011
Neha Trivedi; Lynlee Wolfe; Janki Patel; Meghan Farrell; Gladys A. Ramos; Dolores H. Pretorius; Jennifer Wan; David Schrimmer
/data/revues/00029378/v204i1sS/S000293781001433X/ | 2011
Neha Trivedi; Lynlee Wolfe; Janki Patel; Meghan Farrell; Gladys Ramos; Dolores H. Pretorius; Caitlin Hartney; Yvonne E. Vaucher; David Schrimmer