Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeffrey J. Danielson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeffrey J. Danielson.


International Journal of Remote Sensing | 2013

Accuracy assessment of a mobile terrestrial lidar survey at Padre Island National Seashore

Samsung Lim; Cindy A. Thatcher; John C. Brock; Dustin R. Kimbrow; Jeffrey J. Danielson; B.J. Reynolds

The higher point density and mobility of terrestrial laser scanning (light detection and ranging (lidar)) is desired when extremely detailed elevation data are needed for mapping vertically orientated complex features such as levees, dunes, and cliffs, or when highly accurate data are needed for monitoring geomorphic changes. Mobile terrestrial lidar scanners have the capability for rapid data collection on a larger spatial scale compared with tripod-based terrestrial lidar, but few studies have examined the accuracy of this relatively new mapping technology. For this reason, we conducted a field test at Padre Island National Seashore of a mobile lidar scanner mounted on a sport utility vehicle and integrated with a position and orientation system. The purpose of the study was to assess the vertical and horizontal accuracy of data collected by the mobile terrestrial lidar system, which is georeferenced to the Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. To accomplish the study objectives, independent elevation data were collected by conducting a high-accuracy global positioning system survey to establish the coordinates and elevations of 12 targets spaced throughout the 12 km transect. These independent ground control data were compared to the lidar scanner-derived elevations to quantify the accuracy of the mobile lidar system. The performance of the mobile lidar system was also tested at various vehicle speeds and scan density settings (e.g. field of view and linear point spacing) to estimate the optimal parameters for desired point density. After adjustment of the lever arm parameters, the final point cloud accuracy was 0.060 m (east), 0.095 m (north), and 0.053 m (height). The very high density of the resulting point cloud was sufficient to map fine-scale topographic features, such as the complex shape of the sand dunes.


International Symposium on Lidar and Radar Mapping 2011: Technologies and Applications | 2011

Evaluation of the Global Multi-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010) using ICESat geodetic control

Claudia C. Carabajal; David J. Harding; J.-P. Boy; Jeffrey J. Danielson; Dean B. Gesch; Vijay P. Suchdeo

Supported by NASAs Earth Surface and Interior (ESI) Program, we are producing a global set of Ground Control Points (GCPs) derived from the Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) altimetry data. From February of 2003, to October of 2009, ICESat obtained nearly global measurements of land topography (± 86° latitudes) with unprecedented accuracy, sampling the Earths surface at discrete ~50 m diameter laser footprints spaced 170 m along the altimetry profiles. We apply stringent editing to select the highest quality elevations, and use these GCPs to characterize and quantify spatially varying elevation biases in Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). In this paper, we present an evaluation of the soon to be released Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010). Elevation biases and error statistics have been analyzed as a function of land cover and relief. The GMTED2010 products are a large improvement over previous sources of elevation data at comparable resolutions. RMSEs for all products and terrain conditions are below 7 m and typically are about 4 m. The GMTED2010 products are biased upward with respect to the ICESat GCPs on average by approximately 3 m.


Journal of Coastal Research | 2016

Topobathymetric elevation model development using a new methodology: Coastal National Elevation Database

Jeffrey J. Danielson; Sandra K. Poppenga; John C. Brock; Gayla A. Evans; Dean J. Tyler; Dean B. Gesch; Cindy A. Thatcher; John A. Barras

ABSTRACT Danielson, J.J.; Poppenga, S.K.; Brock, J.C.; Evans, G.A.; Tyler, D.J.; Gesch, D.B.; Thatcher, C.A., and Barras, J.A., 2016. Topobathymetric elevation model development using a new methodology: Coastal National Elevation Database. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Models, and Applications. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 76, pp. 75–89. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. During the coming decades, coastlines will respond to widely predicted sea-level rise, storm surge, and coastal inundation flooding from disastrous events. Because physical processes in coastal environments are controlled by the geomorphology of over-the-land topography and underwater bathymetry, many applications of geospatial data in coastal environments require detailed knowledge of the near-shore topography and bathymetry. In this paper, an updated methodology used by the U.S. Geological Survey Coastal National Elevation Database (CoNED) Applications Project is presented for developing coastal topobathymetric elevation models (TBDEMs) from multiple topographic data sources with adjacent intertidal topobathymetric and offshore bathymetric sources to generate seamlessly integrated TBDEMs. This repeatable, updatable, and logically consistent methodology assimilates topographic data (land elevation) and bathymetry (water depth) into a seamless coastal elevation model. Within the overarching framework, vertical datum transformations are standardized in a workflow that interweaves spatially consistent interpolation (gridding) techniques with a land/water boundary mask delineation approach. Output gridded raster TBDEMs are stacked into a file storage system of mosaic datasets within an Esri ArcGIS geodatabase for efficient updating while maintaining current and updated spatially referenced metadata. Topobathymetric data provide a required seamless elevation product for several science application studies, such as shoreline delineation, coastal inundation mapping, sediment-transport, sea-level rise, storm surge models, and tsunami impact assessment. These detailed coastal elevation data are critical to depict regions prone to climate change impacts and are essential to planners and managers responsible for mitigating the associated risks and costs to both human communities and ecosystems. The CoNED methodology approach has been used to construct integrated TBDEM models in Mobile Bay, the northern Gulf of Mexico, San Francisco Bay, the Hurricane Sandy region, and southern California.


Journal of Coastal Research | 2016

Creating a Coastal National Elevation Database (CoNED) for Science and Conservation Applications

Cindy A. Thatcher; John C. Brock; Jeffrey J. Danielson; Sandra K. Poppenga; Dean B. Gesch; Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy; John A. Barras; Gayla A. Evans; Ann E. Gibbs

ABSTRACT Thatcher, C.A.; Brock, J.C.; Danielson, J.J.; Poppenga, S.K.; Gesch, D.B.; Palaseanu-Lovejoy, M.E.; Barras, J.A.; Evans, G.A., and Gibbs, A.E., 2016. Creating a Coastal National Elevation Database (CoNED) for science and conservation applications. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Models, and Applications. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 76, pp. 64–74. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. The U.S. Geological Survey is creating the Coastal National Elevation Database, an expanding set of topobathymetric elevation models that extend seamlessly across coastal regions of high societal or ecological significance in the United States that are undergoing rapid change or are threatened by inundation hazards. Topobathymetric elevation models are raster datasets useful for inundation prediction and other earth science applications, such as the development of sediment-transport and storm surge models. These topobathymetric elevation models are being constructed by the broad regional assimilation of numerous topographic and bathymetric datasets, and are intended to fulfill the pressing needs of decision makers establishing policies for hazard mitigation and emergency preparedness, coastal managers tasked with coastal planning compatible with predictions of inundation due to sea-level rise, and scientists investigating processes of coastal geomorphic change. A key priority of this coastal elevation mapping effort is to foster collaborative lidar acquisitions that meet the standards of the USGS National Geospatial Programs 3D Elevation Program, a nationwide initiative to systematically collect high-quality elevation data. The focus regions are located in highly dynamic environments, for example in areas subject to shoreline change, rapid wetland loss, hurricane impacts such as overwash and wave scouring, and/or human-induced changes to coastal topography.


Journal of remote sensing | 2016

Lidar-based mapping of flood control levees in South Louisiana

Cindy A. Thatcher; Samsung Lim; Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy; Jeffrey J. Danielson; Dustin R. Kimbrow

ABSTRACT Flood protection in south Louisiana is largely dependent on earthen levees, and in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina the state’s levee system has received intense scrutiny. Accurate elevation data along the levees are critical to local levee district managers responsible for monitoring and maintaining the extensive system of non-federal levees in coastal Louisiana. In 2012, high resolution airborne lidar data were acquired over levees in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana, and a mobile terrestrial lidar survey was conducted for selected levee segments using a terrestrial lidar scanner mounted on a truck. The mobile terrestrial lidar data were collected to test the feasibility of using this relatively new technology to map flood control levees and to compare the accuracy of the terrestrial and airborne lidar. Metrics assessing levee geometry derived from the two lidar surveys are also presented as an efficient, comprehensive method to quantify levee height and stability. The vertical root mean square error values of the terrestrial lidar and airborne lidar digital-derived digital terrain models were 0.038 m and 0.055 m, respectively. The comparison of levee metrics derived from the airborne and terrestrial lidar-based digital terrain models showed that both types of lidar yielded similar results, indicating that either or both surveying techniques could be used to monitor geomorphic change over time. Because airborne lidar is costly, many parts of the USA and other countries have never been mapped with airborne lidar, and repeat surveys are often not available for change detection studies. Terrestrial lidar provides a practical option for conducting repeat surveys of levees and other terrain features that cover a relatively small area, such as eroding cliffs or stream banks, and dunes.


Archive | 2011

ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results

Tetushi Tachikawa; Manabu Kaku; Akira Iwasaki; Dean B. Gesch; Michael J. Oimoen; Z. Zhang; Jeffrey J. Danielson; Tabatha Krieger; Bill Curtis; Jeff Haase; Michael Abrams; Claudia C. Carabajal


Open-File Report | 2011

Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010)

Jeffrey J. Danielson; Dean B. Gesch


ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences | 2016

VALIDATION OF THE ASTER GLOBAL DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL VERSION 2 OVER THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES

Dean B. Gesch; Michael J. Oimoen; Zheng Zhang; David J. Meyer; Jeffrey J. Danielson


Data Series | 2013

Topobathymetric model of Mobile Bay, Alabama

Jeffrey J. Danielson; John C. Brock; Daniel M. Howard; Dean B. Gesch; J.M. Bonisteel-Cormier; Laurinda J. Travers


Fact Sheet | 2014

Hydrologic enforcement of lidar DEMs

Sandra K. Poppenga; Bruce B. Worstell; Jeffrey J. Danielson; John C. Brock; Gayla A. Evans; H. Karl Heidemann

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeffrey J. Danielson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dean B. Gesch

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cindy A. Thatcher

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandra K. Poppenga

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John C. Brock

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dean J. Tyler

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gayla A. Evans

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. Harding

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dustin R. Kimbrow

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge