Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeffrey R. Whiteaker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeffrey R. Whiteaker.


Nature Biotechnology | 2009

Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma.

Terri Addona; Susan E. Abbatiello; Birgit Schilling; Steven J. Skates; D. R. Mani; David M. Bunk; Clifford H. Spiegelman; Lisa J. Zimmerman; Amy-Joan L. Ham; Hasmik Keshishian; Steven C. Hall; Simon Allen; Ronald K. Blackman; Christoph H. Borchers; Charles Buck; Michael P. Cusack; Nathan G. Dodder; Bradford W. Gibson; Jason M. Held; Tara Hiltke; Angela M. Jackson; Eric B. Johansen; Christopher R. Kinsinger; Jing Li; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A. Neubert; Richard K. Niles; Trenton Pulsipher; David F. Ransohoff; Henry Rodriguez

Verification of candidate biomarkers relies upon specific, quantitative assays optimized for selective detection of target proteins, and is increasingly viewed as a critical step in the discovery pipeline that bridges unbiased biomarker discovery to preclinical validation. Although individual laboratories have demonstrated that multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry can quantify candidate protein biomarkers in plasma, reproducibility and transferability of these assays between laboratories have not been demonstrated. We describe a multilaboratory study to assess reproducibility, recovery, linear dynamic range and limits of detection and quantification of multiplexed, MRM-based assays, conducted by NCI-CPTAC. Using common materials and standardized protocols, we demonstrate that these assays can be highly reproducible within and across laboratories and instrument platforms, and are sensitive to low μg/ml protein concentrations in unfractionated plasma. We provide data and benchmarks against which individual laboratories can compare their performance and evaluate new technologies for biomarker verification in plasma.


Nature | 2014

Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer

Bing Zhang; Jing Wang; Xiaojing Wang; Jing Zhu; Qi Liu; Zhiao Shi; Matthew C. Chambers; Lisa J. Zimmerman; Kent Shaddox; Sangtae Kim; Sherri R. Davies; Sean Wang; Pei Wang; Christopher R. Kinsinger; Robert Rivers; Henry Rodriguez; R. Reid Townsend; Matthew J. Ellis; Steven A. Carr; David L. Tabb; Robert J. Coffey; Robbert J. C. Slebos; Daniel C. Liebler; Michael A. Gillette; Karl R. Klauser; Eric Kuhn; D. R. Mani; Philipp Mertins; Karen A. Ketchum; Amanda G. Paulovich

Extensive genomic characterization of human cancers presents the problem of inference from genomic abnormalities to cancer phenotypes. To address this problem, we analysed proteomes of colon and rectal tumours characterized previously by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and perform integrated proteogenomic analyses. Somatic variants displayed reduced protein abundance compared to germline variants. Messenger RNA transcript abundance did not reliably predict protein abundance differences between tumours. Proteomics identified five proteomic subtypes in the TCGA cohort, two of which overlapped with the TCGA ‘microsatellite instability/CpG island methylation phenotype’ transcriptomic subtype, but had distinct mutation, methylation and protein expression patterns associated with different clinical outcomes. Although copy number alterations showed strong cis- and trans-effects on mRNA abundance, relatively few of these extend to the protein level. Thus, proteomics data enabled prioritization of candidate driver genes. The chromosome 20q amplicon was associated with the largest global changes at both mRNA and protein levels; proteomics data highlighted potential 20q candidates, including HNF4A (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4, alpha), TOMM34 (translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 34) and SRC (SRC proto-oncogene, non-receptor tyrosine kinase). Integrated proteogenomic analysis provides functional context to interpret genomic abnormalities and affords a new paradigm for understanding cancer biology.


Journal of Proteome Research | 2010

Repeatability and Reproducibility in Proteomic Identifications by Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry

David L. Tabb; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Paul A. Rudnick; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Amy-Joan L. Ham; David M. Bunk; Lisa E. Kilpatrick; Dean Billheimer; Ronald K. Blackman; Steven A. Carr; Karl R. Clauser; Jacob D. Jaffe; Kevin A. Kowalski; Thomas A. Neubert; Fred E. Regnier; Birgit Schilling; Tony Tegeler; Mu Wang; Pei Wang; Jeffrey R. Whiteaker; Lisa J. Zimmerman; Susan J. Fisher; Bradford W. Gibson; Christopher R. Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Henry Rodriguez; Stephen E. Stein; Paul Tempst; Amanda G. Paulovich; Daniel C. Liebler

The complexity of proteomic instrumentation for LC-MS/MS introduces many possible sources of variability. Data-dependent sampling of peptides constitutes a stochastic element at the heart of discovery proteomics. Although this variation impacts the identification of peptides, proteomic identifications are far from completely random. In this study, we analyzed interlaboratory data sets from the NCI Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for Cancer to examine repeatability and reproducibility in peptide and protein identifications. Included data spanned 144 LC-MS/MS experiments on four Thermo LTQ and four Orbitrap instruments. Samples included yeast lysate, the NCI-20 defined dynamic range protein mix, and the Sigma UPS 1 defined equimolar protein mix. Some of our findings reinforced conventional wisdom, such as repeatability and reproducibility being higher for proteins than for peptides. Most lessons from the data, however, were more subtle. Orbitraps proved capable of higher repeatability and reproducibility, but aberrant performance occasionally erased these gains. Even the simplest protein digestions yielded more peptide ions than LC-MS/MS could identify during a single experiment. We observed that peptide lists from pairs of technical replicates overlapped by 35-60%, giving a range for peptide-level repeatability in these experiments. Sample complexity did not appear to affect peptide identification repeatability, even as numbers of identified spectra changed by an order of magnitude. Statistical analysis of protein spectral counts revealed greater stability across technical replicates for Orbitraps, making them superior to LTQ instruments for biomarker candidate discovery. The most repeatable peptides were those corresponding to conventional tryptic cleavage sites, those that produced intense MS signals, and those that resulted from proteins generating many distinct peptides. Reproducibility among different instruments of the same type lagged behind repeatability of technical replicates on a single instrument by several percent. These findings reinforce the importance of evaluating repeatability as a fundamental characteristic of analytical technologies.


Molecular & Cellular Proteomics | 2010

An Automated and Multiplexed Method for High Throughput Peptide Immunoaffinity Enrichment and Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry-based Quantification of Protein Biomarkers

Jeffrey R. Whiteaker; Lei Zhao; Leigh Anderson; Amanda G. Paulovich

There is an urgent need for quantitative assays in verifying and validating the large numbers of protein biomarker candidates produced in modern “-omics” experiments. Stable isotope standards with capture by anti-peptide antibodies (SISCAPA) has shown tremendous potential to meet this need by combining peptide immunoaffinity enrichment with quantitative mass spectrometry. In this study, we describe three significant advances to the SISCAPA technique. First, we develop a method for an automated magnetic bead-based platform capable of high throughput processing. Second, we implement the automated method in a multiplexed SISCAPA assay (nine targets in one assay) and assess the performance characteristics of the multiplexed assay. Using the automated, multiplexed platform, we demonstrate detection limits in the physiologically relevant ng/ml range (from 10 μl of plasma) with sufficient precision (median coefficient of variation, 12.6%) for quantifying biomarkers. Third, we demonstrate that enrichment of peptides from larger volumes of plasma (1 ml) can extend the limits of detection to the low pg/ml range of protein concentration. The method is generally applicable to any protein or biological specimen of interest and holds great promise for analyzing large numbers of biomarker candidates.


Nature Biotechnology | 2011

A targeted proteomics–based pipeline for verification of biomarkers in plasma

Jeffrey R. Whiteaker; Chenwei Lin; Jacob Kennedy; Liming Hou; Mary Trute; Izabela Sokal; Ping Yan; Regine M. Schoenherr; Lei Zhao; Uliana J. Voytovich; Karen S. Kelly-Spratt; Alexei L. Krasnoselsky; Philip R. Gafken; Jason M. Hogan; Lisa A. Jones; Pei Wang; Lynn M. Amon; Lewis A. Chodosh; Peter S. Nelson; Martin W. McIntosh; Christopher J. Kemp; Amanda G. Paulovich

High-throughput technologies can now identify hundreds of candidate protein biomarkers for any disease with relative ease. However, because there are no assays for the majority of proteins and de novo immunoassay development is prohibitively expensive, few candidate biomarkers are tested in clinical studies. We tested whether the analytical performance of a biomarker identification pipeline based on targeted mass spectrometry would be sufficient for data-dependent prioritization of candidate biomarkers, de novo development of assays and multiplexed biomarker verification. We used a data-dependent triage process to prioritize a subset of putative plasma biomarkers from >1,000 candidates previously identified using a mouse model of breast cancer. Eighty-eight novel quantitative assays based on selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry were developed, multiplexed and evaluated in 80 plasma samples. Thirty-six proteins were verified as being elevated in the plasma of tumor-bearing animals. The analytical performance of this pipeline suggests that it should support the use of an analogous approach with human samples.


Analytical Chemistry | 2010

Effect of Collision Energy Optimization on the Measurement of Peptides by Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) Mass Spectrometry

Brendan MacLean; Daniela M. Tomazela; Susan E. Abbatiello; Shucha Zhang; Jeffrey R. Whiteaker; Amanda G. Paulovich; Steven A. Carr; Michael J. MacCoss

Proteomics experiments based on Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM, also referred to as Multiple Reaction Monitoring or MRM) are being used to target large numbers of protein candidates in complex mixtures. At present, instrument parameters are often optimized for each peptide, a time and resource intensive process. Large SRM experiments are greatly facilitated by having the ability to predict MS instrument parameters that work well with the broad diversity of peptides they target. For this reason, we investigated the impact of using simple linear equations to predict the collision energy (CE) on peptide signal intensity and compared it with the empirical optimization of the CE for each peptide and transition individually. Using optimized linear equations, the difference between predicted and empirically derived CE values was found to be an average gain of only 7.8% of total peak area. We also found that existing commonly used linear equations fall short of their potential, and should be recalculated for each charge state and when introducing new instrument platforms. We provide a fully automated pipeline for calculating these equations and individually optimizing CE of each transition on SRM instruments from Agilent, Applied Biosystems, Thermo-Scientific and Waters in the open source Skyline software tool ( http://proteome.gs.washington.edu/software/skyline ).


Cell | 2016

Integrated proteogenomic characterization of human high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Hui Zhang; Tao Liu; Zhen Zhang; Samuel H. Payne; Bai Zhang; Jason E. McDermott; Jian-Ying Zhou; Vladislav A. Petyuk; Li Chen; Debjit Ray; Shisheng Sun; Feng Yang; Lijun Chen; Jing Wang; Punit Shah; Seong Won Cha; Paul Aiyetan; Sunghee Woo; Yuan Tian; Marina A. Gritsenko; Therese R. Clauss; Caitlin H. Choi; Matthew E. Monroe; Stefani N. Thomas; Song Nie; Chaochao Wu; Ronald J. Moore; Kun-Hsing Yu; David L. Tabb; David Fenyö

To provide a detailed analysis of the molecular components and underlying mechanisms associated with ovarian cancer, we performed a comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of 174 ovarian tumors previously analyzed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), of which 169 were high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). Integrating our proteomic measurements with the genomic data yielded a number of insights into disease, such as how different copy-number alternations influence the proteome, the proteins associated with chromosomal instability, the sets of signaling pathways that diverse genome rearrangements converge on, and the ones most associated with short overall survival. Specific protein acetylations associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggest a potential means for stratifying patients for therapy. In addition to providing a valuable resource, these findings provide a view of how the somatic genome drives the cancer proteome and associations between protein and post-translational modification levels and clinical outcomes in HGSC. VIDEO ABSTRACT.


Molecular & Cellular Proteomics | 2010

Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses

Paul A. Rudnick; Karl R. Clauser; Lisa E. Kilpatrick; Dmitrii V. Tchekhovskoi; P. Neta; Nikša Blonder; Dean Billheimer; Ronald K. Blackman; David M. Bunk; Amy-Joan L. Ham; Jacob D. Jaffe; Christopher R. Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A. Neubert; Birgit Schilling; David L. Tabb; Tony Tegeler; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Pei Wang; Jeffrey R. Whiteaker; Lisa J. Zimmerman; Steven A. Carr; Susan J. Fisher; Bradford W. Gibson; Amanda G. Paulovich; Fred E. Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman

A major unmet need in LC-MS/MS-based proteomics analyses is a set of tools for quantitative assessment of system performance and evaluation of technical variability. Here we describe 46 system performance metrics for monitoring chromatographic performance, electrospray source stability, MS1 and MS2 signals, dynamic sampling of ions for MS/MS, and peptide identification. Applied to data sets from replicate LC-MS/MS analyses, these metrics displayed consistent, reasonable responses to controlled perturbations. The metrics typically displayed variations less than 10% and thus can reveal even subtle differences in performance of system components. Analyses of data from interlaboratory studies conducted under a common standard operating procedure identified outlier data and provided clues to specific causes. Moreover, interlaboratory variation reflected by the metrics indicates which system components vary the most between laboratories. Application of these metrics enables rational, quantitative quality assessment for proteomics and other LC-MS/MS analytical applications.


Molecular & Cellular Proteomics | 2012

Interlaboratory Evaluation of Automated, Multiplexed Peptide Immunoaffinity Enrichment Coupled to Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Quantifying Proteins in Plasma

Eric Kuhn; Jeffrey R. Whiteaker; D. R. Mani; Angela M. Jackson; Lei Zhao; Matthew E. Pope; Derek Smith; Keith D. Rivera; N. Leigh Anderson; Steven J. Skates; Terry W. Pearson; Amanda G. Paulovich; Steven A. Carr

The inability to quantify large numbers of proteins in tissues and biofluids with high precision, sensitivity, and throughput is a major bottleneck in biomarker studies. We previously demonstrated that coupling immunoaffinity enrichment using anti-peptide antibodies (SISCAPA) to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) produces Immunoprecipitation MRM-MS (immuno-MRM-MS) assays that can be multiplexed to quantify proteins in plasma with high sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Here we report the first systematic evaluation of the interlaboratory performance of multiplexed (8-plex) immuno-MRM-MS in three independent labs. A staged study was carried out in which the effect of each processing and analysis step on assay coefficient of variance, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and recovery was evaluated. Limits of detection were at or below 1 ng/ml for the assayed proteins in 30 μl of plasma. Assay reproducibility was acceptable for verification studies, with median intra- and interlaboratory coefficients of variance above the limit of quantification of 11% and <14%, respectively, for the entire immuno-MRM-MS assay process, including enzymatic digestion of plasma. Trypsin digestion and its requisite sample handling contributed the most to assay variability and reduced the recovery of target peptides from digested proteins. Using a stable isotope-labeled protein as an internal standard instead of stable isotope-labeled peptides to account for losses in the digestion process nearly doubled assay accuracy for this while improving assay precision 5%. Our results demonstrate that multiplexed immuno-MRM-MS can be made reproducible across independent laboratories and has the potential to be adopted widely for assaying proteins in matrices as complex as plasma.


Molecular & Cellular Proteomics | 2010

Interlaboratory Study Characterizing a Yeast Performance Standard for Benchmarking LC-MS Platform Performance

Amanda G. Paulovich; Dean Billheimer; Amy-Joan L. Ham; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Paul A. Rudnick; David L. Tabb; Pei Wang; Ronald K. Blackman; David M. Bunk; Karl R. Clauser; Christopher R. Kinsinger; Birgit Schilling; Tony Tegeler; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R. Whiteaker; Lisa J. Zimmerman; David Fenyö; Steven A. Carr; Susan J. Fisher; Bradford W. Gibson; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A. Neubert; Fred E. Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman; Stephen E. Stein; Paul Tempst; Daniel C. Liebler

Optimal performance of LC-MS/MS platforms is critical to generating high quality proteomics data. Although individual laboratories have developed quality control samples, there is no widely available performance standard of biological complexity (and associated reference data sets) for benchmarking of platform performance for analysis of complex biological proteomes across different laboratories in the community. Individual preparations of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome have been used extensively by laboratories in the proteomics community to characterize LC-MS platform performance. The yeast proteome is uniquely attractive as a performance standard because it is the most extensively characterized complex biological proteome and the only one associated with several large scale studies estimating the abundance of all detectable proteins. In this study, we describe a standard operating protocol for large scale production of the yeast performance standard and offer aliquots to the community through the National Institute of Standards and Technology where the yeast proteome is under development as a certified reference material to meet the long term needs of the community. Using a series of metrics that characterize LC-MS performance, we provide a reference data set demonstrating typical performance of commonly used ion trap instrument platforms in expert laboratories; the results provide a basis for laboratories to benchmark their own performance, to improve upon current methods, and to evaluate new technologies. Additionally, we demonstrate how the yeast reference, spiked with human proteins, can be used to benchmark the power of proteomics platforms for detection of differentially expressed proteins at different levels of concentration in a complex matrix, thereby providing a metric to evaluate and minimize preanalytical and analytical variation in comparative proteomics experiments.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeffrey R. Whiteaker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amanda G. Paulovich

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lei Zhao

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chenwei Lin

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pei Wang

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ping Yan

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Regine M. Schoenherr

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacob Kennedy

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard G. Ivey

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge