Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jens Uwe Bruch is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jens Uwe Bruch.


Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVIII | 2004

Investigation of systematical overlay errors limiting litho process performance of thick implant resists

A. G. Grandpierre; Roberto Schiwon; Jens Uwe Bruch; Christoph Nacke; Uwe Schroeder

Tapered resist profiles have been found to cause a deterimental effect on the overlay measurement capability, affecting lithography processes which utilize thick implant resist. Particularly, for resist thicknesses greater than 1.5 μm, the systematical contribution to the overlay error becomes predominant. In CMOS manufacturing, these resist types are being used mainly for high energy well implants. As design rules progressively shrink, the overlay requirements are getting tighter, such that the limits of the process capability are reached. Since the resist thickness cannot be reduced due to the requirements of the implant process, it becomes inevitable to reduce the systematical overlay error for the litho process involving thick resists. The following analysis concentrates on the tapers of overlay marks printed on thick i-line positive resists. Conventionally, overlay between two litho layers is measured from box in box marks with respect to a reference layer where the statistical shift between the boxes is expected to provide the biggest source of residuals. We observed however that an even bigger error could be introduced by an unevenness of the i-line resist tapers, adding asymmetrical chip magnification. The inclination of these tapers depends on the proximity and surface of the surrounding features and stack variations. We show that by adjusting soft and hard bake temperatures and times, tapers can be significantly reduced and thereby the overlay performance was greatly improved.


Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVII | 2003

Overlay considerations for 300-mm lithography

Tobias Mono; Uwe Schroeder; Dieter Nees; Katrin Palitzsch; Wolfram Koestler; Jens Uwe Bruch; Sirko Kramp; Markus Veldkamp; Ralf Schuster

Generally, the potential impact of systematical overlay errors on 300mm wafers is much larger than on 200mm wafers. Process problems which are merely identified as minor edge yield detractors on 200mm wafers, can evolve as major roadblocks for 300mm lithography. Therefore, it is commonly believed that achieving product overlay specifications on 300mm wafers is much more difficult than on 200mm wafers. Based on recent results on high volume 300mm DRAM manufacturing, it is shown that in reality this assumption does not hold. By optimizing the process, overlay results can be achieved which are comparable to the 200mm reference process. However, the influence of non-lithographic processes on the overlay performance becomes much more critical. Based on examples for specific overlay signatures, the influence of several processes on the overlay characteristics of 300mm wafers is demonstrated. Thus, process setup and process changes need to be analyzed monitored much more carefully. Any process variations affecting wafer related overlay have to be observed carefully. Fast reaction times are critical to avoid major yield loss. As the semiconductor industry converts to 300mm technology, lithographers have to focus more than ever on process integration aspects.


Archive | 2004

Method for determining the relative positional accuracy of two structure elements on a wafer

Heiko Hommen; Jens Stäcker; Maria de la Piedad Fernandez-Martinez; Jens Uwe Bruch; Thorsten Schedel


Archive | 2003

Anordnung zum Übertragen von Informationen/Strukturen auf Wafer unter Verwendung eines Stempels

Jens Staecker; Jens Uwe Bruch; Heiko Hommen


Archive | 2003

Appliance for transfer of information or structures onto wafer, using stamp with raised structures produced by suitable method, e.g. photolithography in conjunction with etching

Jens Uwe Bruch; Heiko Hommen; Jens Stäcker


Archive | 2004

Method for carrying out a double or multiple exposure

Jens Stäcker; Heiko Hommen; Jens Uwe Bruch; Marlene Strobl; Karl Schumacher


Archive | 2006

Method for fastening substrate at substrate holder involves laying of first side of substrate on substrate holder, setting of first fluid pressure at first sub range of first side of substrate and setting of second fluid pressure

Jens Uwe Bruch; Jens Stäcker; Heiko Hommen; Karl Schumacher; Roberto Schiwon; Martin Schmidt-Lanz; Dirk Efferenn


Archive | 2005

Maske, Maskensubstrathalter und Verfahren zur Durchführung einer Doppel- oder Mehrfachbelichtung mit der Maske und dem Maskensubstrathalter

Marlene Strobl; Karl Schumacher; Jens Stäcker; Jens Uwe Bruch; Heiko Hommen


Archive | 2003

Determining relative position accuracy method e.g. for two structure elements on wafer, involves making wafer available with a substrate, on conductive layer with resist arranged and structural component of a first mask

Jens Staecker; Thorsten Schedel; Heiko Hommen; Jens Uwe Bruch; Piedad Fernandez-Martinez


Archive | 2005

Photomaske und Verfahren zur Verwendung der Photomaske in einer Belichtungsanlage

Lothar Bauch; Anja Bonness; Jens Uwe Bruch; Stefan Geyer; Heiko Hommen; Patrick Klingbeil; Dieter Nees; Roberto Schiwon; Karl Schumacher; Jens Stäcker

Collaboration


Dive into the Jens Uwe Bruch's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge