Jes Clauson-Kaas
COWI A/S
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jes Clauson-Kaas.
Water Science and Technology | 2008
Linda Høibye; Jes Clauson-Kaas; Henrik Wenzel; Henrik Fred Larsen; Bo Neergaard Jacobsen; Ole Dalgaard
As a consequence of the EU Water Framework Directive more focus is now on discharges of hazardous substances from wastewater treatment plants and sewers. Thus, many municipalities in Denmark may have to adopt to future advanced treatment technologies. This paper describes a holistic assessment, which includes technical, economical and environmental aspects. The technical and economical assessment is performed on 5 advanced treatment technologies: sand filtration, ozone treatment, UV exclusively for disinfection of pathogenic microorganisms, membrane bioreactor (MBR) and UV in combination with advanced oxidation. The technical assessment is based on 12 hazardous substances comprising heavy metals, organic pollutants, endocrine disruptors as well as pathogenic microorganisms. The environmental assessment is performed by life cycle assessment (LCA) comprising 9 of the specific hazardous substances and three advanced treatment methods; sand filtration, ozone treatment and MBR. The technical and economic assessment showed that UV solely for disinfection purposes or ozone treatment is the most advantageous advanced treatment methods if the demands are restricted to pathogenic microorganisms. In terms of sustainability, sand filtration is the most advantageous method based on the technical and environmental assessment due to the low energy consumption and high efficiency with regards to removal of heavy metals.
Water Science and Technology | 2011
Berit Godskesen; Kim Cecilia Zambrano; A. Trautner; N.-B. Johansen; L. Thiesson; L. Andersen; Jes Clauson-Kaas; T.L. Neidel; Martin Rygaard; N.H. Kløverpris; Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen
Environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate three different water systems of the water sector in Copenhagen, Denmark, including technologies within water supply, facilities recycling water and treatment of sewer overflow. In these three water systems LCA was used to evaluate the environmental impacts of each of the processes involved. The overall conclusion was that LCA is suitable as a decision support tool in the water sector as it provides a holistic evaluation platform of the considered alternatives categorised in environmental impact categories. The use of LCA in the water sector of this region has limitations since it does not yet consider impact categories assessing freshwater scarcity and ecological sustainability.
Water Science and Technology | 2008
Henrik Wenzel; Henrik Fred Larsen; Jes Clauson-Kaas; Linda Høibye; Bo Neergaard Jacobsen
Water Science and Technology | 2001
Jes Clauson-Kaas; T. S. Poulsen; Bo Neergaard Jacobsen; T. Guildal; Henrik Wenzel
Water Science and Technology | 2004
Jes Clauson-Kaas; T. Sander Poulsen; B. Neergaard-Jacobsen; T. Guildal; C. Thirsing
Journal of Water and Climate Change | 2012
Jes Clauson-Kaas; Birgitte Lilholt Sørensen; Ole Dalgaard; Anitha Kumari Sharma; Niels Bent Johansen; Kim Rindel; Helle K. Andersen
danskVAND | 2010
Jes Clauson-Kaas; Birgitte Lilholt Sørensen; Ole Dalgaard
Archive | 2009
Birgitte Lilholt Sørensen; Jes Clauson-Kaas; Ole Dalgaard; Anitha Kumari Sharma
Archive | 2006
Ulla Tolstrup Andersen; Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen; Rasmus Boe-Hansen; Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen; Jes Clauson-Kaas; Heidi L. Enemark; T.A. Stenström; A. Dalsgaard
13th International Symposium on Health-related Water Microbiology | 2005
Ulla Tolstrup Andersen; Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen; Thor Axel Stenström; Heidi L. Enemark; Rasmus Boe-Hansen; Jes Clauson-Kaas; Anders Dalsgaard; Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen