Jessica Couch

Therapeutic bispecific antibodies cross the blood-brain barrier in nonhuman primates

Bispecific antibodies engineered to both bind to the primate transferrin receptor and inhibit β-secretase are taken up by the nonhuman primate brain and reduce brain β-amyloid. A Two-Pronged Approach for Central Nervous System Therapeutics The brain has been considered off-limits to antibody therapies because of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which protects the brain from circulating toxins while selectively transporting essential molecules into the brain. Efforts to use natural transport mechanisms to deliver antibody therapies into the brain have been successful in rodents. Whether a similar approach can be used in primates, including humans, remains unknown. Using bispecific antibodies with one arm binding to the transferrin receptor and the other to an Alzheimer’s disease drug target, we show that therapeutic antibodies can effectively and safely cross the BBB and enter the primate brain, thus paving the way for antibody therapeutics to treat central nervous system diseases in humans. Using therapeutic antibodies that need to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to treat neurological disease is a difficult challenge. We have shown that bispecific antibodies with optimized binding to the transferrin receptor (TfR) that target β-secretase (BACE1) can cross the BBB and reduce brain amyloid-β (Aβ) in mice. Can TfR enhance antibody uptake in the primate brain? We describe two humanized TfR/BACE1 bispecific antibody variants. Using a human TfR knock-in mouse, we observed that anti-TfR/BACE1 antibodies could cross the BBB and reduce brain Aβ in a TfR affinity–dependent fashion. Intravenous dosing of monkeys with anti-TfR/BACE1 antibodies also reduced Aβ both in cerebral spinal fluid and in brain tissue, and the degree of reduction correlated with the brain concentration of anti-TfR/BACE1 antibody. These results demonstrate that the TfR bispecific antibody platform can robustly and safely deliver therapeutic antibody across the BBB in the primate brain.

Addressing safety liabilities of TfR bispecific antibodies that cross the blood-brain barrier.

The safety of therapeutic bispecific antibodies that use TfR for delivery to the brain can be improved by reducing affinity for TfR and eliminating antibody effector function. Averting Roadblocks En Route to the Brain The blood-brain barrier represents a formidable blockade preventing therapeutic antibody delivery into the brain. Bispecific antibodies using the transferrin receptor (TfR) have shown promise for boosting therapeutic antibody uptake into the brain. Although TfR can act as a molecular lift to promote brain uptake, little is known about the safety ramifications of this approach. Building on a pair of studies published in Science Translational Medicine, Couch and colleagues now report that when mice were dosed with therapeutic TfR antibodies, the animals showed acute clinical reactions and a reduction in immature red blood cells, known as reticulocytes. TfR bispecific antibodies engineered to lack Fc interactions with immune cells eliminated adverse acute clinical reactions and reduced reticulocyte loss; the extent of reticulocyte loss was also influenced by binding to TfR and interaction with the complement cascade. Because reticulocytes express high levels of TfR, other cell types that express high levels of TfR were also investigated. The authors observed, for example, that the blood-brain barrier remained completely intact after TfR antibodies were administered to mice, despite the high expression of TfR in brain endothelial cells. Finally, multiple doses of TfR/BACE1 bispecific antibodies reduced amyloid-β, a toxic protein implicated in Alzheimer’s disease, with minimal sustained toxicity. Investigation of monkey and human TfR levels in circulating reticulocytes suggested that loss of these cells may be less likely to occur in primates than in mice. The translational implications of these discoveries suggest that the blood-brain barrier is not the only obstacle to surmount on the way to the brain, at least when using TfR as a molecular lift. Bispecific antibodies using the transferrin receptor (TfR) have shown promise for boosting antibody uptake in brain. Nevertheless, there are limited data on the therapeutic properties including safety liabilities that will enable successful development of TfR-based therapeutics. We evaluate TfR/BACE1 bispecific antibody variants in mouse and show that reducing TfR binding affinity improves not only brain uptake but also peripheral exposure and the safety profile of these antibodies. We identify and seek to address liabilities of targeting TfR with antibodies, namely, acute clinical signs and decreased circulating reticulocytes observed after dosing. By eliminating Fc effector function, we ameliorated the acute clinical signs and partially rescued a reduction in reticulocytes. Furthermore, we show that complement mediates a residual decrease in reticulocytes observed after Fc effector function is eliminated. These data raise important safety concerns and potential mitigation strategies for the development of TfR-based therapies that are designed to cross the blood-brain barrier.

Alternative Strategies for Toxicity Testing of Species-Specific Biopharmaceuticals

Although toxicology studies should always be conducted in pharmacologically relevant species, the specificity of many biopharmaceuticals can present challenges in identification of a relevant species. In certain cases, that is, when the clinical product is active only in humans or chimpanzees, or if the clinical candidate is active in other species but immunogenicity limits the ability to conduct a thorough safety assessment, alternative approaches to evaluating the safety of a biopharmaceutical must be considered. Alternative approaches, including animal models of disease, genetically modified mice, or use of surrogate molecules, may improve the predictive value of preclinical safety assessments of species-specific biopharmaceuticals, although many caveats associated with these models must be considered. Because of the many caveats that are discussed in this article, alternative approaches should only be used to evaluate safety when the clinical candidate cannot be readily tested in at least one relevant species to identify potential hazards.

Pharmaceutical toxicology: Designing studies to reduce animal use, while maximizing human translation

Evaluation of the safety of new chemicals and pharmaceuticals requires the combination of information from various sources (e.g. in vitro, in silico and in vivo) to provide an assessment of risk to human health and the environment. The authors have identified opportunities to maximize the predictivity of this information to humans while reducing animal use in four key areas; (i) accelerating the uptake of in vitro methods; (ii) incorporating the latest science into safety pharmacology assessments; (iii) optimizing rodent study design in biological development and (iv) consolidating approaches in developmental and reproductive toxicology. Through providing a forum for open discussion of novel proposals, reviewing current research and obtaining expert opinion in each of the four areas, the authors have developed recommendations on good practice and future strategy.

The design of chronic toxicology studies of monoclonal antibodies: implications for the reduction in use of non-human primates.

The changing environment of monoclonal antibody (mAb) development is impacting on the cost of drug development and the use of experimental animals, particularly non-human primates (NHPs). The drive to reduce these costs is huge and involves rethinking and improving nonclinical studies to make them more efficient and more predictive of man. While NHP use might be unavoidable in many cases because of the exquisite specificity and consequent species selectivity of mAbs, our increasing knowledge base can be used to improve drug development and maximise the output of experimental data. Data on GLP regulatory toxicology studies for 58mAbs were obtained from 10 companies across a wide range of therapeutic indications. These data have been used to investigate current practice and identify study designs that minimise NHP use. Our analysis shows that there is variation in the number of animals used for similar studies. This information has been used to develop practical guidance and make recommendations on the use of science-based rationale to design studies using fewer animals taking into account the current regulatory guidance. There are eight recommendations intended to highlight areas for consideration. They include guidance on the main group size, the inclusion of recovery groups and the number of dose groups used in short and long term chronic toxicology studies.

Recommendations from a global cross-company data sharing initiative on the incorporation of recovery phase animals in safety assessment studies to support first-in-human clinical trials.

An international expert group which includes 30 organisations (pharmaceutical companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) has shared data on the use of recovery animals in the assessment of pharmaceutical safety for early development. These data have been used as an evidence-base to make recommendations on the inclusion of recovery animals in toxicology studies to achieve scientific objectives, while reducing animal use. Recovery animals are used in pharmaceutical development to provide information on the potential for a toxic effect to translate into long-term human risk. They are included on toxicology studies to assess whether effects observed during dosing persist or reverse once treatment ends. The group devised a questionnaire to collect information on the use of recovery animals in general regulatory toxicology studies to support first-in-human studies. Questions focused on study design, the rationale behind inclusion or exclusion and the impact this had on internal and regulatory decisions. Data on 137 compounds (including 53 biologicals and 78 small molecules) from 259 studies showed wide variation in where, when and why recovery animals were included. An analysis of individual study and programme design shows that there are opportunities to reduce the use of recovery animals without impacting drug development.

Effector-attenuating Substitutions That Maintain Antibody Stability and Reduce Toxicity in Mice

The antibody Fc region regulates antibody cytotoxic activities and serum half-life. In a therapeutic context, however, the cytotoxic effector function of an antibody is often not desirable and can create safety liabilities by activating native host immune defenses against cells expressing the receptor antigens. Several amino acid changes in the Fc region have been reported to silence or reduce the effector function of antibodies. These earlier studies focused primarily on the interaction of human antibodies with human Fc-γ receptors, and it remains largely unknown how such changes to Fc might translate to the context of a murine antibody. We demonstrate that the commonly used N297G (NG) and D265A, N297G (DANG) variants that are efficacious in attenuating effector function in primates retain potent complement activation capacity in mice, leading to safety liabilities in murine studies. In contrast, we found an L234A, L235A, P329G (LALA-PG) variant that eliminates complement binding and fixation as well as Fc-γ-dependent, antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxity in both murine IgG2a and human IgG1. These LALA-PG substitutions allow a more accurate translation of results generated with an “effectorless” antibody between mice and primates. Further, we show that both human and murine antibodies containing the LALA-PG variant have typical pharmacokinetics in rodents and retain thermostability, enabling efficient knobs-into-holes bispecific antibody production and a robust path to generating highly effector-attenuated bispecific antibodies for preclinical studies.

Mathematical PKPD and safety model of bispecific TfR/BACE1 antibodies for the optimization of antibody uptake in brain

Treatment of diseases of the central nervous system by monoclonal antibodies may be limited by the restricted uptake of antibodies across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). An antibody targeting transferrin receptor (TfR) has been shown to take advantage of the receptor-mediated transcytosis properties of TfR in order to cross the BBB in mice, with the uptake in the brain being dependent on the affinity to TfR. In the bispecific format with arms targeting both TfR and β-secretase 1 (BACE1), altering the affinity to TfR has been shown to impact systemic exposure and safety profiles. In this work, a mathematical model incorporating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) and safety profiles is developed for bispecific TfR/BACE1 antibodies with a range of affinities to TfR in order to guide candidate selection. The model captures the dependence of both systemic and brain exposure on TfR affinity and the subsequent impact on brain Aβ40 lowering and circulating reticulocyte levels. Model simulations identify the optimal affinity for the TfR arm of the bispecific to maximize Aβ reduction while maintaining reticulocyte levels. The model serves as a useful tool to prioritize and optimize preclinical studies and has been used to support the selection of additional candidates for further development.

Challenges and opportunities for the future of monoclonal antibody development: Improving safety assessment and reducing animal use

ABSTRACT The market for biotherapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is large and is growing rapidly. However, attrition poses a significant challenge for the development of mAbs, and for biopharmaceuticals in general, with large associated costs in resource and animal use. Termination of candidate mAbs may occur due to poor translation from preclinical models to human safety. It is critical that the industry addresses this problem to maintain productivity. Though attrition poses a significant challenge for pharmaceuticals in general, there are specific challenges related to the development of antibody-based products. Due to species specificity, non-human primates (NHP) are frequently the only pharmacologically relevant species for nonclinical safety and toxicology testing for the majority of antibody-based products, and therefore, as more mAbs are developed, increased NHP use is anticipated. The integration of new and emerging in vitro and in silico technologies, e.g., cell- and tissue-based approaches, systems pharmacology and modeling, have the potential to improve the human safety prediction and the therapeutic mAb development process, while reducing and refining animal use simultaneously. In 2014, to engage in open discussion about the challenges and opportunities for the future of mAb development, a workshop was held with over 60 regulators and experts in drug development, mechanistic toxicology and emerging technologies to discuss this issue. The workshop used industry case-studies to discuss the value of the in vivo studies and identify opportunities for in vitro technologies in human safety assessment. From these and continuing discussions it is clear that there are opportunities to improve safety assessment in mAb development using non-animal technologies, potentially reducing future attrition, and there is a shared desire to reduce animal use through minimised study design and reduced numbers of studies.

Prospective Design of Anti-Transferrin Receptor Bispecific Antibodies for Optimal Delivery into the Human Brain

Anti‐transferrin receptor (TfR)‐based bispecific antibodies have shown promise for boosting antibody uptake in the brain. Nevertheless, there are limited data on the molecular properties, including affinity required for successful development of TfR‐based therapeutics. A complex nonmonotonic relationship exists between affinity of the anti‐TfR arm and brain uptake at therapeutically relevant doses. However, the quantitative nature of this relationship and its translatability to humans is heretofore unexplored. Therefore, we developed a mechanistic pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic (PK‐PD) model for bispecific anti‐TfR/BACE1 antibodies that accounts for antibody‐TfR interactions at the blood‐brain barrier (BBB) as well as the pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of anti‐BACE1 arm. The calibrated model correctly predicted the optimal anti‐TfR affinity required to maximize brain exposure of therapeutic antibodies in the cynomolgus monkey and was scaled to predict the optimal affinity of anti‐TfR bispecifics in humans. Thus, this model provides a framework for testing critical translational predictions for anti‐TfR bispecific antibodies, including choice of candidate molecule for clinical development.