Jesús Cisneros

Preliminary Results of a Comparative Study with Intracavernous Sodium Nitroprusside and Prostaglandin E1 in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

We compared the effect of intracavernous administration of sodium nitroprusside, a nitric oxide donor and, therefore, stimulator of the cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway, with the activity of prostaglandin E1, which is a stimulator of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate pathway. To date 105 patients with erectile dysfunction have entered the study. As part of the diagnostic evaluation every patient received an intracavernous injection of 20 micrograms prostaglandin E1 and a second injection of sodium nitroprusside at different concentrations (100 micrograms in 10 patients, 300 micrograms in 60 and 400 micrograms in 35). Sodium nitroprusside at a dose of 100 micrograms was not effective for inducing erections. Prostaglandin E1 induced better responses overall than sodium nitroprusside at 300 and 400 micrograms (p < 0.001). The overall duration of erections was also significantly longer with prostaglandin E1 (mean 88.5 minutes) than with 300 micrograms sodium nitroprusside (mean 50.8 minutes, p < 0.001) but did not reach statistical significance compared to 400 micrograms sodium nitroprusside (mean 42.2 minutes). Side effects were minimal with both drugs. Although sodium nitroprusside has several benefits over prostaglandin E1 for intracavernous use (such as lower cost, absence of local pain and shorter action, allowing detumescence after orgasm and decreasing the risk of priapism), prostaglandin E1 still remains the agent of choice for intracavernous use.

Prospective Comparative Study with Intracavernous Sodium Nitroprusside and Prostaglandin E1 in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intracavernous administration of sodium nitroprusside and prostaglandin E1 to induce penile erection in men with erectile dysfunction. Material and Methods: 100 patients with erectile dysfunction entered the study prospectively. As part of the diagnostic workup, each patient received an intracavernous injection of 20 µg prostaglandin E1 and a second injection of 600 µg sodium nitroprusside 1–7 days later. A tourniquet was placed at the base of the penis before each injection. The data recorded included time required to initiate tumescence, local and systemic side effects, objective and subjective quality of erections, duration of tumescence and patient satisfaction by means of a personal questionnaire. Results: Prostaglandin E1 induced better overall responses than sodium nitroprusside, the difference being almost significant (p = 0.055). The overall duration of erections was also significantly longer with prostaglandin E1 (mean 81.3 min) than with sodium nitroprusside (mean 65.4 min; p < 0.04). 67% of the patients considered the erections induced with prostaglandin E1 to be of better quality than those with sodium nitroprusside, and only 11% stated that sodium nitroprusside was superior. Side effects were minimal with both drugs, the most frequent side effect being systemic hypotension, which was induced by sodium nitroprusside in 7% of the patients. Conclusions: The moderate risk of systemic hypotension and the lower potency of sodium nitroprusside to induce erections compared to prostaglandin E1 rules out sodium nitroprusside as a routine alternative intracavernous drug in men with erectile dysfunction at the doses employed. Sodium nitroprusside, however, could be used in patients who have intolerance or penile pain with intracavernous prostaglandin E1.

Surgical repair of anterior hypospadias with fish-mouth meatus and intact prepuce based on anatomical characteristics.

Purpose: A variant form of anterior hypospadias, called a megameatus and intact prepuce (MIP), is thought to be less amenable to conventional distal hypospadias repair. The feasibility of using the standard technique with a parameatal-based foreskin flap is described herein. Materials and Methods: Nine children with the MIP variant underwent repair. A foreskin flap for urethroplasty was harvested from either the ventral (Mathiew) or unilateral site. The glans was split along with the cleft glanular groove to create the glans wings. The flap was laid on the urethral plate to form a neourethra, and glanulomeatoplasty was completed by approximation of the glans wings. Sleeve reapproximation of the penile foreskin was performed for uncircumcised skin closure. Results: The functional and cosmetic results of the procedure were excellent in 8 cases including 1 with temporary postoperative edema of redundant foreskin. The last case underwent excision of the ventral excess foreskin for cosmetic reasons. Conclusions: Although the etiology of the MIP variant remains obscure, the urethral plate distal to the meatus is uniformly pliable and healthy in this variant. Furthermore, the ventral portion just proximal to the meatus is well developed and not atretic so that the parameatal ventral foreskin is safely harvested for onlay urethroplasty.

Percutaneous ureteral catheterization in laparoscopic surgery: value of nephroscopy needle trocar.

OBJECTIVES To report our experience with use of the nephroscopy needle trocar for percutaneous catheterization. In multiple urologic procedures, surgeons use ureteral catheters to decrease morbidity, increase the success rate, and allow for postoperative radiographic follow-up. The advent of laparoscopic surgery has logically required catheterization to be adapted to our laparoscopic procedures. METHODS The expansion of our daily practice to include multiple laparoscopic procedures showed us the difficulties inherent to ureteral catheterization in laparoscopic surgery. During our experience of >1000 laparoscopic procedures, we have used more or less complex catheterization techniques. After developing the use of the nephroscopy needle trocar for laparoscopic urinary diversion and finding that such use simplified the procedure, this technique was extended to all other laparoscopic procedures in which catheterization is required. RESULTS We analyzed the use of the nephroscopy needle trocar in 15 ureteropyeloplasty, 21 ileal conduit, and 4 laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation procedures. The mean operating time required for anterograde catheterization in ureteropelvic junction stenosis was 3 minutes, 35 seconds, and the mean operating time for retrograde catheterization was 2 minutes, 20 seconds. Anterograde catheterization was impossible in 1 case. No cases of a false ureteral tract occurred. CONCLUSIONS The results of our analysis have shown that the use of the nephroscopy needle trocar for percutaneous catheterization in laparoscopic surgery markedly simplifies the procedure, with the resultant savings in operating time.

Biochemical recurrence risk factors in surgically treated high and very high-risk prostate tumors.

Introduction High and very high-risk prostate cancers are tumors that display great variation in their progression, making their behaviour and consequent prognosis difficult to predict. We analyse preoperative and postoperative risk factors that could influence biochemical recurrence of these tumors. Material and methods We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses in an attempt to establish statistically significant preoperative (age, rectal examination, PSA, biopsy Gleason score, uni/bilateral tumor, affected cylinder percentage) and postoperative (pT stage, pN lymph node affectation, Gleason score, positive surgical margins, percentage of tumor affectation, perineural infiltration) risk factors, as well as their relationship with biochemical recurrence (PSA >0.2 ng/mL). Results We analysed 276 patients with high and very high-risk prostate cancer that were treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) between 2003-2007, with a mean follow-up of 84 months. Incidence of biochemical recurrence is 37.3%. Preoperative factors with the greatest impact on recurrence are suspicious rectal exam (OR 2.2) and the bilateralism of the tumor in the biopsy (OR 1.8). Among the postoperative factors, the presence of a LRP positive surgical margins (OR 3.4) showed the greatest impact, followed by the first grade of the Gleason score (OR 3.3). Conclusions The factor with the greatest influence on biochemical recurrence when it comes to surgery and high and very high-risk prostate cancer is the presence of a positive margin, followed by the Gleason score. Preoperative factors (PSA, biopsy Gleason score, rectal examination, number of affected cylinders) offered no guidance concerning the incidence of BCR.