John A. Ausink

A Modeling Framework for Optimizing F 35A Strategic Basing Decisions to Meet Training Requirements

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RANDs publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. iii Preface Domestic basing decisions can have significant implications for the U.S. Air Force (USAF) in terms of the costs and risks associated with meeting mission requirements. Strategic basing is an important and timely topic given the large number of pending basing decisions for the F-35A, which will soon enter full-rate production and eventually constitute a significant portion of the future USAF fighter force structure. PAF work in fiscal year (FY) 2013 showed that the basing process uses authoritative and consistent data to make individual basing decisions but does not systematically and quantitatively make enterprisewide assessments that incorporate broader USAF strategic concerns into each basing decision (Samaras et al., 2016). To begin to address this gap, PAF developed a methodology in FY 2014 to assess the cost, effectiveness, and risk associated with different basing postures representing different degrees of fleet consolidation and geographic distribution. Using the F-35A as an exemplar, the FY 2014 project showed that moderate consolidation of the F-35A fleet around potential fifth-generation training ranges could save substantial one-time and recurring costs, while enabling more aircraft to be based near advanced training ranges capable of supporting fifth-generation fighter training (Bednarz et al., 2015). It suggested focusing limited range modernization dollars on a few ideally suited training ranges and heavily weighting proximity to these ranges in the basing process for future F-35A operational units. Two developments strengthen the case for considering anticipated locations of suitable training ranges and accounting for existing and emerging training requirements for the F-35A in making future basing decisions. First, USAF is in the midst of making plans to …