John A. Fox
Kansas State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John A. Fox.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 2003
Jayson L. Lusk; Jutta Roosen; John A. Fox
We compare consumer valuations of beef ribeye steaks from cattle produced without growth hormones or genetically modified corn in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Results suggest that French consumers place a higher value on beef from cattle that have not been administered added growth hormones than U.S. consumers; however, valuations of non-hormone-treated beef are statistically indistinguishable across Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Results also suggest that European consumers place a much higher value on beef from cattle that have not been fed genetically modified corn than U.S. consumers. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 1998
John A. Fox; Jason F. Shogren; Dermot J. Hayes; James Kliebenstein
We design and implement a method, CVM-X, to calibrate hypothetical survey values using experimental auction markets. We test the procedure using consumer willingness-to-pay for irradiated/nonirradiated meat. Our results show that calibration factors for those who favor the irradiation process (0.67–0.69) are less severe than for those with an initial dislike of the process (0.55–0.59), suggesting that calibration may be commodity specific. Copyright 1998, Oxford University Press.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 2001
Jayson L. Lusk; John A. Fox; Ted C. Schroeder; James R. Mintert; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Experimental methods were used to examine consumer willingness-to-pay for steak tenderness in a grocery store setting. When relying on a taste test alone to determine product quality, the participants paid an average premium of
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 1998
Jean C. Buzby; John A. Fox; Richard C. Ready; Stephen R. Crutchfield
1.23/lb for a tender versus tough steak. Fifty-one percent of the participants were willing to pay an average of
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 2002
Jayson L. Lusk; John A. Fox
1.84/lb when they had completed a taste test and were also provided information about the steak’s tenderness. Results indicate that most consumers prefer more tender steaks and that many are willing to pay a premium for tender steaks.
Economics Letters | 2003
Jayson L. Lusk; John A. Fox
Microbial pathogens and pesticide residues in food pose a financial burden to society which can be reduced by incurring costs to reduce these food safety risks. We explore three valuation techniques that place a monetary value on food safety risk reductions, and we present a case study for each: a contingent valuation survey on pesticide residues, an experimental auction market for a chicken sandwich with reduced risk of Salmonella, and a cost-of-illness analysis for seven foodborne pathogens. Estimates from these techniques can be used in cost/benefit analyses for policies that reduce food safety risks.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 1994
Jason F. Shogren; Dermot J. Hayes; James Kliebenstein; John A. Fox
This study estimates the value of policies that would mandate labeling of beef from cattle produced with growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn. At no cost, 85 percent of respondents desired mandatory labeling of beef produced with growth hormones and 64 percent of respondents preferred mandatory labeling of beef fed genetically modified corn. Estimates suggest that consumers would be willing to pay 17.0 percent and 10.6 percent higher prices for beef on average to obtain information provided via mandatory labeling about whether the beef is from cattle produced with growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn, respectively.
Radiation Physics and Chemistry | 1998
John A. Fox; Dennis G. Olson
Abstract An increasing number of studies have begun conducting economic experiments in field, rather than laboratory settings. We directly compare results from laboratory and field valuation experiments. After controlling for unengaged bidders, results indicate field valuations were greater than laboratory valuations. Results are discussed in the context of recent literature on commitment costs.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 2008
Brett R. Gelso; John A. Fox; Jeffrey M. Peterson
A research study explored a version of economist W. Vickreys second-price, sealed-bid auction used for the valuation of nonmarket goods. The sensitivity of revealed values generated by this variation were examined. A standard second-price auction with repeated market trials was compared to a random nth-price auction and a combinatorial private-collection auction with sequentially-revealed values. Results showed the consistency of revealed values in a low probability risk scenario.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 1999
John A. Fox; David A. Hennessy
The potential market for irradiated chicken breasts was investigated using a mail survey and a retail trial. Results from the mail survey suggested a significantly higher level of acceptability of irradiated chicken than did the retail trial. A subsequent market experiment involving actual purchases showed levels of acceptability similar to that of the mail survey when similar information about food irradiation was provided.