John C. Hamilton
United States Geological Survey
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John C. Hamilton.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 2000
Hsi-Ping Liu; David M. Boore; William B. Joyner; David Oppenheimer; Richard E. Warrick; Wenbo Zhang; John C. Hamilton; Leo T. Brown
Shear-wave velocities (VS) are widely used for earthquake ground- motion site characterization. VS data are now largely obtained using borehole meth- ods. Drilling holes, however, is expensive. Nonintrusive surface methods are inex- pensive for obtaining VS information, but not many comparisons with direct borehole measurements have been published. Because different assumptions are used in data interpretation of each surface method and public safety is involved in site character- ization for engineering structures, it is important to validate the surface methods by additional comparisons with borehole measurements. We compare results obtained from a particular surface method (array measurement of surface waves associated with microtremor) with results obtained from borehole methods. Using a 10-element nested-triangular array of 100-m aperture, we measured surface-wave phase veloci- ties at two California sites, Garner Valley near Hemet and Hollister Municipal Air- port. The Garner Valley site is located at an ancient lake bed where water-saturated sediment overlies decomposed granite on top of granite bedrock. Our array was deployed at a location where seismic velocities had been determined to a depth of 500 m by borehole methods. At Hollister, where the near-surface sediment consists of clay, sand, and gravel, we determined phase velocities using an array located close to a 60-m deep borehole where downhole velocity logs already exist. Because we want to assess the measurements uncomplicated by uncertainties introduced by the inversion process, we compare our phase-velocity results with the borehole VS depth profile by calculating fundamental-mode Rayleigh-wave phase velocities from an earth model constructed from the borehole data. For wavelengths less than 2 times of the array aperture at Garner Valley, phase-velocity results from array measure- ments agree with the calculated Rayleigh-wave velocities to better than 11%. Mea- surement errors become larger for wavelengths 2 times greater than the array aper- ture. At Hollister, the measured phase velocity at 3.9 Hz (near the upper edge of the microtremor frequency band) is within 20% of the calculated Rayleigh-wave veloc- ity. Because shear-wave velocity is the predominant factor controlling Rayleigh- wave phase velocities, the comparisons suggest that this nonintrusive method can provide VS information adequate for ground-motion estimation.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1998
David P. Schwartz; D. Pantosti; Koji Okumura; Thomas J. Powers; John C. Hamilton
Trenching, microgeomorphic mapping, and tree ring analysis provide information on timing of paleoearthquakes and behavior of the San Andreas fault in the Santa Cruz mountains. At the Grizzly Flat site alluvial units dated at 1640–1659 A.D., 1679–1894 A.D., 1668–1893 A.D., and the present ground surface are displaced by a single event. This was the 1906 surface rupture. Combined trench dates and tree ring analysis suggest that the penultimate event occurred in the mid-1600 s, possibly in an interval as narrow as 1632–1659 A.D. There is no direct evidence in the trenches for the 1838 or 1865 earthquakes, which have been proposed as occurring on this part of the fault zone. In a minimum time of about 340 years only one large surface faulting event (1906) occurred at Grizzly Flat, in contrast to previous recurrence estimates of 95–110 years for the Santa Cruz mountains segment. Comparison with dates of the penultimate San Andreas earthquake at sites north of San Francisco suggests that the San Andreas fault between Point Arena and the Santa Cruz mountains may have failed either as a sequence of closely timed earthquakes on adjacent segments or as a single long rupture similar in length to the 1906 rupture around the mid-1600 s. The 1906 coseismic geodetic slip and the late Holocene geologic slip rate on the San Francisco peninsula and southward are about 50–70% and 70% of their values north of San Francisco, respectively. The slip gradient along the 1906 rupture section of the San Andreas reflects partitioning of plate boundary slip onto the San Gregorio, Sargent, and other faults south of the Golden Gate. If a mid-1600 s event ruptured the same section of the fault that failed in 1906, it supports the concept that long strike-slip faults can contain master rupture segments that repeat in both length and slip distribution. Recognition of a persistent slip rate gradient along the northern San Andreas fault and the concept of a master segment remove the requirement that lower slip sections of large events such as 1906 must fill in on a periodic basis with smaller and more frequent earthquakes.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 2002
M. J. Rymer; Gordon G. Seitz; Kristin D. Weaver; Altangerel Orgil; Geoffrey Faneros; John C. Hamilton; Christopher Goetz
Paleoseismic investigations of the Lavic Lake fault at Lavic Lake playa place constraints on the timing of a possible earlier earthquake along the 1999 Hector Mine rupture trace and reveal evidence of the timing of the penultimate earthquake on a strand of the Lavic Lake fault that did not rupture in 1999. Three of our four trenches, trenches A, B, and C, were excavated across the 1999 Hector Mine rupture; a fourth trench, D, was excavated across a vegetation lineament that had only minor slip at its southern end in 1999. Trenches A–C exposed strata that are broken only by the 1999 rupture; trench D exposed horizontal bedding that is locally warped and offset by faults. Stratigraphic evidence for the timing of an earlier earthquake along the 1999 rupture across Lavic Lake playa was not exposed. Thus, an earlier event, if there was one along that rupture trace, predates the lowest stratigraphic level exposed in our trenches. Radiocarbon dating of strata near the bottom of trenches constrains a possible earlier event to some time earlier than about 4950 B.C. Buried faults revealed in trench D are below a vegetation lineament at the ground surface. A depositional contact about 80 cm below the ground surface acts as the upward termination of fault breaks in trench D. Thus, this contact may be the event horizon for a surface-rupturing earthquake prior to 1999—the penultimate earthquake on the Lavic Lake fault. Radiocarbon ages of detrital charcoal samples from immediately below the event horizon indicate that the earthquake associated with the faulting occurred later than A.D. 260. An approximately 1300-year age difference between two samples at about the same stratigraphic level below the event horizon suggests the potential for a long residence time of detrital charcoal in the area. Coupled with a lack of bioturbation that could introduce young organic material into the stratigraphic section, the charcoal ages provide only a maximum bounding age; thus, the recognized event may be younger. There is abundant, subtle evidence for pre-1999 activity of the Lavic Lake fault in the playa area, even though the fault was not mapped near the playa prior to the Hector Mine earthquake. The most notable indicators for long-term presence of the fault are pronounced, persistent vegetation lineaments and uplifted basalt exposures. Primary and secondary slip occurred in 1999 on two southern vegetation lineaments, and minor slip locally formed on a northern lineament; trench exposures across the northern vegetation lineament revealed the post-A.D. 260 earthquake, and a geomorphic trough extends northward into alluvial fan deposits in line with this lineament. The presence of two basalt exposures in Lavic Lake playa indicates the presence of persistent compressional steps and uplift along the fault. Fault-line scarps are additional geomorphic markers of repeated slip events in basalt exposures.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 2005
Suzanne Hecker; D. Pantosti; David P. Schwartz; John C. Hamilton; Liam Reidy; Thomas J. Powers
The Rodgers Creek fault (rcf) is a principal component of the San Andreas fault system north of San Francisco. No evidence appears in the historical record of a large earthquake on the rcf, implying that the most recent earthquake (mre) occurred before 1824, when a Franciscan mission was built near the fault at Sonoma, and probably before 1776, when a mission and presidio were built in San Francisco. The first appearance of nonnative pollen in the stratigraphic record at the Triangle G Ranch study site on the south-central reach of the rcf confirms that the mre occurred before local settlement and the beginning of livestock grazing. Chronological modeling of earthquake age using radiocarbon-dated charcoal from near the top of a faulted alluvial sequence at the site indicates that the mre occurred no earlier than a.d. 1690 and most likely occurred after a.d. 1715. With these age constraints, we know that the elapsed time since the mre on the rcf is more than 181 years and less than 315 years and is probably between 229 and 290 years. This elapsed time is similar to published recurrence-interval estimates of 131 to 370 years (preferred value of 230 years) and 136 to 345 years (mean of 205 years), calculated from geologic data and a regional earthquake model, respectively. Importantly, then, the elapsed time may have reached or exceeded the average recurrence time for the fault. The age of the mre on the rcf is similar to the age of prehistoric surface rupture on the northern and southern sections of the Hayward fault to the south. This suggests possible rupture scenarios that involve simultaneous rupture of the Rodgers Creek and Hayward faults. A buried channel is offset 2.2 (+1.2, −0.8) m along one side of a pressure ridge at the Triangle G Ranch site. This provides a minimum estimate of right-lateral slip during the mre at this location. Total slip at the site may be similar to, but is probably greater than, the 2 (+0.3, −0.2) m measured previously at the nearby Beebe Ranch site.
Open-File Report | 2004
Thomas E. Fumal; Gordon F. Heingartner; Laura Samrad; Timothy E. Dawson; John C. Hamilton; John N. Baldwin
Archive | 2003
Thomas E. Fumal; Gordon F. Heingartner; Todd E. Dawson; R. Flowers; John C. Hamilton; John D. Kessler; Liam Reidy; Laura Samrad; Gordon G. Seitz; John R. Southon
Open-File Report | 2004
Thomas E. Fumal; Timothy E. Dawson; Rebecca Flowers; John C. Hamilton; Gordon F. Heingartner; James Kessler; Laura Samrad
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2001
M. J. Rymer; Jerome A. Treiman; Thomas J. Powers; Thomas E. Fumal; David P. Schwartz; John C. Hamilton; F. R. Cinti
Open-File Report | 1995
Suzanne Hecker; Daniel J. Ponti; C.D. Garvin; Thomas J. Powers; Thomas E. Fumal; John C. Hamilton; R.V. Sharp; M.J. Rymer; Carol S. Prentice; F.R. Cinti
Open-File Report | 2004
Thomas E. Fumal; William T. Frost; Christopher Garvin; John C. Hamilton; Monique Jaasma; M. J. Rymer