Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John M. Brittingham is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John M. Brittingham.


Nature Medicine | 2002

Improved genetic immunization via micromechanical disruption of skin-barrier function and targeted epidermal delivery

John A. Mikszta; Jason B. Alarcon; John M. Brittingham; Diane E. Sutter; Ronald J. Pettis; Noel G. Harvey

Skin is an attractive target for delivery of genetic therapies and vaccines. However, new approaches are needed to access this tissue more effectively. Here, we describe a new delivery technology based on arrays of structurally precise, micron-scale silicon projections, which we term microenhancer arrays (MEAs). In a human clinical study, these devices effectively breached the skin barrier, allowing direct access to the epidermis with minimal associated discomfort and skin irritation. In a mouse model, MEA-based delivery enabled topical gene transfer resulting in reporter gene activity up to 2,800-fold above topical controls. MEA-based delivery enabled topical immunization with naked plasmid DNA, inducing stronger and less variable immune responses than via needle-based injections, and reduced the number of immunizations required for full seroconversion. Together, the results provide the first in vivo use of microfabricated devices to breach the skin barrier and deliver vaccines topically, suggesting significant clinical and practical advantages over existing technologies.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2005

Protective Immunization against Inhalational Anthrax: A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Delivery Platforms

John A. Mikszta; Vincent J. Sullivan; Cheryl H. Dean; Andrea Waterston; Jason B. Alarcon; John P. Dekker; John M. Brittingham; Juan Huang; Matthew S. Ferriter; Ge Jiang; Kevin D. Mar; Kamal U. Saikh; Bradley G. Stiles; Chad J. Roy; Robert G. Ulrich; Noel G. Harvey

A new anthrax vaccine under clinical investigation is based on recombinant Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (rPA). Here, we investigated microneedle-based cutaneous and nasal mucosal delivery of rPA in mice and rabbits. In mice, intradermal (id) delivery achieved up to 90% seroconversion after a single dose, compared with 20% after intramuscular (im) injection. Intranasal (inl) delivery of a liquid formulation required 3 doses to achieve responses that were comparable with those achieved via the id or im routes. In rabbits, id delivery provided complete protection against aerosol challenge with anthrax spores; in addition, novel powder formulations administered inl provided complete protection, whereas a liquid formulation provided only partial protection. These results demonstrate, for the first time, that cutaneous or nasal mucosal administration of rPA provides complete protection against inhalational anthrax in rabbits. The novel vaccine/device combinations described here have the potential to improve the efficacy of rPA and other biodefense vaccines.


Infection and Immunity | 2006

Microneedle-Based Intradermal Delivery of the Anthrax Recombinant Protective Antigen Vaccine

John A. Mikszta; John P. Dekker; Noel G. Harvey; Cheryl H. Dean; John M. Brittingham; Joanne Huang; Vincent J. Sullivan; Beverly Dyas; Chad J. Roy; Robert G. Ulrich

ABSTRACT The recombinant protective antigen (rPA) of Bacillus anthracis is a promising anthrax vaccine. We compared serum immunoglobulin G levels and toxin-neutralizing antibody titers in rabbits following delivery of various doses of vaccine by microneedle-based intradermal (i.d.) delivery or intramuscular (i.m.) injection using conventional needles. Intradermal delivery required less antigen to induce levels of antibody similar to those produced via i.m. injection during the first 2 weeks following primary and booster inoculation. This dose-sparing effect was less evident at the later stages of the immune response. Rabbits immunized i.d. with 10 μg of rPA displayed 100% protection from aerosol spore challenge, while i.m. injection of the same dose provided slightly lower protection (71%). Groups immunized with lower antigen doses were partially protected (13 to 29%) regardless of the mode of administration. Overall, our results suggest rPA formulated with aluminum adjuvant and administered to the skin by a microneedle-based device is as efficacious as i.m. vaccination.


Archive | 2004

Methods for intradermal delivery of therapeutics agents

Ronald J. Pettis; Alfred Harvey; Robert L. Campbell; John A. Mikszta; John M. Brittingham; Glenn P Vonk; Colleen M. Nycz


Archive | 2004

Improved intra-dermal delivery of biologically active agents

Colleen M. Nycz; Glenn P Vonk; John M. Brittingham; Ronald J. Pettis; Alfred Harvey; Robert L. Campbell; John A. Mikszta


Archive | 2004

Administration cellulaire intradermique au moyen d'une micro-cannule de faible calibre

John M. Brittingham; John A. Mikszta; Cheryl H. Dean; Dominique J. Williams


Archive | 2004

Verfahren für die intradermale abgabe von therapeutischen mitteln

Ronald J. Pettis; Alfred Harvey; Robert L. Campbell; John A. Mikszta; John M. Brittingham


Archive | 2004

Intradermale abgabe von zellen mittels dünner mikrokanüle

John M. Brittingham; Cheryl H. Dean; John A. Mikszta; Dominique J. Williams


Archive | 2004

Procedes d'administration intradermique d'agents therapeutiques

Ronald J. Pettis; Alfred Harvey; Robert L. Campbell; John A. Mikszta; John M. Brittingham


Archive | 2002

Verfahren und vorrichtung für die abgabe einer substanz

Jason B. Alarcon; John M. Brittingham; Iii John P. Dekker; John A. Mikszta; Ronald J. Pettis

Collaboration


Dive into the John M. Brittingham's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge