John Q. Easton
University of Chicago
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John Q. Easton.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis | 2008
Joseph Kahne; Susan E. Sporte; Marisa de la Torre; John Q. Easton
This study examines 4 years of small school reform in Chicago, focusing on schools formed by converting large traditional high schools into small autonomous ones. Analyzing systemwide survey and outcome data, the authors assess the assumptions embedded in the reform’s theory of change. They find that these schools are characterized by more collegial and committed teacher contexts and more academically and personally supportive student contexts. There is some evidence of decreased dropout rates and increased graduation rates for the first cohort of students but not for the second cohort. The authors do not find stronger instruction, nor do they find student achievement has improved. They discuss implications for reformers and policy makers who are interested in small schools in particular and high school reform in general.
Social Psychology of Education | 1997
Anthony S. Bryk; Yeow Meng Thum; John Q. Easton; Stuart Luppescu
This paper considers the issues raised in using standardized achievement test scores for purposes of examining the academic productivity of schools. We critique some commonly used practices by urban school districts and suggest an alternative approach – the school productivity profile. This profile is based on an assessment of each schools contribution to student learning, or value-added, rather than just the overall level of student attainment. We illustrate, using 10-year achievement trend data from the Chicago Public Schools (CPS), both the problems with some commonly reported indicators of school effectiveness and the idea of a school productivity profile. While our analyses suggest broad-based improvements in student learning in many Chicago schools over the past 10 years, we also found that the current testing system is not well designed to make such judgments accurately. We conclude that extant standardized testing systems, like the ITBS used in Chicago, do not afford an accurate basis for assessing school productivity and how this might be changing over time. These results have important policy implications. As school districts seek to become more “outcome oriented,” they will need to invest in better testing and reporting systems in order to know whether they are making genuine progress in this regard.
Improving Schools | 2005
Joseph Kahne; Susan E. Sporte; John Q. Easton
There is widespread concern in many US cities about student alienation, dropout and under-achievement in large urban high schools. Chicago, with support from the Gates Foundation and other agencies, has embarked on a major reform involving the establishment of new small schools and the division of larger schools into smaller ones. This article reports on early evaluations of the project, alongside previous evaluations of small high schools. It highlights early effects such as: improved relationships; cooperation between teachers; awareness of personal difficulties; student engagement; and better attendance. Although it is too early to demonstrate the result in terms of summative attainment measures, these clearly provide a strong foundation.
Archive | 2010
Anthony S. Bryk; Penny Bender Sebring; Elaine Allensworth; Stuart Luppescu; John Q. Easton
Consortium on Chicago School Research | 2007
Elaine Allensworth; John Q. Easton
Archive | 1999
Melissa Roderick; Anthony S. Bryk; Brian A. Jacob; John Q. Easton; Elaine Allensworth
Education and Urban Society | 1994
John Q. Easton; Sandra Storey
Education and Urban Society | 1994
Anthony S. Bryk; Paul E. Deabster; John Q. Easton; Stuart Luppescu; Yeow Meng Thum
Consortium on Chicago School Research | 2009
Melissa Roderick; John Q. Easton; Penny Bender Sebring
Archive | 2001
Elaine Allensworth; John Q. Easton