Jonathan R. Kamerlink
New York University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jonathan R. Kamerlink.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2010
Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Martin Quirno; Joshua D. Auerbach; Andrew H. Milby; Lynne Windsor; Laura Dean; Joseph Dryer; Thomas J. Errico; Baron S. Lonner
BACKGROUND Although achieving clinical success is the main goal in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, it is becoming increasingly important to do so in a cost-effective manner. The goal of the present study was to determine the surgical and hospitalization costs, charges, and reimbursements for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery at one institution. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 16,536 individual costs and charges, including overall reimbursements, for 125 consecutive patients who were managed surgically for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by three different surgeons between 2006 and 2007. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were recorded for each patient. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was employed to assess independent correlation with total cost and charge. Nonparametric descriptive statistics were calculated for total cost with use of the Lenke curve-classification system. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 15.2 years. The mean main thoracic curve measured 50 degrees, and the thoracolumbar curve measured 41 degrees. The cost varied with Lenke curve type:
Spine | 2010
Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Thomas J. Errico; Shaun Xavier; Ashish Patel; Amar Patel; Alexa Cohen; Mark Reiger; Joseph W. Dryer; David S. Feldman; Baron S. Lonner; Aleksandar Beric; Frank J. Schwab
29,955 for type 1,
Spine | 2010
Jeffrey M. Spivak; Frederick J. Kummer; Deyu Chen; Martin Quirno; Jonathan R. Kamerlink
31,414 for type 2,
Sas Journal | 2009
Thomas J. Errico; Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Martin Quirno; Jacques Samani; Robert J. Chomiak
31,975 for type 3,
Spine | 2009
Martin Quirno; Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Antonio Valdevit; Matthew M. Kang; Burt Yaszay; Naphysah Duncan; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Baron S. Lonner; Thomas J. Errico
60,754 for type 4,
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics | 2010
Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Itzhak Engel; Ajit Patwardhan; Antonio Valdevit; Gary Lowery; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Reinhard Zeller; Thomas J. Errico
32,652 for type 5, and
The Spine Journal | 2009
Firas M. Kara; Kushagra Verma; Shaun Xavier; Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Thorsten Kirsch
33,416 for type 6. Independently significant increases for total cost were found in association with the number of pedicle screws placed, the total number of vertebral levels fused, and the type of surgical approach (R(2) = 0.35, p <or= 0.03). Independently significant increases for reimbursement were found in association with the number of pedicle screws placed and the type of surgical approach (R(2) = 0.12, p <or= 0.02). The hospital was reimbursed 53% of total charges and 120% of total costs. Reimbursement was highly correlated with charge (r = 0.45, p < 0.001). For rehospitalizations, the hospital was reimbursed 65% of charges and 93% of costs. CONCLUSIONS The largest contributors to overall cost were implants (29%), intensive care unit and inpatient room costs (22%), operating room time (9.9%), and bone grafts (6%). There were three significant independent predictors of increased total cost: the surgical approach used, the number of pedicle screws placed, and the number of vertebral levels fused. This study characterizes the relative contributions of factors that contribute to total costs, charges, and reimbursements that can, in time, identify potential areas for cost reduction or redistribution of resources in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
The Spine Journal | 2009
Kushagra Verma; Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Shaun Xavier; Marc Ialenti; Joseph Dryer; David S. Feldman; Baron S. Lonner
Study Design. Retrospective review. Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the preoperative neurologic risk in a consecutive series of spinal deformity patients undergoing correction surgery at one institution. Summary of Background Data. During spinal deformity correction surgery, neurologic monitoring techniques are commonly applied to reduce the risk of neurologic deficits. While previous studies have demonstrated risk factors for neurologic changes in the setting of spinal surgery, these involved long time spans and heterogeneous patient populations. Methods. Of 301 cases performed over 1 year, 281 cases were monitorable. Patients were grouped according to diagnosis: neuromuscular (NM) scoliosis, Sagittal Plane deformity, and Scoliosis. Demographic and surgical data were collected for neurologically monitorable patients. Coronal and sagittal parameters were measured using digital images of radiographs. Neurologic status was measured with somatosensory-evoked potentials and/or motor-evoked potentials. Results. Primary NM scoliosis cases had the highest incidence of neurologic monitoring changes (NMC) (10%) while revision sagittal plane deformity had the second highest (9.8%). Sensitivity and specificity were both 100%. Overall incidence of neurologic deficit was 1.1%. Of the 13 NMCs patients, 3 patients had persistent neurologic deficit. Majority of NMCs occurred before deformity correction. In patients with NM scoliosis, NMCs increased with hybrid constructs with wires (P < 0.01). In patients with scoliosis, NMCs increased with increased body mass index, estimated blood loss, operative time, and postoperative coronal thoracolumbar curve magnitude (P < 0.04). In patients with primarily sagittal plane deformity, NMCs increased with preoperative proximal curve, postoperative proximal and thoracolumbar curves, and postoperative kyphosis and lordosis (P < 0.04). Conclusion. Primary NM scoliosis and revision sagittal plane deformities appear to carry greatest incidence of NMCs during surgical intervention. Most observed NMCs did not result in a permanent neurologic deficit. Neuromonitoring should be assessed throughout the entire surgical procedure. This study may aid surgeons and patients to better assess neurologic risks related to spinal deformity surgery.
The Spine Journal | 2009
Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Kushagra Verma; Shaun Xavier; Marc Ialenti; Joseph Dryer; David S. Feldman; Baron S. Lonner
Study Design. Anatomic study. Objective. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the slip amount, slip angle, and disc height on the geometry of the L5 foramen in low-grade, low-dysplasia isthmic L5 spondylolisthesis using a human cadaveric model. Summary of Background Data. Radicular pain and varying degrees of nerve root dysfunction are present in many adult isthmic spondylolisthesis patients and can be the result of compression of the L5 root within its foramen. Methods. The intervertebral foramens of six L5 vertebra and sacrum cadaver specimens had a standardized pars defect created and were mounted on an adjustable frame. Plasticene molds of the foramens were made by varying sagittal translocation (0%, 12.5%, 25%, and 50%), slip angle (kyphotic 10° and lordotic 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°), and disc height (0, 5, and 10 mm). The volume of each mold was measured. The surface area was determined by sagittally slicing on a microtome the mold and each sections face was measured by computer image analysis. Results. The area and volume of the foramen at a sagittal slip of 0%, slip angle of 0°, and 0 mm disc height were used as a control. As disc height decreased from 10 to 5 mm, 10 to 0 mm, and 5 to 0 mm, the foramen area and volume significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Incremental slip percentage from 0% to 12.5%, 25%, and 50% produced significantly reduced foramen area and volumes (P < 0.05). As slip angle increased from 10° kyphosis to 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° lordosis, foramen area and volume decreased (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Disc height and slip percentage had the largest effect on intervertebral foramen area and volume in this model of low-grade, low-dysplasia isthmic spondylolisthesis. Slip angle changes affected foramen area to a lesser degree. Surgical treatment strategies should consider restoration of disc height in cases with foraminal stenosis.
The Spine Journal | 2009
Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Shaun Xavier; Ashish Patel; Amar Patel; Alexa Cohen; Mark Reiger; Joseph Dryer; David S. Feldman; Baron S. Lonner; Aleksandar Beric; Frank J. Schwab
Background The purpose of this study was to determine the indications for implantation of the coflex device (Paradigm Spine, LLC, New York, New York), assess long-term complications, and evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients. Methods A total of 127 patients underwent placement of a coflex implant for various indications by one orthopaedic spine surgeon. The mean follow-up was 6.3 years. The original indications for implantation were determined based upon the data provided in the case report forms. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients were asked to grade their low-back and leg pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the pain severity scale: no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), or severe pain (3). Patients were queried about their satisfaction with the surgical procedure. Follow-up radiographs were taken to determine any device-related issues. Results The most prevalent diagnoses for implantation were spinal stenosis (19.7%) and spinal stenosis with lumbar disc herniation (35.4%). The mean severity of low-back pain was decreased by 33% (from moderate to mild) at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001) and at the 5-year follow-up (from moderate to mild, P < .001). The mean severity of leg pain was decreased by 66% (from severe to mild) at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001) and at the 5-year follow-up (from severe to mild, P < .001). At the mean follow-up period of 6.3 years, a patient satisfaction query demonstrated that 7% were unsatisfied, 46% were satisfied, and 46% were very satisfied with their clinical outcome. Based on the follow-up radiographs, 92 of patients had no devicerelated issues and 8% had device-related issues. Conclusion The data provided have demonstrated that the coflex implant provides pain relief for patients with low-back pain and leg pain. The most common indications for implantation were spinal stenosis and spinal stenosis with lumbar disc herniation. There were very few device-related complications. Clinical Significance Using coflex is a safe and viable option in the selection of instrumentation for spinal stabilization.