Joseph Barten Legutki

Scalable high-density peptide arrays for comprehensive health monitoring

There is an increasing awareness that health care must move from post-symptomatic treatment to presymptomatic intervention. An ideal system would allow regular inexpensive monitoring of health status using circulating antibodies to report on health fluctuations. Recently, we demonstrated that peptide microarrays can do this through antibody signatures (immunosignatures). Unfortunately, printed microarrays are not scalable. Here we demonstrate a platform based on fabricating microarrays (~10 M peptides per slide, 330,000 peptides per assay) on silicon wafers using equipment common to semiconductor manufacturing. The potential of these microarrays for comprehensive health monitoring is verified through the simultaneous detection and classification of six different infectious diseases and six different cancers. Besides diagnostics, these high-density peptide chips have numerous other applications both in health care and elsewhere.

Physical Characterization of the “Immunosignaturing Effect”

Identifying new, effective biomarkers for diseases is proving to be a challenging problem. We have proposed that antibodies may offer a solution to this problem. The physical features and abundance of antibodies make them ideal biomarkers. Additionally, antibodies are often elicited early in the ontogeny of different chronic and infectious diseases. We previously reported that antibodies from patients with infectious disease and separately those with Alzheimers disease display a characteristic and reproducible “immunosignature” on a microarray of 10,000 random sequence peptides. Here we investigate the physical and chemical parameters underlying how immunosignaturing works. We first show that a variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies raised against different classes of antigens produce distinct profiles on this microarray and the relative affinities are determined. A proposal for how antibodies bind the random sequences is tested. Sera from vaccinated mice and people suffering from a fugal infection are individually assayed to determine the complexity of signals that can be distinguished. Based on these results, we propose that this simple, general and inexpensive system could be optimized to generate a new class of antibody biomarkers for a wide variety of diseases.

Immunosignaturing: a critical review

Health is a complex interaction between metabolism, physiology, and immunity. Although it is difficult to define quantitatively, the activity of the humoral immune system provides a reasonable proxy for changes in health. Immunosignaturing is a microarray-based technology that quantitates the dynamics of circulating antibodies. Recent advancements in the field warrant a review of the technology. Here, we provide an introduction to the technique, evaluate the current progress, contrast similar technologies, and suggest applications that immunosignaturing could facilitate.

Evaluation of biological sample preparation for immunosignature-based diagnostics.

ABSTRACT To address the need for a universal system to assess health status, we previously described a method termed “immunosignaturing” which splays the entire humoral antibody repertoire across a peptide microarray. Two important issues relative to the potential broad use of immunosignatures are sample preparation and stability. In the present study, we compared the immunosignatures developed from serum, plasma, saliva, and antibodies eluted from blood dried onto filter paper. We found that serum and plasma provide identical immunosignatures. Immunosignatures derived from dried blood also correlated well with those from nondried serum from the same individual. Immunosignatures derived from dried blood were capable of distinguishing naïve mice from those infected with influenza virus. Saliva was applied to the arrays, and the IgA immunosignature correlated strongly with that from dried blood. Finally, we demonstrate that dried blood retains immunosignature information even when exposed to high temperature. This work expands the potential diagnostic uses for immunosignatures. These features suggest that different forms of archival samples can be used for diagnosis development and that in prospective studies samples can be easily procured.

Immunosignatures can predict vaccine efficacy

Significance Vaccines have been the most important medical intervention developed, yet vaccines for many diseases are still needed. Despite its success, the process to develop a vaccine remains empirical, resting on measuring the number of vaccinees that incur or do not incur an infection. Here we test in the mouse flu model whether the “immunosignature” diagnostic technology could be applied to predict vaccine efficacy. Immunosignatures are produced by profiling the antibody repertoire of an individual on a chip arrayed with nonnatural sequence peptides. It is attractive in that it is a simple but comprehensive measure of the complexity of the humoral response. We found that immunosignatures are a promising approach to predicting whether a vaccine will confer protection. The development of new vaccines would be greatly facilitated by having effective methods to predict vaccine performance. Such methods could also be helpful in monitoring individual vaccine responses to existing vaccines. We have developed “immunosignaturing” as a simple, comprehensive, chip-based method to display the antibody diversity in an individual on peptide arrays. Here we examined whether this technology could be used to develop correlates for predicting vaccine effectiveness. By using a mouse influenza infection, we show that the immunosignaturing of a natural infection can be used to discriminate a protective from nonprotective vaccine. Further, we demonstrate that an immunosignature can determine which mice receiving the same vaccine will survive. Finally, we show that the peptides comprising the correlate signatures of protection can be used to identify possible epitopes in the influenza virus proteome that are correlates of protection.

Autoreactive antibodies raised by self derived de novo peptides can identify unrelated antigens on protein microarrays. Are autoantibodies really autoantibodies

The development of arrays of human proteins has been a huge boon to the search for autoantibody diagnostics. Typically, slides with thousands of recombinant human proteins arrayed in an addressable fashion are incubated with sera from diseased or normal people. If an antibody binds a protein more in the diseased than in the normal cohort it is considered an autoantibody response. It is usually presumed that the autoantibody was elicited by the protein bound on the array. However, our studies using human protein and random peptide arrays indicate that antibody specificity may not be as high as commonly thought. Therefore we have tested the assumption of the source of autoantibodies. One test was to generate antibodies to two totally random peptides and bind these antibodies to a human protein array. One of the antibodies generated bound two human proteins. A second test was to generate an antibody to a frameshift peptide occurring in cancers. This antibody also bound several proteins on the array. We conclude that one should be cautious about assuming a particular autoantibody target on an array which elicited the original immune response.

A Simple Platform for the Rapid Development of Antimicrobials

Recent infectious outbreaks highlight the need for platform technologies that can be quickly deployed to develop therapeutics needed to contain the outbreak. We present a simple concept for rapid development of new antimicrobials. The goal was to produce in as little as one week thousands of doses of an intervention for a new pathogen. We tested the feasibility of a system based on antimicrobial synbodies. The system involves creating an array of 100 peptides that have been selected for broad capability to bind and/or kill viruses and bacteria. The peptides are pre-screened for low cell toxicity prior to large scale synthesis. Any pathogen is then assayed on the chip to find peptides that bind or kill it. Peptides are combined in pairs as synbodies and further screened for activity and toxicity. The lead synbody can be quickly produced in large scale, with completion of the entire process in one week.

An ImmunoSignature test distinguishes Trypanosoma cruzi, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and West Nile virus seropositivity among asymptomatic blood donors

Background The complexity of the eukaryotic parasite Trypanosoma (T.) cruzi manifests in its highly dynamic genome, multi-host life cycle, progressive morphologies and immune-evasion mechanisms. Accurate determination of infection or Chagas’ disease activity and prognosis continues to challenge researchers. We hypothesized that a diagnostic platform with higher ligand complexity than previously employed may hold value. Methodology We applied the ImmunoSignature Technology (IST) for the detection of T. cruzi-specific antibodies among healthy blood donors. IST is based on capturing the information in an individual’s antibody repertoire by exposing their peripheral blood to a library of >100,000 position-addressable, chemically-diverse peptides. Principal findings Initially, samples from two Chagas cohorts declared positive or negative by bank testing were studied. With the first cohort, library-peptides displaying differential binding signals between T. cruzi sero-states were used to train an algorithm. A classifier was fixed and tested against the training-independent second cohort to determine assay performance. Next, samples from a mixed cohort of donors declared positive for Chagas, hepatitis B, hepatitis C or West Nile virus were assayed on the same library. Signals were used to train a single algorithm that distinguished all four disease states. As a binary test, the accuracy of predicting T. cruzi seropositivity by IST was similar, perhaps modestly reduced, relative to conventional ELISAs. However, the results indicate that information beyond determination of seropositivity may have been captured. These include the identification of cohort subclasses, the simultaneous detection and discerning of other diseases, and the discovery of putative new antigens. Conclusions & significance The central outcome of this study established IST as a reliable approach for specific determination of T. cruzi seropositivity versus disease-free individuals or those with other diseases. Its potential contribution for monitoring and controlling Chagas lies in IST’s delivery of higher resolution immune-state readouts than obtained with currently-used technologies. Despite the complexity of the ligand presentation and large quantitative readouts, performing an IST test is simple, scalable and reproducible.

Could immunosignatures technology enable the development of a preventative cancer vaccine

The exciting prospect of developing a universal prophylactic cancer vaccine now seems more possible due to advances in technology and basic knowledge. However, the problem of testing the efficacy of such a vaccine in a clinical trial seems daunting. The low incidence and long lead-time to diagnosis of cancer would make a standard clinical trial long and expensive. Recently, we demonstrated that the immunosignatures diagnostic technology could be useful in evaluating vaccines. The technology is based on profiling the antibody diversity in an individual on a peptide chip platform. Here we propose that this technology may also enable a clinical trial of a preventative vaccine. Preliminary evidence supports the prospect of immunosignatures detecting cancer at very early stages, well before conventional diagnosis. Because the technology is simple and inexpensive, it could be used to monitor the occurrence of cancer in participants and shorten the clinical trial.