Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joseph C. Reese is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joseph C. Reese.


Cell | 1998

A Subset of TAFIIs Are Integral Components of the SAGA Complex Required for Nucleosome Acetylation and Transcriptional Stimulation

Patrick A. Grant; David Schieltz; Marilyn G. Pray-Grant; David J. Steger; Joseph C. Reese; John R. Yates; Jerry L. Workman

A number of transcriptional coactivator proteins have been identified as histone acetyltransferase (HAT) proteins, providing a direct molecular basis for the coupling of histone acetylation and transcriptional activation. The yeast Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex requires the coactivator protein Gcn5 for HAT activity. Identification of protein subunits by mass spectrometry and immunoblotting revealed that the TATA binding protein-associated factors (TAF(II)s) TAF(II)90, -68/61, -60, -25/23, and -20/17 are integral components of this complex. In addition, TAF(II)68 was required for both SAGA-dependent nucleosomal HAT activity and transcriptional activation from chromatin templates in vitro. These results illustrate a role for certain TAF(II) proteins in the regulation of gene expression at the level of chromatin modification that is distinct from the TFIID complex and TAF(II)145.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 1992

Examination of the DNA-binding ability of estrogen receptor in whole cells: implications for hormone-independent transactivation and the actions of antiestrogens.

Joseph C. Reese; Benita S. Katzenellenbogen

We describe an assay employing the competitive binding of estrogen receptor (ER) with basal transcription factors on a constitutive promoter (cytomegalovirus-hormone response element[s]-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase [CMV-(HRE)n-CAT, containing a hormone response element(s) between the TATA box and the start site of transcription]) to examine the DNA-binding ability of the human ER in whole cells. We used this promoter interference assay to examine the DNA binding of ER in cell lines containing high and low levels of endogenous ER, as well as in CHO cells expressing wild-type and mutant ERs from cotransfected expression vectors. The ER is capable of binding to the promoter interference constructs in the absence of added ligand, and estrogen (estradiol) or antiestrogen (trans-hydroxytamoxifen or ICI 164,384) enhances or stabilizes this interaction. The binding of unoccupied ER to reporter gene activation plasmids results in ligand-independent transactivation, presumably due to the TAF-1 function of the receptor. DNA binding of ER in the absence of ligand is observed in cells containing endogenous ER, or expressed ER, and occurs in cells with high or low receptor contents. Although estrogen- and antiestrogen-occupied ER complexes bind to DNA and reduce the template promoter activity, the extent of suppression achieved by ICI-bound ERs is consistently less than that achieved with the other ligands, presumably caused by the fact that ICI rapidly reduces the level of ER in most of the cells examined. However, the ICI-ER complexes that remain are in sufficient quantity to bind to gene activation reporter constructs, and in these cells, ICI still behaves as a pure antagonist of gene transcription and does not activate reporter genes. Hence, obstruction of ER DNA binding or reduction of ER in target cells may contribute to, but cannot fully explain, the pure antagonist character of the antiestrogen ICI 164,384. In addition, DNA binding by the ER alone is clearly not sufficient for ensuring full activation of transcription and argues for an intermediate in the receptor activation of promoters.


Genes & Development | 2011

The multifunctional Ccr4-Not complex directly promotes transcription elongation

Arnob Dutta; Jianhua Fu; David S. Gilmour; Joseph C. Reese

The Ccr4-Not complex has been implicated in the control of multiple steps of mRNA metabolism; however, its functions in transcription remain ambiguous. The discovery that Ccr4/Pop2 is the major cytoplasmic mRNA deadenylase and the detection of Not proteins within mRNA processing bodies have raised questions about the roles of the Ccr4-Not complex in transcription. Here we firmly establish Ccr4-Not as a positive elongation factor for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). The Ccr4-Not complex is targeted to the coding region of genes in a transcription-dependent manner similar to RNAPII and promotes elongation in vivo. Furthermore, Ccr4-Not interacts directly with elongating RNAPII complexes and stimulates transcription elongation of arrested polymerase in vitro. Ccr4-Not can reactivate backtracked RNAPII using a mechanism different from that of the well-characterized elongation factor TFIIS. While not essential for its interaction with elongation complexes, Ccr4-Not interacts with the emerging transcript and promotes elongation in a manner dependent on transcript length, although this interaction is not required for it to bind RNAPII. Our comprehensive analysis shows that Ccr4-Not directly regulates transcription, and suggests it does so by promoting the resumption of elongation of arrested RNAPII when it encounters transcriptional blocks in vivo.


Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | 2012

Ccr4-Not complex: the control freak of eukaryotic cells

Jason E. Miller; Joseph C. Reese

The purpose of this review is to provide an analysis of the latest developments on the functions of the carbon catabolite-repression 4-Not (Ccr4-Not) complex in regulating eukaryotic gene expression. Ccr4-Not is a nine-subunit protein complex that is conserved in sequence and function throughout the eukaryotic kingdom. Although Ccr4-Not has been studied since the 1980s, our understanding of what it does is constantly evolving. Once thought to solely regulate transcription, it is now clear that it has much broader roles in gene regulation, such as in mRNA decay and quality control, RNA export, translational repression and protein ubiquitylation. The mechanism of actions for each of its functions is still being debated. Some of the difficulty in drawing a clear picture is that it has been implicated in so many processes that regulate mRNAs and proteins in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. We will describe what is known about the Ccr4-Not complex in yeast and other eukaryotes in an effort to synthesize a unified model for how this complex coordinates multiple steps in gene regulation and provide insights into what questions will be most exciting to answer in the future.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2007

Histone Deacetylases RPD3 and HOS2 Regulate the Transcriptional Activation of DNA Damage-Inducible Genes

Vishva Mitra Sharma; Raghuvir S. Tomar; Alison E. Dempsey; Joseph C. Reese

ABSTRACT DNA microarray and genetic studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have demonstrated that histone deacetylases (HDACs) are required for transcriptional activation and repression, but the mechanism by which they activate transcription remains poorly understood. We show that two HDACs, RPD3 and HOS2, are required for the activation of DNA damage-inducible genes RNR3 and HUG1. Using mutants specific for the Rpd3L complex, we show that the complex is responsible for regulating RNR3. Furthermore, unlike what was described for the GAL genes, Rpd3L regulates the activation of RNR3 by deacetylating nucleosomes at the promoter, not at the open reading frame. Rpd3 is recruited to the upstream repression sequence of RNR3, which surprisingly does not require Tup1 or Crt1. Chromatin remodeling and TFIID recruitment are largely unaffected in the Δrpd3/Δhos2 mutant, but the recruitment of RNA polymerase II is strongly reduced, arguing that Rpd3 and Hos2 regulate later stages in the assembly of the preinitiation complex or facilitate multiple rounds of polymerase recruitment. Furthermore, the histone H4 acetyltransferase Esa1 is required for the activation of RNR3 and HUG1. Thus, reduced or unregulated constitutive histone H4 acetylation is detrimental to promoter activity, suggesting that HDAC-dependent mechanisms are in place to reset promoters to allow high levels of transcription.


The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | 1993

Hormone binding and transcription activation by estrogen receptors: analyses using mammalian and yeast systems.

Benita S. Katzenellenbogen; Bhavna Bhardwaj; Henry Fang; B.Avery Ince; Farzad Pakde; Joseph C. Reese; David Schodin; Carol K. Wrenn

We have used affinity labeling, site-directed mutagenesis and regional chemical mutagenesis in order to determine regions of the human estrogen receptor (ER) important in hormone binding, ligand discrimination between estrogens and antiestrogens, and transcriptional activation. Affinity labeling studies with the antiestrogen, tamoxifen aziridine and the estrogen, ketononestrol aziridine have identified cysteine 530 in the ER hormone binding domain as the primary site of labeling. In the absence of a cysteine at 530 (i.e. C530 mutant), C381 becomes the site of estrogen-compatible tamoxifen aziridine labeling. Hence these two residues, although far apart in the primary linear sequence of the ER protein, must be close in the three-dimensional structure of the protein, in the ER ligand binding pocket, so that the ligand can reach either site. Site-directed mutagenesis of selected residues in the ER and region-specific chemical mutagenesis of the ER hormone binding domain with initial phenotypic screening in yeast have enabled the identification of a region near C530 important in discrimination between estrogens and antiestrogens and of other residues important in hormone-dependent transcriptional activation. Some ER mutants with alterations in the carboxy-terminal portion of the hormone binding domain are transcriptionally inactive yet bind hormone and also function as potent dominant negative ERs, suppressing the activity of wild-type ER at low concentrations. These studies reveal a separation of the hormone binding and transcription activation functions of the ER. They are also beginning to provide a more detailed picture of the ER hormone binding domain and amino acids important in ligand binding and discrimination between different categories of agonist and antagonist ligands. Such information will be important in the design of maximally effective antiestrogens. In addition, since there is now substantial evidence for a mixture of wild-type and variant ERs in breast cancers, our studies should provide insight about the bioactivities of these variant receptors and their roles in modulating the activity of wild type ER, and should lead to a better understanding of the possible role of variant receptors in altered response or resistance to antiestrogen and endocrine therapy in breast cancer. In addition, some dominant negative receptors may prove useful in examining ER mechanisms of action and in suppressing the estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer cells.


The EMBO Journal | 2004

Ssn6–Tup1 requires the ISW2 complex to position nucleosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Zhengjian Zhang; Joseph C. Reese

The Imitation SWItch (ISWI) chromatin remodeling factors have been implicated in nucleosome positioning. In vitro, they can mobilize nucleosomes bi‐directionally, making it difficult to envision how they can establish precise translational positioning of nucleosomes in vivo. It has been proposed that they require other cellular factors to do so, but none has been identified thus far. Here, we demonstrate that both ISW2 and TUP1 are required to position nucleosomes across the entire coding sequence of the DNA damage‐inducible gene RNR3. The chromatin structure downstream of the URS is indistinguishable in Δisw2 and Δtup1 mutants, and the crosslinking of Tup1 and Isw2 to RNR3 is independent of each other, indicating that both complexes are required to maintain repressive chromatin structure. Furthermore, Tup1 repressed RNR3 and blocked preinitiation complex formation in the Δisw2 mutant, even though nucleosome positioning was completely disrupted over the promoter and ORF. Our study has revealed a novel collaboration between two nucleosome‐positioning activities in vivo, and suggests that disruption of nucleosome positioning is insufficient to cause a high level of transcription.


Current Opinion in Genetics & Development | 2003

Basal transcription factors.

Joseph C. Reese

The functions of the basal transcription factors involved in RNA polymerase II dependent transcription have been the focus of many years of biochemical analysis. Recent advances have shed some light on the structure of these factors, how conformational changes and intramolecular interactions regulate activity, and have revealed an expanded role for TFIIH in nuclear transcription.


PLOS ONE | 2009

The C-terminal domain of CENP-C displays multiple and critical functions for mammalian centromere formation.

Stefania Trazzi; Giovanni Perini; Roberto Bernardoni; Monica Zoli; Joseph C. Reese; Andrea Musacchio; Giuliano Della Valle

CENP-C is a fundamental component of functional centromeres. The elucidation of its structure-function relationship with centromeric DNA and other kinetochore proteins is critical to the understanding of centromere assembly. CENP-C carries two regions, the central and the C-terminal domains, both of which are important for the ability of CENP-C to associate with the centromeric DNA. However, while the central region is largely divergent in CENP-C homologues, the C-terminal moiety contains two regions that are highly conserved from yeast to humans, named Mif2p homology domains (blocks II and III). The activity of these two domains in human CENP-C is not well defined. In this study we performed a functional dissection of C-terminal CENP-C region analyzing the role of single Mif2p homology domains through in vivo and in vitro assays. By immunofluorescence and Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP) we were able to elucidate the ability of the Mif2p homology domain II to target centromere and contact alpha satellite DNA. We also investigate the interactions with other conserved inner kinetochore proteins by means of coimmunoprecipitation and bimolecular fluorescence complementation on cell nuclei. We found that the C-terminal region of CENP-C (Mif2p homology domain III) displays multiple activities ranging from the ability to form higher order structures like homo-dimers and homo-oligomers, to mediate interaction with CENP-A and histone H3. Overall, our findings support a model in which the Mif2p homology domains of CENP-C, by virtue of their ability to establish multiple contacts with DNA and centromere proteins, play a critical role in the structuring of kinethocore chromatin.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2000

Identification of a Yeast Transcription Factor IID Subunit, TSG2/TAF48

Joseph C. Reese; Zhengjian Zhang; Harsha Kurpad

The RNA polymerase II general transcription factor TFIID is a complex containing the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and associated factors (TAFs). We have used a mutant allele of the gene encoding yeast TAFII68/61p to analyze its functionin vivo. We provide biochemical and genetic evidence that the C-terminal α-helix of TAFII68/61p is required for its direct interaction with TBP, the stable incorporation of TBP into the TFIID complex, the integrity of the TFIID complex, and the transcription of most genes in vivo. This is the first evidence that a yeast TAFII other than TAFII145/130 interacts with TBP, and the implications of this on the interpretation of data obtained studying TAFIImutants in vivo are discussed. We have identified a high copy suppressor of the TAF68/61 mutation, TSG2, that has sequence similarity to a region of the SAGA subunit Ada1. We demonstrate that it directly interacts with TAFII68/61pin vitro, is a component of TFIID, is required for the stability of the complex in vivo, and is necessary for the transcription of many yeast genes. On the basis of these functions, we propose that Tsg2/TAFII48p is the histone 2A-like dimerization partner for the histone 2B-like TAFII68/61p in the yeast TFIID complex.

Collaboration


Dive into the Joseph C. Reese's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zhengjian Zhang

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael R. Green

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arnob Dutta

Stowers Institute for Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jianhua Fu

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suting Zheng

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hesheng Zhang

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bing Li

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David S. Gilmour

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason E. Miller

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jerry L. Workman

Stowers Institute for Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge