Joseph DiRocco

Dynamic alveolar mechanics and ventilator-induced lung injury.

Objectives:To review the mechanism of dynamic alveolar mechanics (i.e., the dynamic change in alveolar size and shape during ventilation) in both the normal and acutely injured lung; to investigate the alteration in alveolar mechanics secondary to acute lung injury as a mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI); and to examine the hypothesis that the reduced morbidity and mortality associated with protective strategies of mechanical ventilation is related to the normalization of alveolar mechanics. Data Extraction and Synthesis:This review is based on original published articles and review papers dealing with the mechanism of lung volume change at the alveolar level and the role of altered alveolar mechanics as a mechanism of VILI. In addition, data from our laboratory directly visualizing dynamic alveolar mechanics is reviewed and related to the literature. Conclusions:The mechanism of alveolar inflation in normal lungs is unclear. Nonetheless, normal alveoli are very stable and change size very little with ventilation. Acute lung injury causes marked destabilization of individual alveoli. Alveolar instability causes pulmonary damage and is believed to be a major component in the mechanism of VILI. Ventilator strategies that reduce alveolar instability may potentially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with VILI.

The role of time and pressure on alveolar recruitment

Inappropriate mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and increase the morbidity and mortality. Reopening collapsed lung units may significantly reduce VILI, but the mechanisms governing lung recruitment are unclear. We thus investigated the dynamics of lung recruitment at the alveolar level. Rats (n = 6) were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. The lungs were then lavaged with saline to simulate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A left thoracotomy was performed, and an in vivo microscope was placed on the lung surface. The lung was recruited to three recruitment pressures (RP) of 20, 30, or 40 cmH(2)O for 40 s while subpleural alveoli were continuously filmed. Following measurement of microscopic alveolar recruitment, the lungs were excised, and macroscopic gross lung recruitment was digitally filmed. Recruitment was quantified by computer image analysis, and data were interpreted using a mathematical model. The majority of alveolar recruitment (78.3 +/- 7.4 and 84.6 +/- 5.1%) occurred in the first 2 s (T2) following application of RP 30 and 40, respectively. Only 51.9 +/- 5.4% of the microscopic field was recruited by T2 with RP 20. There was limited recruitment from T2 to T40 at all RPs. The majority of gross lung recruitment also occurred by T2 with gradual recruitment to T40. The data were accurately predicted by a mathematical model incorporating the effects of both pressure and time. Alveolar recruitment is determined by the magnitude of recruiting pressure and length of time pressure is applied, a concept supported by our mathematical model. Such a temporal dependence of alveolar recruitment needs to be considered when recruitment maneuvers for clinical application are designed.

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume on lung injury induced by alveolar instability

IntroductionOne potential mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is due to shear stresses associated with alveolar instability (recruitment/derecruitment). It has been postulated that the optimal combination of tidal volume (Vt) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) stabilizes alveoli, thus diminishing recruitment/derecruitment and reducing VILI. In this study we directly visualized the effect of Vt and PEEP on alveolar mechanics and correlated alveolar stability with lung injury.MethodsIn vivo microscopy was utilized in a surfactant deactivation porcine ARDS model to observe the effects of Vt and PEEP on alveolar mechanics. In phase I (n = 3), nine combinations of Vt and PEEP were evaluated to determine which combination resulted in the most and least alveolar instability. In phase II (n = 6), data from phase I were utilized to separate animals into two groups based on the combination of Vt and PEEP that caused the most alveolar stability (high Vt [15 cc/kg] plus low PEEP [5 cmH2O]) and least alveolar stability (low Vt [6 cc/kg] and plus PEEP [20 cmH2O]). The animals were ventilated for three hours following lung injury, with in vivo alveolar stability measured and VILI assessed by lung function, blood gases, morphometrically, and by changes in inflammatory mediators.ResultsHigh Vt/low PEEP resulted in the most alveolar instability and lung injury, as indicated by lung function and morphometric analysis of lung tissue. Low Vt/high PEEP stabilized alveoli, improved oxygenation, and reduced lung injury. There were no significant differences between groups in plasma or bronchoalveolar lavage cytokines or proteases.ConclusionA ventilatory strategy employing high Vt and low PEEP causes alveolar instability, and to our knowledge this is the first study to confirm this finding by direct visualization. These studies demonstrate that low Vt and high PEEP work synergistically to stabilize alveoli, although increased PEEP is more effective at stabilizing alveoli than reduced Vt. In this animal model of ARDS, alveolar instability results in lung injury (VILI) with minimal changes in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage cytokines and proteases. This suggests that the mechanism of lung injury in the high Vt/low PEEP group was mechanical, not inflammatory in nature.

Alveolar instability caused by mechanical ventilation initially damages the nondependent normal lung

BackgroundSeptic shock is often associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome, a serious clinical problem exacerbated by improper mechanical ventilation. Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) can exacerbate the lung injury caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome, significantly increasing the morbidity and mortality. In this study, we asked the following questions: what is the effect of the lung position (dependent lung versus nondependent lung) on the rate at which VILI occurs in the normal lung? Will positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) slow the progression of lung injury in either the dependent lung or the nondependent lung?Materials and methodsSprague–Dawley rats (n = 19) were placed on mechanical ventilation, and the subpleural alveolar mechanics were measured with an in vivo microscope. Animals were placed in the lateral decubitus position, left lung up to measure nondependent alveolar mechanics and left lung down to film dependent alveolar mechanics. Animals were ventilated with a high peak inspiratory pressure of 45 cmH2O and either a low PEEP of 3 cmH2O or a high PEEP of 10 cmH2O for 90 minutes. Animals were separated into four groups based on the lung position and the amount of PEEP: Group I, dependent + low PEEP (n = 5); Group II, nondependent + low PEEP (n = 4);Group III, dependent + high PEEP (n = 5); and Group IV, nondependent + high PEEP (n = 5). Hemodynamic and lung function parameters were recorded concomitant with the filming of alveolar mechanics. Histological assessment was performed at necropsy to determine the presence of lung edema.ResultsVILI occurred earliest (60 min) in Group II. Alveolar instability eventually developed in Groups I and II at 75 minutes. Alveoli in both the high PEEP groups were stable for the entire experiment. There were no significant differences in arterial PO2 or in the degree of edema measured histologically among experimental groups.ConclusionThis open-chest animal model demonstrates that the position of the normal lung (dependent or nondependent) plays a role on the rate of VILI.

Absence of Alveolar Tears in Rat Lungs with Significant Alveolar Instability

Background: Lung injury associated with the acute respiratory distress syndrome can be exacerbated by improper mechanical ventilation creating a secondary injury known as ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). We hypothesized that VILI could be caused in part by alveolar recruitment/derecruitment resulting in gross tearing of the alveolus. Objectives: The exact mechanism of VILI has yet to be elucidated though multiple hypotheses have been proposed. In this study we tested the hypothesis that gross alveolar tearing plays a key role in the pathogenesis of VILI. Methods: Anesthetized rats were ventilated and instrumented for hemodynamic and blood gas measurements. Following baseline readings, rats were exposed to 90 min of either normal ventilation (control group: respiratory rate 35 min–1, positive end-expiratory pressure 3 cm H2O, peak inflation pressure 14 cm H2O) or injurious ventilation (VILI group: respiratory rate 20 min–1, positive end-expiratory pressure 0 cm H2O, peak inflation pressure 45 cm H2O). Parameters studied included hemodynamics, pulmonary variables, in vivovideo microscopy of alveolar mechanics (i.e. dynamic alveolar recruitment/derecruitment) and scanning electron microscopy to detect gross tears on the alveolar surface. Results: Injurious ventilation significantly increased alveolar instability after 45 min and alveoli remained unstable until the end of the study (electron microscopy after 90 min revealed that injurious ventilation did not cause gross tears in the alveolar surface). Conclusions: We demonstrated that alveolar instability induced by injurous ventilation does not cause gross alveolar tears, suggesting that the tissue injury in this animal VILI model is due to a mechanism other than gross rupture of the alveolus.