Joseph Yanchunas

Involvement of DPP‐IV catalytic residues in enzyme–saxagliptin complex formation

The inhibition of DPP‐IV by saxagliptin has been proposed to occur through formation of a covalent but reversible complex. To evaluate further the mechanism of inhibition, we determined the X‐ray crystal structure of the DPP‐IV:saxagliptin complex. This structure reveals covalent attachment between S630 and the inhibitor nitrile carbon (C–O distance <1.3 Å). To investigate whether this serine addition is assisted by the catalytic His‐Asp dyad, we generated two mutants of DPP‐IV, S630A and H740Q, and assayed them for ability to bind inhibitor. DPP‐IVH740Q bound saxagliptin with an ∼1000‐fold reduction in affinity relative to DPP‐IVWT, while DPP‐IVS630A showed no evidence for binding inhibitor. An analog of saxagliptin lacking the nitrile group showed unchanged binding properties to the both mutant proteins, highlighting the essential role S630 and H740 play in covalent bond formation between S630 and saxagliptin. Further supporting mechanism‐based inhibition by saxagliptin, NMR spectra of enzyme–saxagliptin complexes revealed the presence of three downfield resonances with low fractionation factors characteristic of short and strong hydrogen bonds (SSHB). Comparison of the NMR spectra of various wild‐type and mutant DPP‐IV:ligand complexes enabled assignment of a resonance at ∼14 ppm to H740. Two additional DPP‐IV mutants, Y547F and Y547Q, generated to probe potential stabilization of the enzyme–inhibitor complex by this residue, did not show any differences in inhibitor binding either by ITC or NMR. Together with the previously published enzymatic data, the structural and binding data presented here strongly support a histidine‐assisted covalent bond formation between S630 hydroxyl oxygen and the nitrile group of saxagliptin.

Correlation of High-Throughput Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) Transactivation and Binding Assays

Pregnane X receptor (PXR) transactivation and binding assays have been developed into high-throughput assays, which are robust and reproducible (Z′ > 0.5). For most compounds, there was a good correlation between the results of the transactivation and binding assays. EC50 values of compounds in the transactivation assay correlated reasonably well with their IC50 values in the binding assay. However, there were discrepancies with some compounds showing high binding affinity in the binding assay translated into low transactivation. The most likely cause for these discrepancies was an agonist-dependent relationship between binding affinity and transactivation response. In general, compounds that bound to human PXR and transactivated PXR tended to be large hydrophobic molecules.

Molecular Basis for Increased Susceptibility of Isolates with Atazanavir Resistance-Conferring Substitution I50L to Other Protease Inhibitors

ABSTRACT Protease inhibitors (PIs) are highly effective drugs against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), yet long-term therapeutic use is limited by emergence of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) protease substitutions that confer cross-resistance to multiple protease inhibitor drugs. Atazanavir is a highly potent HIV protease inhibitor with a distinct resistance profile that includes effectiveness against most HIV-1 isolates resistant to one or two PIs. The signature resistance substitution for atazanavir is I50L, and it is frequently (53%) accompanied by a compensatory A71V substitution that helps restore viability and increases atazanavir resistance levels. We measured the binding affinities of wild-type (WT) and I50L/A71V HIV-1 proteases to atazanavir and other currently approved PIs (ritonavir, lopinavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, and amprenavir) by isothermal titration calorimetry. Remarkably, we find that all of the PIs have 2- to 10-fold increased affinities for I50L/A71V protease, except for atazanavir. The results are also manifested by thermal stability measures of affinity for WT and I50L/A71V proteases. Additional biophysical and enzyme kinetics experiments show I50L/A71V protease is a stable enzyme with catalytic activity that is slightly reduced (34%) relative to the WT. Computational modeling reveals that the unique resistance phenotype of I50L/A71V protease likely originates from bulky tert-butyl groups at P2 and P2′ (specific to atazanavir) that sterically clash with methyl groups on residue L50. The results of this study provide a molecular understanding of the novel hypersusceptibility of atazanavir-resistant I50L/A71V-containing clinical isolates to other currently approved PIs.

Design, structure-activity relationships, X-ray crystal structure, and energetic contributions of a critical P1 pharmacophore: 3-chloroindole-7-yl-based factor Xa inhibitors.

An indole-based P1 moiety was incorporated into a previously established factor Xa inhibitor series. The indole group was designed to hydrogen-bond with the carbonyl of Gly218, while its 3-methyl or 3-chloro substituent was intended to interact with Tyr228. These interactions were subsequently observed in the X-ray crystal structure of compound 18. SAR studies led to the identification of compound 20 as the most potent FXa inhibitor in this series (IC(50) = 2.4 nM, EC(2xPT) = 1.2 microM). An in-depth energetic analysis suggests that the increased binding energy of 3-chloroindole-versus 3-methylindole-containing compounds in this series is due primarily to (a) the more hydrophobic nature of chloro- versus methyl-containing compounds and (b) an increased interaction of 3-chloroindole versus 3-methylindole with Gly218 backbone. The stronger hydrophobicity of chloro- versus methyl-substituted aromatics may partly explain the general preference for chloro- versus methyl-substituted P1 groups in FXa, which extends beyond the current series.

Comparative studies of active site–ligand interactions among various recombinant constructs of human β-amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) cleaving enzyme (BACE) is the enzyme responsible for beta-site cleavage of APP, leading to the formation of the amyloid-beta peptide that is thought to be pathogenic in Alzheimers disease (AD). Hence, BACE is an attractive pharmacological target, and numerous research groups have begun searching for potent and selective inhibitors of this enzyme as a potential mechanism for therapeutic intervention in AD. The mature enzyme is composed of a globular catalytic domain that is N-linked glycosylated in mammalian cells, a single transmembrane helix that anchors the enzyme to an intracellular membrane, and a short C-terminal domain that extends outside the phospholipid bilayer of the membrane. Here we have compared the substrate and active site-directed inhibitor binding properties of several recombinant constructs of human BACE. The constructs studied here address the importance of catalytic domain glycosylation state, inclusion of domains other than the catalytic domain, and incorporation into a membrane bilayer on the interactions of the enzyme active site with peptidic ligands. We find no significant differences in ligand binding properties among these various constructs. These data demonstrate that the nonglycosylated, soluble catalytic domain of BACE faithfully reflects the ligand binding properties of the full-length mature enzyme in its natural membrane environment. Thus, the use of the nonglycosylated, soluble catalytic domain of BACE is appropriate for studies aimed at understanding the determinants of ligand recognition by the enzyme active site.

Structural and functional characterization of CFE88: Evidence that a conserved and essential bacterial protein is a methyltransferase

CFE88 is a conserved essential gene product from Streptococcus pneumoniae. This 227‐residue protein has minimal sequence similarity to proteins of known 3Dstructure. Sequence alignment models and computational protein threading studies suggest that CFE88 is a methyltransferase. Characterization of the conformation and function of CFE88 has been performed by using several techniques. Backbone atom and limited side‐chain atom NMR resonance assignments have been obtained. The data indicate that CFE88 has two domains: an N‐terminal domain with 163 residues and a C‐terminal domain with 64 residues. The C‐terminal domain is primarily helical, while the N‐terminal domain has a mixed helical/extended (Rossmann) fold. By aligning the experimentally observed elements of secondary structure, an initial unrefined model of CFE88 has been constructed based on the X‐ray structure of ErmC′ methyltransferase (Protein Data Bank entry 1QAN). NMR and biophysical studies demonstrate binding of S‐adenosyl‐L‐homocysteine (SAH) to CFE88; these interactions have been localized by NMR to the predicted active site in the N‐terminal domain. Mutants that target this predicted active site (H26W, E46R, and E46W) have been constructed and characterized. Overall, our results both indicate that CFE88 is a methyltransferase and further suggest that the methyltransferase activity is essential for bacterial survival.