Julie Coffey

Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND The value of continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus has not been determined. METHODS In a multicenter clinical trial, we randomly assigned 322 adults and children who were already receiving intensive therapy for type 1 diabetes to a group with continuous glucose monitoring or to a control group performing home monitoring with a blood glucose meter. All the patients were stratified into three groups according to age and had a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.0 to 10.0%. The primary outcome was the change in the glycated hemoglobin level at 26 weeks. RESULTS The changes in glycated hemoglobin levels in the two study groups varied markedly according to age group (P=0.003), with a significant difference among patients 25 years of age or older that favored the continuous-monitoring group (mean difference in change, -0.53%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.71 to -0.35; P<0.001). The between-group difference was not significant among those who were 15 to 24 years of age (mean difference, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.33; P=0.52) or among those who were 8 to 14 years of age (mean difference, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.11; P=0.29). Secondary glycated hemoglobin outcomes were better in the continuous-monitoring group than in the control group among the oldest and youngest patients but not among those who were 15 to 24 years of age. The use of continuous glucose monitoring averaged 6.0 or more days per week for 83% of patients 25 years of age or older, 30% of those 15 to 24 years of age, and 50% of those 8 to 14 years of age. The rate of severe hypoglycemia was low and did not differ between the two study groups; however, the trial was not powered to detect such a difference. CONCLUSIONS Continuous glucose monitoring can be associated with improved glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Further work is needed to identify barriers to effectiveness of continuous monitoring in children and adolescents. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00406133.)

Comparison of fingerstick hemoglobin A1c levels assayed by DCA 2000 with the DCCT/EDIC central laboratory assay: results of a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study.

Abstract:  Background:  The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for measuring hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) serves as a reference standard against which other assays are compared. The DCA 2000® + Analyzer (Bayer Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA), which uses an immunoassay, is a very popular device for measuring HbA1c levels in pediatric diabetes practices.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: 12-Month Follow-Up of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the pediatric population is not well characterized. We have evaluated the use of CGM over a 12-month interval in youth with type 1 diabetes (TID) and have provided a description of CGM use. METHODS Eighty subjects 8-17 years old with T1D and baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >or=7.0% used CGM as part of a 6-month randomized trial and subsequent 6-month extension study. Outcomes included frequency of CGM use, HbA1c levels, rate of severe hypoglycemia, and a CGM satisfaction scale. RESULTS Seventy-six (95%) of 80 subjects were using CGM after 6 months (median use = 5.5 days/week) compared with 67 (84%) after 12 months (median use = 4.0 days/week). The 17 subjects using CGM >or=6 days/week in month 12 had substantially greater improvement from baseline in HbA1c than did the 63 subjects using CGM <6 days/week in month 12 (mean change - 0.8 +/- 0.6% vs. +0.1 +/- 0.7%, P < 0.001). They also reported greater satisfaction with use of CGM (P = 0.001). The incidence of severe hypoglycemic events was low during the 12 months of the study irrespective of the amount of CGM use. CONCLUSIONS In youth with T1D, frequency of use decreases over time. Individuals who use CGM on a near-daily basis can have substantial improvement in glycemic control.

Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with Type 1 diabetes

Diabet. Med. 28, 1118–1122 (2011)

Impaired overnight counterregulatory hormone responses to spontaneous hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes

Abstract:  To assess the changes in counterregulatory hormones overnight after an afternoon of structured exercise or sedentary activity in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) studied 50 children (10 to <18 yr) with T1DM in five clinical research centers on two separate days (with and without an afternoon exercise session) using a crossover design. Glucose, epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, growth hormone (GH), and glucagon concentrations were measured hourly overnight. Nocturnal hypoglycemia [plasma glucose concentrations ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L)] occurred more frequently on the nights following exercise (56 vs. 36%; p = 0.008). Mean hourly concentrations of most hormones did not differ between sedentary or exercise nights or between nights with or without hypoglycemia. Spontaneous nocturnal hypoglycemia only stimulated small increases in plasma epinephrine and GH concentrations and failed to cause a rise in norepinephrine, cortisol, or glucagon levels in comparison with values during the hour before or after hypoglycemia or other times during those same nights. Counterregulatory hormone responses to spontaneous nocturnal hypoglycemia were markedly decreased regardless of whether there was antecedent afternoon exercise in children with T1DM. Sleep‐induced impairments in counterregulatory hormone responses likely contribute to the increased risk of hypoglycemia during the entire overnight period in youth with T1DM.

Educating Families on Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring The DirecNet Navigator Pilot Study Experience

Purpose The purpose of this article is to describe the process of educating families and children with type 1 diabetes on real time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) and to note the similarities and differences of training patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple daily injections (MDI). Methods A total of 30 CSII participants and 27 MDI participants were educated using the Navigator RT-CGM in a clinical trial. Time spent with families for visits and calls was tracked and compared between patient groups. The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) educators were surveyed to assess the most crucial, time intensive, and difficult educational concepts related to CGM. Results Of the 27 MDI families, an average of 9.6 hours was spent on protocol-prescribed visits and calls (not measured in CSII) and 2 hours on participant-initiated contacts over 3 months. MDI families required an average of 5.4 more phone contacts over 3 months than CSII families. According to the DirecNet educators, lag time and calibrations were the most crucial teaching concepts for successful RT-CGM use. The most time was spent on teaching technical aspects, troubleshooting, and insulin dosing. The most unanticipated difficulties were skin problems including irritation and the sensor not adhering well. Conclusion Educators who teach RT-CGM should emphasize lag time and calibration techniques, technical device training, and sensor insertion. Follow-up focus should include insulin dosing adjustments and skin issues. The time and effort required to introduce RT-CGM provided an opportunity for the diabetes educators to reemphasize good diabetes care practices and promote self-awareness and autonomy to patients and families.

Skin and Adhesive Issues With Continuous Glucose Monitors A Sticky Situation

Background: The purpose of this article is to describe challenges associated with successful use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) by young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to detail the techniques and products used to improve the duration of sensor wear. Methods: The DirecNet Study Group conducted 2 studies in 169 children with T1D between the ages of 1 and 9 years who were instructed to wear a CGM device daily. Problems related to skin irritation and sensor adhesiveness in these young children presented challenges to daily use of the CGM. Study coordinators instituted a variety of techniques using commercially available products to attempt to overcome these problems. Results: Three primary factors that contributed to reduced CGM use were identified: the limited body surface area in smaller children, ambient temperature and humidity, as well as the type and duration of physical activity. Using supplemental products to minimize the impact of these factors resulted in improved adherence and reduced skin irritation. Conclusion: Achieving satisfactory adhesion of the CGM sensor and transmitter may involve finding the right supplemental product or combination of products through trial and error. Optimizing adhesion and minimizing skin irritation can significantly improve duration of use and tolerability of CGM devices by young children.

Extended 6-Month Follow-Up of A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Young Children Aged 4 to <10 Years

In a 6-month randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in children 4–9 years of age with type 1 diabetes (1), the DirecNet Study Group reported no difference in change in A1C between the CGM and usual care groups, although parents expressed high satisfaction with use of CGM. In a 6-month posttrial phase, the CGM group continued to use CGM and the control group was started on CGM. This observation provides a summary of the findings for both groups during this posttrial phase. Sixty-four of the 69 children in the CGM group who completed the trial participated in the extension phase; all 64 completed the 12-month visit. Baseline A1C was 7.9 ± 0.8 and 7.8 ± 0.8% at the beginning of the extension phase and 7.9 ± 0.8% at 12 months. During the extension phase, A1C decreased ≥0.5% in 14% and increased ≥0.5% in 25%. Sensor use dropped from a median of 92 h/week at 6 months to …