Julieta C. Martinelli
Macquarie University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Julieta C. Martinelli.
Scientific Data | 2016
Joshua S. Madin; Kristen D. Anderson; Magnus Heide Andreasen; Tom C. L. Bridge; Stephen D. Cairns; Sean R. Connolly; Emily S. Darling; Marcela Diaz; Daniel S. Falster; Erik C. Franklin; Ruth D. Gates; Mia O. Hoogenboom; Danwei Huang; Sally A. Keith; Matthew A. Kosnik; Chao-Yang Kuo; Janice M. Lough; Catherine E. Lovelock; Osmar J. Luiz; Julieta C. Martinelli; Toni Mizerek; John M. Pandolfi; Xavier Pochon; Morgan S. Pratchett; Hollie M. Putnam; T. Edward Roberts; Michael Stat; Carden C. Wallace; Elizabeth Widman; Andrew Baird
Trait-based approaches advance ecological and evolutionary research because traits provide a strong link to an organism’s function and fitness. Trait-based research might lead to a deeper understanding of the functions of, and services provided by, ecosystems, thereby improving management, which is vital in the current era of rapid environmental change. Coral reef scientists have long collected trait data for corals; however, these are difficult to access and often under-utilized in addressing large-scale questions. We present the Coral Trait Database initiative that aims to bring together physiological, morphological, ecological, phylogenetic and biogeographic trait information into a single repository. The database houses species- and individual-level data from published field and experimental studies alongside contextual data that provide important framing for analyses. In this data descriptor, we release data for 56 traits for 1547 species, and present a collaborative platform on which other trait data are being actively federated. Our overall goal is for the Coral Trait Database to become an open-source, community-led data clearinghouse that accelerates coral reef research.
PALAIOS | 2013
Julieta C. Martinelli; Sandra Gordillo; Fernando Archuby
ABSTRACT Drilling predation is frequently studied in the fossil record. Less information is available from recent environments, however. Previous studies have indicated that drilling predation is usually higher in the tropics but little research has been undertaken in high latitudes. To address this hypothesis, we examine muricid-drilling predation along a 1,000 km transect in southern South America. Drilling frequencies ranged between 3% and 36%, and they were not correlated with the abundance of the predator (Trophon geversianus) or the abundance of its preferred prey. The only locality with exceptionally high predation (36%) was a heavily anthropogenically impacted site. Trophon exhibited different drilling strategies on different prey, and edge drilling represented 27%–56% of the drill holes in mytilids. Drilling frequencies were not correlated with latitude or water temperature. Our results, however, show that drilling frequencies are indeed lower at high latitudes compared to the tropics, and these data provide a recent baseline to compare and interpret spatial variability in muricid drilling predation from past environments. The fact that dead-shell assemblages seem to be recording human-related impacts in this system strengthens their relevance as potentially valuable conservation tools.
PALAIOS | 2015
Fernando Archuby; Mariana Laura Adami; Julieta C. Martinelli; Sandra Gordillo; Gabriela M. Boretto; Mariano E. Malvé
Abstract The use of rocky intertidal assemblages in paleoecology and conservation paleobiology studies is limited because these environments have low preservation potential. Here, we evaluate the fidelity between living intertidal mussel bed communities (life assemblages or LAs) and mollusk shell accumulations (death assemblages or DAs) from the environmentally harsh Patagonian Atlantic Coast. LAs were sampled from rocky mid-intertidal and mussel-dominated habitats while DAs were collected from the high water mark at beaches in close proximity to the living intertidal community to assess live-dead mismatch at regional scales. DAs were restricted to the subset of species in the DAs that inhabit rocky intertidal habitats. A total of 37,193 mollusk specimens from 15 intertidal species were included in the analysis. Ten species were present in LAs, 14 in DAs, and nine were shared by LAs and DAs. DAs showed higher diversity, less dominance, and more rare species than LAs. Despite finding good agreement in species composition between DAs and LAs within the same region, smaller species are underrepresented, as shown by differences in size-frequency distributions. Our findings indicate that the composition of DAs is a result of the combined effects of spatial and temporal averaging, size-related biases, and biases related to low detectability of boring and vagile species in LAs. Thus, DAs do not accurately detect within-provincial latitudinal gradients in composition. However, DAs clearly capture differences between the Argentine–Magellanic Transition Zone and the Magellanic Province, indicating that DAs are informative tools at regional scales despite the environmental harshness to which they are subjected.
PALAIOS | 2015
Julieta C. Martinelli; Matthew A. Kosnik; Joshua S. Madin
Abstract Predation is frequently suggested to be a key biotic process that can shape ecological communities and drive coevolution. The premise behind these hypotheses is that predators select prey to ensure maximum gain per unit effort; for example, by selecting species that are more abundant or accessible. In this study, we tested for predator selectivity in a tropical molluscan assemblage by quantifying the influence of relative abundance (encounter frequency) on predation frequencies. We collected macromollusks (> 4 mm) from 15 sites in three soft-sediment reef lagoons at One Tree Reef (southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia). Dead mollusks were counted and identified to species level (61 species, n = 8131), and species predation frequencies were calculated as the proportion of shells with drill holes. We found that in this infauna-dominated community, levels of drilling predation were low (7.14% on average), and there was no evidence that predators selected prey based on encounter frequency. This result was consistent across prey species and lagoons. Thus, drilling predators did not specialize on more accessible prey species and were not a major cause of mortality in this modern macromollusk assemblage. Since drilling gastropods are size selective, lack of selectivity in our samples only applies to the prey size range considered. Detailed studies of prey morphological traits, as well as accounting for predator non-consumptive effects could shed light on the preferences and relevance of drilling gastropods in this soft-sediment carbonate reef assemblage.
Scientific Data | 2017
Joshua S. Madin; Kristen D. Anderson; Magnus Heide Andreasen; Tom C. L. Bridge; Stephen D. Cairns; Sean R. Connolly; Emily S. Darling; Marcela Diaz; Daniel S. Falster; Erik C. Franklin; Ruth D. Gates; Aaron M. T. Harmer; Mia O. Hoogenboom; Danwei Huang; Sally A. Keith; Matthew A. Kosnik; Chao-Yang Kuo; Janice M. Lough; Catherine E. Lovelock; Osmar J. Luiz; Julieta C. Martinelli; Toni Mizerek; John M. Pandolfi; Xavier Pochon; Morgan S. Pratchett; Hollie M. Putnam; T. Edward Roberts; Michael Stat; Carden C. Wallace; Elizabeth Widman
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.17.
Marine Pollution Bulletin | 2017
Jane E. Williamson; Evan E. Byrnes; Jennalee A. Clark; David M. Connolly; Sabine Eva Schiller; Jessica A. Thompson; Louise Tosetto; Julieta C. Martinelli; Vincent Raoult
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology | 2016
Julieta C. Martinelli; Joshua S. Madin; Matthew A. Kosnik
Coral Reefs | 2015
Joshua S. Madin; Chao-Yang Kuo; Julieta C. Martinelli; Toni Mizerek; Andrew Baird
Archive | 2017
Julieta C. Martinelli; Luis P. Soto; Jorge González; Marcelo M. Rivadeneira
GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA - 2017 | 2017
Julieta C. Martinelli; Sandra Gordillo; Maria Carla De Aranzamendi; Marcelo M. Rivadeneira