Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jun Li is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jun Li.


Pediatrics | 2008

Cancer incidence among children and adolescents in the United States, 2001-2003.

Jun Li; Trevor D. Thompson; Jacqueline W. Miller; Lori A. Pollack; Sherri L. Stewart

OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to describe current childhood cancer incidence in the United States and identify demographic and geographic variation among children and adolescents with cancer. METHODS. We examined data from 39 National Program of Cancer Registries and 5 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results statewide registries (representing >90% of the US population) to identify cancers diagnosed among persons aged 0 to 19 from 2001–2003. Diagnosed cancers were grouped by the third version of the International Childhood Cancer Classification. Analyses were stratified according to gender, age, race, ethnicity, and US census region. A multivariable negative binomial regression model was used to evaluate demographic and geographic differences in incidence for all cancers combined. RESULTS. We identified 36446 cases of childhood cancer with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 165.92 per million. Stratified analyses showed that, for all cancers combined, boys had a significantly higher rate than girls; children (aged 0–14 years) had a significantly lower rate than adolescents (aged 15–19 years); and white children had the highest incidence rate among all races. Young people living in the Northeast had the highest incidence rate among all US census regions, which may be partially attributed to significantly higher incidence rates for central nervous system neoplasms and lymphomas in this region compared with other US census regions. Negative binomial regression analysis demonstrated that the childhood cancer-incidence rate varied significantly according to gender, age, race, ethnicity, and geography. CONCLUSIONS. This study is the first to demonstrate substantial regional differences in the incidence of childhood cancer. It also shows that incidence varies according to gender, age, race, and ethnicity. Our research findings are useful for prioritizing future childhood cancer research needs.


Pediatrics | 2014

Cancer incidence rates and trends among children and adolescents in the United States, 2001-2009.

David A. Siegel; Jessica B. King; Eric Tai; Natasha Buchanan; Umed A. Ajani; Jun Li

OBJECTIVES: Cancer continues to be the leading disease-related cause of death among children and adolescents in the United States. More current information is needed to describe recent cancer trends and identify demographic and geographic variations. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results statewide registries representing 94.2% of the US population to identify cancers diagnosed among persons aged 0 to 19 years during 2001–2009. Age-adjusted rates and annual percentage change for trends were calculated. Data were stratified by age, gender, race, ethnicity, and geography. RESULTS: We identified 120u2009137 childhood and adolescent cancer cases during 2001–2009 with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 171.01 per million. The overall rate of all cancers combined remained stable over time (annual percent change [APC], 0.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.1 to 0.7). There was an increase in the overall cancer trend among African American children and adolescents (APC, 1.3%; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.5). An increasing trend for thyroid cancer was observed among both genders (APC, 4.9%; 95% CI, 3.2 to 6.6) and specifically among adolescents and those in the Northeast, South, and West regions of the United States. Renal carcinoma incidence was increasing significantly overall (APC, 5.4%; 95% CI, 2.8 to 8.1). Extracranial and extragonadal germ cell tumors and melanoma were both significantly decreasing. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the novel finding that renal carcinoma rates are increasing among children and adolescents. This study confirms that thyroid cancer rates are increasing and further describes rising cancer rates among African Americans.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2011

Melanoma in adolescents and young adults (ages 15-39 years): United States, 1999-2006

Hannah K. Weir; Loraine D. Marrett; Vilma Cokkinides; Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan; Pragna Patel; Eric Tai; Ahmedin Jemal; Jun Li; Julian Kim; Donatus U. Ekwueme

BACKGROUNDnInvasive melanoma of the skin is the third most common cancer diagnosed among adolescents and young adults (aged 15-39 years) in the United States. Understanding the burden of melanoma in this age group is important to identifying areas for etiologic research and in developing effective prevention approaches aimed at reducing melanoma risk.nnnMETHODSnMelanoma incidence data reported from 38 National Program of Cancer Registries and/or Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results statewide cancer registries covering nearly 67.2% of the US population were used to estimate age-adjusted incidence rates for persons 15-39 years of age. Incidence rate ratios were calculated to compare rates between demographic groups.nnnRESULTSnMelanoma incidence was higher among females (age-adjusted incidence rates = 9.74; 95% confidence interval 9.62-9.86) compared with males (age-adjusted incidence rates = 5.77; 95% confidence interval 5.68-5.86), increased with age, and was higher in non-Hispanic white compared with Hispanic white and black, American Indians/Alaskan Natives, and Asian and Pacific Islanders populations. Melanoma incidence rates increased with year of diagnosis in females but not males. The majority of melanomas were diagnosed on the trunk in all racial and ethnic groups among males but only in non-Hispanic whites among females. Most melanomas were diagnosed at localized stage, and among those melanomas with known histology, the majority were superficial spreading.nnnLIMITATIONSnAccuracy of melanoma cases reporting was limited because of some incompleteness (delayed reporting) or nonspecific reporting including large proportion of unspecified histology.nnnCONCLUSIONSnDifferences in incidence rates by anatomic site, histology, and stage among adolescents and young adults by race, ethnicity, and sex suggest that both host characteristics and behaviors influence risk. These data suggest areas for etiologic research around gene-environment interactions and the need for targeted cancer control activities specific to adolescents and young adult populations.


Lung Cancer | 2014

Patterns in lung cancer incidence rates and trends by histologic type in the United States, 2004-2009.

Keisha A. Houston; S. Jane Henley; Jun Li; Mary C. White; Thomas B. Richards

OBJECTIVEnThe examination of lung cancer by histology type is important for monitoring population trends that have implications for etiology and prevention, screening and clinical diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. We provide a comprehensive description of recent histologic lung cancer incidence rates and trends in the USA using combined population-based registry data for the entire nation.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnHistologic lung cancer incidence data was analyzed from CDCs National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the National Cancer Institutes Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Standardized rates and trends were calculated for men and women by age, race/ethnicity, and U.S. Census region. Rate ratios were examined for differences in rates between men and women, and annual percent change was calculated to quantify changes in incidence rates over time.nnnRESULTSnTrend analysis demonstrate that overall rates have decreased, but incidence has remained stable for women aged 50 or older. Adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were the two most common histologic subtypes. Adenocarcinoma rates continued to increase in men and women, and squamous cell rates increased in women only. All histologic subtype rates for white women exceeded rates for black women. Histologic rates for black men exceeded those for white men, except for small cell carcinoma. The incidence rate for Hispanics was nearly half the rate for blacks and whites.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe continuing rise in incidence of lung adenocarcinoma, the rise of squamous cell cancer in women, and differences by age, race, ethnicity and region points to the need to better understand factors acting in addition to, or in synergy with, cigarette smoking that may be contributing to observed differences in lung cancer histology.


The Journal of Urology | 2014

Continued Increase in Incidence of Renal Cell Carcinoma, Especially in Young Patients and High Grade Disease: United States 2001 to 2010

Sallyann M. Coleman King; Lori A. Pollack; Jun Li; Jessica B. King; Viraj Master

PURPOSEnMore than 50,000 Americans were diagnosed with kidney and renal pelvis cancer in 2010. The National Program of Cancer Registries and SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) combined data include cancer incidences from the entire United States. Our study presents updated incidence data, evaluates trends and adds geographic distribution to the literature.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnWe examined invasive, microscopically confirmed kidney and renal pelvis cancers diagnosed from 2001 to 2010 that met United States Cancer Statistics reporting criteria for each year, excluding cases diagnosed by autopsy or death certificate. Histology codes classified cases as renal cell carcinoma. Rates and trends were estimated using SEER∗Stat.nnnRESULTSnA total of 342,501 renal cell carcinoma cases were diagnosed. The renal cell carcinoma incidence rate increased from 10.6/100,000 individuals in 2001 to 12.4/100,000 in 2010 and increased with age until ages 70 to 74 years. The incidence rate in men was almost double that in women. The annual percent change was higher in women than in men, in those 20 to 24 years old and in grade III tumors.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe annual percent change incidence increased from 2001 to 2010. Asian/Pacific Islanders and 20 to 24-year-old individuals had the highest annual percent change. While some increase resulted from localized disease, the highest annual percent change was in grade III tumors, indicating more aggressive disease. Continued monitoring of trends and epidemiological study are warranted to determine risk factors.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2011

Subsequent primary cancers among men and women with in situ and invasive melanoma of the skin

Appathurai Balamurugan; Judy R. Rees; Carol Kosary; Sun Hee Rim; Jun Li; Sherri L. Stewart

BACKGROUNDnAn estimated 750,000 melanoma survivors in the United States are at increased risk of subsequent primary cancers.nnnOBJECTIVEnWe sought to assess the risk of developing subsequent primary cancers among people with cutaneous melanoma.nnnMETHODSnUsing 1992 to 2006 data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 40,881 people with in situ melanoma and 76,041 people with invasive melanoma were followed up (mean of 5.6 years) for the development of subsequent primary cancers. The observed number of subsequent cancers was compared with those expected based on age-/race-/year-/site-specific rates in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) (SIR = observed number/expected number) were considered statistically significant if they differed from 1, with an alpha level of 0.05.nnnRESULTSnAfter a first primary in situ melanoma, risk was significantly elevated for subsequent invasive melanoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia among men (SIRs = 8.43 and 1.44, respectively) and women (SIRs = 12.33 and 1.79, respectively). After a first primary invasive melanoma, risk was significantly elevated for subsequent invasive melanoma, thyroid cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia among both men (SIRs = 12.50, 2.67, 1.56, and 1.57, respectively) and women (SIRs = 15.67, 1.77, 1.42, and 1.63, respectively).nnnLIMITATIONSnCase ascertainment issues particularly affecting in situ melanoma cases could affect results. The role of detection bias in the diagnoses of some subsequent cancers cannot be completely eliminated.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe findings of the study should guide the development of strategies such as posttreatment surveillance, screening, and ultraviolet exposure education among melanoma survivors to improve cancer survivorship.


Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine | 2015

Decrease in Prostate Cancer Testing Following the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Recommendations

Jun Li; Zahava Berkowitz; Ingrid J. Hall

Purpose: To assess changes of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing following recent US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate cancer screening recommendations using 2005 to 2013 National Health Interview Survey data. Methods: We calculated the percentage of PSA testing among men ≥40 years by age group and age-adjusted race for each survey year. Differences between years were assessed with linear contrasts after combining all years data. Results: The overall percentage of PSA testing was highest in 2008 and decreased significantly in 2013. Compared with 2008, each age group had significantly lower screening percentages in 2013, especially men ≥75 years old (−14.0% points; P < .001). Both men aged 50 to 74 and men aged ≥75 had significantly lower percentages in 2013 than in 2010. For white and black men, the PSA testing percentages were highest in 2008 and decreased significantly in 2013. Only white men had a significantly lower percentage in 2013 than in 2010. Conclusions: Significant declines in PSA testing from 2008 to 2013 in men ≥75 years old may reflect the impact of the 2008 USPSTF recommendations. While the cause of the decreases in PSA testing between 2010 and 2013 among men aged 50 to 74 years old and white men is unknown, the decreases may suggest the early effects of the 2012 recommendations.


Cancer Epidemiology | 2012

Recent trends in prostate cancer testing and incidence among men under age of 50

Jun Li; Robert R. German; Jessica B. King; Djenaba A. Joseph; Trevor D. Thompson; Xiao Cheng Wu; Umed A. Ajani; Eric Tai

BACKGROUNDnInformation on prostate cancer testing and incidence among men under age 50 is scant. This study aims to describe trends of prostate cancer testing and incidence by demographic and clinical characteristics and identify potential correlations between prostate cancer testing and incidence.nnnMETHODSnWe examined prostate cancer testing and incidence rates among American men under age of 50 using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008) and data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results programs (2001-2006). We conducted descriptive, logistic regression, and trend analyses using SUDAAN and SEER*Stat.nnnRESULTSnThe prostate cancer incidence rate among black men was more than 2-fold that of white men. The overall prostate cancer incidence rate slightly increased from 2001 to 2006; however, the prevalence of prostate cancer testing declined over time. There was a borderline significant increase in prostate cancer incidence rate (APC=3.5, 95% CI=0.0, 7.0) for men aged 40-44. Well-differentiated prostate cancer incidence decreased significantly (APC=-24.7; 95% confidence interval (CI)=-34.9, -12.8) over time.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWe observed a large difference in prostate cancer incidence between blacks and whites under age 50. Similar patterns in prostate cancer testing and cancer incidence by race and ethnicity suggested prostate cancer testing might have influenced incidence to some extent in this young population. The different temporal patterns for prostate cancer testing and incidence, especially for men aged 40-44 years, suggested screening alone could not fully accounted for the increasing prostate cancer incidence rates. Decreasing trend of well-differentiated prostate cancer may be partially due to Grade Inflation.


JAMA Pediatrics | 2010

Differences in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Survival Between Young Adults and Children

Eric Tai; Lori A. Pollack; Julie S. Townsend; Jun Li; C. Brooke Steele; Lisa C. Richardson

OBJECTIVEnTo examine differences in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survival between young adults and children/adolescents.nnnDESIGNnSurvival analysis using 13 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries.nnnSETTINGnCancer survival information from population-based cancer registries from 1992 through 2001.nnnPARTICIPANTSnA total of 2442 cases of NHL among children/adolescents (aged 0-19 years) and young adults (aged 20-29 years).nnnMAIN EXPOSUREnDifferences in NHL survival between young adults and children.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURESnComparison of 5-year survival by constructing Kaplan-Meier survival curves and modeling 5-year survival with multivariate Cox proportional hazards.nnnRESULTSnYoung adults were more likely to die compared with children/adolescents (hazard ratio = 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-2.56) even after accounting for NHL subtype and stage at diagnosis. Persons diagnosed with stage III disease (hazard ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.46) and stage IV disease (hazard ratio = 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.47-4.13) were more likely to die compared with persons diagnosed with stage I disease.nnnCONCLUSIONSnBeing a young adult at diagnosis and having a higher stage of disease at diagnosis were associated with higher risk of death from NHL. Increasing survival with NHL is dependent on receiving appropriate cancer therapy. Therefore, efforts to address survival should include improving enrollment in clinical trials as well as increasing access to care.


Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine | 2013

Shared Decision Making in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing With Men Older Than 70 Years

Jun Li; Zahava Berkowitz; Thomas B. Richards; Lisa C. Richardson

Background: Little is known about how shared decision making (SDM) is being carried out between older men and their health care providers. Our study aimed to describe the use of SDM key elements and assess their associations with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing among older men. Methods: We conducted descriptive and logistic regression modeling analyses using the 2005 and 2010 National Health Interview Survey data. Results: Age-specific prevalence of PSA testing was similar in 2005 and 2010. In 2010, 44.1% of men aged ≥70 years had PSA testing. Only 27.2% (95% confidence interval, 22.2–32.9) of them reported having discussions about both advantages and disadvantages of testing. Multiple regression analyses showed that PSA-based screening was positively associated with discussions of advantages only (P < .001) and with discussions of both advantages and disadvantages (P < .001) compared with no discussion. Discussion of scientific uncertainties was not associated with PSA testing. Conclusions: Efforts are needed to increase physicians awareness of and adherence to PSA-based screening recommendations. Given that discussions of both advantages and disadvantages increased the uptake of PSA testing and discussion of scientific uncertainties has no effect, additional research about the nature, context, and extent of SDM and about patients knowledge, values, and preferences regarding PSA-based screening is warranted.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jun Li's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas B. Richards

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lori A. Pollack

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingrid J. Hall

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessica B. King

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Tai

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa C. Richardson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Jane Henley

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Siegel

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hannah K. Weir

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trevor D. Thompson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge