K. N. Ganeshaiah
Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K. N. Ganeshaiah.
Oecologia | 1988
K. N. Ganeshaiah; R. Uma Shaanker
SummaryDalbergia sissoo, a wind-dispersed tropical tree, shows a positively skewed distribution of seeds per pod. This is attributed to the enhanced dispersal advantage of few-seeded pods due to their reduced wing loading (ratio of weight to pod surface area) and low settling velocity. The proximate mechanisms causing the positively skewed distribution were investigated. The distribution could not be attributed to the distribution pattern of ovule number per ovary, pollen grain limitation, lack of ovule fertilization, or post-fertilization elimination of many-seeded pods. Rather, it was caused by the post-fertilization abortion of seeds within a pod 2 weeks after fertilization. This intra-pod seed abortion (IPSA) is due to a dominance hierarchy of fertilized ovules from the distal (near stigma) to the basal end, generated by the temporal differences in fertilization. The dominant developing seeds at the distal end cause the abortion of others through the production and diffusion of an aborting agent. When the dominance hierarchy of the siblings is not intense, pods are formed with more than one seed. We argue that the positively skewed distribution of seeds per pod is not due to maternal regulation but is a result of sibling rivalry. We propose that this sibling rivalry is generated by genetic differences in pollen grain fitness and disucss the results in the context of parent-offspring conflict.
Oikos | 1991
K. N. Ganeshaiah; R. Uma Shaanker
Seed size optimization theories are generally based on the assumption that seedling fitness increases at a decreasing rate with seed size. But often, offspring fitness is also influenced by other components such as dispersal efficiency, especially in wind, water and animal dispersed species. We argue that in these species where the dispersal efficiency of the seeds and fruits decreases with the seed mass, the latter is optimised in order to maximize the product of the two components of offspring fitness namely, seedling establishment and dispersal efficiency. In this paper, we show that seed mass in a wind dispersed tree, Butea monosperma is a consequence of selection in opposite directions to favour seedling establishment on one hand and wing loading (dispersal efficiency of pods) on the other hand. We also discuss the interaction of various components of the pod in optimising the seed size.
American Journal of Botany | 2001
G. S. Mohana; R. Uma Shaanker; K. N. Ganeshaiah; Selvadurai Dayanandan
Dalbergia sissoo, a wind-dispersed tropical tree, exhibits high intrafruit seed abortion. Of the four to five ovules in the flower, generally one and occasionally two or three develop to maturity. It has been proposed that the seed abortion is a consequence of intense sibling competition for maternal resources and that this competition occurs as an inverse function of the genetic relatedness among the developing seeds. Accordingly, developing seeds compete intensely when they are genetically less related but tend to develop together when genetically more related. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the genetic similarity among the pairs of seeds developing within a pod with that among (a) random pairs from the pool of all seeds, (b) random pairs from single-seeded pods, and (c) random pairs from two-seeded pods, using both randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and isozymes in five trees. We found that the pairs of seeds developing within a pod are genetically more similar than any random pairs of seeds in a tree. Thus the formation of two-seeded pods appear to be associated with increased genetic relatedness among the developing seeds. We discuss the results in the context of possible fitness advantages and then discuss the possible mechanisms that promote tolerance among related seeds.
Current Science | 1997
R. U. Shaanker; K. N. Ganeshaiah
Nature | 1989
Kamaljit S. Bawa; S. G. Hedge; K. N. Ganeshaiah; R. Uma Shaanker
International Journal of Plant Sciences | 1996
H. S. Arathi; K. N. Ganeshaiah; R. Uma Shaanker; S. G. Hegde
Current Science | 1995
Prarthana Kathuria; K. N. Ganeshaiah; R. Uma Shaanker; R. Vasudeva
Current Science | 1992
K. N. Ganeshaiah; R. Uma Shaanker
Journal of the Indian Institute of Science | 2000
G. Ravikanth; R. Uma Shaanker; K. N. Ganeshaiah
Current Science | 1995
B. Mohan Raju; R. Uma Shaanker; K. N. Ganeshaiah
Collaboration
Dive into the K. N. Ganeshaiah's collaboration.
Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research
View shared research outputs