K Otto

New developments in arc radiation therapy: A review

Arc therapies have gained widespread clinical interest in radiation oncology over the past decade. Arc therapies have several potential advantages over standard techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with implications for patients, administrators, and oncologists. This review focuses on the rationale for arc therapy, descriptions of the modern arc techniques that are currently clinically available, and highlights some distinguishing features of arc therapies, such as dose distributions, treatment times, and imaging capabilities. Arc therapies are exciting examples of progress in radiotherapy through technological innovation, aimed at ultimately improving the therapeutic ratio for patients receiving radiation.

Investigation of a novel algorithm for true 4D-VMAT planning with comparison to tracked, gated and static delivery.

PURPOSE A novel 4D volumetric modulated are therapy (4D-VMAT) planning system is presented where radiation sparing of organs at risk (OARs) is enhanced by exploiting respiratory motion of tumor and healthy tissues. METHODS In conventional radiation therapy, a motion encompassing margin is normally added to the clinical target volume (CTV) to ensure the tumor receives the planned treatment dose. This results in a substantial increase in dose to the OARs. Our 4D-VMAT algorithm aims to reduce OAR dose by incorporating 4D volumetric target and OAR motions directly into the optimization process. During optimization, phase correlated beam samples are progressively added throughout the full range of gantry rotation. The resulting treatment plans have respiratory phase-optimized apertures whose deliveries are synchronized to the patients respiratory cycle. 4D-VMAT plans reduce dose to the OAR by: (1) eliminating the motion margin, (2) selectively redistributing OAR dose over the OAR volume, and (3) timing larger dose contributions (MU) to respiratory phases where greater separations between the target and OAR occur. Our 4D-VMAT algorithm was tested by simulating a variety of tumor motion amplitudes (0.5-2 cm) in the superior/inferior and anterior/ posterior directions. 4D-VMATs performance was compared against 3D-VMAT, gated VMAT and dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC) ideal-tracking VMAT. RESULTS Results show that OAR sparing of 4D-VMAT was greater than 3D-VMAT in all cases due to the smaller PTV margin. Compared to DMLC ideal-tracking VMAT, 4D-VMATs OAR sparing is superior only when the relative distance between the PTV and OAR is changing. For gated VMAT, results compared to 4D-VMAT are phantom dependent. There was negligible difference in plan qualities for the tested case of motion along the anterior/posterior axis. For motions along the superior/inferior axis, gated VMATs narrow beam-on window reduces the OAR volume directly irradiated by the linac but also allows higher dose accumulation in the exposed OAR. In contrast, 4D-VMAT can reduce the OAR volume exposed to high doses but at the cost of redistributing the OAR dose over a larger volume. Finally for 4D-VMAT, an increase in tumor motion no longer resulted in greater irradiation of the OAR as seen in conventional 3D radiation therapy. OAR dose levels were preserved for increasing target motion along the anterior/posterior axis. For increasing superior/inferior motion, the volume of OAR exposed to high doses actually decreased due to dose redistribution. CONCLUSIONS Our investigation demonstrated that the 4D-VMAT system has the potential to improve radiation therapy of periodically moving tumors over 3D-VMAT, gating or tracking methods.

Enhancement of IMRT delivery through MLC rotation

Multileaf collimator (MLC) based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques are well established but suffer several physical limitations. Dosimetric spatial resolution is limited by the MLC leaf width; interleaf leakage and tongue-and-groove effects degrade dosimetric accuracy and the range of leaf motion limits the maximum deliverable field size. Collimator rotation is used in standard radiation therapy to improve the conformity of the MLC shape to the target volume. Except for opposed orthogonal fields, collimator rotation has not been exploited in IMRT due to the complexity of deriving the MLC leaf configurations for rotated sub-fields. Here we report on a new way that MLC-based IMRT is delivered which incorporates collimator rotation, providing an extra degree of freedom in deriving leaf sequences for a desired fluence map. Specifically, we have developed a series of unique algorithms that are capable of determining rotated MLC segments. These IMRT fields may be delivered statically (with the collimator rotating to a new position in between sub-fields) or dynamically (with the collimator rotating and leaves moving simultaneously during irradiation). This introductory study provides an analysis of the rotating leaf motion calculation algorithms with focus on radiation efficiency, the range of collimator rotation and number of segments. We then evaluate the technique by characterizing the ability of the algorithms to generate rotating leaf sequences for desired fluence maps. Comparisons are also made between our method and conventional sliding window and step-and-shoot techniques. Results show improvements in spatial resolution, reduced interleaf effects and maximum deliverable field size over conventional techniques. Clinical application of these enhancements can be realized immediately with static rotational delivery although improved dosimetric modelling of the MLC will be required for dynamic delivery.

Exploring the limits of spatial resolution in radiation dose delivery

Flexibility and complexity in patient treatment due to advances in radiotherapy techniques necessitates a simple method for evaluating spatial resolution capabilities of the dose delivery device. Our purpose in this investigation is to evaluate a model that describes the ability of a radiation therapy device to deliver a desired dose distribution. The model is based on linear systems theory and is analogous to methods used to describe resolution degradation in imaging systems. A qualitative analysis of spatial resolution degradation using the model is presented in the spatial and spatial frequency domains. The ability of the model to predict the effects of geometric dose conformity to treatment volumes is evaluated by varying multileaf collimator leaf width and magnitude of dose spreading. Dose distributions for three clinical treatment shapes, circular shapes of varying diameter and one intensity modulated shape are used in the evaluation. We show that the model accurately predicts the dependence of dose conformity on these parameters. The spatial resolution capabilities of different radiation therapy devices can be quantified using the model, providing a simple method for comparing different treatment machine characteristics. Also, as different treatment sites have different resolution requirements this model may be used to tailor machine characteristics to the specific site.

A simple and robust trajectory‐based stereotactic radiosurgery treatment

Introduction: We present a Trajectory‐based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (TVMAT) technique for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) that takes advantage of a modern linacs ability to modulate dose rate and move the couch dynamically. In addition, we investigate the quality of the developed TVMAT method and the dosimetric accuracy of the technique. Methods: The main feature of the TVMAT technique is a standard beam trajectory formed by dynamic motion of the treatment couch and the linac gantry. The couch rotates slowly through 180 degrees while the gantry delivers radiation through continuous sweeps of the gantry. The number of partial arcs that constitute the trajectory can be varied between two and eight and as the number of partial arcs increases, the trajectory more finely samples 4π geometry. Along these trajectories, the multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) and dose rate are optimized through an inverse planning framework. The TVMAT method was tested on ten cranial SRS patients who were previously treated with the Dynamic Conformal Arc (DCA) technique. The plans were compared with the DCA and a four‐ arc VMAT technique with regards to dose to the OAR, dose falloff, V12Gy, and V4Gy. Validation measurements were performed using ion‐chamber and Gafchromic film. In addition, the trajectory‐log files were analyzed and compared with the treatment plan beam data. Results: The TVMAT treatment plans were successfully delivered with a treatment time between 3–8 min which mostly depended on total cumulated dose. Ion chamber measurements had an average measured error of 1.1 ± 0.6% and a maximum value of 2.2% of the delivered dose. The 2%, 2 mm gamma pass rates for the film measurements were 96% or greater. In a preliminary comparison of ten patients who underwent SRS treatments with the DCA technique, the TVMAT and VMAT techniques were able to produce plans with comparable dose falloff and OAR doses, while achieving better dose conformality, V4Gy and V12Gy when compared to the original DCA plans. The improvement of the TVMAT plans were as follows (mean % improvement ± standard err): Conformity (10 ± 2%), V4 (20 ± 20%), V12 (27 ± 10%), volume weighted mean dose to organs at risk (13 ± 13%), homogeneity index (2 ± 2%) and falloff (4 ± 2%). Conclusion: We have developed and validated a trajectory‐based dose delivery method which has dose distribution improvements while having a treatment time of 3–8 min. In addition, it has the potential for a simpler planning experience while maintaining an accurate delivery on the Varian Truebeam Linac.

TU‐C‐224A‐06: Exploiting the Full Potential of MLC Based Aperture Optimization Through Collimator Rotation

Purpose: To investigate the benefits of MLC rotation in Direct Aperture Optimization (DAO) inverse treatment planning.Method and Materials: An alternative to fluence based inverse planning is to optimize directly the leaf positions and field weights of MLC apertures. Here we introduce a new technique called Rotating Aperture Optimization (RAO) which is based on an extension of DAO. Our technique differs from existing aperture based IMRT techniques in that the MLC is rotated in between each aperture. Treatment plans are generated for 10 nasopharynx recurrence patients with and without MLC rotation for 5 mm and 1cm leaf width MLCs. A comparison study is performed between RAO and DAO in order to assess the benefits of RAO over and above those available with fixed collimator angle DAO. Film verification is also performed to evaluate the accuracy of fixed and rotated collimator aperture delivery. Results: An analysis of the final cost values and DVHs indicate that plans generated with RAO are as good as or better than DAO while maintaining a smaller number of apertures and MU than conventional IMRT. In particular, RAO with the 1cm leaf width MLC is able to produce better plans than DAO with the 1 cm leaf width MLC and plans that are equivalent to DAO with the higher resolution 5mm leaf width MLC. Film verification results show that RAO is less sensitive to tongue and groove effects than DAO. Although delivery time is increased due to the collimator rotation speed this is a mechanical limit that could be easily overcome. Conclusion: Our results indicate that RAO is able to provide superior dose distributions, particularly with larger (1 cm) leaf width MLCs, while maintaining the lower MU and number of apertures afforded by the direct aperture approach. Conflict of Interest: Supported in part by Varian Medical Systems.

Sci—Thur PM: YIS — 03: Comparing 4D‐VMAT, Gated‐VMAT and 3D‐VMAT in SBRT treatment of lung cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the treatment plan qualities of 4D-VMAT, gated-VMAT and 3D-VMAT in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS 4D-VMAT is a motion compensation strategy that aims to exploit relative target and OAR motion to increase OAR sparing over 3D-VMAT without the long treatment times associated with gated-VMAT. The 4D-VMAT algorithm incorporates the entire patient respiratory cycle and 4D-CT in the optimization process. Resulting treatment plans synchronize the delivery of each MLC aperture to a specific phase of the target motion. Using software developed in Matlab™, SBRT treatment plans for 4D-VMAT, gated-VMAT and 3D-VMAT were generated on 3 patients with NSCLC. Tumour motion ranged from 1.4-3.4 cm. The fractionation scheme was 48Gy in 4 fractions with the GTV receiving 100% of the prescribed dose. For gated-VMAT, the treatment window constrained residual tumour motion to 3 mm or less corresponding to duty cycles of 40-60%. In 3D-VMAT, the ITV was generated by merging the GTV from all phases. A b-spline transformation model was used to register the 4D-CT images and DVHs were calculated from total dose accumulated on the max expiration phase. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION For the majority of OARs, gated-VMAT provided the greatest radiation sparing but significantly extended treatment times (25-35 gantry interruptions/arc). For 3D-VMAT, only 2 patients had clinically acceptable plans that met all the strict dose limits. OAR sparing in 4D-VMAT was comparable to gated-VMAT but with significantly improved delivery efficiency.

SU-F-T-503: Trajectory Modulated Arc Therapy of Intracranial Lesions: Development of a Standardized Path-Based Technique for Fully Dynamic Couch-Gantry Modulated Treatments

PURPOSE The integration of couch motion during arc delivery is necessitated to enable irradiation trajectories such as coronal arcs, and to enhance the geometrical sampling for dynamic deliveries to the highest extent. To enable such capability, a platform of Trajectory Modulated Arc Therapy (TMAT) is developed in conjunction with standardized noncollisional dynamic path-set for irradiation of intracranial lesions. METHODS A generalized path-set was constructed through the combination of sagittal arcs (45 degrees from the CAX), axial arcs, and coronal arcs produced through modulation of the dynamic rotation of couch. The standardized path was implemented in a contiguous manner enabling the formation of fully automated sub-trajectories to provide maximal geometrical convergence with minimal number of arcs. Progressive sampling technique is used for direct aperture optimization of the MLCs and the selection of couch positions across the control points. Dosimetry of the resulting plans was assessed relative to clinically delivered plans. Using the TrueBeam Developer Mode, plan deliverability was tested. RESULTS Treatment planning of TMAT sub-trajectories for central, anterior and posterior tumor sites with volumes ranging from 4.75cc to 107cc demonstrated radically reduced doses to the critical OARs when compared to the clinically treated VMAT. Specifically, percentage reduction in mean dose for critical organs such as brainstem, cochlea, and optic nerve are found to be as low as 74±15%, 50±26% and 74±30% respectively as compared to VMAT. Conformity Index, defined as the ratio of tumor volume (VPTV) and 100% dose volume (V(D100%)), was reduced up to 12% while the Gradient Index, defined as V(D100%)/V(D50%), was concurrently improved by up to 14%. CONCLUSION An automated standardized trajectory with dynamically modulated couch-gantry arcs has been developed for intracranial radiotherapy. Through the incorporation of coronal arcs, it is demonstrated that significantly reduced OAR doses can be achieved relative to clinically treated patient plans via VMAT. Research Grant Funding Support by Varian Medical Systems.

A Novel Couch-Gantry Trajectory Based Stereotactic Treatment Method

We propose a robust inverse planning solution for trajectory-based stereotactic (SRS) treatment of small lesions in the brain with a conventional c-arm linear accelerator (linac). The linac’s beam trajectory is formed by simultaneously rotating the gantry and the treatment couch, thus enabling a wide selection of beam angles in a time-efficient manner. Dose is optimized by dynamically varying the dose rate and the multi-leaf collimators’ (MLC) leaf positions along the beam trajectory. The pre-defined beam trajectory is formed by the couch sweeping left to right (1800) while the gantry produces partial arcs in a sinusoidal pattern.

Sci-Thur PM: Planning & Delivery - 06: Real-Time Interactive Treatment Planning

Purpose: To describe and evaluate a novel system for generalized Real-Time Interactive Planning (RTIP) applied to head & neck (H&N) VMAT. Methods: The clinician interactively manipulates dose distributions using DVHs, isodoses, or rate of dose fall-off, which may be subjected to user-defined constraints. Dose is calculated using a fast Achievable Dose Estimate (ADE) algorithm, which simulates the limits of what can be achieved during treatment. After each manipulation contributing fluence elements are modified and the dose distribution updates in effectively real-time. For H&N VMAT planning, structure sets for 11 patients were imported into RTIP. Each dose distribution was interactively modified to minimize OAR dose while constraining target DVHs. The resulting RTIP DVHs were transferred to the Eclipse™ VMAT optimizer, and conventional VMAT optimization was performed. Results: Dose calculation and update times for the ADE algorithm ranged from 2.4 to 22.6 milliseconds, thus facilitating effectively real-time manipulation of dose distributions. For each of the 11 H&N VMAT cases, the RTIP process took ∼2–10 minutes. All RTIP plans exhibited acceptable PTV coverage, mean dose, and max dose. 10 of 11 RTIP plans achieved substantially improved sparing of one or more OARs without compromising dose to targets or other OARs. Importantly, 10 of the 11 RTIP plans required only one or two post-RTIP optimizations. Conclusions: RTIP is a novel system for manipulating and updating achievable dose distributions in real-time. H&N VMAT plans generated using RTIP demonstrate improved OAR sparing and planning efficiency. Disclosures: One author has a commercial interest in the presented materials.