Karl Eugen Hauptmann

TAXUS I Six- and Twelve-Month Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on a Slow-Release Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Lesions

Background—The TAXUS NIRx stent (Boston Scientific Corp) provides local delivery of paclitaxel via a slow-release polymer coating. The TAXUS I trial was the first in-human experience evaluating safety and feasibility of the TAXUS NIRx stent system compared with bare NIR stents (control) (Boston Scientific Corp) for treatment of coronary lesions. Methods and Results—The TAXUS I trial was a prospective, double-blind, three-center study randomizing 61 patients with de novo or restenotic lesions (≤12 mm) to receive a TAXUS (n=31) versus control (n=30) stent (diameter 3.0 or 3.5 mm). Demographics, lesion characteristics, clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups. The 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 0% in both groups (P =NS). No stent thromboses were reported at 1, 6, 9, or 12 months. At 12 months, the MACE rate was 3% (1 event) in the TAXUS group and 10% (4 events in 3 patients) in the control group (P =NS). Six-month angiographic restenosis rates were 0% for TAXUS versus 10% for control (P =NS) patients. There were significant improvements in minimal lumen diameter (2.60±0.49 versus 2.19±0.65 mm), diameter stenosis (13.56±11.77 versus 27.23±16.69), and late lumen loss (0.36±0.48 versus 0.71±0.48 mm) in the TAXUS group (all P <0.01). No evidence of edge restenosis was seen in either group. Intravascular ultrasound analysis showed significant improvements in normalized neointimal hyperplasia in the TAXUS (14.8 mm3) group compared with the control group (21.6 mm3) (P <0.05). Conclusions—In this feasibility trial, the TAXUS slow-release stent was well tolerated and showed promise for treatment of coronary lesions, with significant reductions in angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measures of restenosis.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry

AIMS Treatment of elderly symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and co-morbidities is challenging. Transcatheter aortic valve interventions [balloon valvuloplasty and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)] are evolving as alternative treatment options to surgical valve replacement. We report the first results of the prospective multi-centre German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions-Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS Between January 2009 and December 2009, a total of 697 patients (81.4 ± 6.3 years, 44.2% males, and logistic EuroScore 20.5 ± 13.2%) underwent TAVI. Pre-operative aortic valve area was 0.6 ± 0.2 cm² with a mean transvalvular gradient of 48.7 ± 17.2 mmHg. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed percutaneously in the majority of patients [666 (95.6%)]. Only 31 (4.4%) procedures were done surgically: 26 (3.7%) transapically and 5 (0.7%) transaortically. The Medtronic CoreValve™ prosthesis was used in 84.4%, whereas the Sapien Edwards™ prosthesis was used in the remaining cases. Technical success was achieved in 98.4% with a post-operative mean transaortic pressure gradient of 5.4 ± 6.2 mmHg. Any residual aortic regurgitation was observed in 72.4% of patients, with a significant aortic insufficiency (≥Grade III) in only 16 patients (2.3%). Complications included pericardial tamponade in 1.8% and stroke in 2.8% of patients. Permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI became necessary in 39.3% of patients. In-hospital death rate was 8.2%, and the 30-day death rate 12.4%. CONCLUSION In this real-world registry of high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, TAVI had a high success rate and was associated with moderate in-hospital complications. However, careful patient selection and continued hospital selection seem crucial to maintain these results.

Incomplete Stent Apposition After Implantation of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents or Bare Metal Stents Insights From the Randomized TAXUS II Trial

Background—The clinical impact of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) for drug-eluting stents is unknown. We sought to prospectively investigate the incidence and extent of ISA after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up of paclitaxel-eluting stents in comparison with bare metal stents (BMS) and survey the clinical significance of ISA over a period of 12 months. Methods and Results—TAXUS II was a randomized, double-blind study with 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts comparing slow-release (SR; 131 patients) and moderate-release (MR; 135 patients) paclitaxel-eluting stents with BMS (270 patients). This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy included patients who underwent serial IVUS examination after the procedure and at 6 months (BMS, 240 patients; SR, 113; MR, 116). The qualitative and quantitative analyses of ISA were performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. More than half of the instances of ISA observed after the procedure resolved at 6 months in all groups. No difference in the incidence of late-acquired ISA was observed among the 3 groups (BMS, 5.4%; SR, 8.0%; MR, 9.5%; P=0.306), with a similar ISA volume (BMS, 11.4 mm3; SR, 21.7 mm3; MR, 8.5 mm3; P=0.18). Late-acquired ISA was the result of an increase of vessel area without change in plaque behind the stent. Predictive factors of late-acquired ISA were lesion length, unstable angina, and absence of diabetes. No stent thrombosis occurred in the patients diagnosed with ISA over a period of 12 months. Conclusions—The incidence and extent of late-acquired ISA are comparable in paclitaxel-eluting stents and BMS. ISA is a pure IVUS finding without clinical repercussions.

Final 5-Year Results of the TAXUS II Trial: A Randomized Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Slow- and Moderate-Release Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Background— The TAXUS II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the commercialized slow-release (SR) and an investigation-only moderate-release (MR) polymer-based TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with a bare-metal stent for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. Methods and Results— This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial enrolled 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts to compare TAXUS SR (n=131) and TAXUS MR (n=135) with an identical but uncoated bare-metal stent control (n=270). The present analysis reports final 5-year clinical outcomes of TAXUS II. At 5 years, both TAXUS SR and MR showed superior outcomes compared with control. The 5-year rates of major adverse cardiac events were 27.6%, 20.4%, and 15.1% (P=0.01); rates of target-vessel revascularization were 22.5%, 16.6%, and 9.0% (P=0.004); and rates of target-lesion revascularization were 18.4%, 10.3%, and 4.5% (P<0.001) for the control, TAXUS SR, and TAXUS MR groups, respectively. The rates of all-cause death and myocardial infarction were low and similar between groups, with 2 stent thromboses with bare-metal stents compared with no event beyond 2 years with either of the TAXUS stents. Conclusions— TAXUS II is the first large TAXUS trial to have reached 5-year follow-up. Both the SR and MR stents lowered the rates of target-vessel and target-lesion revascularization, which indicates their sustained efficacy. Furthermore, the low overall rates of all death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis support the long-term safety of the TAXUS stent system.

A Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Amphilimus- With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions

OBJECTIVES This study sought to demonstrate the noninferiority of polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (Cre8, CID, Saluggia, Italy) versus permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in de novo percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND Although the efficacy of the drug-eluting stent has been well established, the risk-benefit balance is still suboptimal, and the safety of polymers remains uncertain. METHODS Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomly assigned 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté stents. Primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) within a noninferiority scope. Six-month intravascular ultrasound was performed in 20% of the patients. All patients will be clinically followed up to 5 years. RESULTS Out of 323 patients enrolled, 162 received Cre8 and 161 Taxus Liberté stents. In-stent LLL was significantly lower in Cre8 group (0.14 ± 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 ± 0.40 mm, p noninferiority <0.0001, p superiority <0.0001). Clinical endpoints (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) up to 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The Cre8 stent in de novo lesions showed significantly lower in-stent LLL at 6 months than the Taxus Liberté stent did, with a trend toward better 12-month clinical safety and efficacy results. (International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions [NEXT]; NCT01373502).

Comparison of primary angioplasty with conservative therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and contraindications for thrombolytic therapy

The benefit of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and contraindications for thrombolysis compared to a conservative regimen is still unclear. Out of 5,869 patients with AMI registered by the MITRA trial, 337 (5.7%) patients had at least one strong contraindication for thrombolytic therapy. Out of these 337 patients 46 (13.6%) were treated with primary angioplasty and 276 (86.4%) were treated conservatively. Patients treated conservatively were older (70 years vs. 60 years; P = 0.001), had a higher rate of a history with chronic heart failure (14.8% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.053), a higher heart rate at admission (86 beats/min vs. 74 beats/min; P = 0.001), and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (27.1% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.056). Patients treated with primary angioplasty received more often aspirin (91.3% vs. 74.6%; P = 0.012), β‐blockers (60.9% vs. 46.1%; P = 0.062), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (71.7% vs. 44%; P = 0.001), and the so‐called optimal adjunctive medication (54.4% vs. 32.3%; P = 0.004). Hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients who received primary angioplasty (univariate: 2.2% vs. 24.7%; P = 0.001; multivariate: OR = 0.46; P = 0.0230). In patients with AMI and contraindications for thrombolytic therapy, primary angioplasty was associated with a significantly lower mortality compared to conservative treatment. Therefore, hospitals without the facilities to perform primary angioplasty should try to refer such patients to centers with the facilities for such a service, if this is possible in an acceptable time.Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 46:127–133, 1999.

The impact of peripheral arterial disease on early outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Results From the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions Registry

BACKGROUND A significant proportion of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have concomitant peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which plays a crucial role in the preinterventional selection process of determining an optimal vascular access site. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of PAD on clinical outcome after TAVI in a real-world setting. METHODS A total of 1,315 patients (mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation 20.6% ± 13.7%) underwent TAVI in 27 centers and were included in the prospective German TAVI Registry. RESULTS Of the 1,315 patients with TAVI, 330 (25.1%) had PAD. These patients had a higher logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (27.7% ± 16.0% vs 18.3% ± 12.0%, P < .0001), mainly attributed to more frequent and severe comorbidities. Compared with patients without PAD, patients with PAD had a higher rate of vascular complications (28.5% vs 20.7%, P < .01), dialysis-dependent renal failure (11.2% vs 5.4%, P < .001), myocardial infarction (1.2% vs 0.3%, P < .05), and, subsequently, 30-day mortality (12.7% vs 6.9%, P < .001). Choosing a surgical approach, for example, transapical access, did not reduce the periprocedural risk associated with PAD; in-hospital mortality was 15.7% for surgical and 10.5% for percutaneous patients with TAVI having PAD (P < .001). In a multivariate regression analysis, PAD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7, P = .004) after TAVI. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world TAVI Registry, PAD was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with percutaneous and surgical TAVI, including vascular complications. Assessment of PAD should play a crucial role in the preinterventional selection process, regardless of the access strategy.

Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).

Die stentgestützte Ballondilatation von symptomatischen und asymptomatischen Carotisstenosen (CAS) findet zunehmend Verbreitung im klinischen Alltag. Über die Machbarkeit und die Sicherheit der CAS in der täglichen Routine an einem Spektrum von verschiedenen Krankenhäusern liegen jedoch nur wenige Daten vor. Wir untersuchten die Daten des prospektiven multizentrischen Carotis-Stent (CAS) Registers der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Zwischen 7/1996 und 5/2004 wurden 1888 Patienten an 28 Kliniken in das CAS-Register eingeschlossen. Die mediane Aufenthaltsdauer nach der Stentimplantation betrug 3 Tage (Quartile: 2–6 Tage). Die Patienten waren im Median 70 Jahre alt (Quartile: 64–76 Jahre) und in 72,1% der Fälle Männer. Die CAS wurde in 55% der Fälle bei symptomatischen Carotisstenosen durchgeführt. CAS-Patienten hatten in 66,5% der Fälle eine koronare Herzkrankheit, einen hohen Blutdruck in 91,7%, in 86,3% eine Hyperlipoproteinämie und waren zu 34,2% Diabetiker. Das CAS konnte in 98,1% erfolgreich zu Ende geführt werden, wobei eine Stentimplantation bei 97,3% der Patienten erfolgte. Die mediane Implantationszeit betrug 43 min (Quartile: 30–60 min). Während des Krankenhausaufenthaltes kam es in 0,3% (5/1888) zu Todesfällen und die ipsilaterale Insultrate betrug 3,2% (58/1840). In 1,4% (26/1840) der Patienten kam es zu einer kontralateralen Ischämie. Die kombinierte Rate aus Tod oder Apoplex betrug 3,8% (70/ 1841). Während des Beobachtungszeitraumes fand sich ein kontinuierlicher Anstieg der Rate des Einsatzes von Embolie-Protektionssystemen, der zuletzt 2004 97,9% betrug (p für Trend <0,0001). Wir beobachten ebenso einen Anstieg des Anteiles an behandelten asymptomatischen Carotisstenosen (p für Trend <0,0001) sowie einen Rückgang der Komplikationsraten bestehend aus Tod oder Apoplex von 6,3% 1996 auf 1,9% 2004 (p für Trend=0,021). Die CAS ist auch im klinischen Routineeinsatz eine bezüglich der Akutkomplikationen sichere und in einem hohen Maße erfolgreiche Prozedur. Im Laufe der letzten 8 Jahre konnte eine sehr starke Zunahme des Einsatzes von Embolie-Protektionssystemen bei gleichzeitigem Anstieg der Behandlung asymptomatischer Carotisstenosen und einem Rückgang in der akuten Komplikationsrate beobachtet werden. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis seems to be on the doorstep of more widespread use. However, its feasibility and safety in clinical practice at a broad spectrum of hospitals needs to be determined. We analyzed data of the prospective multi-centre Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) Registry of the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). From 7/1996 to 5/2004 1888 patients from 28 hospitals were included in the CAS Registry. The median hospital stay from CAS until hospital discharge was 3 days (quartiles: 2–6 days). Median patients age was 70 years (quartiles: 64–76 years) with 72.1% males. CAS for symptomatic stenosis was performed in 55% of cases. Patients treated with CAS suffered from coronary artery disease in 66.5%, had arterial hypertension in 91.7%, hyperlipidemia in 86.3% and 34.2% were diabetics. The intended CAS procedure was completed in 98.1% of cases. A stent was implanted in 97.3% of completed cases. The median intervention time was 43 min (quartiles: 30–60 min). During the hospital stay death rate was 0.3% (5/1888) and the rate of ipsilateral stroke 3.2% (58/1840). A contralateral ischemic event occurred in 1.4% (26/ 1840) of patients. The combined rate of all death or strokes was 3.8% (70/1841). Between 1996 and 2004 there was a steady increase in the use of protection devices during CAS (0% in 1996 and 97.9% in 2004; p for trend <0.0001). There was also an increase in the proportion of patients treated for asymptomatic stenoses (p for trend <0.0001). We observed a decrease of the combined endpoint of death or stroke from 6.3% in 1996 to 1.9% in 2004 (p for trend=0.021). The multi-centre ALKK CAS Registry data confirm the feasibility and shot-term safety of CAS even in daily clinical practice. There was a rapid penetration of the use of embolic protection devices, an increase in treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenoses and a decrease in acute complication rates from 1996 to 2004.

First-in-man (FIM) study of the Stentys™ bifurcation stent - 30 days results

AIMS We report the acute and 30 day results of the OPEN I study, a multicentre prospective single arm study evaluating the safety and feasibility of the Stentys bifurcation stent. METHODS AND RESULTS The Stentys stent is a provisional, self-expanding nitinol drug eluting or bare metal stent with small interconnections that can be disconnected by balloon angioplasty to provide access to the side-branch and full ostium coverage. Forty patients with de novo coronary bifurcation lesions were enrolled to be clinically followed-up over four years. In addition to angiographic QCA evaluation, documentary IVUS and/or OCT were used in all cases to assess the stents deployment. The patient population consisted of 85% males with an average age of 62 years. Almost half had previous PCI, 31% previous MI and 5% previous CABG. The majority of lesions (80%) involved the LAD-D, 42% of the patients had disease affecting the side-branch, with all three arms diseased in 24% of the cases. The average lesion length in the main branch was 12.95 +/- 3.63 mm with a bifurcation angle of 55 degrees (range 30 degrees - 80 degrees). Procedural success was achieved in 39/40 cases (95.5%) due to inability to track the stent in one patient with an extremely tortuous vessel. In total 6 (15%) paclitaxel eluting and 33 (85%) BMS Stentys stents were successfully implanted, and simple disconnection of the stent mesh overlying the SB ostium was achieved in 37/39 cases (94.9%); in two cases, disconnection was not attempted. The MACE at 30 days was 5.1% as a result of one non Q-wave MI following the procedure and one ischemia-driven revascularisation six days after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS This first-in-man (FIM) study demonstrates that the Stentys stent is safe and feasible resulting in an excellent procedural success rate and a low MACE rate. The struts can be easily and safely disconnected to perform provisional stenting.

Assessment of the safety and performance of the STENTYS self-expanding coronary stent in acute myocardial infarction: results from the APPOSITION I study

AIMS In the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), epicardial vasoconstriction and thrombus load may lead to stent undersizing and malapposition after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), which can both be responsible for stent thrombosis or restenosis. Aggressive stent deployment can, on the other hand, cause distal embolisation and the no-reflow phenomenon. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a novel self-expanding stent by assessing the clinical, angiographic and intravascular outcomes after stent deployment at three days and at six months follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS This prospective, multicentre, non-randomised study enrolled 25 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI; a nitinol, self-expanding, coronary stent (STENTYS® stent; STENTYS, Paris, France) was used in all patients. Angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed immediately after stent deployment, after three days and at six months. Primary safety endpoints were mortality, reinfarction, stent thrombosis and stroke at discharge and at six months. The primary feasibility endpoints were technical, device and procedural success, and stent apposition at three days and six months. Secondary endpoints included distal embolisation, binary restenosis, ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and late lumen loss (LLL). There were no adverse events at discharge or at six months. Technical, device and procedural success were 100%, 96% and 96%, respectively. IVUS showed a significant vasodilatation distal to the culprit lesion at three-day follow-up (+19%), with a concordant expansion of the implanted stent (+18%), p≤0.001 for both values. One case of distal embolisation was reported. There were no cases of late stent malapposition at six months. In-stent and in-segment LLL were 0.71±0.71 mm and 0.58±0.61 mm. Binary restenosis was 25%, ischaemia-driven TLR was 12%. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the use of the STENTYS® self-expanding stent is safe and feasible in STEMI patients. Three days after the procedure, the stent expanded to the same extent as the epicardial vasodilatation and appeared completely apposed to the vessel wall. This could be of benefit in preventing stent thrombosis in the setting of STEMI.