Kathleen A. Durkin

Neuroactive insecticides: targets, selectivity, resistance, and secondary effects.

Neuroactive insecticides are the principal means of protecting crops, people, livestock, and pets from pest insect attack and disease transmission. Currently, the four major nerve targets are acetylcholinesterase for organophosphates and methylcarbamates, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor for neonicotinoids, the γ-aminobutyric acid receptor/chloride channel for polychlorocyclohexanes and fiproles, and the voltage-gated sodium channel for pyrethroids and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. Species selectivity and acquired resistance are attributable in part to structural differences in binding subsites, receptor subunit interfaces, or transmembrane regions. Additional targets are sites in the sodium channel (indoxacarb and metaflumizone), the glutamate-gated chloride channel (avermectins), the octopamine receptor (amitraz metabolite), and the calcium-activated calcium channel (diamides). Secondary toxic effects in mammals from off-target serine hydrolase inhibition include organophosphate-induced delayed neuropathy and disruption of the cannabinoid system. Possible associations between pesticides and Parkinsons and Alzheimers diseases are proposed but not established based on epidemiological observations and mechanistic considerations.

Circulating tumour DNA profiling reveals heterogeneity of EGFR inhibitor resistance mechanisms in lung cancer patients

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis facilitates studies of tumour heterogeneity. Here we employ CAPP-Seq ctDNA analysis to study resistance mechanisms in 43 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with the third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor rociletinib. We observe multiple resistance mechanisms in 46% of patients after treatment with first-line inhibitors, indicating frequent intra-patient heterogeneity. Rociletinib resistance recurrently involves MET, EGFR, PIK3CA, ERRB2, KRAS and RB1. We describe a novel EGFR L798I mutation and find that EGFR C797S, which arises in ∼33% of patients after osimertinib treatment, occurs in <3% after rociletinib. Increased MET copy number is the most frequent rociletinib resistance mechanism in this cohort and patients with multiple pre-existing mechanisms (T790M and MET) experience inferior responses. Similarly, rociletinib-resistant xenografts develop MET amplification that can be overcome with the MET inhibitor crizotinib. These results underscore the importance of tumour heterogeneity in NSCLC and the utility of ctDNA-based resistance mechanism assessment.

Neonicotinoid insecticides induce salicylate-associated plant defense responses

Neonicotinoid insecticides control crop pests based on their action as agonists at the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which accepts chloropyridinyl- and chlorothiazolyl-analogs almost equally well. In some cases, these compounds have also been reported to enhance plant vigor and (a)biotic stress tolerance, independent of their insecticidal function. However, this mode of action has not been defined. Using Arabidopsis thaliana, we show that the neonicotinoid compounds, imidacloprid (IMI) and clothianidin (CLO), via their 6-chloropyridinyl-3-carboxylic acid and 2-chlorothiazolyl-5-carboxylic acid metabolites, respectively, induce salicylic acid (SA)-associated plant responses. SA is a phytohormone best known for its role in plant defense against pathogens and as an inducer of systemic acquired resistance; however, it can also modulate abiotic stress responses. These neonicotinoids effect a similar global transcriptional response to that of SA, including genes involved in (a)biotic stress response. Furthermore, similar to SA, IMI and CLO induce systemic acquired resistance, resulting in reduced growth of a powdery mildew pathogen. The action of CLO induces the endogenous synthesis of SA via the SA biosynthetic enzyme ICS1, with ICS1 required for CLO-induced accumulation of SA, expression of the SA marker PR1, and fully enhanced resistance to powdery mildew. In contrast, the action of IMI does not induce endogenous synthesis of SA. Instead, IMI is further bioactivated to 6-chloro-2-hydroxypyridinyl-3-carboxylic acid, which is shown here to be a potent inducer of PR1 and inhibitor of SA-sensitive enzymes. Thus, via different mechanisms, these chloropyridinyl- and chlorothiazolyl-neonicotinoids induce SA responses associated with enhanced stress tolerance.

Atypical nicotinic agonist bound conformations conferring subtype selectivity

The nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (nAChR) plays a crucial role in excitatory neurotransmission and is an important target for drugs and insecticides. Diverse nAChR subtypes with various subunit combinations confer differential selectivity for nicotinic drugs. We investigated the subtype selectivity of nAChR agonists by comparing two ACh-binding proteins (AChBPs) as structural surrogates with distinct pharmacological profiles [i.e., Lymnaea stagnalis (Ls) AChBP of low neonicotinoid and high nicotinoid sensitivities and Aplysia californica (Ac) AChBP of high neonicotinoid sensitivity] mimicking vertebrate and insect nAChR subtypes, respectively. The structural basis of subtype selectivity was examined here by photoaffinity labeling. Two azidoneonicotinoid probes in the Ls-AChBP surprisingly modified two distinct and distant subunit interface sites: loop F Y164 of the complementary or (−)-face subunit and loop C Y192 of the principal or (+)-face subunit, whereas three azidonicotinoid probes derivatized only Y192. Both the neonicotinoid and nicotinoid probes labeled Ac-AChBP at only one position at the interface between loop C Y195 and loop E M116. These findings were used to establish structural models of the two AChBP subtypes. In the Ac-AChBP, the neonicotinoids and nicotinoids are nestled in similar bound conformations. Intriguingly, for the Ls-AChBP, the neonicotinoids have two bound conformations that are inverted relative to each other, whereas nicotinoids appear buried in only one conserved conformation as seen for the Ac-AChBP subtype. Accordingly, the subtype selectivity is based on two disparate bound conformations of nicotinic agonists, thereby establishing an atypical concept for neonicotinoid versus nicotinoid selectivity between insect and vertebrate nAChRs.

Mapping the elusive neonicotinoid binding site

Two types of structurally similar nicotinic agonists have very different biological and physicochemical properties. Neonicotinoids, important insecticides including imidacloprid and thiacloprid, are nonprotonated and selective for insects and their nicotinic receptors, whereas nicotinoids such as nicotine and epibatidine are cationic and selective for mammalian systems. We discovered that a mollusk acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP), as a structural surrogate for the extracellular ligand-binding domain of the nicotinic receptor, is similarly sensitive to neonicotinoids and nicotinoids. It therefore seemed possible that the proposed very different interactions of the neonicotinoids and nicotinoids might be examined with a single AChBP by using optimized azidochloropyridinyl photoaffinity probes. Two azidoneonicotinoids with a nitro or cyano group were compared with the corresponding desnitro or descyano azidonicotinoids. The four photoactivated nitrene probes modified AChBP with up to one agonist for each subunit based on analysis of the intact derivatized protein. Identical modification sites were observed by collision-induced dissociation analysis for the neonicotinoids and nicotinoids with similar labeling frequency of Tyr-195 of loop C and Met-116 of loop E at the subunit interface. The nitro- or cyano-substituted guanidine/amidine planes of the neonicotinoids provide a unique electronic conjugation system to interact with loop C Tyr-188. The neonicotinoid nitro oxygen and cyano nitrogen contact loop C Cys-190/Ser-189, whereas the cationic head of the corresponding nicotinoids is inverted for hydrogen-bonding and cation-π contact with Trp-147 and Tyr-93. These structural models based on AChBP directly map the elusive neonicotinoid binding site and further describe the molecular determinants of agonists on nicotinic receptors.

Anticholinesterase insecticide retrospective.

The anticholinesterase (antiChE) organophosphorus (OP) and methylcarbamate (MC) insecticides have been used very effectively as contact and systemic plant protectants for seven decades. About 90 of these compounds are still in use - the largest number for any insecticide chemotype or mode of action. In both insects and mammals, AChE inhibition and acetylcholine accumulation leads to excitation and death. The cholinergic system of insects is located centrally (where it is protected from ionized OPs and MCs) but not at the neuromuscular junction. Structural differences between insect and mammalian AChE are also evident in their genomics, amino acid sequences and active site conformations. Species selectivity is determined in part by inhibitor and target site specificity. Pest population selection with OPs and MCs has resulted in a multitude of modified AChEs of altered inhibitor specificity some conferring insecticide resistance and others enhancing sensitivity. Much of the success of antiChE insecticides results from a suitable balance of bioactivation and detoxification by families of CYP450 oxidases, hydrolases, glutathione S-transferases and others. Known inhibitors for these enzymes block detoxification and enhance potency which is particularly important in resistant strains. The current market for OPs and MCs of 19% of worldwide insecticide sales is only half of that of 10 years ago for several reasons: there have been no major new compounds for 30 years; resistance has eroded their effectiveness; human toxicity problems are still encountered; the patents have expired reducing the incentive to update registration packages; alternative chemotypes or control methods have been developed. Despite this decline, they still play a major role in pest control and the increasing knowledge on their target sites and metabolism may make it possible to redesign the inhibitors for insensitive AChEs and to target new sites in the cholinergic system. The OPs and MCs are down but not out.

Molecular Features of Neonicotinoid Pharmacophore Variants Interacting with the Insect Nicotinic Receptor

Molecular interactions of neonicotinoid insecticides with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor have been mapped by chemical and structural neurobiology approaches, thereby encouraging the biorational design of novel nicotinic ligands. This investigation designs, prepares, and evaluates the target site potency of neonicotinoid analogues with various types of electronegative pharmacophores and subsequently predicts their molecular recognition in the ligand-binding pocket. The N-nitroimino (NNO2) neonicotinoid pharmacophore is systematically replaced by N-nitrosoimino (NNO), N-formylimino [NC(O)H], N-alkyl- and N-arylcarbonylimino [NC(O)R], and N-alkoxy- and N-aryloxycarbonylimino [NC(O)OR] variants. The NNO analogues essentially retain the binding affinity of the NNO2 compounds, while the isosteric NC(O)H congeners have diminished potency. The NC(O)R and NC(O)OR analogues, where R is methyl, trifluoromethyl, phenyl, or pyridin-3-yl, have moderate to high affinities. Orientation of the tip oxygen plays a critical role for binding of the NNO and NC(O)H pharmacophores, and the extended NC(O)R and NC(O)OR moieties are embraced by unique binding domains.

Selective molecular recognition by nanoscale environments in a supported iridium cluster catalyst

The active sites of enzymes are contained within nanoscale environments that exhibit exquisite levels of specificity to particular molecules. The development of such nanoscale environments on synthetic surfaces, which would be capable of discriminating between molecules that would nominally bind in a similar way to the surface, could be of use in nanosensing, selective catalysis and gas separation. However, mimicking such subtle behaviour, even crudely, with a synthetic system remains a significant challenge. Here, we show that the reactive sites on the surface of a tetrairidium cluster can be controlled by using three calixarene-phosphine ligands to create a selective nanoscale environment at the metal surface. Each ligand is 1.4 nm in length and envelopes the cluster core in a manner that discriminates between the reactivities of the basal-plane and apical iridium atoms. CO ligands are initially present on the clusters and can be selectively removed from the basal-plane sites by thermal dissociation and from the apical sites by reactive decarbonylation with the bulky reactant trimethylamine-N-oxide. Both steps lead to the creation of metal sites that can bind CO molecules, but only the reactive decarbonylation step creates vacancies that are also able to bond to ethylene, and catalyse its hydrogenation.

Neonicotinoid substituents forming a water bridge at the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Neonicotinoid insecticides are extensively used for crop protection. The chloropyridinyl or chlorothiazolyl nitrogen and tetrahydrofuryl oxygen atoms of neonicotinoids serve as hydrogen acceptors at the target site. This investigation designs and prepares neonicotinoid probes to understand the structure-activity relationships (SARs) at the target site focusing on the water-mediated ligand-protein interactions. 2-Nitroiminoimidazolidine analogues with hydrogen-acceptor N-CH(2)CH(2)CH(2)F and N-CH(2)CH(2)C(O)CH(3) substituents showed higher binding affinities to the Drosophila melanogaster nicotinic receptor than probes with different hydrogen-bonding points in location and capability, suggesting that the appropriately positioned fluorine or carbonyl oxygen plays an important role on hydrogen-bond formation. Their binding site interactions were predicted using a crystal structure of the acetylcholine binding protein. The fluorine or carbonyl oxygen forms a water bridge to Ile-118 (and/or Ile-106) at the binding domain, consistent with that of neonicotinoids with a chloropyridinylmethyl, chlorothiazolylmethyl, or tetrahydrofurylmethyl moiety. Therefore, the present SAR study on binding site interactions helps design potent neonicotinoids with novel substituents.

Potency and Selectivity of Trifluoroacetylimino and Pyrazinoylimino Nicotinic Insecticides and Their Fit at a Unique Binding Site Niche

Neonicotinoid agonists with a nitroimino or cyanoimino pharmacophore are the newest of the four most important classes of insecticides. Our studies on the nicotinic receptor structure in the neonicotinoid-bound state revealed a unique niche of about 6 A depth beyond the nitro oxygen or cyano nitrogen tip. The N-substituted imino pharmacophore was therefore extended to fill the gap. Excellent target site selectivity with high insecticidal activity and low toxicity to mammals were achieved rivaling those of the current neonicotinoid insecticides as illustrated here by 3-(6-chloropyridin-3-ylmethyl)-2-trifluoroacetyliminothiazoline and its pyrazinoylimino analogue.