Keith T. Muir

Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil I. Model development

BackgroundPrevious studies have reported conflicting results concerning the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodyn

The Pharmacokinetics of the New Short-acting Opioid Remifentanil (gi87084b) in Healthy Adult Male Volunteers

BackgroundRemifentanil (GI87084B) is a new short-acting opioid with a unique ester structure. Metabolism of remifentanil by ester hydrolysis results in very rapid elimination. The aim of this study was to characterize in detail the pharmacokinetic profile of remifentanil in healthy male volunteers. MethodsTen healthy adult male volunteers received a zero-order infusion of remifentanil at doses ranging from 1 to 8 μg · kg-1 · min-1 for 20 min. Frequent arterial blood samples were drawn and analyzed by gas chromatographic mass spectroscopy to determine the remifentanil blood concentrations. The raw pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using three different parametric compartmental modeling methods (traditional two-stage, naive pooled data, and NONMEM). The raw pharmacokinetic data also were analyzed using numeric deconvolution and a nonparametric moment technique. A computer simulation using the pharmacokinetic parameters of the NONMEM compartmental model was performed to provide a more intuitively meaningful and clinically relevant description of the pharmacokinetics. The simulation estimated the time necessary to achieve a 50% decrease in remifentanil concentration after a variable-length infusion. ResultsFor each parametric method, a three-compartment mamillary model that accurately describes remifentanils concentration decay curve was constructed. The NONMEM analysis population pharmacokinetic parameters included a central clearance of 2.8 1/min, a volume of distribution at steady state of 32.8 1, and a terminal half-life of 48 min. The mean results of the nonparametric moment analysis included a clearance of 2.9 1/min, a volume of distribution at steady state of 31.8 1, and a mean residence time of 10.9 min. The computer simulation revealed the strikingly unique pharmacokinetic profile of remifentanil compared to that of the currently available fentanyl family of opioids. ConclusionsRemifentanil is a new, short-acting opioid with promising clinical potential in anesthesiology.

Pharmacokinetics of Remifentanil (GI87084B) and Its Major Metabolite (GI90291) in Patients Undergoing Elective Inpatient Surgery

BackgroundRemifentanil is a highly potent opioid with a rapid onset and a short duration of action due to its rapid hydrolysis by esterases in blood and tissues. The major metabolite of remifentanil, GI90291, is much less potent than remifentanil. MethodsThe pharmacokinetics of remifentanil and its major metabolite, GI90291, were determined in 24 patients undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Remifentanil was administered as a 1-min infusion (2, 5, 15, and 30 μg/kg) after the induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation. Serial arterial blood samples were collected over 6 h and assayed for remifentanil and GI90291. ResultsThe pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were described using a three-compartment model. Total clearance (250–300 1/h) of remifentanil was independent of dose and was approximately three to four times greater than the normal hepatic blood flow. Volume of distribution at steady state (25–40 1) also was independent of dose. The terminal half-life of remifentanil ranged from 10 to 21 min. Covariate analysis of remifentanil clearance and patient demographics showed that patient body weight, age, and gender did not influence total clearance. This suggests that remifentanil may not need to be dosed according to body weight in adult patients. A simulation was conducted to determine the time required for a 50% reduction in effect site concentration after an infusion designed to maintain a constant effect site concentration. The time required for a 50% reduction in the effect site concentration of remifentanil (3.65 min) was considerably less than that for sufentanil (33.9 min), alfentanil (58.5 min), and fentanyl (262 min). The pharmacokinetics of the major metabolite, GI90291, were independent of the dose of remifentanil. The mean terminal half-life of GI90291 ranged from 88 to 137 min. ConclusionsThe pharmacokinetics of remifentanil are consistent with its rapid elimination by blood and tissue esterases; its major metabolite is eliminated more slowly but is not likely to make any significant contribution to the total effect because of its much lower potency. The rapid onset and short duration of action of remifentanil make it well suited for titration of dose (infusion rate) to the desired degree of effect.

Remifentanil versus alfentanil : Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers

Background Remifentanil is an esterase-metabolized opioid with a rapid clearance. The aim of this study was to contrast the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and alfentanil in healthy, adult male volunteers. Methods Ten volunteers received infusions of remifentanil and alfentanil on separate study sessions using a randomized, open-label crossover design. Arterial blood samples were analyzed to determine drug blood concentrations. The electroencephalogram was employed as the measure of drug effect. The pharmacokinetics were characterized using a moment analysis, a nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM) population analysis, and context-sensitive half-time computer simulations. After processing the raw electroencephalogram to obtain the spectral edge parameter, the pharmacodynamics were characterized using an effect compartment, inhibitory maximum effect model. Results Pharmacokinetically, the two drugs are similar in terms of steady-state distribution volume (VDss), but remifentanils central clearance (CLc) is substantially greater. The NONMEM analysis population pharmacokinetic parameters for remifentanil include a CLc of 2.9 l *symbol* min sup -1, a VDss of 21.81, and a terminal half-life of 35.1 min. Corresponding NONMEM parameters for alfentanil are 0.36 l *symbol* min sup -1, 34.11, and 94.5 min. Pharmacodynamically, the drugs are similar in terms of the time required for equilibration between blood and the effect-site concentrations, as evidenced by a T12 Ke0 for remifentanil of 1.6 min and 0.96 min for alfentanil. However, remifentanil is 19 times more potent than alfentanil, with an effective concentration for 50% maximal effect of 19.9 ng *symbol* ml sup -1 versus 375.9 ng *symbol* ml sup -1 for alfentanil. Conclusions Compared to alfentanil, the high clearance of remifentanil, combined with its small steady-state distribution volume, results in a rapid decline in blood concentration after termination of an infusion. With the exception of remifentanils nearly 20-times greater potency (30-times if alfentanil partitioning between whole blood and plasma is considered), the drugs are pharmacodynamically similar.

Measured Context-sensitive Half-times of Remifentanil and Alfentanil

BackgroundThe context-sensitive half-time, rather than the terminal elimination half-life, has been proposed as a more clinically relevant measure of decreasing drug concentration after a constant infusion of a given duration. The context-sensitive half-time is derived from computer modelling using

Remifentanil Pharmacokinetics in Obese versus Lean Patients

Background Remifentanil is a short-acting opioid whose pharmacokinetics have been characterized in detail. However, the impact of obesity on remifentanil pharmacokinetics has not been specifically examined. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of body weight on remifentanil pharmacokinetics. Methods Twelve obese and 12 matched lean subjects undergoing elective surgery received a 1-min remifentanil infusion after induction of anesthesia. Arterial blood samples were collected for determination of remifentanil blood concentrations. Each subjects pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by fitting a two-compartment model to the concentration versus time curves. Nonlinear mixed-effects population models examining the influence of lean body mass (LBM) and total body weight (TBW) were also constructed. Clinical simulations using the final population model were performed. Results The obese patient cohort reached substantially higher remifentanil concentrations. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters of a two-compartment model were not significantly different between the obese versus lean cohorts (unless normalized to TBW). The final population model scaled central clearance and the central and peripheral distribution volumes to LBM. The simulations illustrated that remifentanil pharmacokinetics are not grossly different in obese versus lean subjects and that TBW based dosing in obese patients can result in excessively high remifentanil concentrations. Conclusions The essential findings of the study are that remifentanils pharmacokinetics are not appreciably different in obese versus lean subjects and that remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameters are therefore more closely related to LBM than to TBW. Clinically this means that remifentanil dosing regimens should be based on ideal body weight (or LBM) and not TBW.

Pharmacokinetics of Remifentanil in Anesthetized Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery or Diagnostic Procedures

Remifentanil hydrochloride is an ultra-short-acting opioid that undergoes rapid metabolism by tissue and plasma esterases. We aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and determine the hemodynamic profile of remifentanil after a single-bolus dose in children aged 0 to 18 yr. Forty-two children undergoing elective surgical procedures received remifentanil 5 &mgr;g/kg infused over 1 min. Patients were divided into age groups as follows: young infants (≤2 mo), older infants (>2 mo to <2 yr), young children (2 to <7 yr), older children (7 to <13 yr), adolescents (13 to <16 yr), and young adults (16 to <18 yr). Arterial blood samples were collected and analyzed by mass spectroscopy to determine remifentanil pharmacokinetic profiles. Hemodynamic measurements for remifentanil’s effect were made after the infusion. Methods of statistical analysis included analysis of variance and linear regression, with significance at P ≤ 0.05. Complete remifentanil pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 34 patients. The volume of distribution was largest in the infants <2 mo (mean, 452 mL/kg) and decreased to means of 223 to 308 mL/kg in the older patients. There was a more rapid clearance in the infants <2 mo of age (90 mL · kg−1 · min−1) and infants 2 mo to 2 yr (92 mL · kg−1 · min−1) than in the other groups (means, 46 to 76 mL · kg−1 · min−1). The half-life was similar in all age groups, with means of 3.4 to 5.7 min. Seven subjects (17%) developed hypotension related to the remifentanil bolus. Remifentanil showed an extremely rapid elimination similar to that in adults. The fast clearance rates observed in neonates and infants, as well as the lack of age-related changes in half-life, are in sharp contrast to the pharmacokinetic profile of other opioids. Remifentanil in a bolus dose of 5 &mgr;g/kg may cause hypotension in anesthetized children.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in volunteer subjects with severe liver disease.

Background Remifentanil, a new micro-opioid agonist with an extremely short duration of action, is metabolized by circulating and tissue esterases; therefore, its clearance should be relatively unaffected by changes in hepatic or renal function. This study was designed to determine whether severe hepatic disease affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Methods Ten volunteers with chronic, stable, severe hepatic disease and awaiting liver transplantation and ten matched controls were enrolled. Each subject was given a 4-h infusion of remifentanil. The first five pairs received 0.0125 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 3 h; the second five pairs received double these infusion rates. During and after the infusion, arterial blood was obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses, and the ventilatory response to a hypercarbic challenge was assessed. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed. The pharmacokinetics were described using a one-compartment intravenous infusion model, and ventilatory depression was modelled using the inhibitory Emax model. The pharmacokinetics of the metabolite GR90291 were determined using noncompartmental methods. Results There were no differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for remifentanil or GR90291 between the two groups. The subjects with liver disease were more sensitive to the ventilatory depressant effects of remifentanil. The EC50 values (the remifentanil concentrations determined from simultaneous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses to depress carbon dioxide-stimulated minute ventilation by 50%) in the control and hepatic disease groups were 2.52 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 2.07-2.97 ng/ml) and 1.56 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 1.37-1.76 ng/ml), respectively. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil and GR90291 are unchanged in persons with severe, chronic liver disease. Such patients may be more sensitive to the ventilatory depressant effects of remifentanil, a finding of uncertain clinical significance, considering the extremely short duration of action of the drug.

Histamine concentrations and hemodynamic responses after remifentamil

Remifentanil is a new potent opioid analgesic that undergoes rapid esterase metabolism.The purpose of this study was to investigate hemodynamic responses to 2-30 micro gram/kg remifentanil (escalating doses) injected as a bolus over 1 min during general anesthesia. After general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, placement of a radial artery catheter, and pretreatment with glycopyrrolate, remifentanil 2, 5, 15, or 30 micro gram/kg (six patients, three male and three female per group) was administered over 1 min. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured noninvasively before drug administration, after drug administration, and then every minute for 5 min. Arterial blood was taken for histamine determinations before drug administration and then at 1, 3, and 5 min after drug administration. Administration of remifentanil was associated with a reduction in systolic blood pressure from 134 +/- 18 to 91 +/- 16 mm Hg and heart rate from 99 +/- 20 to 69 +/- 21 bpm and was not associated with alterations in histamine concentration. (Anesth Analg 1995;80:990-3)

Pharmacokinetics Anesthesiologists, and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Persons with Renal Failure Compared with Healthy Volunteers

Background Remifentanil is an opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia. An ester linkage renders it susceptible to rapid metabolism by blood and tissue esterases. Thus it was hypothesized that remifentanil elimination would be independent of renal function. Because its principal metabolite (GR90291) is eliminated renally, it would depend on renal function. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite in persons with and without renal failure. Methods Two groups of volunteers received two-stage infusions of remifentanil: low dose with 0.0125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h; and high dose with 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h. Blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were fit using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanils effect was determined intermittently using minute ventilation during a hypercapnic (7.5% CO2) challenge. Results Fifteen patients with renal failure and eight control participants were enrolled. The clearance and volume of distribution of remifentanil were not different between those with renal failure and the controls. Patients with renal failure showed a marked reduction in the elimination of GR90291; the half-life of the metabolite increased from 1.5 h in the controls to more than 26 h in patients with renal failure. The steady-state concentration of GR90291 is likely to be more than 25 times higher in persons with renal failure. There were no obvious differences in opioid effects on minute ventilation in the controls and in patients with renal failure. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil were not altered in patients with renal disease, but the elimination of its principal metabolite, GR90291, was markedly reduced. Based on simulations, the concentration of GR90291 at the end of a 12-h remifentanil infusion of 2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 is not likely to produce significant opioid effects.