Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein
United States Department of Agriculture
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein.
Economic Research Report | 2011
Keith O. Fuglie; Paul W. Heisey; John L. King; Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein; David Schimmelpfennig; Sun Ling Wang
Meeting growing global demand for food, fiber, and biofuel requires robust investment in agricultural research and development (R&D) from both public and private sectors. This study examines global R&D spending by private industry in seven agricultural input sectors, food manufacturing, and biofuel and describes the changing structure of these industries. In 2007 (the latest year for which comprehensive estimates are available), the private sector spent
Economic Research Report | 2012
Scott A. Malcolm; Elizabeth Marshall; Marcel P. Aillery; Paul W. Heisey; Michael J. Livingston; Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein
19.7 billion on food and agricultural research (56 percent in food manufacturing and 44 percent in agricultural input sectors) and accounted for about half of total public and private spending on food and agricultural R&D in high-income countries. In R&D related to biofuel, annual private-sector investments are estimated to have reached
Economic Information Bulletin | 2015
Paul W. Heisey; Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein
1.47 billion worldwide by 2009. Incentives to invest in R&D are influenced by market structure and other factors. Agricultural input industries have undergone significant structural change over the past two decades, with industry concentration on the rise. A relatively small number of large, multinational firms with global R&D and marketing networks account for most R&D in each input industry. Rising market concentration has not generally been associated with increased R&D investment as a percentage of industry sales.
Agricultural Information Bulletins | 2001
Robbin A. Shoemaker; Joy L. Harwood; Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein; Terry Dunahay; Paul W. Heisey; Linwood A. Hoffman; Cassandra Klotz-Ingram; William W. Lin; Lorraine Mitchell; William D. McBride; Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo
Global climate models predict increases over time in average temperature worldwide, with significant impacts on local patterns of temperature and precipitation. The extent to which such changes present a risk to food supplies, farmer livelihoods, and rural communities depends in part on the direction, magnitude, and rate of such changes, but equally importantly on the ability of the agricultural sector to adapt to changing patterns of yield and productivity, production cost, and resource availability. Study findings suggest that, while impacts are highly sensitive to uncertain climate projections, farmers have considerable fl exibility to adapt to changes in local weather, resource conditions, and price signals by adjusting crops, rotations, and production practices. Such adaptation, using existing crop production technologies, can partially mitigate the impacts of climate change on national agricultural markets. Adaptive redistribution of production, however, may have signifi cant implications for both regional land use and environmental quality.
Archive | 1999
Cassandra Klotz-Ingram; Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein
Climate change poses significant risks to future crop productivity as temperatures rise, rainfall patterns become more variable, and pest and disease pressures increase. The use of crop genetic resources to develop varieties more tolerant to rapidly changing environmental conditions will be an important part of agricultural adaptation to climate change. Finding new genetic traits that can facilitate adaptation—and incorporating them into commercially successful varieties—is time-consuming, expensive, and technically difficult. The public-goods characteristics of genetic resources can create obstacles to rewards for private research and development. Because of insufficient private incentives, public-sector investment in the use of genetic resources will help determine the agricultural sector’s ability to maintain crop productivity, and for society as a whole, the potential benefits of public investment are large. The study authors find, however, that factors such as intellectual property rules for genetic resources and for research tools, or international agreements governing genetic resource exchange, have the potential both to promote and to hamper greater use of genetic resources for climate change adaptation.
Public-Private Collaboration in Agricultural Research: New Institutional Arrangements and Economic Implications | 2008
Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein; Keith O. Fuglie
Economic Research Report | 2010
Paul W. Heisey; John L. King; Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein; Dale A. Bucks; Rick Welsh
Economic Research Report | 2006
Paul W. Heisey; Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein; John L. King
Amber Waves | 2003
Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein; Paul W. Heisey
Journal of Agribusiness | 1999
Kelly A. Day-Rubenstein; Keith O. Fuglie