Kevin J. Coppersmith
Woodward, Inc.
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kevin J. Coppersmith.
Earthquake Spectra | 2001
J. Carl Stepp; Ivan Wong; John W. Whitney; Richard Quittmeyer; Norman A. Abrahamson; Gabriel R. Toro; Robert R. Youngs; Kevin J. Coppersmith; Jean Savy; Timothy J. Sullivan
Probabilistic seismic hazard analyses were conducted to estimate both ground motion and fault displacement hazards at the potential geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The study is believed to be the largest and most comprehensive analyses ever conducted for ground-shaking hazard and is a first-of-a-kind assessment of probabilistic fault displacement hazard. The major emphasis of the study was on the quantification of epistemic uncertainty. Six teams of three experts performed seismic source and fault displacement evaluations, and seven individual experts provided ground motion evaluations. State-of-the-practice expert elicitation processes involving structured workshops, consensus identification of parameters and issues to be evaluated, common sharing of data and information, and open exchanges about the basis for preliminary interpretations were implemented. Ground-shaking hazard was computed for a hypothetical rock outcrop at -300 m, the depth of the potential waste emplacement drifts, at the designated design annual exceedance probabilities of 10-3 and 10-4. The fault displacement hazard was calculated at the design annual exceedance probabilities of 10-4 and 10-5.
Earthquake Spectra | 2003
Robert R. Youngs; Walter J. Arabasz; R. Ernest Anderson; Alan R. Ramelli; Jon P. Ake; David B. Slemmons; James P. McCalpin; Diane I. Doser; Christopher J. Fridrich; Frank H. Swan; Albert M. Rogers; James C. Yount; Laurence W. Anderson; Kenneth D. Smith; Ronald L. Bruhn; Peter L. K. Knuepfer; Robert B. Smith; Craig M. dePolo; Dennis W. O'Leary; Kevin J. Coppersmith; Silvio K. Pezzopane; David P. Schwartz; John W. Whitney; Susan S. Olig; Gabriel R. Toro
We present a methodology for conducting a site-specific probabilistic analysis of fault displacement hazard. Two approaches are outlined. The first relates the occurrence of fault displacement at or near the ground surface to the occurrence of earthquakes in the same manner as is done in a standard probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for ground shaking. The methodology for this approach is taken directly from PSHA methodology with the ground-motion attenuation function replaced by a fault displacement attenuation function. In the second approach, the rate of displacement events and the distribution for fault displacement are derived directly from the characteristics of the faults or geologic features at the site of interest. The methodology for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis (PFDHA) was developed for a normal faulting environment and the probability distributions we present may have general application in similar tectonic regions. In addition, the general methodology is applicable to any region and we indicate the type of data needed to apply the methodology elsewhere.
Earthquake Spectra | 2015
Julian J. Bommer; Kevin J. Coppersmith; Ryan Coppersmith; Kathryn L. Hanson; Azangi Mangongolo; Johann Neveling; Ellen M. Rathje; Adrian Rodriguez-Marek; Frank Scherbaum; Refilwe Shelembe; Peter J. Stafford; Fleur O. Strasser
A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis has been conducted for a potential nuclear power plant site on the coast of South Africa, a country of low-to-moderate seismicity. The hazard study was conducted as a SSHAC Level 3 process, the first application of this approach outside North America. Extensive geological investigations identified five fault sources with a non-zero probability of being seismogenic. Five area sources were defined for distributed seismicity, the least active being the host zone for which the low recurrence rates for earthquakes were substantiated through investigations of historical seismicity. Empirical ground-motion prediction equations were adjusted to a horizon within the bedrock at the site using kappa values inferred from weak-motion analyses. These adjusted models were then scaled to create new equations capturing the range of epistemic uncertainty in this region with no strong motion recordings. Surface motions were obtained by convolving the bedrock motions with site amplification functions calculated using measured shear-wave velocity profiles.
Archive | 2012
Kevin J. Coppersmith; Lawrence A. Salomone; Christopher W. Fuller; Laura L. Glaser; Kathryn L. Hanson; Ross D. Hartleb; William R. Lettis; Scott C. Lindvall; Stephen M. Mcduffie; Robin K. McGuire; Gerry L. Stirewalt; Gabriel R. Toro; Robert R. Youngs; David L. Slayter; Serkan B. Bozkurt; Randolph Cumbest; Valentina Montaldo Falero; Roseanne C. Perman' Allison M. Shumway; Frank H. Syms
This report describes a new seismic source characterization (SSC) model for the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS). It will replace the Seismic Hazard Methodology for the Central and Eastern United States, EPRI Report NP-4726 (July 1986) and the Seismic Hazard Characterization of 69 Nuclear Plant Sites East of the Rocky Mountains, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Model, (Bernreuter et al., 1989). The objective of the CEUS SSC Project is to develop a new seismic source model for the CEUS using a Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) Level 3 assessment process. The goal of the SSHAC process is to represent the center, body, and range of technically defensible interpretations of the available data, models, and methods. Input to a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) consists of both seismic source characterization and ground motion characterization. These two components are used to calculate probabilistic hazard results (or seismic hazard curves) at a particular site. This report provides a new seismic source model. Results and Findings The product of this report is a regional CEUS SSC model. This model includes consideration of an updated database, full assessment and incorporation of uncertainties, and the range of diverse technical interpretations from the larger technical community. The SSC model will be widely applicable to the entire CEUS, so this project uses a ground motion model that includes generic variations to allow for a range of representative site conditions (deep soil, shallow soil, hard rock). Hazard and sensitivity calculations were conducted at seven test sites representative of different CEUS hazard environments. Challenges and Objectives The regional CEUS SSC model will be of value to readers who are involved in PSHA work, and who wish to use an updated SSC model. This model is based on a comprehensive and traceable process, in accordance with SSHAC guidelines in NUREG/CR-6372, Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts. The model will be used to assess the present-day composite distribution for seismic sources along with their characterization in the CEUS and uncertainty. In addition, this model is in a form suitable for use in PSHA evaluations for regulatory activities, such as Early Site Permit (ESPs) and Combined Operating License Applications (COLAs). Applications, Values, and Use Development of a regional CEUS seismic source model will provide value to those who (1) have submitted an ESP or COLA for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review before 2011; (2) will submit an ESP or COLA for NRC review after 2011; (3) must respond to safety issues resulting from NRC Generic Issue 199 (GI-199) for existing plants and (4) will prepare PSHAs to meet design and periodic review requirements for current and future nuclear facilities. This work replaces a previous study performed approximately 25 years ago. Since that study was completed, substantial work has been done to improve the understanding of seismic sources and their characterization in the CEUS. Thus, a new regional SSC model provides a consistent, stable basis for computing PSHA for a future time span. Use of a new SSC model reduces the risk of delays in new plant licensing due to more conservative interpretations in the existing and future literature. Perspective The purpose of this study, jointly sponsored by EPRI, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the NRC was to develop a new CEUS SSC model. The team assembled to accomplish this purpose was composed of distinguished subject matter experts from industry, government, and academia. The resulting model is unique, and because this project has solicited input from the present-day larger technical community, it is not likely that there will be a need for significant revision for a number of years. See also Sponsors Perspective for more details. The goal of this project was to implement the CEUS SSC work plan for developing a regional CEUS SSC model. The work plan, formulated by the project manager and a technical integration team, consists of a series of tasks designed to meet the project objectives. This report was reviewed by a participatory peer review panel (PPRP), sponsor reviewers, the NRC, the U.S. Geological Survey, and other stakeholders. Comments from the PPRP and other reviewers were considered when preparing the report. The SSC model was completed at the end of 2011.
Archive | 1989
Kevin J. Coppersmith; Robert R. Youngs
We summarize several important issues related to the characterization of earthquake sources within stable continental interiors and we present some effective methods for incorporating uncertainties in source characteristics into seismic hazard analyses. The focus of the conclusions drawn is the central and eastern United States (CEUS), but they may be applicable to other analogous regions as shown in an example. Three important aspects of hazard analysis considered here are earthquake source location, maximum earthquake size, and earthquake recurrence. Historically, estimates of the location of future earthquake sources has relied heavily on seismicity data and on the pattern of past earthquake occurrence. Because the historical record may be too short to include all earthquake sources, tectonic data are being considered. The stress regime in the CEUS appears to be regionally compressive and to have a generally uniform NE to ENE orientation, suggesting far-field tectonic stress mechanisms. Within this regime, some tectonic features appear to be reactivated, although local stress concentration may also be important. A variety of approaches toward estimating maximum earthquakes have been proposed, most relying to some extent on the historical record or extrapolation thereof. These methods are described and an ongoing study that uses worldwide observations of large earthquakes is also summarized. Detailed studies of earthquake recurrence at active seismic zones in the CEUS strongly suggest that earthquakes are temporally and spatially clustered. Preliminary work at these locations suggests that a temporal cluster has a lifetime of at least several thousand years and that the locations of the most recent prehistoric earthquakes has been generally at the locations of observed events. We describe the use of logic trees to document and incorporate the uncertainties in seismic source characteristics into seismic hazard analysis, and we present an example of their application in the Norwegian North Sea.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 1994
Donald Wells; Kevin J. Coppersmith
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1984
David P. Schwartz; Kevin J. Coppersmith
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 1985
Robert R. Youngs; Kevin J. Coppersmith
Risk Analysis | 1998
Robert J. Budnitz; George E. Apostolakis; David M. Boore; Lloyd S. Cluff; Kevin J. Coppersmith; C. Allin Cornell; Peter A. Morris
Swiss Journal of Geosciences | 2009
Kevin J. Coppersmith; Robert R. Youngs; Christian Sprecher