Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kevin T. Chapman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kevin T. Chapman.


Communications Biology | 2018

Light-activated cell identification and sorting (LACIS) for selection of edited clones on a nanofluidic device

Annamaria Mocciaro; Theodore L. Roth; Hayley M. Bennett; Magali Soumillon; Abhik Shah; Joseph Hiatt; Kevin T. Chapman; Alexander Marson; Gregory Lavieu

Despite improvements in the CRISPR molecular toolbox, identifying and purifying properly edited clones remains slow, laborious, and low-yield. Here, we establish a method to enable clonal isolation, selection, and expansion of properly edited cells, using OptoElectroPositioning technology for single-cell manipulation on a nanofluidic device. Briefly, after electroporation of primary T cells with CXCR4-targeting Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, single T cells are isolated on a chip and expanded into colonies. Phenotypic consequences of editing are rapidly assessed on-chip with cell-surface staining for CXCR4. Furthermore, individual colonies are identified based on their specific genotype. Each colony is split and sequentially exported for on-target sequencing and further off-chip clonal expansion of the validated clones. Using this method, single-clone editing efficiencies, including the rate of mono- and bi-allelic indels or precise nucleotide replacements, can be assessed within 10 days from Cas9 ribonucleoprotein introduction in cells.Annamaria Mocciaro et al. present LACIS, a method for identifying and selecting gene-edited clones using a microfluidic device. The authors apply LACIS to primary T cells after CRISPR-Cas9 editing of CXCR4 and show that selection of edited clones was possible within 10 days from initiation of gene editing.


bioRxiv | 2017

Light-Activated Cell Identification and Sorting (LACIS): A New Method to Identify and Select Edited Clones on a Microfluidic Device

Annamaria Mocciaro; Theodore L. Roth; Hayley M. Bennett; Magali Soumillon; Abhik Shah; Joseph Hiatt; Kevin T. Chapman; Alexander Marson; Gregory Lavieu

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has revolutionized cell engineering and promises to open new doors in gene and cell therapies. Despite improvements in the CRISPR-editing molecular toolbox in cell lines and primary cells, identifying and purifying properly edited clones remains slow, laborious and low-yield. Here, we establish a new method that uses cell manipulation on a chip with Opto-Electronic Positioning (OEP) technology to enable clonal isolation and selection of edited cells. We focused on editing CXCR4 in primary human T cells, a gene that encodes a co-receptor for HIV entry. T cells hold significant potential for cell-based therapy, but the gene-editing efficiency and expansion potential of these cells is limited. We describe here a method to obviate these limitations. Briefly, after electroporation of cells with CXCR4-targeting Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs), single T cells were isolated on a chip, where they proliferated over time into well-resolved colonies. Phenotypic consequences of genome editing could be rapidly assessed on-chip with cell-surface staining for CXCR4. Furthermore, independent of phenotype, individual colonies could be identified based on their specific genotype at the 5-10 cell stage. Each colony was split and sequentially exported for immediate on-target sequencing and validation, and further off-chip clonal expansion of the validated clones. We were able to assess single-clone editing efficiencies, including the rate of monoallelic and biallelic indels or precise nucleotide replacements. This new method will enable identification and selection of perfectly edited clones within 10 days from Cas9-RNP introduction in cells based on the phenotype and/or genotype.


Archive | 2013

Pens For Biological Micro-Objects

Kevin T. Chapman; Igor Y. Khandros; Gaetan L. Mathieu; J. Tanner Nevill; Ming C. Wu


Archive | 2014

Micro-Fluidic Devices for Assaying Biological Activity

Kevin T. Chapman; Daniele Malleo; J. Tanner Nevill; Steven W. Short; Mark P. White


Archive | 2014

Capturing Specific Nucleic Acid Materials From Individual Biological Cells In A Micro-Fluidic Device

Kevin T. Chapman; Eric D. Hobbs; Steven W. Short; Mark P. White


Archive | 2016

Generation and Selection of Embryos in Vitro

Kevin T. Chapman; Volker Kurz; Peggy Radel; Grant Yonehiro


Archive | 2016

FREEZING AND ARCHIVING CELLS ON A MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE

Mark P. White; Kevin T. Chapman; Andrew W. Mcfarland; Eric D. Hobbs; Randall D. Lowe


Archive | 2014

Erfassung spezifischer nukleinsäuren materialien aus einzelnen biologischen zellen in einer mikrofluidischen vorrichtung

Kevin T. Chapman; Eric D. Hobbs; Steven W. Short; Mark P. White; Daniele Malleo


Archive | 2014

Capture de matériaux d'acide nucléique spécifiques issus de cellules biologiques individuelles, dans un dispositif microfluidique

Kevin T. Chapman; Eric D. Hobbs; Steven W. Short; Mark P. White


Archive | 2013

Combining Biological Micro-Objects

Kevin T. Chapman; Igor Y. Khandros; Gaetan L. Mathieu; Steven W. Short; Ming C. Wu

Collaboration


Dive into the Kevin T. Chapman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark P. White

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric D. Hobbs

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abhik Shah

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniele Malleo

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory Lavieu

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge