Kim I. de la Cruz

Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs

OBJECTIVE Since the pioneering era of E. Stanley Crawford, our multimodal strategy for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has evolved. We describe our approximately 3-decade single-practice experience regarding 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs and identify predictors of early death and other adverse postoperative outcomes. METHODS We analyzed retrospective (1986-2006) and prospective data (2006-2014) obtained from patients (2043 male; median age, 67 [59-73] years) who underwent 914 Crawford extent I, 1066 extent II, 660 extent III, and 669 extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, of which 723 (21.8%) were urgent or emergency. Repairs were performed to treat degenerative aneurysm (64.2%) or aortic dissection (35.8%). The outcomes examined included operative death (ie, 30-day or in-hospital death) and permanent stroke, paraplegia, paraparesis, and renal failure necessitating dialysis, as well as adverse event, a composite of these outcomes. RESULTS There were 249 operative deaths (7.5%). Permanent paraplegia and paraparesis occurred after 97 (2.9%) and 81 (2.4%) repairs, respectively. Of 189 patients (5.7%) with permanent renal failure, 107 died in the hospital. Permanent stroke was relatively uncommon (n = 74; 2.2%). The rate of the composite adverse event (n = 478; 14.4%) was highest after extent II repair (n = 203; 19.0%) and lowest after extent IV repair (n = 67; 10.2%; P < .0001). Estimated postoperative survival was 83.5% ± 0.7% at 1 year, 63.6% ± 0.9% at 5 years, 36.8% ± 1.0% at 10 years, and 18.3% ± 0.9% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS Repairing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms poses substantial risks, particularly when the entire thoracoabdominal aorta (extent II) is replaced. Nonetheless, our data suggest that thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, when performed at an experienced center, can produce respectable outcomes.

Hypoalbuminemia and Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND Hypoalbuminemia is associated with increased morbidity in surgical patients. The impact of low albumin level on survival in cardiac surgical patients is unknown. We hypothesized that a low preoperative albumin level negatively affects long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS We reviewed prospectively gathered data from the records of 1,164 consecutive patients who underwent primary isolated CABG at our institution between 1997 and 2007. Propensity score analysis of 18 preoperative and intraoperative variables balanced potential confounding factors between the two groups of patients, so that the final study cohort consisted of 588 patients: 294 with a preoperative albumin level less than 3.5 g/dL (ie, hypoalbuminemia) and 294 patients with a preoperative albumin level of 3.5 g/dL or greater. We assessed long-term survival by using Kaplan-Meier curves generated by log rank tests. RESULTS The two groups of patients were well matched in terms of preoperative and intraoperative covariates. Both groups had similar early outcomes, including 30-day mortality rates (2.0% versus 1.7%; p = 0. 76) and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (2.7% versus 2.7%; p = 1.0). However, patients with hypoalbuminemia had a significantly worse 8-year survival rate (65% ± 7% versus 86% ± 3%; hazard ratio 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.4 to 3.6; p = 0.001) than patients without hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSIONS Although preoperative hypoalbuminemia did not predict increased early postoperative mortality or morbidity in CABG patients, it did independently predict poor long-term survival after CABG. Identifying the mechanism that underlies this relationship is essential in improving overall survival among patients with low serum albumin levels who are undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization.

Innominate artery cannulation: an alternative to femoral or axillary cannulation for arterial inflow in proximal aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of innominate artery cannulation in proximal aortic procedures, including those involving hypothermic circulatory arrest. METHODS A total of 68 patients underwent innominate artery cannulation with a side graft during proximal aortic surgery performed by way of a median sternotomy. The indications for surgery were proximal arch aneurysm in 43 patients (63.2%), aortic dissection in 11 patients (16.2%), total arch aneurysm in 10 patients (14.7%), and ascending aortic aneurysm in 4 patients (5.9%). Six patients (8.8%) had undergone previous sternotomy. Hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 64 patients (94.1%). Of the 68 patients, 63 (92.6%) received antegrade cerebral perfusion to both cerebral hemispheres. The median antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 20 minutes (range, 15.0-33.0 minutes). Seven patients had periods of circulatory arrest without antegrade cerebral perfusion for a median of 20 minutes (range, 6-33 minutes). RESULTS One patient died, for 30-day mortality of 1.5%. Three patients (4.4%) had strokes, two of whom had a partial recovery. Seven patients (10.3%) developed temporary postoperative confusion that resolved successfully in all cases. CONCLUSIONS Cannulating the innominate artery for arterial inflow is an alternative technique for proximal aortic surgery procedures. It is especially useful in cases requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest to deliver antegrade cerebral perfusion.

Total aortic arch replacement: A comparative study of zone 0 hybrid arch exclusion versus traditional open repair

OBJECTIVE We attempted to identify predictors of adverse outcomes after traditional open and hybrid zone 0 total aortic arch replacement. METHODS We performed multivariable analysis using 16 variables to identify predictors of adverse outcomes (mortality, permanent neurologic events, and permanent renal failure necessitating hemodialysis) in 319 consecutive patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement in the past 8.5 years and a subgroup analysis in 25 propensity-matched pairs. A total of 274 patients (85.9%) had traditional open repair, and 45 patients (14.1%) had hybrid zone 0 total arch exclusion. RESULTS Operative mortality was 10.3% (n = 33): 11.1% (n = 5) in the hybrid group and 10.2% (n = 28) in the traditional group (P = .79). A total of 19 patients (5.9%) had permanent stroke (15 traditional [5.5%] vs 4 hybrid [8.9%]; P = .32), and 2 patients (both traditional) had permanent paraplegia (P = 1.00). The hybrid group had more total neurologic events (P = .051) but not more permanent strokes (P = .32). Prior cardiac disease unrelated to the aorta (P = .0033) and congestive heart failure (P = .0053) independently predicted permanent adverse outcome (operative mortality, permanent neurologic event, or permanent renal failure). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting independently predicted permanent stroke (P = .032), as did previous cerebrovascular disease (P = .032). In multivariable analysis, procedure type (hybrid or traditional) was not an independent predictor of stroke (P = .09). During a median follow-up of 4.5 years (95% confidence interval, 3.9-4.9), survival was 78.7%, with no intergroup difference (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS Among contemporary cases, both traditional and hybrid total aortic arch replacement had acceptable results. Comparing these 2 different surgical treatment options is challenging, and an individualized approach offers the best results. Permanent adverse outcome was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Procedure type is not an independent predictor of permanent stroke. Prior cardiac disease, past or current smoking, and congestive heart failure predict adverse outcomes for total aortic arch replacement.

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a branched graft

Many aspects of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair are individualized according to patient-specific factors related to the type and extent of disease, comorbid conditions, and physiological reserve. One example of how surgeons can individualize the technical approach to this operation is the use of a prefabricated aortic graft with four side branches designed for reattaching the celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and both renal arteries (1-4). Using this branched graft in TAAA repairs is ideal when one of two conditions are met: (I) The patient has a connective tissue disorder (e.g., Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome), and aortic tissue that remains after the procedure will be prone to aneurysmal dilatation, pseudoaneurysm formation, and rupture, eventually necessitating reintervention (5-7); or (II) the origins of the patient’s visceral vessels are far enough apart that an island patch reimplantation is not desirable. The ultimate goal of these operations is to balance the need to resect and replace as much diseased aortic tissue as possible with the need to protect the spinal cord and other organs and, thereby, prevent postoperative complications. Our strategies for organ protection have been described in detail elsewhere (8-14). To protect the spinal cord, we employ mild passive hypothermia, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, left heart bypass (LHB), sequential cross-clamping, and selective reimplantation of intercostal or lumbar arteries (9-11,14). The renal arteries are perfused with cold crystalloid solution to protect the kidneys from ischemic damage (8,12,13). Perfusing the celiac axis and the SMA with isothermic blood from the LHB circuit minimizes the duration of abdominal-organ ischemia.

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cerebral Perfusion for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) is standard treatment for complex aortic pathology and includes both unilateral (u-ACP) and bilateral (b-ACP) techniques. Focusing on proximal acute aortic dissection, we investigated the clinical effect of u-ACP versus b-ACP. METHODS From January 2005 to May 2013, 157 consecutive patients presented with acute type A aortic dissection. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 153 patients (97.4%). Ninety patients (58.8%) received u-ACP, and 63 (41.2%) received b-ACP. No retrograde cerebral perfusion was used. The target systemic hypothermia temperature during ACP was 22° to 24°C. The mean ACP, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardiac ischemia times were 34.6 ± 18.0, 125.6 ± 48.0, and 92.6 ± 34.1 minutes, respectively. RESULTS The p values from logistic regression models indicated that in both groups combined, the ACP, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardiac ischemia times predicted hospital mortality (p = 0.035, p = 0.0033, and p = 0.035, respectively) but not stroke. The operative mortality was 13.3% (n = 12) with u-ACP and 12.7% (n = 8) with b-ACP (p = 0.91). Of the survivors, 13 of 88 u-ACP patients (14.8%) and 8 of 62 b-ACP patients (12.9%) had a postoperative stroke (p = 0.75). A circulatory arrest time of >30 minutes was associated with stroke (p = 0.031). Temporary neurologic dysfunction was present in 10 u-ACP (11.4%) and 5 b-ACP (8.2%) patients (p = 0.53). Postoperative renal failure occurred in 10 u-ACP (11.4%) and 10 b-ACP patients (16.1%) (p = 0.40). Antegrade stent delivery in the descending thoracic aorta did not affect the ACP, cardiac ischemia, circulatory arrest, or cardiopulmonary bypass times. CONCLUSIONS As one of the largest single-center studies of the efficacy of u-ACP and b-ACP in patients with type A aortic dissection, operative mortality, stroke, temporary neurologic dysfunction, and renal failure rates were similar in both. In this intrinsically complex disease, survival is the most important outcome; u-ACP may provide cardiac surgeons with valuable technical simplicity during challenging procedures, and b-ACP may be justified for circulatory arrest times of more than 30 minutes.

Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Early and Midterm Outcomes in 83 Patients

BACKGROUND Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an alternative to traditional composite valve graft (CVG) root replacement. We examined early and midterm outcomes after VSARR. METHODS A combined retrospective/prospective study was performed in 83 patients who underwent VSARR (16%) among 515 patients who underwent aortic root replacement during a nearly 12-year period. Thirty-six patients (43%) had a connective tissue disorder, 3 patients (4%) had acute aortic dissection, and 40 (48%) patients had at least moderate aortic regurgitation (AR). Twenty-eight patients (34%) had left ventricular hypertrophy or dilatation. The reimplantation VSARR technique was used in 82 patients (99%), and the Florida sleeve technique was used in 1 patient. Thirty-two patients (39%) underwent concomitant aortic arch replacement. For early survivors, the median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 5 days-12.2 years). RESULTS One patient had severe AR after VSARR that necessitated intraoperative conversion to a mechanical CVG. The 1 operative death and 1 stroke occurred in a patient with acute dissection. Actuarial survival was 96.4%±2.0% at 2 years and 86.9%±5.6% at 8 years. Six patients (7%) had late valve-related complications: 1 died of endocarditis, 4 underwent reoperation for severe AR and received replacement valves, and 1 had severe AR and is being monitored. Freedom from repair failure (reoperation, endocarditis, or severe AR) was 94.8%±2.6% at 2 years and 87.3%±5.7% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can have excellent early and respectable midterm outcomes, even when combined with arch repair. Further follow-up remains necessary to evaluate the long-term durability of VSARR.

Hemiarch and Total Arch Surgery in Patients With Previous Repair of Acute Type I Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND We examined our contemporary experience with hemiarch and total arch replacement in patients with previous acute type I aortic dissection. METHODS Over an 8.5-year period, 137 consecutive patients (median age 58 years, interquartile range, 50 to 67) underwent hemiarch or total transverse aortic arch replacement a median of 7.7 years (range, 67 days to 32 years; interquartile range, 2.8 to 12.3 years) after previous acute type I aortic dissection repair. Interventions involving only the aortic root, aortic valve, descending aorta, or thoracoabdominal aorta were excluded. Multivariate analysis of 20 potential preoperative and intraoperative risk factors was performed to examine early death, neurologic deficit, composite endpoint (operative death, permanent neurologic deficit, or hemodialysis at discharge), and long-term mortality. RESULTS Total arch replacement was performed in 103 patients (75.2%), hemiarch replacement in 34 (24.8%), and elephant trunk procedures in 77 (56.2%). Thirty-one repairs (22.6%) were emergent or urgent. There were 16 operative deaths (11.7%), 4 permanent strokes (3.6%), and 21 (15.3%) instances of the composite endpoint. In the multivariate analysis, congestive heart failure and cardiopulmonary bypass time independently predicted operative mortality (p = 0.0027, p = 0.018). Emergency operation approached significance for stroke (p = 0.088). Predictors of long-term mortality (during a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, 95% confidence interval: 4.4 to 5.8) were female sex (p = 0.0036), congestive heart failure (p = 0.0045), and circulatory arrest time (p = 0.0013); preoperative pulmonary disease approached significance (p = 0.074). Five-year survival was 73.2%. CONCLUSIONS In patients with previous acute type I aortic dissection repair, hemiarch and total arch operations have respectable morbidity and survival rates. Congestive heart failure predicts operative death, long-term mortality, and our adverse event endpoint. Cardiopulmonary bypass time predicts operative mortality, and female sex and circulatory arrest time predict long-term mortality.

Outcomes of open distal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with chronic DeBakey type I dissection

OBJECTIVES In patients with acute DeBakey type I dissection, endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta during proximal aortic repair is an increasingly popular approach to preventing distal aortic sequelae and subsequent repair. To better define the risks and outcomes associated with these secondary operations, we examined our contemporary experience with open distal aortic repair in patients with chronic type I aortic dissection. METHODS Data were collected between January 2005 and June 2013 regarding 198 consecutive open descending thoracic (n = 27) or thoracoabdominal (n = 171) aortic repairs performed in patients with chronic type I dissection. The median interval between the dissection onset and the subsequent distal operation was 5.0 years (interquartile range, 2.4-10.5 years). A total of 110 repairs (56%) were performed in patients with genetic disorders. RESULTS There were 14 early deaths (7%). Permanent paraplegia developed in 2 patients (1%), 5 patients (3%) had permanent stroke, and 9 patients (5%) had permanent renal failure. Factors associated with early death included greater age (P = .01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .01), clamping proximal to the left subclavian artery (P = .004), and use of hypothermic circulatory arrest (P = .002). The use of cold renal perfusion (P < .001) was associated with early survival. Early death was not associated with genetic disorders, emergency surgery, or extent of aortic repair. There were 36 late deaths, yielding an actuarial 8-year survival of 65.6% ± 5.9%. At 7 years, freedom from repair failure was 95.7% ± 1.7%, and freedom from subsequent repair for disease progression was 84.8% ± 4.6%. CONCLUSIONS In survivors of DeBakey type I aortic dissection with distal aneurysm, open repair of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta can be performed with excellent early survival, acceptable morbidity, and relatively few late aortic events.

Endovascular Repair as a Bridge to Surgical Repair of an Aortobronchial Fistula Complicating Chronic Residual Aortic Dissection

Endovascular and open surgical repair have been used in patients with descending thoracic aortic dissection; however, the appropriate treatment is debated. We describe the case of a 60-year-old woman who had a symptomatic, chronic, residual, descending thoracic aortic dissection that was complicated by an aortobronchial fistula. She underwent emergent thoracic endovascular stent-grafting but remained symptomatic. Computed tomographic angiograms showed a contained rupture into the lower lobe of the left lung. The patient underwent definitive surgery to remove the stents, reconstruct the aorta, and resect the nonviable lung tissue. The remainder of her postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged from the hospital 13 days after the 2nd operation. Results of genetic testing confirmed an earlier presumptive diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. In an emergency, the best initial option for patients with a complicated descending thoracic aortic dissection might be thoracic endovascular aortic repair, which could serve as a bridge to definitive open repair.