Matt D. Price

Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs

OBJECTIVE Since the pioneering era of E. Stanley Crawford, our multimodal strategy for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has evolved. We describe our approximately 3-decade single-practice experience regarding 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs and identify predictors of early death and other adverse postoperative outcomes. METHODS We analyzed retrospective (1986-2006) and prospective data (2006-2014) obtained from patients (2043 male; median age, 67 [59-73] years) who underwent 914 Crawford extent I, 1066 extent II, 660 extent III, and 669 extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, of which 723 (21.8%) were urgent or emergency. Repairs were performed to treat degenerative aneurysm (64.2%) or aortic dissection (35.8%). The outcomes examined included operative death (ie, 30-day or in-hospital death) and permanent stroke, paraplegia, paraparesis, and renal failure necessitating dialysis, as well as adverse event, a composite of these outcomes. RESULTS There were 249 operative deaths (7.5%). Permanent paraplegia and paraparesis occurred after 97 (2.9%) and 81 (2.4%) repairs, respectively. Of 189 patients (5.7%) with permanent renal failure, 107 died in the hospital. Permanent stroke was relatively uncommon (n = 74; 2.2%). The rate of the composite adverse event (n = 478; 14.4%) was highest after extent II repair (n = 203; 19.0%) and lowest after extent IV repair (n = 67; 10.2%; P < .0001). Estimated postoperative survival was 83.5% ± 0.7% at 1 year, 63.6% ± 0.9% at 5 years, 36.8% ± 1.0% at 10 years, and 18.3% ± 0.9% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS Repairing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms poses substantial risks, particularly when the entire thoracoabdominal aorta (extent II) is replaced. Nonetheless, our data suggest that thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, when performed at an experienced center, can produce respectable outcomes.

Results of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Background: Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) enables the effective replacement of the diseased aortic segment and reliably prevents aneurysm rupture. However, these operations also carry substantial risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, principally caused by the associated ischemic insult involving the spinal cord, kidneys, and other abdominal viscera. Here, we describe the early outcomes of a contemporary series of open TAAA repairs. Methods: We reviewed the outcomes of 823 open TAAA repairs performed between January 2005 and May 2012. Of these, 209 (25.4%) were Crawford extent I repairs, 264 (32.1%) were extent II, 157 (19.1%) were extent III, and 193 (23.5%) were extent IV. Aortic dissection was present in 350 (42.5%) cases, and aneurysm rupture was present in 37 (4.5%). Adjuncts used during the procedures included cerebrospinal fluid drainage in 639 (77.6%) cases, left heart bypass in 430 (52.2%), and cold renal perfusion in 674 (81.9%). Results: The composite endpoint, adverse outcome—defined as operative death, renal failure that necessitated dialysis at discharge, stroke, or permanent paraplegia or paraparesis—occurred after 131 (15.9%) procedures. There were 69 (8.4%) operative deaths. Permanent paraplegia or paraparesis occurred after 42 (5.1%) cases, stroke occurred after 27 (3.3%), and renal failure necessitating permanent dialysis occurred after 45 (5.5%). Conclusions: Although open surgical repair of the thoracoabdominal aorta can be life-saving to patients at risk for fatal aneurysm rupture, these operations remain challenging and are associated with substantial risk of early death and major complications. Additional improvements are needed to further reduce the risks associated with TAAA repair, particularly as increasing numbers of patients with advanced age and multiple or severe comorbidities present for treatment.

Moderate hypothermia during aortic arch surgery is associated with reduced risk of early mortality

OBJECTIVE Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) during hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) provides cerebral protection during aortic arch surgery. However, the ideal temperature for HCA during ACP remains unknown. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients who underwent moderate (nasopharyngeal temperature, ≥ 20 °C) versus deep (nasopharyngeal temperature, <20 °C) HCA with ACP during aortic arch repair. METHODS By using a prospectively maintained clinical database, we analyzed data from 221 consecutive patients who underwent aortic arch replacement with HCA and ACP between December 2006 and May 2009. Seventy-eight patients underwent deep hypothermia (mean lowest temperature, 16.8 °C ± 1.7 °C) and 143 patients underwent moderate hypothermia (mean, 22.9 °C ± 1.4 °C) before systemic circulatory arrest was initiated. Multivariate stepwise logistic and linear regressions were performed to determine whether depth of hypothermia independently predicted postoperative outcomes and blood-product use. RESULTS Compared with moderate hypothermia, deep hypothermia was associated independently with a greater risk of in-hospital death (7.7% vs 0.7%; odds ratio [OR], 9.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-81.6; P = .005) and 30-day all-cause mortality (9.0% vs 2.1%; OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.2-18.6; P = .02), and with longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (154 ± 62 vs 140 ± 46 min; P = .008). Deep hypothermia also was associated with a higher incidence of stroke, although this association was not statistically significant (7.6% vs 2.8%; P = .073; OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 0.9-12.5). No difference was seen in acute kidney injury, blood product transfusion, or need for surgical re-exploration. CONCLUSIONS Moderate hypothermia with ACP is associated with lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality, shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time, and fewer neurologic sequelae than deep hypothermia in patients who undergo aortic arch surgery with ACP.

Early Outcomes After Aortic Arch Replacement by Using the Y-Graft Technique

BACKGROUND Aortic arch replacement remains among the most technically challenging cardiovascular operations, incurring considerable risk for perioperative death and stroke. The trifurcated graft technique, in which a double Y-graft is used to connect brachiocephalic branches to the main aortic graft, was recently developed to simplify arch reconstruction, reduce embolization, and minimize related cerebral ischemia. We examined early outcomes of aortic arch replacement performed by using single or double Y-graft variations of this technique. METHODS Between December 2006 and May 2009, the Y-graft technique was used to perform aortic arch replacement in 55 patients. Thirty-three patients had prior median sternotomy (60%), and 34 (62%) had ascending aortic dissection. Axillary cannulation was used in 52 patients (95%), and hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion were used in all patients. Median systemic and cerebral circulatory arrest times were 65 minutes and 0 minutes, respectively. A first-stage elephant trunk repair was performed in 46 patients (84%). Follow-up data were obtained for all patients. RESULTS There were no in-hospital deaths and one 30-day death (2%). Three patients (5%) had strokes, 1 of which was transient. Actuarial 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 80.0% ± 5.4% and 77.6% ± 5.7%, respectively. Thirty-one of the elephant trunk patients (67%) subsequently underwent second-stage completion procedures, 5 (16%) of them endovascular. CONCLUSIONS Early results of aortic arch replacement by the Y-graft technique compare favorably with those of traditional approaches. The technique enables effective delivery of antegrade cerebral perfusion during complex arch procedures and incurs only a low risk of neurologic sequelae.

Total aortic arch replacement: A comparative study of zone 0 hybrid arch exclusion versus traditional open repair

OBJECTIVE We attempted to identify predictors of adverse outcomes after traditional open and hybrid zone 0 total aortic arch replacement. METHODS We performed multivariable analysis using 16 variables to identify predictors of adverse outcomes (mortality, permanent neurologic events, and permanent renal failure necessitating hemodialysis) in 319 consecutive patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement in the past 8.5 years and a subgroup analysis in 25 propensity-matched pairs. A total of 274 patients (85.9%) had traditional open repair, and 45 patients (14.1%) had hybrid zone 0 total arch exclusion. RESULTS Operative mortality was 10.3% (n = 33): 11.1% (n = 5) in the hybrid group and 10.2% (n = 28) in the traditional group (P = .79). A total of 19 patients (5.9%) had permanent stroke (15 traditional [5.5%] vs 4 hybrid [8.9%]; P = .32), and 2 patients (both traditional) had permanent paraplegia (P = 1.00). The hybrid group had more total neurologic events (P = .051) but not more permanent strokes (P = .32). Prior cardiac disease unrelated to the aorta (P = .0033) and congestive heart failure (P = .0053) independently predicted permanent adverse outcome (operative mortality, permanent neurologic event, or permanent renal failure). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting independently predicted permanent stroke (P = .032), as did previous cerebrovascular disease (P = .032). In multivariable analysis, procedure type (hybrid or traditional) was not an independent predictor of stroke (P = .09). During a median follow-up of 4.5 years (95% confidence interval, 3.9-4.9), survival was 78.7%, with no intergroup difference (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS Among contemporary cases, both traditional and hybrid total aortic arch replacement had acceptable results. Comparing these 2 different surgical treatment options is challenging, and an individualized approach offers the best results. Permanent adverse outcome was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Procedure type is not an independent predictor of permanent stroke. Prior cardiac disease, past or current smoking, and congestive heart failure predict adverse outcomes for total aortic arch replacement.

Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Early and Midterm Outcomes in 83 Patients

BACKGROUND Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an alternative to traditional composite valve graft (CVG) root replacement. We examined early and midterm outcomes after VSARR. METHODS A combined retrospective/prospective study was performed in 83 patients who underwent VSARR (16%) among 515 patients who underwent aortic root replacement during a nearly 12-year period. Thirty-six patients (43%) had a connective tissue disorder, 3 patients (4%) had acute aortic dissection, and 40 (48%) patients had at least moderate aortic regurgitation (AR). Twenty-eight patients (34%) had left ventricular hypertrophy or dilatation. The reimplantation VSARR technique was used in 82 patients (99%), and the Florida sleeve technique was used in 1 patient. Thirty-two patients (39%) underwent concomitant aortic arch replacement. For early survivors, the median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 5 days-12.2 years). RESULTS One patient had severe AR after VSARR that necessitated intraoperative conversion to a mechanical CVG. The 1 operative death and 1 stroke occurred in a patient with acute dissection. Actuarial survival was 96.4%±2.0% at 2 years and 86.9%±5.6% at 8 years. Six patients (7%) had late valve-related complications: 1 died of endocarditis, 4 underwent reoperation for severe AR and received replacement valves, and 1 had severe AR and is being monitored. Freedom from repair failure (reoperation, endocarditis, or severe AR) was 94.8%±2.6% at 2 years and 87.3%±5.7% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can have excellent early and respectable midterm outcomes, even when combined with arch repair. Further follow-up remains necessary to evaluate the long-term durability of VSARR.

Hemiarch and Total Arch Surgery in Patients With Previous Repair of Acute Type I Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND We examined our contemporary experience with hemiarch and total arch replacement in patients with previous acute type I aortic dissection. METHODS Over an 8.5-year period, 137 consecutive patients (median age 58 years, interquartile range, 50 to 67) underwent hemiarch or total transverse aortic arch replacement a median of 7.7 years (range, 67 days to 32 years; interquartile range, 2.8 to 12.3 years) after previous acute type I aortic dissection repair. Interventions involving only the aortic root, aortic valve, descending aorta, or thoracoabdominal aorta were excluded. Multivariate analysis of 20 potential preoperative and intraoperative risk factors was performed to examine early death, neurologic deficit, composite endpoint (operative death, permanent neurologic deficit, or hemodialysis at discharge), and long-term mortality. RESULTS Total arch replacement was performed in 103 patients (75.2%), hemiarch replacement in 34 (24.8%), and elephant trunk procedures in 77 (56.2%). Thirty-one repairs (22.6%) were emergent or urgent. There were 16 operative deaths (11.7%), 4 permanent strokes (3.6%), and 21 (15.3%) instances of the composite endpoint. In the multivariate analysis, congestive heart failure and cardiopulmonary bypass time independently predicted operative mortality (p = 0.0027, p = 0.018). Emergency operation approached significance for stroke (p = 0.088). Predictors of long-term mortality (during a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, 95% confidence interval: 4.4 to 5.8) were female sex (p = 0.0036), congestive heart failure (p = 0.0045), and circulatory arrest time (p = 0.0013); preoperative pulmonary disease approached significance (p = 0.074). Five-year survival was 73.2%. CONCLUSIONS In patients with previous acute type I aortic dissection repair, hemiarch and total arch operations have respectable morbidity and survival rates. Congestive heart failure predicts operative death, long-term mortality, and our adverse event endpoint. Cardiopulmonary bypass time predicts operative mortality, and female sex and circulatory arrest time predict long-term mortality.

Midterm Survival and Quality of Life After Extent II Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair in Marfan Syndrome

BACKGROUND Pathologic conditions of the aorta remain a major source of morbidity and mortality for patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair can prevent aortic catastrophe but carries substantial risk of perioperative adverse events. We evaluated midterm survival and quality of life (QoL) after contemporary Crawford extent II TAAA repair in patients with MFS. METHODS From 2004 to 2010, 49 consecutive patients with MFS (mean age, 43.4 ± 12.0 years) underwent extent II TAAA repair (41 elective and 8 urgent/emergent procedures) with intercostal reimplantation. Thirty-six patients (73%) had aorta-related symptoms, and 45 (92%) had distal aortic dissection. Operative adjuncts included cerebrospinal fluid drainage (n = 47 [96%]), left heart bypass (n = 46 [94%]), and cold renal perfusion (n = 47 [96%]). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. QoL was assessed in 24 patients with a 12-item survey (12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 [SF-12v2]) a median of 5.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-7.9) years postoperatively. QoL data were normalized and compared with data from the general population. RESULTS There were no operative deaths, strokes, paraparesis, or paraplegia. Two patients (4%) had permanent renal failure necessitating hemodialysis. The most frequent complication was vocal cord paralysis (n = 21 [43%]). Six-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 84% ± 6%. The 24 patients with QoL data had slightly worse physical component scores (46.0 ± 10.6) and slightly better mental component scores (51.4 ± 10.4) than the general population (50 ± 10 for both scores). CONCLUSIONS Operative treatment of extensive TAAA in patients with MFS enables excellent midterm survival and QoL. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left heart bypass, and cold renal perfusion probably aid in achieving excellent outcomes.

Are outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair different in men versus women? A propensity-matched comparison

Objective: Women fare worse than men after many cardiovascular operations, including coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery. We sought to determine whether sex affects outcomes after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods: We evaluated data on 3353 consecutive patients (1281 women, 38.2%) who underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between October 1986 and July 2015. We compared preoperative characteristics, surgical variables, and outcomes between men and women in the overall group. A propensity‐matching analysis was performed to adjust for preoperative and intraoperative differences. A multivariable analysis was conducted to identify predictors of poor outcomes using relevant preoperative and intraoperative factors. Results: Men had a significantly higher prevalence of comorbid conditions, including coronary artery disease, and presented more often with dissection; women were slightly older than men (median age, 69 [62‐74] years vs 67 [57‐73] years; P < .001) and more often symptomatic. Men underwent extent II and IV repairs more often, whereas women more often had extent I and III repairs. The propensity analysis resulted in 958 matched pairs. Overall, women and men had similar early mortality (7.9% vs 7.2%, P = .5) and adverse event rates (14.8% vs 14.1%, P = .6), which were similar in propensity‐matched groups. Multivariable analysis showed that predictors of operative death and adverse event differed between the sexes. Survival and freedom from repair failure were similar between the overall and matched groups. Conclusions: Men and women who undergo thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair have similar outcomes, but there are important differences in several perioperative factors and predictors of poor outcomes.

Moderate hypothermia at warmer temperatures is safe in elective proximal and total arch surgery: Results in 665 patients

Objective: To evaluate adverse outcomes after elective aortic arch surgery performed at higher or lower temperatures (24.0°C‐28.0°C vs 20.1°C‐23.9°C) within the wide range of moderate hypothermia. Methods: Over a 9‐year period, a total of 665 patients underwent elective proximal (n = 479) or total (n = 186) arch replacement with moderate hypothermia and antegrade cerebral perfusion. Circulatory arrest was initiated at an actual temperature of 20.1°C to 23.9°C in the lower‐temperature group (n = 334; 223 proximal, 111 total) and at 24.0°C to 28.0°C in the higher‐temperature group (n = 331; 256 proximal, 75 total). Composite adverse outcome was defined as operative mortality or persistent neurologic event or persistent hemodialysis at discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to model adverse outcome. In addition to the actual temperature, a new, balanced variable, “predicted temperature,” was analyzed to eliminate surgeon bias. We used this variable in a propensity score–matching analysis to validate the multivariate analysis results. Results: A composite adverse outcome occurred in 7.2% of cases. Operative mortality was 5.1%. The rate of postoperative persistent neurologic deficits was 2.4%. No significant differences were found between the lower– and higher–predicted temperature groups within the moderate hypothermia range in the propensity score–matching analysis. The higher–actual temperature group had a lower rate of ventilator support at >48 hours (P = .036) and less need for tracheostomy (P = .023). Packed red blood cell transfusion and previous coronary artery bypass independently predicted composite adverse outcome (P = .0053 and .0002, respectively), operative mortality (P = .0051 and .0041), and postoperative stroke (P = .045 and .048). Cardiopulmonary bypass time independently predicted composite outcome (P = .0005), operative mortality (P < .0001), ventilatory support for >48 hours (P < .0001), and renal dysfunction (P = .0005). Conclusions: In elective proximal or total arch surgery, higher temperatures (≥24.0°C‐28.0°C) within the wide range of moderate hypothermia (20.1°C‐28°C) are safe and, compared with colder temperatures, not associated with significantly different rates of composite and adverse outcomes.