Susan Y. Green

Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs

OBJECTIVE Since the pioneering era of E. Stanley Crawford, our multimodal strategy for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has evolved. We describe our approximately 3-decade single-practice experience regarding 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs and identify predictors of early death and other adverse postoperative outcomes. METHODS We analyzed retrospective (1986-2006) and prospective data (2006-2014) obtained from patients (2043 male; median age, 67 [59-73] years) who underwent 914 Crawford extent I, 1066 extent II, 660 extent III, and 669 extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, of which 723 (21.8%) were urgent or emergency. Repairs were performed to treat degenerative aneurysm (64.2%) or aortic dissection (35.8%). The outcomes examined included operative death (ie, 30-day or in-hospital death) and permanent stroke, paraplegia, paraparesis, and renal failure necessitating dialysis, as well as adverse event, a composite of these outcomes. RESULTS There were 249 operative deaths (7.5%). Permanent paraplegia and paraparesis occurred after 97 (2.9%) and 81 (2.4%) repairs, respectively. Of 189 patients (5.7%) with permanent renal failure, 107 died in the hospital. Permanent stroke was relatively uncommon (n = 74; 2.2%). The rate of the composite adverse event (n = 478; 14.4%) was highest after extent II repair (n = 203; 19.0%) and lowest after extent IV repair (n = 67; 10.2%; P < .0001). Estimated postoperative survival was 83.5% ± 0.7% at 1 year, 63.6% ± 0.9% at 5 years, 36.8% ± 1.0% at 10 years, and 18.3% ± 0.9% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS Repairing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms poses substantial risks, particularly when the entire thoracoabdominal aorta (extent II) is replaced. Nonetheless, our data suggest that thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, when performed at an experienced center, can produce respectable outcomes.

Results of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Background: Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) enables the effective replacement of the diseased aortic segment and reliably prevents aneurysm rupture. However, these operations also carry substantial risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, principally caused by the associated ischemic insult involving the spinal cord, kidneys, and other abdominal viscera. Here, we describe the early outcomes of a contemporary series of open TAAA repairs. Methods: We reviewed the outcomes of 823 open TAAA repairs performed between January 2005 and May 2012. Of these, 209 (25.4%) were Crawford extent I repairs, 264 (32.1%) were extent II, 157 (19.1%) were extent III, and 193 (23.5%) were extent IV. Aortic dissection was present in 350 (42.5%) cases, and aneurysm rupture was present in 37 (4.5%). Adjuncts used during the procedures included cerebrospinal fluid drainage in 639 (77.6%) cases, left heart bypass in 430 (52.2%), and cold renal perfusion in 674 (81.9%). Results: The composite endpoint, adverse outcome—defined as operative death, renal failure that necessitated dialysis at discharge, stroke, or permanent paraplegia or paraparesis—occurred after 131 (15.9%) procedures. There were 69 (8.4%) operative deaths. Permanent paraplegia or paraparesis occurred after 42 (5.1%) cases, stroke occurred after 27 (3.3%), and renal failure necessitating permanent dialysis occurred after 45 (5.5%). Conclusions: Although open surgical repair of the thoracoabdominal aorta can be life-saving to patients at risk for fatal aneurysm rupture, these operations remain challenging and are associated with substantial risk of early death and major complications. Additional improvements are needed to further reduce the risks associated with TAAA repair, particularly as increasing numbers of patients with advanced age and multiple or severe comorbidities present for treatment.

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysms and patch aneurysms

Pseudoaneurysms and patch aneurysms are life-threatening late complications after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. We treated four patients who presented with a pseudoaneurysm or patch aneurysm involving the descending thoracic portion of a previously implanted TAAA graft. In each patient, stent grafts were placed within the existing graft to cover the aneurysm endoluminally. All patients recovered without major complications, and computed tomography performed after a mean follow-up of 51.5 ± 19.7 months showed that the repairs remained intact.

Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Early and Midterm Outcomes in 83 Patients

BACKGROUND Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an alternative to traditional composite valve graft (CVG) root replacement. We examined early and midterm outcomes after VSARR. METHODS A combined retrospective/prospective study was performed in 83 patients who underwent VSARR (16%) among 515 patients who underwent aortic root replacement during a nearly 12-year period. Thirty-six patients (43%) had a connective tissue disorder, 3 patients (4%) had acute aortic dissection, and 40 (48%) patients had at least moderate aortic regurgitation (AR). Twenty-eight patients (34%) had left ventricular hypertrophy or dilatation. The reimplantation VSARR technique was used in 82 patients (99%), and the Florida sleeve technique was used in 1 patient. Thirty-two patients (39%) underwent concomitant aortic arch replacement. For early survivors, the median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 5 days-12.2 years). RESULTS One patient had severe AR after VSARR that necessitated intraoperative conversion to a mechanical CVG. The 1 operative death and 1 stroke occurred in a patient with acute dissection. Actuarial survival was 96.4%±2.0% at 2 years and 86.9%±5.6% at 8 years. Six patients (7%) had late valve-related complications: 1 died of endocarditis, 4 underwent reoperation for severe AR and received replacement valves, and 1 had severe AR and is being monitored. Freedom from repair failure (reoperation, endocarditis, or severe AR) was 94.8%±2.6% at 2 years and 87.3%±5.7% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can have excellent early and respectable midterm outcomes, even when combined with arch repair. Further follow-up remains necessary to evaluate the long-term durability of VSARR.

Hemiarch and Total Arch Surgery in Patients With Previous Repair of Acute Type I Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND We examined our contemporary experience with hemiarch and total arch replacement in patients with previous acute type I aortic dissection. METHODS Over an 8.5-year period, 137 consecutive patients (median age 58 years, interquartile range, 50 to 67) underwent hemiarch or total transverse aortic arch replacement a median of 7.7 years (range, 67 days to 32 years; interquartile range, 2.8 to 12.3 years) after previous acute type I aortic dissection repair. Interventions involving only the aortic root, aortic valve, descending aorta, or thoracoabdominal aorta were excluded. Multivariate analysis of 20 potential preoperative and intraoperative risk factors was performed to examine early death, neurologic deficit, composite endpoint (operative death, permanent neurologic deficit, or hemodialysis at discharge), and long-term mortality. RESULTS Total arch replacement was performed in 103 patients (75.2%), hemiarch replacement in 34 (24.8%), and elephant trunk procedures in 77 (56.2%). Thirty-one repairs (22.6%) were emergent or urgent. There were 16 operative deaths (11.7%), 4 permanent strokes (3.6%), and 21 (15.3%) instances of the composite endpoint. In the multivariate analysis, congestive heart failure and cardiopulmonary bypass time independently predicted operative mortality (p = 0.0027, p = 0.018). Emergency operation approached significance for stroke (p = 0.088). Predictors of long-term mortality (during a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, 95% confidence interval: 4.4 to 5.8) were female sex (p = 0.0036), congestive heart failure (p = 0.0045), and circulatory arrest time (p = 0.0013); preoperative pulmonary disease approached significance (p = 0.074). Five-year survival was 73.2%. CONCLUSIONS In patients with previous acute type I aortic dissection repair, hemiarch and total arch operations have respectable morbidity and survival rates. Congestive heart failure predicts operative death, long-term mortality, and our adverse event endpoint. Cardiopulmonary bypass time predicts operative mortality, and female sex and circulatory arrest time predict long-term mortality.

Midterm Survival and Quality of Life After Extent II Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair in Marfan Syndrome

BACKGROUND Pathologic conditions of the aorta remain a major source of morbidity and mortality for patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair can prevent aortic catastrophe but carries substantial risk of perioperative adverse events. We evaluated midterm survival and quality of life (QoL) after contemporary Crawford extent II TAAA repair in patients with MFS. METHODS From 2004 to 2010, 49 consecutive patients with MFS (mean age, 43.4 ± 12.0 years) underwent extent II TAAA repair (41 elective and 8 urgent/emergent procedures) with intercostal reimplantation. Thirty-six patients (73%) had aorta-related symptoms, and 45 (92%) had distal aortic dissection. Operative adjuncts included cerebrospinal fluid drainage (n = 47 [96%]), left heart bypass (n = 46 [94%]), and cold renal perfusion (n = 47 [96%]). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. QoL was assessed in 24 patients with a 12-item survey (12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 [SF-12v2]) a median of 5.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-7.9) years postoperatively. QoL data were normalized and compared with data from the general population. RESULTS There were no operative deaths, strokes, paraparesis, or paraplegia. Two patients (4%) had permanent renal failure necessitating hemodialysis. The most frequent complication was vocal cord paralysis (n = 21 [43%]). Six-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 84% ± 6%. The 24 patients with QoL data had slightly worse physical component scores (46.0 ± 10.6) and slightly better mental component scores (51.4 ± 10.4) than the general population (50 ± 10 for both scores). CONCLUSIONS Operative treatment of extensive TAAA in patients with MFS enables excellent midterm survival and QoL. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left heart bypass, and cold renal perfusion probably aid in achieving excellent outcomes.

Are outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair different in men versus women? A propensity-matched comparison

Objective: Women fare worse than men after many cardiovascular operations, including coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery. We sought to determine whether sex affects outcomes after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods: We evaluated data on 3353 consecutive patients (1281 women, 38.2%) who underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between October 1986 and July 2015. We compared preoperative characteristics, surgical variables, and outcomes between men and women in the overall group. A propensity‐matching analysis was performed to adjust for preoperative and intraoperative differences. A multivariable analysis was conducted to identify predictors of poor outcomes using relevant preoperative and intraoperative factors. Results: Men had a significantly higher prevalence of comorbid conditions, including coronary artery disease, and presented more often with dissection; women were slightly older than men (median age, 69 [62‐74] years vs 67 [57‐73] years; P < .001) and more often symptomatic. Men underwent extent II and IV repairs more often, whereas women more often had extent I and III repairs. The propensity analysis resulted in 958 matched pairs. Overall, women and men had similar early mortality (7.9% vs 7.2%, P = .5) and adverse event rates (14.8% vs 14.1%, P = .6), which were similar in propensity‐matched groups. Multivariable analysis showed that predictors of operative death and adverse event differed between the sexes. Survival and freedom from repair failure were similar between the overall and matched groups. Conclusions: Men and women who undergo thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair have similar outcomes, but there are important differences in several perioperative factors and predictors of poor outcomes.

Open descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic approaches for complications of endovascular aortic procedures: 19-year experience

Objectives Endovascular aortic repair is increasingly being used to treat aneurysms, dissections, and traumatic injuries, despite its unknown long‐term durability. We describe our 19‐year experience with open descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair after endovascular aortic repair. Methods Between 1996 and 2015, 67 patients were treated with open distal arch, descending thoracic, or thoracoabdominal aortic repair, or extra‐anatomic bypass repair with aortic extirpation for complications after endovascular repair of the thoracic (n = 45, 67%) or abdominal (n = 22, 33%) aorta. The median interval between procedures was 18.0 months (interquartile range, 3.9‐44.9). Indications for open repair included expanding aneurysm (n = 56), infection (n = 11), fistula (n = 8), aneurysm rupture (n = 5), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), and restenosis (n = 1). Open repair involved partial (n = 9, 13%) or complete (n = 56, 84%) device removal or device salvage (n = 2, 3%) through a thoracoabdominal (n = 58, 87%) or thoracotomy (n = 9, 13%) incision. Eight patients (12%) underwent emergency procedures. Results There were 3 early (operative) deaths (2 with preoperative device infection) and 19 late deaths during a median follow‐up of 35.8 months (interquartile range, 16.8‐52.8 months). Overall 1‐ and 5‐year survivals were 85% ± 4% and 60% ± 8%, respectively. Four patients had open repair failures necessitating reoperation; 2 patients had preoperative infection, and both died (1 early and 1 late). Conclusions Open repair for complications after endovascular procedures is not uncommon. Experienced centers can yield acceptable outcomes, especially in patients without infection. Close surveillance is mandatory after endovascular aortic repair.

Elective primary aortic root replacement with and without hemiarch repair in patients with no previous cardiac surgery

Objective: Excellent outcomes have been established for elective aortic root replacement (ARR). It is less clear whether extending the repair into the proximal aortic arch with hypothermic circulatory arrest increases risk. We examined the early outcomes of elective, primary ARR, with and without hemiarch replacement, in patients without previous cardiac surgery. Methods: Over a 4‐year period, 140 non‐redo patients (median age, 54 years) underwent elective, primary ARR for root aneurysms; 119 patients (85%) had hemiarch replacement, and 21 (15%) had only ascending aortic replacement. Valve‐sparing ARR was performed in 41 cases (29.3%) and valve‐replacing ARR in 99 (70.7%). Moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion were used in 118 (99%) hemiarch repairs. Results: There were no operative deaths or permanent strokes. Complications included temporary renal dialysis (n = 1; 4.8%), transient neurologic deficit (n = 2; 9.5%), and tracheostomy (n = 2; 9.5%) after ascending aortic repair and bleeding requiring reoperation (n = 4; 3.4%), pericardial effusion requiring drainage (n = 9; 7.6%), and tracheostomy (n = 2; 1.7%) after hemiarch replacement. No stroke was observed in the hemiarch group (P = .022; univariate analysis). The extent of the repair into the proximal arch did not appear to be associated with any adverse effect. Conclusions: In non‐redo patients, elective primary ARR has excellent early outcomes, regardless of whether repair extends into the proximal arch. Additional elective hemiarch replacement with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion has a low risk of neurologic complications and should be performed if necessary. Long‐term data are needed to compare the rates of reintervention in the aortic arch in patients with or without proximal arch replacement.

The impact of preoperative chronic kidney disease on outcomes after Crawford extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs

Objective: To determine whether preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD) is predictive of poor outcomes in patients who undergo Crawford extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Methods: Data were collected from patients with CKD (defined as a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 399) and without CKD (n = 604) who underwent extent II TAAA repair during 1991 to 2016. We used univariate, multivariable, and propensity score matching analyses to compare outcomes between these 2 groups. Results: Compared with patients without CKD, patients who presented with CKD were older and had greater rates of comorbidities, including coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Patients with CKD had higher rates of operative mortality and adverse events. After propensity analysis, patients with CKD had greater rates of adverse event and renal failure necessitating dialysis, but had comparable rates of operative death to patients without CKD. Multivariable modeling indicated that CKD independently predicted adverse event (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.61; P = .01) and renal failure (RRR = 1.86; P = .02) after repair. After adjustment for median age, patients with CKD had substantially worse mid‐term survival than those without (23.9 ± 2.4% vs 48.5 ± 2.5% at 10 years; P < .001). Conclusions: In patients who present with CKD, extent II open TAAA repair carries considerable risks of operative death and adverse events. Further investigation is needed to improve renal protection during such repair.