Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where L. Ameye is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by L. Ameye.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008

Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

D. Timmerman; Antonia Carla Testa; Tom Bourne; L. Ameye; D. Jurkovic; C. Van Holsbeke; D. Paladini; B. Van Calster; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel; Lil Valentin

To derive simple and clinically useful ultrasound‐based rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.


BMJ | 2010

Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group

Dirk Timmerman; L. Ameye; D. Fischerova; E. Epstein; Gian Benedetto Melis; S. Guerriero; Caroline Van Holsbeke; L. Savelli; R. Fruscio; Andrea Lissoni; Antonia Carla Testa; Joan Lenore Veldman; Ignace Vergote; Sabine Van Huffel; Tom Bourne; Lil Valentin

Objectives To prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of simple ultrasound rules to predict benignity/malignancy in an adnexal mass and to test the performance of the risk of malignancy index, two logistic regression models, and subjective assessment of ultrasonic findings by an experienced ultrasound examiner in adnexal masses for which the simple rules yield an inconclusive result. Design Prospective temporal and external validation of simple ultrasound rules to distinguish benign from malignant adnexal masses. The rules comprised five ultrasonic features (including shape, size, solidity, and results of colour Doppler examination) to predict a malignant tumour (M features) and five to predict a benign tumour (B features). If one or more M features were present in the absence of a B feature, the mass was classified as malignant. If one or more B features were present in the absence of an M feature, it was classified as benign. If both M features and B features were present, or if none of the features was present, the simple rules were inconclusive. Setting 19 ultrasound centres in eight countries. Participants 1938 women with an adnexal mass examined with ultrasound by the principal investigator at each centre with a standardised research protocol. Reference standard Histological classification of the excised adnexal mass as benign or malignant. Main outcome measures Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Results Of the 1938 patients with an adnexal mass, 1396 (72%) had benign tumours, 373 (19.2%) had primary invasive tumours, 111 (5.7%) had borderline malignant tumours, and 58 (3%) had metastatic tumours in the ovary. The simple rules yielded a conclusive result in 1501 (77%) masses, for which they resulted in a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval 89% to 94%) and a specificity of 96% (94% to 97%). The corresponding sensitivity and specificity of subjective assessment were 91% (88% to 94%) and 96% (94% to 97%). In the 357 masses for which the simple rules yielded an inconclusive result and with available results of CA-125 measurements, the sensitivities were 89% (83% to 93%) for subjective assessment, 50% (42% to 58%) for the risk of malignancy index, 89% (83% to 93%) for logistic regression model 1, and 82% (75% to 87%) for logistic regression model 2; the corresponding specificities were 78% (72% to 83%), 84% (78% to 88%), 44% (38% to 51%), and 48% (42% to 55%). Use of the simple rules as a triage test and subjective assessment for those masses for which the simple rules yielded an inconclusive result gave a sensitivity of 91% (88% to 93%) and a specificity of 93% (91% to 94%), compared with a sensitivity of 90% (88% to 93%) and a specificity of 93% (91% to 94%) when subjective assessment was used in all masses. Conclusions The use of the simple rules has the potential to improve the management of women with adnexal masses. In adnexal masses for which the rules yielded an inconclusive result, subjective assessment of ultrasonic findings by an experienced ultrasound examiner was the most accurate diagnostic test; the risk of malignancy index and the two regression models were not useful.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2006

Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis

Lil Valentin; L. Ameye; D. Jurkovic; U. Metzger; Fabrice Lecuru; S. Van Huffel; D. Timmerman

To determine which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings, and to determine if the use of logistic regression models for calculation of individual risk of malignancy would improve the diagnostic accuracy in difficult tumors.


British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2006

The use of ultrasound-based 'soft markers' for the prediction of pelvic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain--can we reduce the need for laparoscopy?

E. Okaro; G. Condous; A. Khalid; Dirk Timmerman; L. Ameye; Sabine Van Huffel; Tom Bourne

Objective  To assess the accuracy of new transvaginal ultrasound‐scan‐based markers and to compare them to conventional ultrasound methods used in the detection of common pelvic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).


Gynecologic Oncology | 2013

Early-stage cervical cancer: Tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - A European multicenter trial

E. Epstein; Antonia Carla Testa; A. Gaurilcikas; Alessia Di Legge; L. Ameye; Vaida Atstupenaite; Anna Lia Valentini; Benedetta Gui; Nils-Olof Wallengren; Sonja Pudaric; Arvydas Cizauskas; Anna Måsbäck; Gian Franco Zannoni; Päivi Kannisto; M. Zikan; I. Pinkavova; Andrea Burgetova; Pavel Dundr; Kristyna Nemejcova; David Cibula; D. Fischerova

OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative assessment of early-stage cervical cancer using pathologic findings as the reference standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective multi-center trial enrolling 209 consecutive women with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO IA2-IIA) scheduled for surgery. The following parameters were assessed on US and MRI and compared to pathology: remaining tumor, size, tumor stromal invasion<2/3 (superficial) or ≥2/3 (deep), and parametrial invasion. RESULTS Complete data were available for 182 patients. The agreement between US and pathology was excellent for detecting tumors, correctly classifying bulky tumors (>4cm), and detecting deep stromal invasion (kappa values 0.84, 0.82, and 0.81 respectively); and good for classifying small tumors (<2cm) and detecting parametrial invasion (kappa values 0.78 and 0.75, respectively). The agreement between MRI and histology was good for classifying tumors as <2cm, or >4cm, and detecting deep stromal invasion (kappa values 0.71, 0.76, and 0.77, respectively). It was moderately accurate in tumor detection, and in assessing parametrial invasion (kappa values 0.52 and 0.45, respectively). The agreement between histology and US was significantly better in assessing residual tumor (p<0.001) and parametrial invasion (p<0.001) than the results obtained by MRI. Imaging methods were not significantly influenced by previous cone biopsy. CONCLUSION US and MRI are highly accurate for the preoperative assessment of women with early-stage cervical cancer, although US may be more accurate in detecting residual tumors and assessing parametrial invasion.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2011

Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help

Lil Valentin; L. Ameye; L. Savelli; R. Fruscio; Fpg Leone; A. Czekierdowski; Aa Lissoni; D. Fischerova; S. Guerriero; C. Van Holsbeke; S. Van Huffel; D. Timmerman

To develop a logistic regression model that can discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses perceived to be difficult to classify by subjective evaluation of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (subjective assessment) and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of subjective assessment, serum CA 125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI).


IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering | 2011

Effect of Insertion Speed on Tissue Response and Insertion Mechanics of a Chronically Implanted Silicon-Based Neural Probe

Marleen Welkenhuysen; Alexandru Andrei; L. Ameye; Wolfgang Eberle; Bart Nuttin

In this study, the effect of insertion speed on long-term tissue response and insertion mechanics was investigated. A dummy silicon parylene-coated probe was used in this context and implanted in the rat brain at 10 μm/s (n = 6) or 100 μm/s ( n = 6) to a depth of 9 mm. The insertion mechanics were assessed by the dimpling distance, and the force at the point of penetration, at the end of the insertion phase, and after a 3-min rest period in the brain. After 6 weeks, the tissue response was evaluated by estimating the amount of gliosis, inflammation, and neuronal cell loss with immunohistochemistry. No difference in dimpling, penetration force, or the force after a 3-min rest period in the brain was observed. However, the force at the end of the insertion phase was significantly higher when inserting the probes at 100 μm/s compared to 10 μm/s. Furthermore, an expected tissue response was seen with an increase of glial and microglial reactivity around the probe. This reaction was similar along the entire length of the probe. However, evidence for a neuronal kill zone was observed only in the most superficial part of the implant. In this region, the lesion size was also greatest. Comparison of the tissue response between insertion speeds showed no differences.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2009

A scoring system to differentiate malignant from benign masses in specific ultrasound-based subgroups of adnexal tumors

L. Ameye; Lil Valentin; Antonia Carla Testa; C. Van Holsbeke; E Domali; S. Van Huffel; Ignace Vergote; Tom Bourne; D. Timmerman

To investigate if the prediction of malignant adnexal masses can be improved by considering different ultrasound‐based subgroups of tumors and constructing a scoring system for each subgroup instead of using a risk estimation model applicable to all tumors.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2012

Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology

L. Ameye; D. Timmerman; Lil Valentin; D. Paladini; J. Zhang; C. Van Holsbeke; Andrea Lissoni; L. Savelli; J. Veldman; A. Testa; Frédéric Amant; S. Van Huffel; Tom Bourne

To determine the diagnostic performance of ultrasound‐based simple rules, risk of malignancy index (RMI), two logistic regression models (LR1 and LR2) and real‐time subjective assessment by experienced ultrasound examiners following the exclusion of masses likely to be judged as easy and ‘instant’ to diagnose by an ultrasound examiner, and to develop a new strategy for the assessment of adnexal pathology based on this.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2013

Risk of malignancy in unilocular cysts: a study of 1148 adnexal masses classified as unilocular cysts at transvaginal ultrasound and review of the literature

Lil Valentin; L. Ameye; D. Franchi; S. Guerriero; D. Jurkovic; L. Savelli; D. Fischerova; Andrea Lissoni; C. Van Holsbeke; R. Fruscio; S. Van Huffel; A. Testa; D. Timmerman

The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of malignancy in adnexal lesions described as unilocular cysts at transvaginal ultrasound examination and to investigate if there are differences in clinical and ultrasound characteristics between benign and malignant unilocular cysts.

Collaboration


Dive into the L. Ameye's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Timmerman

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Van Huffel

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Van Holsbeke

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Testa

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonia Carla Testa

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dirk Timmerman

Catholic University of Leuven

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge