L. Reginato
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. Reginato.
Physics of fluids. B, Plasma physics | 1993
J.J. Barnard; F. Deadrick; A. Friedman; David P. Grote; L. V. Griffith; H. C. Kirbie; V. K. Neil; M. A. Newton; Arthur C. Paul; W.M. Sharp; H. D. Shay; Roger O. Bangerter; A. Faltens; C. G. Fong; David L. Judd; E.P. Lee; L. Reginato; S.S. Yu; T. F. Godlove
A two‐year study of recirculating induction heavy ion accelerators as low‐cost driver for inertial‐fusion energy applications was recently completed. The projected cost of a 4 MJ accelerator was estimated to be about
Fusion Engineering and Design | 1996
A. Tauschwitz; S.S. Yu; S. Eylon; Roger O. Bangerter; W. P. Leemans; C. Peters; J.O. Rasmussen; L. Reginato; J.J. Barnard; W.M. Sharp
500 M (million) and the efficiency was estimated to be 35%. The principal technology issues include energy recovery of the ramped dipole magnets, which is achieved through use of ringing inductive/capacitive circuits, and high repetition rates of the induction cell pulsers, which is accomplished through arrays of field effect transistor (FET) switches. Principal physics issues identified include minimization of particle loss from interactions with the background gas, and more demanding emittance growth and centroid control requirements associated with the propagation of space‐charge‐dominated beams around bends and over large path lengths. In addition, instabilities such as the longitudinal resistive instability, beam‐breakup instability and betatron‐orbit instability were found to be controllable with careful design.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 1996
S.S. Yu; S. Eylon; E. Henestroza; C. Peters; L. Reginato; A. Tauschwitz; D.P. Grote; F.J. Deadrick
Abstract The capabilities of adiabatic, current-carrying plasma lenses for the final focus problem in heavy-ion-beam-driven inertial confinement fusion are explored and compared with the performance of non-adiabatic plasma lenses, and with that of conventional quadrupole lenses. A final focus system for a fusion reactor is proposed, consisting of a conventional quadrupole lens to prefocus the driver beams to the entrance aperture of the adiabatic lens, the plasma lens itself, and a high current discharge channel inside the chamber to transport the focused beam to the fusion pellet. Two experiments are described that address the issues of adiabatic focusing, and of transport channel generation and stability for ion beam transport. The test of the adiabatic focusing principle shows a 26-fold current density increase of a 1.5 MeV potassium ion beam during operation of the lens. The lens consist of a discharge of length 300 mm, filled with helium gas at a pressure of 1 Torr and is pulsed with a current between 5 and 15 kA. The investigations of discharge channels for ion beam transport show that preionization of the discharge channels with a UV laser can be an efficient way to direct and stabilize the discharge.
ieee particle accelerator conference | 1995
L. Reginato; C. Peters; D. Vanecek; S.S. Yu; F.J. Deadrick
Abstract We report on progress in the preparation of the 2 MV injector at LBNL as the front end of Elise and as a multipurpose experimental facility for heavy ion fusion beam dynamics studies. Recent advances in the performance and understanding of the injector are described, and some of the ongoing experimental activities are summarized.
ieee particle accelerator conference | 1995
S.S. Yu; S. Eylon; E. Henestroza; C. Peters; L. Reginato; D. Vanecek; F. delaRama; R. Hipple; J. Stoker; D.P. Grote; F.J. Deadrick
Ultra-high gradient radio frequency linacs require network current. Efficient and reliable power sources. The induction linac has proven to be a reliable source of low energy, high current and high brightness electron beams. The low energy beam is bunched, transported through resonant transfer cavities in which it radiates microwave energy that is coupled to an adjacent high energy accelerator. The low energy beam is maintained at a constant energy by periodic induction accelerator cells. This paper describes the engineering aspects of the induction accelerator based relativistic klystron. The physics issues are covered in another paper at this conference.
Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference | 2005
William L. Waldron; L. Reginato; Richard J. Briggs
A heavy-ion-fusion driver-scale injector has been constructed and operated at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. The injector has produced 2.3 MV and 950 mA of K/sup +/, 15% above original design goals in energy and current. Normalized edge emittance of less than 1 /spl pi/ mm-mr was measured over a broad range of parameters. The head-to-tail energy flatness is less than /spl plusmn/0.2% over the 1 /spl mu/s pulse.
The fourteenth international conference on the application of accelerators in research and industry | 1997
J.W. Kwan; E. Henestroza; C. Peters; L. Reginato; S.S. Yu
To accelerate ions using a helical pulseline requires the launching of a high voltage traveling wave with a waveform determined by the beam transport physics in order to maintain stability and acceleration. This waveform is applied to the front of the helix, creating a steep voltage ramp that moves down the helix, accelerating ions over distances much longer than the ramp length. An oil dielectric helix to demonstrate ion acceleration has been designed and fabricated. Helix design parameters, high voltage issues, input coupling methods, termination methods, and pulsers are described. Waveforms from the initial characterization of the oil dielectric helix are also described.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 1996
Joe W. Kwan; Roger O. Bangerter; A. Faltens; E.P. Lee; C. Peters; L. Reginato; J.J. Barnard; W.M. Sharp
ESQ accelerators are capable of producing high current, DC megavolt beams, thus they are ideal for BNCT application. In our preliminary design, a 3.6 m long ESQ column with a 6 cm bore diameter will accelerate a proton beam up to 2.5 MeV. The accelerator column is surrounded by an air-core transformer stack which provides DC power to the ESQ electrodes. The assembly is enclosed inside a 6.1 m long 2.4 m diameter high pressure vessel. Computer simulation shows that the beam envelope remains small compare to the bore diameter thus allowing a wide range of operation for beam currents ranging from 25 mA to 125 mA.
Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica A-nuclei Particles and Fields | 1993
J.J. Barnard; Roger O. Bangerter; F. Deadrick; A. Faltens; A. Friedman; C. G. Fong; T. F. Godlove; D.P. Grote; David L. Judd; L. V. Griffith; H. C. Kirbie; E.P. Lee; V. K. Neil; M. A. Newton; Arthur C. Paul; L. Reginato; W.M. Sharp; H. D. Shay; S.S. Yu
Abstract Elise is a heavy-ion induction linear accelerator that will demonstrate beam manipulations required in a driver for inertial fusion energy. With a line charge density similar to that of heavy-ions drivers, Elise will accelerate a beam pulse (duration of 1 μs or more) of K + ions from an initial energy of 2 MeV to a final energy 5 MeV or more. In the present design, the Elise electrostatic quadrupoles (ESQs) will have an aperture of radius 2.33 cm operating at ± 59 kV. The half-lattice periods range from 21 to 31 cm. The entire machine will be approximately 30 m long, half of which is the induction accelerator with the remaining half being the injector (including the Marx generator) and the matching section. Elise will be built in a way that allows future expansion into the full Induction Linear Accelerator Systems Experiments (ILSE) configuration, so it will have an array of four ESQ focusing channels capable of transporting up to a total of 3.2 A of beam current. Elise will also have an active alignment system with an alignment tolerance of less than 0.1 mm. Initially, only one beam channel will be used during nominal Elise operation. At the currently expected funding rate, the construction time will be 4.75 years, with FY95 being an extra year for research and development before construction. Total project cost is estimated to be US
Fusion Engineering and Design | 1996
L. Reginato; C. Peters
25.9m, including contingency costs.