Laura J.A. Hardwick

Cell cycle regulation of proliferation versus differentiation in the central nervous system

Formation of the central nervous system requires a period of extensive progenitor cell proliferation, accompanied or closely followed by differentiation; the balance between these two processes in various regions of the central nervous system gives rise to differential growth and cellular diversity. The correlation between cell cycle lengthening and differentiation has been reported across several types of cell lineage and from diverse model organisms, both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, different cell fates might be determined during different phases of the preceding cell cycle, indicating direct cell cycle influences on both early lineage commitment and terminal cell fate decisions. Significant advances have been made in the last decade and have revealed multi-directional interactions between the molecular machinery regulating the processes of cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation. Here, we first introduce the modes of proliferation in neural progenitor cells and summarise evidence linking cell cycle length and neuronal differentiation. Second, we describe the manner in which components of the cell cycle machinery can have additional and, sometimes, cell-cycle-independent roles in directly regulating neurogenesis. Finally, we discuss the way that differentiation factors, such as proneural bHLH proteins, can promote either progenitor maintenance or differentiation according to the cellular environment. These intricate connections contribute to precise coordination and the ultimate division versus differentiation decision.

Nervous decision-making: to divide or differentiate

Highlights • Multiple mechanisms coordinate the cell cycle and neuronal differentiation.• Lengthening of G1 phase is functionally important for differentiation.• Cell cycle components can directly and independently affect neurogenesis.• Differentiation factors can directly affect the cell cycle structure and machinery.

An oncologist׳s friend: How Xenopus contributes to cancer research.

One of the most striking features of the Xenopus system is the versatility in providing a unique range of both in vitro and in vivo models that are rapid, accessible and easily manipulated. Here we present an overview of the diverse contribution that Xenopus has made to advance our understanding of tumour biology and behaviour; a contribution that goes beyond the traditional view of Xenopus as a developmental model organism. From the utility of the egg and oocyte extract system to the use of whole embryos as developmental or induced tumour models, the Xenopus system has been fundamental to investigation of cell cycle mechanisms, cell metabolism, cell signalling and cell behaviour, and has allowed an increasing appreciation of the parallels between early development and the pathogenesis of tumour progression and metastasis. Although not the prototypical oncological model system, we propose that Xenopus is an adaptable and multifunctional tool in the oncologist׳s arsenal.

Multi-site phosphorylation regulates NeuroD4 activity during primary neurogenesis: a conserved mechanism amongst proneural proteins

BackgroundBasic Helix Loop Helix (bHLH) proneural transcription factors are master regulators of neurogenesis that act at multiple stages in this process. We have previously demonstrated that multi-site phosphorylation of two members of the proneural protein family, Ngn2 and Ascl1, limits their ability to drive neuronal differentiation when cyclin-dependent kinase levels are high, as would be found in rapidly cycling cells. Here we investigate potential phospho-regulation of proneural protein NeuroD4 (also known as Xath3), the Xenopus homologue of Math3/NeuroM, that functions downstream of Ngn2 in the neurogenic cascade.ResultsUsing the developing Xenopus embryo system, we show that NeuroD4 is expressed and phosphorylated during primary neurogenesis, and this phosphorylation limits its ability to drive neuronal differentiation. Phosphorylation of up to six serine/threonine-proline sites contributes additively to regulation of NeuroD4 proneural activity without altering neuronal subtype specification, and number rather than location of available phospho-sites is the key for limiting NeuroD4 activity. Mechanistically, a phospho-mutant NeuroD4 displays increased protein stability and enhanced chromatin binding relative to wild-type NeuroD4, resulting in transcriptional up-regulation of a range of target genes that further promote neuronal differentiation.ConclusionsMulti-site phosphorylation on serine/threonine-proline pairs is a widely conserved mechanism of limiting proneural protein activity, where it is the number of phosphorylated sites, rather than their location that determines protein activity. Hence, multi-site phosphorylation is very well suited to allow co-ordination of proneural protein activity with the cellular proline-directed kinase environment.

Multi-site Neurogenin3 Phosphorylation Controls Pancreatic Endocrine Differentiation

Summary The proneural transcription factor Neurogenin3 (Ngn3) plays a critical role in pancreatic endocrine cell differentiation, although regulation of Ngn3 protein is largely unexplored. Here we demonstrate that Ngn3 protein undergoes cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)-mediated phosphorylation on multiple serine-proline sites. Replacing wild-type protein with a phosphomutant form of Ngn3 increases α cell generation, the earliest endocrine cell type to be formed in the developing pancreas. Moreover, un(der)phosphorylated Ngn3 maintains insulin expression in adult β cells in the presence of elevated c-Myc and enhances endocrine specification during ductal reprogramming. Mechanistically, preventing multi-site phosphorylation enhances both Ngn3 stability and DNA binding, promoting the increased expression of target genes that drive differentiation. Therefore, multi-site phosphorylation of Ngn3 controls its ability to promote pancreatic endocrine differentiation and to maintain β cell function in the presence of pro-proliferation cues and could be manipulated to promote and maintain endocrine differentiation in vitro and in vivo.

Emergence of neuronal diversity from patterning of telencephalic progenitors.

During central nervous system (CNS) development, hundreds of distinct neuronal subtypes are generated from a single layer of multipotent neuroepithelial progenitor cells. Within the rostral CNS, initial regionalization of the telencephalon marks the territories where the cerebral cortex and the basal ganglia originate. Subsequent refinement of the primary structures determines the formation of domains of differential gene expression, where distinct fate‐restricted progenitors are located. To understand how diversification of neural progenitors and neurons is achieved in the telencephalon, it is important to address early and late patterning events in this context. In particular, important questions include: How does the telencephalon become specified and regionalized along the major spatial axes? Within each region, are the differences in neuronal subtypes established at the progenitor level or at the postmitotic stage? If distinct progenitors exist that are committed to subtype‐specific neuronal lineages, how does the diversification emerge? What is the contribution of positional and temporal cues and how is this information integrated into the intrinsic programs of cell identity? WIREs Dev Biol 2015, 4:197–214. doi: 10.1002/wdev.174

Complex domain interactions regulate stability and activity of closely related proneural transcription factors

Highlights • Although closely related, Ngn2 is rapidly degraded whereas NeuroD is stable.• NeuroD is ubiquitylated but not degraded.• The N-terminal domain of NeuroD confers stability.• Conserved bHLHs of Ngn2 and NeuroD promote instability/stability respectively.• Stability of chimeric proteins is not correlated with differentiation activity.

MyoD phosphorylation on multiple C terminal sites regulates myogenic conversion activity

MyoD is a master regulator of myogenesis with a potent ability to redirect the cell fate of even terminally differentiated cells. Hence, enhancing the activity of MyoD is an important step to maximising its potential utility for in vitro disease modelling and cell replacement therapies. We have previously shown that the reprogramming activity of several neurogenic bHLH proteins can be substantially enhanced by inhibiting their multi-site phosphorylation by proline-directed kinases. Here we have used Xenopus embryos as an in vivo developmental and reprogramming system to investigate the multi-site phospho-regulation of MyoD during muscle differentiation. We show that, in addition to modification of a previously well-characterised site, Serine 200, MyoD is phosphorylated on multiple additional serine/threonine sites during primary myogenesis. Through mutational analysis, we derive an optimally active phospho-mutant form of MyoD that has a dramatically enhanced ability to drive myogenic reprogramming in vivo. Mechanistically, this is achieved through increased protein stability and enhanced chromatin association. Therefore, multi-site phospho-regulation of class II bHLH proteins is conserved across cell lineages and germ layers, and manipulation of phosphorylation of these key regulators may have further potential for enhancing mammalian cell reprogramming.

The N terminus of Ascl1 underlies differing proneural activity of mouse and Xenopus Ascl1 proteins

The proneural basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor Ascl1 is a master regulator of neurogenesis in both central and peripheral nervous systems in vivo, and is a central driver of neuronal reprogramming in vitro. Over the last three decades, assaying primary neuron formation in Xenopus embryos in response to transcription factor overexpression has contributed to our understanding of the roles and regulation of proneural proteins like Ascl1, with homologues from different species usually exhibiting similar functional effects. Here we demonstrate that the mouse Ascl1 protein is twice as active as the Xenopus protein in inducing neural-β-tubulin expression in Xenopus embryos, despite there being little difference in protein accumulation or ability to undergo phosphorylation, two properties known to influence Ascl1 function. This superior activity of the mouse compared to the Xenopus protein is dependent on the presence of the non-conserved N terminal region of the protein, and indicates species-specific regulation that may necessitate care when interpreting results in cross-species experiments.

Interaction between opposing modes of phospho-regulation of the proneural proteins Ascl1 and Ngn2

From the relatively simple nervous system of Drosophila to the elaborate mammalian cortex, neurogenesis requires exceptional spatial and temporal precision to co-ordinate progenitor cell proliferation and subsequent differentiation to a diverse range of neurons and glia. A limited number of transiently expressed proneural basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, for example achaete-scute-complex (as-c) and atonal (ato) in Drosophila and the vertebrate homologues Ascl1 and Neurogenin2 (Ngn2), are able to orchestrate the onset of neuronal determination, context-dependent subtype selection and even influence later aspects of neuronal migration and maturation. Within the last decade, two models have emerged to explain how the temporal activity of proneural determination factors is regulated by phosphorylation at distinct sites. One model describes how cell-cycle associated phosphorylation on multiple sites in the N and C termini of vertebrate proneural proteins limits neuronal differentiation in cycling progenitor cells. A second model describes phosphorylation on a single site in the bHLH domain of Drosophila atonal that acts as a binary switch, where phosphorylation terminates proneural activity. Here we combine activating mutations of phosphorylation sites in the N- and C- termini with an inhibitory phospho-mimetic mutation in the bHLH domain of Ascl1 and Ngn2 proteins, and test their functions in vivo using Xenopus embryos to determine which mode of phospho-regulation dominates. Enhancing activity by preventing N- and C terminal phosphorylation cannot overcome the inhibitory effect of mimicking phosphorylation of the bHLH domain. Thus we have established a hierarchy between these two modes of proneural protein control and suggest a model of temporal regulation for proneural protein activity.