Leonid B. Leybovich

Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.

PURPOSE Because of biologic, medical, and sometimes logistic reasons, patients may be treated with 3D conformal therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the initial treatment volume (PTV(1)) followed by a sequential IMRT boost dose delivered to the boost volume (PTV(2)). In some patients, both PTV(1) and PTV(2) may be simultaneously treated by IMRT (simultaneous integrated boost technique). The purpose of this work was to assess the sequential and simultaneous integrated boost IMRT delivery techniques on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen patients with head-and-neck (H&N), lung, and prostate cancer were selected for this comparative study. Each site included 5 patients. In all patients, the target consisted of PTV(1) and PTV(2). The prescription doses to PTV(1) and PTV(2) were 46 Gy and 66 Gy (H&N cases), 45 Gy and 66.6 Gy (lung cases), 50 Gy and 78 Gy (prostate cases), respectively. The critical structures included the following: spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem (H&N structures); spinal cord, esophagus, lungs, and heart (lung structures); and bladder, rectum, femurs (prostate structures). For all cases, three IMRT plans were created: (1) 3D conformal therapy to PTV(1) followed by sequential IMRT boost to PTV(2) (sequential-IMRT(1)), (2) IMRT to PTV(1) followed by sequential IMRT boost to PTV(2) (sequential-IMRT(2)), and (3) Simultaneous integrated IMRT boost to both PTV(1) and PTV(2) (SIB-IMRT). The treatment plans were compared in terms of their dose-volume histograms, target volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose (D(100%)), and maximum and mean structure doses (D(max) and D(mean)). RESULTS H&N cases: SIB-IMRT produced better sparing of both parotids than sequential-IMRT(1), although sequential-IMRT(2) also provided adequate parotid sparing. On average, the mean cord dose for sequential-IMRT(1) was 29 Gy. The mean cord dose was reduced to approximately 20 Gy with both sequential-IMRT(2) and SIB-IMRT. Prostate cases: The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy or more (V(>70 Gy)) was reduced to 18.6 Gy with SIB-IMRT from 22.2 Gy with sequential-IMRT(2). SIB-IMRT reduced the mean doses to both bladder and rectum by approximately 10% and approximately 7%, respectively, as compared to sequential-IMRT(2). The mean left and right femur doses with SIB-IMRT were approximately 32% lower than obtained with sequential-IMRT(1). Lung cases: The mean heart dose was reduced by approximately 33% with SIB-IMRT as compared to sequential-IMRT(1). The mean esophagus dose was also reduced by approximately 10% using SIB-IMRT as compared to sequential-IMRT(1). The percentage of the lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V(20 Gy)) was reduced to 26% by SIB-IMRT from 30.6% with sequential-IMRT(1). CONCLUSIONS For equal PTV coverage, both sequential-IMRT techniques demonstrated moderately improved sparing of the critical structures. SIB-IMRT, however, markedly reduced doses to the critical structures for most of the cases considered in this study. The conformality of the SIB-IMRT plans was also much superior to that obtained with both sequential-IMRT techniques. The improved conformality gained with SIB-IMRT may suggest that the dose to nontarget tissues will be lower.

Comparative evaluation of Kodak EDR2 and XV2 films for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Film dosimetry provides a convenient tool to determine dose distributions, especially for verification of IMRT plans. However, the film response to radiation shows a significant dependence on depth, energy and field size that compromise the accuracy of measurements. Kodaks XV2 film has a low saturation dose (approximately 100 cGy) and, consequently, a relatively short region of linear dose-response. The recently introduced Kodak extended range EDR2 film was reported to have a linear dose-response region extending to 500 cGy. This increased dose range may be particularly useful in the verification of IMRT plans. In this work, the dependence of Kodak EDR2 films response on the depth, field size and energy was evaluated and compared with Kodak XV2 film. Co-60, 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV beams were used. Field sizes were 2 x 2, 6 x 6, 10 x 10, 14 x 14, 18 x 18 and 24 x 24 cm2. Doses for XV2 and EDR2 films were 80 cGy and 300 cGy, respectively. Optical density was converted to dose using depth-corrected sensitometric (Hurter and Driffield, or H&D) curves. For each field size, XV2 and EDR2 depth-dose curves were compared with ion chamber depth-dose curves. Both films demonstrated similar (within 1%) field size dependence. The deviation from the ion chamber for both films was small forthe fields ranging from 2 x 2 to 10 x 10 cm2: < or =2% for 6, 10 and 18 MV beams. No deviation was observed for the Co-60 beam. As the field size increased to 24 x 24 cm2, the deviation became significant for both films: approximately 7.5% for Co-60, approximately 5% for 6 MV and 10 MV, and approximately 6% for 18 MV. During the verification of IMRT plans, EDR2 film showed a better agreement with the calculated dose distributions than the XV2 film.

Role of IMRT in reducing penile doses in dose escalation for prostate cancer

PURPOSE In three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), penile tissues adjacent to the prostate are exposed to significant doses of radiation. This is likely to be a factor in development of posttreatment erectile dysfunction. In this study, we investigate whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) leads to lower radiation exposure to proximal penile tissues (PPT) when compared with 3D-CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten randomly selected patients with clinically localized prostate cancer constituted the study group. Using identical structure sets, 3D-CRT and IMRT plans were designed for each patient. For IMRT, both tomographic (TOMO) and step-and-shoot (SS) techniques were used. Treatment plans were developed using 18 MV photons for 3D-CRT, 6 MV photons for TOMO, and 6 MV and 18 MV photons for SS plans. The PPT up to the beginning of the penile shaft (usually measuring 2-3 cm) was outlined by a team composed of a board-certified urologist and a radiation oncologist. The outlined PPT was subdivided into three segments (P1, P2, P3), and the radiation dose to each segment and to the entire structure was calculated. In addition, PPT was subdivided into corporal cavernosa (CC) and corpus spongiosum (bulb). The prostate dose was escalated from 73.8 Gy to 81 Gy to 90 Gy. Target D(95) (dose to 95% volume), critical structure D(5) (dose to 5% volume), and D(mean) (mean dose) were used in the comparison among treatment plans. Because 3D-CRT uses larger field margins than does IMRT, target and critical structure doses were recalculated in 3D-CRT plans employing field margins obtained from IMRT plans. Planning target volumes in original and modified 3D-CRT plans were the same. RESULTS Compared with 3D-CRT plans, the mean PPT doses were reduced by 40.2%, 43.6%, and 46.2%, respectively, at the three prescription dose levels in TOMO plans. The average D(mean) for CC was lower by 46.4%, 48.4%, and 51.4%, whereas the average bulb D(mean) was reduced by 44.2%, 44.9%, and 47.9%, respectively. There was also considerable sparing of P1, with a reduction in average D(mean) of 41.9%, 45.5%, and 48.5% compared with 3D-CRT. All differences between 3D-CRT and IMRT doses were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Similar improvements were noticed in maximum doses (D(5)) for penile structures. The percent dose reduction with IMRT plans improved as prostate dose was escalated. When compared with 3D-CRT plans with reduced fields, IMRT plans showed slightly smaller but still significant improvements in critical structure doses (p < 0.001). Compared with SS plans, TOMO plans produced improved sparing of dose to critical structures. CONCLUSIONS IMRT allows for dose escalation in prostate cancer while keeping penile tissue doses significantly lower compared to conformal radiotherapy. This may result in improved potency rates over current results observed with 3D-CRT.

Dosimetry of Very-Small (5–10 mm) and Small (12.5–40 mm) Diameter Cones and Dose Verification for Radiosurgery with 6-MV X-Ray Beams

The dosimetry and dose verification for 6-MV X-rays were performed for radiosurgery cones of 5- to 40-mm diameter. The total scatter factors decrease slowly from 0.936 (40-mm cone) to 0.893 (10-mm cone; a variation of 5%), but they fall to 0.83 (7.5-mm cone) and 0.67 (5-mm cone). The dmax increases from about 12.9 (5-mm cone) to 16.3 mm (40-mm cone). The full width half maximum (FWHMs) of the beam profiles, measured at 5 cm depth, agree with the cone diameters within 1 mm. The 10-90% beam penumbra/FWHM ratio is 0.23 +/- 0.03 (> or = 20-mm cones); for the smaller-diameter cones this ratio increases reaching 0.84 (5-mm cone). New tissue maximum ratios (TMRs) are reported for the 5-, 7.5-, 32.5-, and 37.5-mm-diameter cones. TMRs for the other diameter cones are consistent with published data. The measured doses in two verification studies using the 12 cones with diameters > or = 12.5 mm with a single 360 degrees arc agreed to 2% with the planned doses, and to about 10% for the three smaller cones. In a simulated treatment neglecting tissue heterogeneties (skull bone), the measured doses for two five arc studies (22.5-mm cone) were within 4% of the calculated dose to isocenter.

A modified method of planning and delivery for dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy

PURPOSE To develop a modified planning and delivery technique that reduces dose nonuniformity for tomographic delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS The NOMOS-CORVUS system delivers IMRT in a tomographic paradigm. This type of delivery is prone to create multiple dose nonuniformity regions at the arc abutment regions. The modified technique was based on the cyclical behavior of arc positions as a function of a target length. With the modified technique, two plans are developed for the same patient, one with the original target and the second with a slightly increased target length and the abutment regions shifted by approximately 5 mm compared to the first plan. Each plan is designed to deliver half of the target prescription dose delivered on alternate days, resulting in periodic shifts of abutment regions. This method was experimentally tested in phantoms with and without intentionally introduced errors in couch indexing. RESULTS With the modified technique, the degree of dose nonuniformity was reduced. For example, with 1 mm error in couch indexing, the degree of dose nonuniformity changed from approximately 25% to approximately 12%. CONCLUSION Use of the modified technique reduces dose nonuniformity due to periodic shifts of abutment regions during treatment delivery.

Design of electron beam wedges for increasing the penumbra of abutting fields

Polystyrene electron beam wedges increase the beam penumbra of electron beams and can reduce the dose non-uniformity of field junctions of abutted adjacent electron fields. The authors have investigated the dependence of the electron beam penumbra on the physical angle of polystyrene wedges for various electron beam energies and field sizes. Square, individual, and uniformly thick (1-15 mm) polystyrene inserts which covered the entire field were placed in electron applicators. Beam profiles, central-axis depth doses, and isodose curves were obtained using a water-phantom scanning system. The dependence of the beam penumbra widths, beam energy and practical range on the thickness of the polystyrene inserts are reported. These data yield the design parameters for polystyrene physical wedge angles which would increase beam penumbra from about 15 mm to about 35 mm.

An immobilization and localization technique for SRT and IMRT of intracranial tumors.

A noninvasive localization and immobilization technique that facilitates planning and accurate delivery of both intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and linac based stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of intracranial tumors has been developed and clinically tested. Immobilization of a patient was based on a commercially available Gill‐Thomas‐Cossman (GTC) relocatable frame. A stereotactic localization frame (LF) with the attached NOMOS localization device (CT pointer) was used for CT scanning of patients. Thus, CT slices contained fiducial marks for both IMRT and SRT. The patient anatomy and target(s) were contoured on a stand‐alone CT‐based imaging system. CT slices and contours were then transmitted to both IMRT and SRT treatment planning systems (TPSs) for concurrent development of IMRT and SRT plans. The treatment method that more closely approached the treatment goals could be selected. Since all TPSs used the same contour set, the accuracy of competing treatment plans comparison was improved. SRT delivery was done conventionally. For IMRT delivery patients used the SRT patient immobilization system. For the patient setup, the IMRT target box was attached to the SRT LF, replacing the IMRT CT Pointer. A modified and lighter IMRT target box compatible with SRT LF was fabricated. The proposed technique can also be used for planning and delivery of 3D CRT, thus improving its accuracy. Day‐to‐day reproducibility of the patient setup can be evaluated using a SRT Depth Helmet. PACS number(s): 87.53.Kn, 87.53Ly, 87.56.Da

Elimination of field size dependence of enhanced dynamic wedge factors

Enhanced dynamic wedge factors (EDWF) are characterized by a strong field size dependence. In contrast to physical wedge factors, the EDWF decrease as the field size is increased: for 6 MV 60 degrees wedge, the EDWF decreases by 50% when the field size is increased from 4 x 4 cm2 to 20 x 20 cm2. A method that eliminates the field size dependence of EDWF was developed and investigated in this work. In this method, the wedged field shape is determined by a multileaf collimator. The initial position of the moving Y jaw is determined by the field size and the stationary Y jaw is kept fixed at 10 cm for field sizes < or = 20 cm in the wedged direction. For all other fields, the stationary Y jaw setting is determined by the field size. The modified method results in EDWF that are independent of field size, with no change in the wedge dose distribution when compared with the conventional use of EDW.

Improvement of tomographic intensity modulated radiotherapy dose distributions using periodic shifting of arc abutment regions

Based on the study of treatment arc positioning versus target length, a method that allowed periodic shift of arc abutment regions through the course of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was developed. In this method, two treatment plans were developed for the same tumor. The first plan contained the original target (Planning Target Volume as defined by radiation oncologist) and the second one contained a modified target. The modification of the original target consisted of simply increasing its length, adding a small extension to it, or creating a distant pseudo target. These modifications cause arc abutment regions in the second plan to be shifted relative to their positions in the first plan. Different methods of target modification were investigated because in some cases (for instance, when a critical structure might overlap with the target extension) a simple extension of the target would cause an unacceptable irradiation of the sensitive structures. The dose prescribed to the modified portion of the target varied from 10% to 100% of the original target dose. It was found that a clinically significant shift (> or =5 mm) in abutment region locations occurred when the dose prescribed to the extended portion of the target was > or =95% of the original target dose. On the other hand, the pseudo target required only approximately 10% to 20% of the original target dose to produce the same shift in arc positions. Results of the film dosimetry showed that when a single plan was used for the treatment delivery, the dose nonuniformity was 17% and 25% of the prescribed dose with 0.5 and 1 mm errors in couch indexing, respectively. The dose nonuniformity was reduced by at least half when two plans were used for IMRT delivery.

A modified technique for RF-LCF interstitial hyperthermia

To provide uniform heating of a tumour, it is necessary to establish sufficient volumetric control of power deposition. The interstitial Radio-Frequency Localized Current Field (RF-LCF) technique may provide such control when segmented electrodes are used. The length of segments is equal to 1-1.5cm. Each segment is connected to a separate power source. However, this technique requires an additional implant for interstitial radiotherapy, because the lumen of segmented electrodes is filled with wires necessary to connect each segment to a separate power source. In this work, a modified method of implant that allows delivery of sequential and concomitant controlled thermoradiotherapy was investigated. In this method, each segmented electrode is surrounded by four continuous electrodes. Continuous electrodes pass through vertices of 1.5x1.5cm square and a segmented electrode passes through the centre of the square. The distance between segmented and continuous electrodes is 1.06cm. The electric field induced between an electrically interacting segment and continuous electrodes is concentrated primarily between this segment and its projection on continuous electrodes. Therefore, control of temperature distribution achieved with a modified implant is similar to that achieved with an implant containing only segmented electrodes. For temperature control during treatment, plastic catheters are inserted at a 0.5cm distance from each segmented electrode. Temperature is monitored using multisensor temperature probes. The continuous electrodes are also used for placement of radioactive sources. The lateral distance between radioactive sources is equal to 1.5cm. Besides allowing a sequential and concomitant thermoradiotherapy, the modified method is simpler to implement because it uses several fold less amount of segmented electrodes and power sources.