Nesrin Dogan

Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.

PURPOSE Because of biologic, medical, and sometimes logistic reasons, patients may be treated with 3D conformal therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the initial treatment volume (PTV(1)) followed by a sequential IMRT boost dose delivered to the boost volume (PTV(2)). In some patients, both PTV(1) and PTV(2) may be simultaneously treated by IMRT (simultaneous integrated boost technique). The purpose of this work was to assess the sequential and simultaneous integrated boost IMRT delivery techniques on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen patients with head-and-neck (H&N), lung, and prostate cancer were selected for this comparative study. Each site included 5 patients. In all patients, the target consisted of PTV(1) and PTV(2). The prescription doses to PTV(1) and PTV(2) were 46 Gy and 66 Gy (H&N cases), 45 Gy and 66.6 Gy (lung cases), 50 Gy and 78 Gy (prostate cases), respectively. The critical structures included the following: spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem (H&N structures); spinal cord, esophagus, lungs, and heart (lung structures); and bladder, rectum, femurs (prostate structures). For all cases, three IMRT plans were created: (1) 3D conformal therapy to PTV(1) followed by sequential IMRT boost to PTV(2) (sequential-IMRT(1)), (2) IMRT to PTV(1) followed by sequential IMRT boost to PTV(2) (sequential-IMRT(2)), and (3) Simultaneous integrated IMRT boost to both PTV(1) and PTV(2) (SIB-IMRT). The treatment plans were compared in terms of their dose-volume histograms, target volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose (D(100%)), and maximum and mean structure doses (D(max) and D(mean)). RESULTS H&N cases: SIB-IMRT produced better sparing of both parotids than sequential-IMRT(1), although sequential-IMRT(2) also provided adequate parotid sparing. On average, the mean cord dose for sequential-IMRT(1) was 29 Gy. The mean cord dose was reduced to approximately 20 Gy with both sequential-IMRT(2) and SIB-IMRT. Prostate cases: The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy or more (V(>70 Gy)) was reduced to 18.6 Gy with SIB-IMRT from 22.2 Gy with sequential-IMRT(2). SIB-IMRT reduced the mean doses to both bladder and rectum by approximately 10% and approximately 7%, respectively, as compared to sequential-IMRT(2). The mean left and right femur doses with SIB-IMRT were approximately 32% lower than obtained with sequential-IMRT(1). Lung cases: The mean heart dose was reduced by approximately 33% with SIB-IMRT as compared to sequential-IMRT(1). The mean esophagus dose was also reduced by approximately 10% using SIB-IMRT as compared to sequential-IMRT(1). The percentage of the lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V(20 Gy)) was reduced to 26% by SIB-IMRT from 30.6% with sequential-IMRT(1). CONCLUSIONS For equal PTV coverage, both sequential-IMRT techniques demonstrated moderately improved sparing of the critical structures. SIB-IMRT, however, markedly reduced doses to the critical structures for most of the cases considered in this study. The conformality of the SIB-IMRT plans was also much superior to that obtained with both sequential-IMRT techniques. The improved conformality gained with SIB-IMRT may suggest that the dose to nontarget tissues will be lower.

Comparative evaluation of Kodak EDR2 and XV2 films for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Film dosimetry provides a convenient tool to determine dose distributions, especially for verification of IMRT plans. However, the film response to radiation shows a significant dependence on depth, energy and field size that compromise the accuracy of measurements. Kodaks XV2 film has a low saturation dose (approximately 100 cGy) and, consequently, a relatively short region of linear dose-response. The recently introduced Kodak extended range EDR2 film was reported to have a linear dose-response region extending to 500 cGy. This increased dose range may be particularly useful in the verification of IMRT plans. In this work, the dependence of Kodak EDR2 films response on the depth, field size and energy was evaluated and compared with Kodak XV2 film. Co-60, 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV beams were used. Field sizes were 2 x 2, 6 x 6, 10 x 10, 14 x 14, 18 x 18 and 24 x 24 cm2. Doses for XV2 and EDR2 films were 80 cGy and 300 cGy, respectively. Optical density was converted to dose using depth-corrected sensitometric (Hurter and Driffield, or H&D) curves. For each field size, XV2 and EDR2 depth-dose curves were compared with ion chamber depth-dose curves. Both films demonstrated similar (within 1%) field size dependence. The deviation from the ion chamber for both films was small forthe fields ranging from 2 x 2 to 10 x 10 cm2: < or =2% for 6, 10 and 18 MV beams. No deviation was observed for the Co-60 beam. As the field size increased to 24 x 24 cm2, the deviation became significant for both films: approximately 7.5% for Co-60, approximately 5% for 6 MV and 10 MV, and approximately 6% for 18 MV. During the verification of IMRT plans, EDR2 film showed a better agreement with the calculated dose distributions than the XV2 film.

Surface and build-up region dosimetry for obliquely incident intensity modulated radiotherapy 6 MV x rays.

This study investigates the surface dose and build-up region dosimetry for oblique IMRT beams. The dependence of surface and build-up region doses of 0 degrees (perpendicular incidence) and 75 degrees (oblique incidence) IMRT fields on field size was measured and compared with open field dosimetry. Measurements were performed using a parallel-plate chamber and KODAK EDR2 films in a polystyrene phantom for a 6 cm x 6 cm and a 12 cm x 12 cm, 6 MV photon beam at depths of 0 mm (surface) through dmax. Data were normalized to the dmax value of each field. Four intensity modulated delivery patterns were created and delivered using step-and-shoot IMRT: (1) six static 1 cm x 6 cm strips (IMRTstrip), (2) 12 static 1 cm x 12 cm strips (IMRTstrip), (3) intensity modulated beam patterns created by using the inverse planning optimization software (IMRTopt) for 6 cm x 6 cm, and (4) IMRTopt for 12 cm x 12 cm field sizes. The percent depth doses (PDDs) of 0 degrees, 6 cm x 6 cm IMRTstrip beam at the surface and 5 mm were lower by 8.8% and 1.6%, respectively, compared to the open field. The PDDs of 75 degrees, 6 cm x 6 cm IMRTstrip beam at the surface and 5 mm were lower by 6.7% and 2.4%, respectively, compared to the open field. This study showed that IMRT itself is not contributing to greater skin doses.

Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry

PURPOSE To investigate the magnitude of edema after prostate brachytherapy and its effect on the CT-based postimplant dosimetry based on the sequential CT scans using dose-volume histograms, dose conformity, and homogeneity indices in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS CT scans were obtained for 25 patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy with 125I or 103Pd before implant and postimplant Day 1, Day 7, and Day 28. The prostate, rectum, and bladder volumes on each scan were contoured by the same physician. Posttreatment dose distributions were generated using FOCUS (CMS Inc., St. Louis, MO) brachytherapy planning software. Dose calculations were based on TG43 formalism. Dose-volume histograms for target, rectum, and bladder were created for all patients, and the quality of the implants was analyzed using the dose conformity indices: CT-based target volumes ratios, TVR(1) and TVR(2); dose homogeneity indices, DHI(1), DHI(2), and DNR; dose coverage index, CI; the percentage of the prostate volume enclosed by 100%, 90%, and 80% of the prescription dose: V(100), V(90), and V(80); the volume of the rectum covered by 100%, 80%, and 70% of the prescription dose; and the dose covering 90% of the prostate volume (D(90)). RESULTS The prostate volume increased between the prescan and the implant Day 1 scans and then decreased between Day 1 and Day 28 scans. The average increase in prostate volume was 30% between the prescan and implant Day 1 scans for the 25 cases evaluated. The prostate volume decreased 20% between the Day 1 and Day 28 scans. The preplan dose coverage to the periphery of the prostate was 100% for all cases evaluated. V(100) increased from an average of 77% to 85% between the Day 1 and Day 28 scans, respectively. On average, D(90) increased from 84% for Day 1 to 93% for Day 28. The average TVR(1), TVR(2), and CI were 1.99, 2.28, and 0.87, respectively, based on the Day 28 scans. The average DHI(1), DHI(2), and DNR were 0.52, 0.46, and 0.48, respectively, based on the Day 28 scans. CONCLUSIONS The decrease in prostate volume from Day 1 to Day 28 after the implant markedly improved the prescription dose covering the prostate from 77% to 85%. Day 28 prostate volumes were still about 10% larger than the preimplant CT volumes for the 25 cases evaluated. Postimplant dosimetry using dose conformity and homogeneity indices is dependent on the timing of CT studies, as a result of changing prostate volumes from edema.

A modified method of planning and delivery for dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy

PURPOSE To develop a modified planning and delivery technique that reduces dose nonuniformity for tomographic delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS The NOMOS-CORVUS system delivers IMRT in a tomographic paradigm. This type of delivery is prone to create multiple dose nonuniformity regions at the arc abutment regions. The modified technique was based on the cyclical behavior of arc positions as a function of a target length. With the modified technique, two plans are developed for the same patient, one with the original target and the second with a slightly increased target length and the abutment regions shifted by approximately 5 mm compared to the first plan. Each plan is designed to deliver half of the target prescription dose delivered on alternate days, resulting in periodic shifts of abutment regions. This method was experimentally tested in phantoms with and without intentionally introduced errors in couch indexing. RESULTS With the modified technique, the degree of dose nonuniformity was reduced. For example, with 1 mm error in couch indexing, the degree of dose nonuniformity changed from approximately 25% to approximately 12%. CONCLUSION Use of the modified technique reduces dose nonuniformity due to periodic shifts of abutment regions during treatment delivery.

Oncology scan--the vision of medical physics.

The Physics editorial team for the International Journal of current technology faces before it can transition into a more Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics includes 8 associate editors and 1 senior editor. Physicists from North America and Europe with a variety of expertise constitute the team, which receives the greatest number of manuscripts in relationship to other categories within the journal. This unfortunately leads to a high number of manuscripts being rejected or declined. We recently set up formal decline criteria, which include the following:

An immobilization and localization technique for SRT and IMRT of intracranial tumors.

A noninvasive localization and immobilization technique that facilitates planning and accurate delivery of both intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and linac based stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of intracranial tumors has been developed and clinically tested. Immobilization of a patient was based on a commercially available Gill‐Thomas‐Cossman (GTC) relocatable frame. A stereotactic localization frame (LF) with the attached NOMOS localization device (CT pointer) was used for CT scanning of patients. Thus, CT slices contained fiducial marks for both IMRT and SRT. The patient anatomy and target(s) were contoured on a stand‐alone CT‐based imaging system. CT slices and contours were then transmitted to both IMRT and SRT treatment planning systems (TPSs) for concurrent development of IMRT and SRT plans. The treatment method that more closely approached the treatment goals could be selected. Since all TPSs used the same contour set, the accuracy of competing treatment plans comparison was improved. SRT delivery was done conventionally. For IMRT delivery patients used the SRT patient immobilization system. For the patient setup, the IMRT target box was attached to the SRT LF, replacing the IMRT CT Pointer. A modified and lighter IMRT target box compatible with SRT LF was fabricated. The proposed technique can also be used for planning and delivery of 3D CRT, thus improving its accuracy. Day‐to‐day reproducibility of the patient setup can be evaluated using a SRT Depth Helmet. PACS number(s): 87.53.Kn, 87.53Ly, 87.56.Da

Elimination of field size dependence of enhanced dynamic wedge factors

Enhanced dynamic wedge factors (EDWF) are characterized by a strong field size dependence. In contrast to physical wedge factors, the EDWF decrease as the field size is increased: for 6 MV 60 degrees wedge, the EDWF decreases by 50% when the field size is increased from 4 x 4 cm2 to 20 x 20 cm2. A method that eliminates the field size dependence of EDWF was developed and investigated in this work. In this method, the wedged field shape is determined by a multileaf collimator. The initial position of the moving Y jaw is determined by the field size and the stationary Y jaw is kept fixed at 10 cm for field sizes < or = 20 cm in the wedged direction. For all other fields, the stationary Y jaw setting is determined by the field size. The modified method results in EDWF that are independent of field size, with no change in the wedge dose distribution when compared with the conventional use of EDW.

Improvement of tomographic intensity modulated radiotherapy dose distributions using periodic shifting of arc abutment regions

Based on the study of treatment arc positioning versus target length, a method that allowed periodic shift of arc abutment regions through the course of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was developed. In this method, two treatment plans were developed for the same tumor. The first plan contained the original target (Planning Target Volume as defined by radiation oncologist) and the second one contained a modified target. The modification of the original target consisted of simply increasing its length, adding a small extension to it, or creating a distant pseudo target. These modifications cause arc abutment regions in the second plan to be shifted relative to their positions in the first plan. Different methods of target modification were investigated because in some cases (for instance, when a critical structure might overlap with the target extension) a simple extension of the target would cause an unacceptable irradiation of the sensitive structures. The dose prescribed to the modified portion of the target varied from 10% to 100% of the original target dose. It was found that a clinically significant shift (> or =5 mm) in abutment region locations occurred when the dose prescribed to the extended portion of the target was > or =95% of the original target dose. On the other hand, the pseudo target required only approximately 10% to 20% of the original target dose to produce the same shift in arc positions. Results of the film dosimetry showed that when a single plan was used for the treatment delivery, the dose nonuniformity was 17% and 25% of the prescribed dose with 0.5 and 1 mm errors in couch indexing, respectively. The dose nonuniformity was reduced by at least half when two plans were used for IMRT delivery.

A modified technique for RF-LCF interstitial hyperthermia

To provide uniform heating of a tumour, it is necessary to establish sufficient volumetric control of power deposition. The interstitial Radio-Frequency Localized Current Field (RF-LCF) technique may provide such control when segmented electrodes are used. The length of segments is equal to 1-1.5cm. Each segment is connected to a separate power source. However, this technique requires an additional implant for interstitial radiotherapy, because the lumen of segmented electrodes is filled with wires necessary to connect each segment to a separate power source. In this work, a modified method of implant that allows delivery of sequential and concomitant controlled thermoradiotherapy was investigated. In this method, each segmented electrode is surrounded by four continuous electrodes. Continuous electrodes pass through vertices of 1.5x1.5cm square and a segmented electrode passes through the centre of the square. The distance between segmented and continuous electrodes is 1.06cm. The electric field induced between an electrically interacting segment and continuous electrodes is concentrated primarily between this segment and its projection on continuous electrodes. Therefore, control of temperature distribution achieved with a modified implant is similar to that achieved with an implant containing only segmented electrodes. For temperature control during treatment, plastic catheters are inserted at a 0.5cm distance from each segmented electrode. Temperature is monitored using multisensor temperature probes. The continuous electrodes are also used for placement of radioactive sources. The lateral distance between radioactive sources is equal to 1.5cm. Besides allowing a sequential and concomitant thermoradiotherapy, the modified method is simpler to implement because it uses several fold less amount of segmented electrodes and power sources.