Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lieven De Moor is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lieven De Moor.


Accounting Forum | 2011

Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?

Lies Bouten; Patricia Everaert; Luc Van Liedekerke; Lieven De Moor; Johan Christiaens

Abstract This study develops a content analysis framework that provides information on the comprehensiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, an important aspect of social and environmental accountability. Comprehensive reporting, as defined here, requires three types of information for each disclosed CSR item: (i) vision and goals, (ii) management approach, and (iii) performance indicators. The feasibility of the framework to assess the comprehensiveness of CSR reporting is demonstrated using the 2005 annual reports of a sample of publicly traded Belgian companies. The content analysis reveals a low level of comprehensive reporting. This finding complements those of prior studies on the completeness of CSR reporting and, therefore, feeds the debate regarding the extent to which CSR reporting can be considered a mechanism for discharging social and environmental accountability.


Applied Financial Economics | 2013

What drives international equity and bond holdings? An empirical study

Lieven De Moor; Rosanne Vanpee

In this article, we explore tentatively and formally the differences between bond and equity home and foreign bias based on a large data set including developed and emerging markets for the period 2001 to 2010. We show that, unlike for equities, the international demand for bonds is mainly supply-side driven: bond home bias increases with a growth in public debt, while the underinvestment bias towards a foreign countrys bonds decreases if this country issues more (sovereign) debt. This explains the absence for a negative time trend in bond home bias while equity home bias has decreased over time, and similarly a decrease in foreign bond bias, which is not observed for equities. Besides variables being significantly more, less or incompatibly important for bond versus equity investment bias, we also determine variables to be exclusively relevant for bonds, like sovereign credit ratings and bank credit supply.


The Investment Analysts Journal | 2016

Mutual Fund Performance: A Market Efficiency Perspective

Tim Verheyden; Lieven De Moor; Rosanne Vanpee

ABSTRACT This study reconciles existing literature on stock market efficiency and mutual fund performance by developing a framework to test whether fund managers are able to exploit market inefficiencies. We find a positive relationship between alpha and weak-form market efficiency. Most funds are unable to outperform the market systematically, although a few are able to exploit relatively inefficient markets. Top performing funds are characterised by a better management of downside risk in times of market distress, whilst simultaneously exploiting learning effects when markets return to equilibrium. By conditioning fund performance on the state of the underlying market, we propose a conditional alpha ratio, which helps to better understand fund performance and can improve the fund selection process for investors.


The Investment Analysts Journal | 2018

Myths about fundamental indexing

Lieven De Moor; Fang Liu; Piet Sercu

ABSTRACT Fundamental indexing starts from the observation that in a value-weighted portfolio, any overpricing affects the stock’s portfolio weight upward and its typical return downward, and vice versa; but on average the ‘drag’ on the portfolio’s expected return caused by this negative interaction is avoided if weights are based instead on accounting-based instruments for true value. We find that the drag effect is statistically and economically unimportant. Our empirical work avoids regression-based alphas, which are flawed by demonstrable instabilities in the exposures.


International Journal of Managing Projects in Business | 2018

Determinants of bank loan spread in project finance

Wouter Thierie; Lieven De Moor

The purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding of the pricing decisions of banks for project finance (PF) loans and the main drivers affecting the cost of debt in infrastructure deals. As infrastructure projects are typically highly leveraged, the cost of bank lending is an important driver of the overall funding costs for the project.,First, the paper provides a general review of the drivers of the cost of funds in PF. Second, the paper develops a regression analysis of the loan’s spread on four categories: project, loan, bank characteristics and the economic environment. By using a new data set of InfraDeals containing data on bank spreads of more than 700 infrastructure projects worldwide from 2006 to 2016.,The results show that the cost of debt is predominantly affected by the market and the business cycle, rather than the structuring of the project. This implicates that the timing when the deal is closed weighs more heavily than the specificities of the project itself.,The results have important policy implications. As PF deals are often paid for by taxpayers, this paper could help policymakers to use public funds for infrastructure in the most efficient way.,One weakness of existing studies in PF loan pricing is that they undervalue the role of the economic environment in the cost of debt. Few studies in the literature include macroeconomic control variables in their model and the others do not seem to find significant results. This paper reveals new insights on the pricing decisions of banks for PF loans.


International Journal of Managing Projects in Business | 2017

Constraints related to developing small-scale PPPs and how to reduce them

Wouter Thierie; Lieven De Moor

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to better understand the constraints related to developing small-scale public-private partnerships (PPPs) and how to reduce them. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides a general review of the characteristics of small-scale PPPs and identifies overarching concerns. Findings The paper finds for small-scale PPPs constraints with respect to the definition, government processes and procedures, transaction costs, public capacity and institutional structure; important issues of transaction costs, minimum size requirement and increasing popularity and recommendations for further development. Practical implications Since most small PPPs are conducted by cities and regional governments, many local bodies would benefit from a better understanding of small-scale projects, helping to develop standard documentation, which is especially relevant for small-scale projects given their relatively large transaction and bid costs, supporting the long-term growth of small PPPs. Originality/value Small-scale PPPs have different characteristics compared with large projects and these characteristics should be studied separately. Although the benefits of small-scale projects are undeniable, relatively few have been undertaken relative to the substantial requirement. A more thorough understanding of the constraints related to developing small-scale PPPs and how to reduce them would help the subset of small projects to reach its full potential. This paper serves as a first step, clearing the ground for further research in specific areas.


Applied Economics Letters | 2015

Characteristics of pricing errors in stocks implied by autocovariance and ‘drag’

Lieven De Moor; Piet Sercu

In this article, we estimate the lower bounds on the volatility and autocorrelation of pricing errors in stocks and infer the market-wide component in the pricing errors, by combining information from the autocovariance and ‘drag’ in stock returns. For the smaller US stocks, we estimate lower bounds of 8−10% for the volatility and 0.3−0.5 for the autocorrelation of the pricing errors, at monthly horizon. We infer that approximately 50% of the pricing errors of the smaller stocks originate from the market-wide component, whereas for larger stocks, virtually all of the pricing errors are market-wide. In practice, this evidence means that market-wide bubbles and busts are far more important than idiosyncratic sources of pricing errors, like thin trading, low liquidity or little analyst following.


The European Journal of Development Research | 2017

Financial Globalisation Dynamic Thresholds for Financial Development: Evidence from Africa

Simplice A. Asongu; Lieven De Moor


Journal of International Money and Finance | 2013

The smallest firm effect: An international study

Lieven De Moor; Piet Sercu


Archive | 2005

The Structure of International Stock Returns: Size, Country and Sector Effects in Capital Asset Pricing

Lieven De Moor

Collaboration


Dive into the Lieven De Moor's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Piet Sercu

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim Verheyden

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luc Van Liedekerke

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rosanne Vanpee

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wouter Thierie

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Filip Van den Bossche

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lies Bouten

Lille Catholic University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge