Luke Hakes
University of Manchester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Luke Hakes.
Journal of Biology | 2007
Juan I. Castrillo; Leo Zeef; David C. Hoyle; Nianshu Zhang; Andrew Hayes; David C. J. Gardner; Michael Cornell; June Petty; Luke Hakes; Leanne Wardleworth; Bharat Rash; Marie Brown; Warwick B. Dunn; David Broadhurst; Kerry O'Donoghue; Svenja Hester; Tom P. J. Dunkley; Sarah R. Hart; Neil Swainston; Peter Li; Simon J. Gaskell; Norman W. Paton; Kathryn S. Lilley; Douglas B. Kell; Stephen G. Oliver
BACKGROUND Cell growth underlies many key cellular and developmental processes, yet a limited number of studies have been carried out on cell-growth regulation. Comprehensive studies at the transcriptional, proteomic and metabolic levels under defined controlled conditions are currently lacking. RESULTS Metabolic control analysis is being exploited in a systems biology study of the eukaryotic cell. Using chemostat culture, we have measured the impact of changes in flux (growth rate) on the transcriptome, proteome, endometabolome and exometabolome of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Each functional genomic level shows clear growth-rate-associated trends and discriminates between carbon-sufficient and carbon-limited conditions. Genes consistently and significantly upregulated with increasing growth rate are frequently essential and encode evolutionarily conserved proteins of known function that participate in many protein-protein interactions. In contrast, more unknown, and fewer essential, genes are downregulated with increasing growth rate; their protein products rarely interact with one another. A large proportion of yeast genes under positive growth-rate control share orthologs with other eukaryotes, including humans. Significantly, transcription of genes encoding components of the TOR complex (a major controller of eukaryotic cell growth) is not subject to growth-rate regulation. Moreover, integrative studies reveal the extent and importance of post-transcriptional control, patterns of control of metabolic fluxes at the level of enzyme synthesis, and the relevance of specific enzymatic reactions in the control of metabolic fluxes during cell growth. CONCLUSION This work constitutes a first comprehensive systems biology study on growth-rate control in the eukaryotic cell. The results have direct implications for advanced studies on cell growth, in vivo regulation of metabolic fluxes for comprehensive metabolic engineering, and for the design of genome-scale systems biology models of the eukaryotic cell.
Nature Biotechnology | 2008
Luke Hakes; John W. Pinney; David Robertson; Simon C. Lovell
Analysis of protein-protein interaction networks is an increasingly popular means to infer biological insight, but is close enough attention being paid to data handling protocols and the degree of bias in the data?
Genome Biology | 2007
Luke Hakes; John W. Pinney; Simon C. Lovell; Stephen G. Oliver; David Robertson
BackgroundGenes in populations are in constant flux, being gained through duplication and occasionally retained or, more frequently, lost from the genome. In this study we compare pairs of identifiable gene duplicates generated by small-scale (predominantly single-gene) duplications with those created by a large-scale gene duplication event (whole-genome duplication) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.ResultsWe find a number of quantifiable differences between these data sets. Whole-genome duplicates tend to exhibit less profound phenotypic effects when deleted, are functionally less divergent, and are associated with a different set of functions than their small-scale duplicate counterparts. At first sight, either of these latter two features could provide a plausible mechanism by which the difference in dispensability might arise. However, we uncover no evidence suggesting that this is the case. We find that the difference in dispensability observed between the two duplicate types is limited to gene products found within protein complexes, and probably results from differences in the relative strength of the evolutionary pressures present following each type of duplication event.ConclusionGenes, and the proteins they specify, originating from small-scale and whole-genome duplication events differ in quantifiable ways. We infer that this is not due to their association with different functional categories; rather, it is a direct result of biases in gene retention.
Comparative and Functional Genomics | 2007
Luke Hakes; David Robertson; Stephen G. Oliver; Simon C. Lovell
By combining crystallographic information with protein-interaction data obtained through traditional experimental means, this paper determines the most appropriate method for generating protein-interaction networks that incorporate data derived from protein complexes. We propose that a combined method should be considered; in which complexes composed of five chains or less are decomposed using the matrix model, whereas the spoke model is used to derive pairwise interactions for those with six chains or more. The results presented here should improve the accuracy and relevance of studies investigating the topology of protein-interaction networks.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2007
Luke Hakes; Simon C. Lovell; Stephen G. Oliver; David Robertson
Omics A Journal of Integrative Biology | 2006
Norman Morrison; A. Joseph Wood; David Hancock; Sonia Shah; Luke Hakes; Tanya Gray; Bela Tiwari; Peter Kille; Andrew R. Cossins; Matthew J. Hegarty; Michael J. Allen; William H. Wilson; Peter J.W. Olive; Cas Kramer; Thierry Bailhache; Jonathan Reeves; Denise Pallett; J.M. Warne; Karim Nashar; Helen Parkinson; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Robert D. Stevens; Jason R. Snape; Andy Brass; Dawn Field
BMC Genomics | 2005
Luke Hakes; David Robertson; Stephen G. Oliver
AAPG Bulletin | 2006
Norman Morrison; Josheph Wood; David Hancock; Sonia Shah; Luke Hakes; Tania Gray; Bela Tiwari; Peter Kille; Andrew R. Cossins; Matthew J. Hegarty; Michael J. Allen; Peter J.W. Olive; Cas Kramer; Thierry Bailhache; Jonathan Reeves; Denise Pallett; J.M. Warne; Karim Nashar; Helen Parkinson; Susanna Sansone; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Robert Stevens; Jason R. Snape; Andy Brass; Dawn Field
Nature Biotechnology | 2008
Luke Hakes; John W. Pinney; David Robertson; Simon C. Lovell
BMC Systems Biology | 2007
Luke Hakes; Simon C. Lovell; Stephen G. Oliver; David Robertson