M Duchateau

Geometric accuracy of a novel gimbals based radiation therapy tumor tracking system.

PURPOSE VERO is a novel platform for image guided stereotactic body radiotherapy. Orthogonal gimbals hold the linac-MLC assembly allowing real-time moving tumor tracking. This study determines the geometric accuracy of the tracking. MATERIALS AND METHODS To determine the tracking error, an 1D moving phantom produced sinusoidal motion with frequencies up to 30 breaths per minute (bpm). Tumor trajectories of patients were reproduced using a 2D robot and pursued with the gimbals tracking system prototype. Using the moving beam light field and a digital-camera-based detection unit tracking errors, system lag and equivalence of pan/tilt performance were measured. RESULTS The system lag was 47.7 ms for panning and 47.6 ms for tilting. Applying system lag compensation, sinusoidal motion tracking was accurate, with a tracking error 90% percentile E(90%)<0.82 mm and similar performance for pan/tilt. Systematic tracking errors were below 0.14 mm. The 2D tumor trajectories were tracked with an average E(90%) of 0.54 mm, and tracking error standard deviations of 0.20 mm for pan and 0.22 mm for tilt. CONCLUSIONS In terms of dynamic behavior, the gimbaled linac of the VERO system showed to be an excellent approach for providing accurate real-time tumor tracking in radiation therapy.

Initial assessment of tumor tracking with a gimbaled linac system in clinical circumstances: A patient simulation study

PURPOSE To have an initial assessment of the Vero Dynamic Tracking workflow in clinical circumstances and quantify the performance of the tracking system, a simulation study was set up on 5 lung and liver patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS The preparatory steps of a tumor tracking treatment, based on fiducial markers implanted in the tumor, were executed allowing pursuit of the tumor with the gimbaled linac and monitoring X-rays acquisition, however, without activating the 6 MV beam. Data were acquired on workflow time-efficiency, tracking accuracy and imaging exposure. RESULTS The average time between the patient entering the treatment room and the first treatment field was about 9 min. The time for building the correlation model was 3.2 min. Tracking errors of 0.55 and 0.95 mm (1σ) were observed in PAN/TILT direction and a 2D range of 3.08 mm. A skin dose was determined of 0.08 mGy/image, with a source-to-skin distance of 900 mm and kV exposure of 1 mAs. On average 1.8 mGy/min kV skin dose was observed for 1 Hz monitoring. CONCLUSION The Vero tracking solution proved to be fully functional and showed performance comparable with other real-time tracking systems.

Treating patients with real-time tumor tracking using the Vero gimbaled linac system: Implementation and first review

PURPOSE To report on the first clinical application of a real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) solution based on the Vero SBRT gimbaled linac system for treatment of moving tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS A first group of 10 SBRT patients diagnosed with NSCLC or oligometastatic disease in lung or liver was treated with the RTTT technique. The PTV volumes and OAR exposure were benchmarked against the widely used ITV approach. Based on data acquired during execution of RTTT treatments, a first review was performed of the process. RESULTS The 35% PTV volume reduction with RTTT of the studied single lesions SBRT irradiations of small target volumes is expected to result in a small (<1%) reduction of lung or liver NTCP. A GTV-PTV margin of 5.0mm was applied for treatment planning of RTTT. From patient data on residual geometric uncertainties, a CTV-PTV margin of 3.2mm was calculated. Reduction of the GTV-PTV margin below 5.0mm without better understanding of biological definition of tumor boundaries was discouraged. Total treatment times were reduced to 34.4 min on average. CONCLUSION A considerable PTV volume reduction was achieved applying RTTT and time efficiency for respiratory correlated SBRT was reestablished with Vero RTTT.

Clinical evaluation of a robotic 6-degree of freedom treatment couch for frameless radiosurgery.

PURPOSE To evaluate the added value of 6-degree of freedom (DOF) patient positioning with a robotic couch compared with 4DOF positioning for intracranial lesions and to estimate the immobilization characteristics of the BrainLAB frameless mask (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany), more specifically, the setup errors and intrafraction motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS We enrolled 40 patients with 66 brain metastases treated with frameless stereotactic radiosurgery and a 6DOF robotic couch. Patient positioning was performed with the BrainLAB ExacTrac stereoscopic X-ray system. Positioning results were collected before and after treatment to assess patient setup error and intrafraction motion. Existing treatment planning data were loaded and simulated for 4DOF positioning and compared with the 6DOF positioning. The clinical relevance was analyzed by means of the Paddick conformity index and the ratio of prescribed isodose volume covered with 4DOF to that obtained with the 6DOF positioning. RESULTS The mean three-dimensional setup error before 6DOF correction was 1.91 mm (SD, 1.25 mm). The rotational errors were larger in the longitudinal (mean, 0.23°; SD, 0.82°) direction compared with the lateral (mean, -0.09°; SD, 0.72°) and vertical (mean, -0.10°; SD, 1.03°) directions (p < 0.05). The mean three-dimensional intrafraction shift was 0.58 mm (SD, 0.42 mm). The mean intrafractional rotational errors were comparable for the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions: 0.01° (SD, 0.35°), 0.03° (SD, 0.31°), and -0.03° (SD, 0.33°), respectively. The mean conformity index decreased from 0.68 (SD, 0.08) (6DOF) to 0.59 (SD, 0.12) (4DOF) (p < 0.05). A loss of prescribed isodose coverage of 5% (SD, 0.08) was found with the 4DOF positioning (p < 0.05). Half a degree for longitudinal and lateral rotations can be identified as a threshold for coverage loss. CONCLUSIONS With a mask immobilization, patient setup error and intrafraction motions need to be evaluated and corrected for. The 6DOF patient positioning with a 6DOF robotic couch to correct translational and rotational setup errors improves target positioning with respect to treatment isocenter, which is in direct relation with the clinical outcome, compared with the 4DOF positioning.

Dosimetric assessment of static and helical TomoTherapy in the clinical implementation of breast cancer treatments

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Investigation of the use of TomoTherapy and TomoDirect versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of post-operative breast carcinoma. This study concentrates on the evaluation of the planning protocol for the TomoTherapy and TomoDirect TPS, dose verification and the implementation of in vivo dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight patients with different breast cancer indications (left/right tumor, axillary nodes involvement (N+)/no nodes (N0), tumorectomy/mastectomy) were enrolled. TomoTherapy, TomoDirect and conventional plans were generated for prone and supine positions leading to six or seven plans per patient. Dose prescription was 42Gy in 15 fractions over 3weeks. Dose verification of a TomoTherapy plan is performed using TLDs and EDR2 film inside a home-made wax breast phantom fixed on a rando-alderson phantom. In vivo dosimetry was performed with TLDs. RESULTS It is possible to create clinically acceptable plans with TomoTherapy and TomoDirect. TLD calibration protocol with a water equivalent phantom is accurate. TLD verification with the phantom shows measured over calculated ratios within 2.2% (PTV). An overresponse of the TLDs was observed in the low dose regions (<0.1Gy). The film measurements show good agreement for high and low dose regions inside the phantom. A sharp gradient can be created to the thoracic wall. In vivo dosimetry with TLDs was clinically feasible. CONCLUSIONS The TomoTherapy and TomoDirect modalities can deliver dose distributions which the radiotherapist judges to be equal to or better than conventional treatment of breast carcinoma according to the organ to be protected.

Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy to primary tumor and metastatic locations in oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment modality in patients presenting with oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SBRT is used as a local consolidative treatment to metastatic disease sites. The majority of patients included in SBRT trials for oligometastatic NSCLC have controlled primary tumors and brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Oligometastatic NSCLC patients with ≤5 metastatic lesions were included in a prospective phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of SBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations. SBRT to a dose of 50 Gy in 10 fractions was delivered. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was carried out at baseline and 3 months after SBRT to evaluate the metabolic response rate according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method from start of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Side-effects were scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0. RESULTS Twenty-six patients received SBRT after induction chemotherapy (n = 17) or as a primary treatment (n = 9). Median follow-up was 16.4 months. Overall metabolic response rate was 60% with seven patients (30%) achieving a complete metabolic remission and 7 (30%) a partial metabolic response. Any acute grade 2 toxicity was observed in four patients (15%) and grade 3 pulmonary toxicity in two patients (8%). Median PFS and OS were 11.2 and 23 months. The 1-year PFS and 1-year OS rate were 45% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSION SBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations, in oligometastatic NSCLC patients produced an acceptable median PFS of 11.2 months.

Assessment of Intrafractional Movement and Internal Motion in Radiotherapy of Rectal Cancer Using Megavoltage Computed Tomography

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to provide estimates of setup and internal margins of patients treated for rectal carcinoma using helical tomotherapy and to assess possible margin adaptations. Using helical tomotherapy, highly conformal dose distributions can be created, and the integrated megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) modality allows very precise daily patient positioning. In clinical protocols, however, margins originating from traditional setup procedures are still being applied. This work investigates whether this modality can aid in redefining treatment margins. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten patients who were treated with tomotherapy underwent MVCT scanning before and after 10 treatments. Using automatic registration the necessary setup margin was investigated by means of bony landmarks. Internal margins were assessed by delineating and describing the mesorectal movement. RESULTS Based on bony landmarks, movement of patients during treatments was limited to 2.45 mm, 1.99 mm, and 1.09 mm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction, respectively. Systematic errors were limited to <1 mm. Measured movement of the mesorectal space was -1.6 mm (+/- 4.2 mm) and 0.1 mm (+/- 4.0 mm) for left and right lateral direction. In the antero-posterior direction, mean shifts were -2 mm (+/- 6.8 mm) and -0.4 mm (+/- 3.8 mm). Mean shifts in the cranio-caudal direction were respectively -3.2 mm (+/- 5.6 mm) and -3.2 mm (+/- 6.8 mm). CONCLUSIONS The use of the integrated MVCT on the tomotherapy system can minimize the setup margin for rectal cancer, and can also be used to adequately describe the internal margin allowing for direct treatment margin adaptation.

An overview of volumetric imaging technologies and their quality assurance for IGRT

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) aims at frequent imaging in the treatment room during a course of radiotherapy, with decisions made on the basis of this information. The concept is not new, but recent developments and clinical implementations of IGRT drastically improved the quality of radiotherapy and broadened its possibilities as well as its indications. In general IGRT solutions can be classified in planar imaging, volumetric imaging using ionising radiation (kV- and MV- based CT) or non-radiographic techniques. This review will focus on volumetric imaging techniques applying ionising radiation with some comments on Quality Assurance (QA) specific for clinical implementation. By far the most important advantage of volumetric IGRT solutions is the ability to visualize soft tissue prior to treatment and defining the spatial relationship between target and organs at risk. A major challenge is imaging during treatment delivery. As some of these IGRT systems consist of peripheral equipment and others present fully integrated solutions, the QA requirements will differ considerably. It should be noted for instance that some systems correct for mechanical instabilities in the image reconstruction process whereas others aim at optimal mechanical stability, and the coincidence of imaging and treatment isocentre needs special attention. Some of the solutions that will be covered in detail are: (a) A dedicated CT-scanner inside the treatment room. (b) Peripheral systems mounted to the gantry of the treatment machine to acquire cone beam volumetric CT data (CBCT). Both kV-based solutions and MV-based solutions using EPIDs will be covered. (c) Integrated systems designed for both IGRT and treatment delivery. This overview will explain some of the technical features and clinical implementations of these technologies as well as providing an insight in the limitations and QA procedures required for each specific solution.

Dosimetric comparison of different treatment modalities for stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations and acoustic neuromas

PURPOSE We investigated the influence of beam modulation on treatment planning by comparing four available stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) modalities: Gamma-Knife-Perfexion, Novalis-Tx Dynamic-Conformal-Arc (DCA) and Dynamic-Multileaf-Collimation-Intensity-Modulated-radiotherapy (DMLC-IMRT), and Cyberknife. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with arteriovenous malformation (n = 10) or acoustic neuromas (n = 5) were planned with different treatment modalities. Paddick conformity index (CI), dose heterogeneity (DH), gradient index (GI) and beam-on time were used as dosimetric indices. RESULTS Gamma-Knife-Perfexion can achieve high degree of conformity (CI = 0.77 ± 0.04) with limited low-doses (GI = 2.59 ± 0.10) surrounding the inhomogeneous dose distribution (D(H) = 0.84 ± 0.05) at the cost of treatment time (68.1 min ± 27.5). Novalis-Tx-DCA improved this inhomogeneity (D(H) = 0.30 ± 0.03) and treatment time (16.8 min ± 2.2) at the cost of conformity (CI = 0.66 ± 0.04) and Novalis-TX-DMLC-IMRT improved the DCA CI (CI = 0.68 ± 0.04) and inhomogeneity (D(H) = 0.18 ± 0.05) at the cost of low-doses (GI = 3.94 ± 0.92) and treatment time (21.7 min ± 3.4) (p<0.01). Cyberknife achieved comparable conformity (CI = 0.77 ± 0.06) at the cost of low-doses (GI = 3.48 ± 0.47) surrounding the homogeneous (D(H) = 0.22 ± 0.02) dose distribution and treatment time (28.4min±8.1) (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Gamma-Knife-Perfexion will comply with all SRS constraints (high conformity while minimizing low-dose spread). Multiple focal entries (Gamma-Knife-Perfexion and Cyberknife) will achieve better conformity than High-Definition-MLC of Novalis-Tx at the cost of treatment time. Non-isocentric beams (Cyberknife) or IMRT-beams (Novalis-Tx-DMLC-IMRT) will spread more low-dose than multiple isocenters (Gamma-Knife-Perfexion) or dynamic arcs (Novalis-Tx-DCA). Inverse planning and modulated fluences (Novalis-Tx-DMLC-IMRT and CyberKnife) will deliver the most homogeneous treatment. Furthermore, Linac-based systems (Novalis and Cyberknife) can perform image verification at the time of treatment delivery.

Volumetric Imaging by Megavoltage Computed Tomography for Assessment of Internal Organ Motion During Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE To assess the internal organ motion of the cervix and uterus by megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten patients with Stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer underwent daily MVCT imaging. Internal organ motion was evaluated on 150 pretreatment MVCT images by measuring shifts in their boundaries between the MVCT and kilovoltage (kV) planning CT scan in the anterior, posterior, left and right lateral, and superior and inferior direction. Additional intrafractional patient movement was evaluated on 50 posttreatment MVCT images. RESULTS Measured cervical motion (mean +/- SD) was 0.4 +/- 10.1 mm in the anterior, -3.0 +/- 6.9 mm in the posterior direction, -3.5 +/- 4.9 mm in the left and 0.2 +/- 4.5 mm in the right lateral direction, 2.2 +/- 8.0 mm in the superior and 0.5 +/- 5.0 mm in the inferior direction. Compared to the cervix, larger uterine motion was observed. Patient movement during treatment was limited to 1.1 +/- 1.3 mm, -0.3 +/- 1.6 mm, and 0.2 +/- 2.3 mm in anteroposterior, laterolateral and superoinferior direction respectively. CONCLUSIONS MVCT imaging can be used to study patient setup accuracy and cervical and uterine motion during IMRT. This data may be used to refine treatment margins.