M.J.W. van Twist
Delft University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M.J.W. van Twist.
hawaii international conference on system sciences | 2000
Pieter W. G. Bots; M.J.W. van Twist; J.H.R. van Duin
The values and opinions of the stakeholders involved in a decision-making process are the key to its outcome. Reflection on how stakeholders perceive a situation, and on the consequences of these perceptions for the decision outcome is an intellectually demanding exercise. To support analysis, we have developed a conceptual modeling tool called DANA (Dynamic Actor Network Analysis). The modeling language is based on the policy network paradigm and embodies concepts from cognitive mapping and linguistic approaches to approximate reasoning. In this paper, we investigate how certain interesting properties of stakeholder networks modeled with DANA can be determined algorithmically. Automatic detection of the factors most relevant to a policy situation, and of disagreement and conflict among stakeholders may help the analyst in focusing her analysis.
Archive | 2015
Martijn van der Steen; R. M. Van Schelven; Richard Kotter; M.J.W. van Twist; Peter van Deventer Mpa
This paper addresses and explores the different strategies governments pursue to support the introduction of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs). This paper presents findings from a European research project that mapped current policies in eight countries, with California as a comparative case to contrast the European findings. The authors analysed the policy strategies that countries have put to practice and analyse how they have performed so far. Arguably, many countries appear to be on track to achieving their short-term goals; in that sense, EV policy is successful. However, once the longer term policy goals for e-mobility are taken into account, it is unlikely that the current policies will be sufficient. Therefore, the authors point out some lessons from current policies that may show a route into the next phase of the introduction of e-mobility. The paper is part of the Interreg e-mobility North Sea Region (E-Mobility NSR) partnership project, which is co-funded by the EU and participating countries/regions/organisations.
Archive | 2018
D. Bressers; M.J.W. van Twist; M. van der Steen; J. M. Schulz
Autonomy and control are important dynamics in each advisory system. Autonomy is important because it ensures independent and critical advice and allows advisors to ‘speak truth to power’ (Wildavsky 1989; Pielke 2010). At the same time, government control is also an important aspect (Van Twist et al. 2015; Craft and Halligan 2015; Halligan 1995) to assure that advices are on-topic, on-time, in the right format, and relevant for government decision-making,- and policymaking processes. This paper describes the trade-off the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom make with regard to the level of ‘autonomy’ and ‘control’ of their policy advisory bodies. We make a distinction between legal, economic, and operational means (Kunneke 1991) through which autonomy is stimulated or control is exercised on a managerial and policy (primary processes) level of policy advisory bodies.
Transportation Planning and Technology | 2006
M.J.W. van Twist; C.J. van Montfort
Van Twist Mark J.W., Van Montfort C.J. IV. La gouvernance publique aux Pays-Bas. In: Annuaire des collectivites locales. Tome 26, 2006. La gouvernance territoriale. pp. 165-181.
international symposium on technology and society | 1996
H. de Bruijn; M.J.W. van Twist; H. Verheul
The tension between technological development and public decision-making is analysed, in particular regarding large projects. Technological options and decision-making processes tend not to be attuned, which lessens the quality of the decision-making. Explanations for this tension are explored using theories of public decision-making and of technology dynamics. It appears that both technology development and public decision-making are unstructured and unpredictable. It is argued that, in trying to improve the fit between the two, one should not attempt to change these characteristics, but rather start to deal with them in an intelligent way. In order to do this, several management strategies are developed.
Archive | 1997
L. Schaap; M.J.W. van Twist
hawaii international conference on system sciences | 1999
Pieter W. G. Bots; M.J.W. van Twist; R. van Duin
Published in <b>2001</b> in Antwerpen by Kluwer | 2007
Mark Bovens; Paul 't Hart; M.J.W. van Twist
Futures | 2013
M. van der Steen; M.J.W. van Twist
European Planning Studies | 2007
Erik-Hans Klijn; M.J.W. van Twist