M. Nicholl
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Nicholl.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
C. Inserra; S. J. Smartt; A. Jerkstrand; S. Valenti; M. Fraser; D. Wright; K. W. Smith; Ting-Wan Chen; R. Kotak; Andrea Pastorello; M. Nicholl; Fabio Bresolin; R. P. Kudritzki; Stefano Benetti; M. T. Botticella; W. S. Burgett; K. C. Chambers; Mattias Ergon; H. Flewelling; J. P. U. Fynbo; S. Geier; Klaus-Werner Hodapp; D. A. Howell; M. E. Huber; Nick Kaiser; G. Leloudas; L. Magill; E. A. Magnier; M. McCrum; N. Metcalfe
We report extensive observational data for five of the lowest redshift Super-Luminous Type Ic Supernovae (SL-SNe Ic) discovered to date, namely PTF10hgi, SN2011ke, PTF11rks, SN2011kf and SN2012il. Photometric imaging of the transients at +50 to +230 days after peak combined with host galaxy subtraction reveals a luminous tail phase for four of these SL-SNe. A high resolution, optical and near infrared spectrum from xshooter provides detection of a broad He I �10830 emission line in the spectrum (+50d) of SN2012il, revealing that at least some SL-SNe Ic are not completely helium free. At first sight, the tail luminosity decline rates that we measure are consistent with the radioactive decay of 56 Co, and would require 1-4 M⊙ of 56 Ni to produce the luminosity. These 56 Ni masses cannot be made consistent with the short diffusion times at peak, and indeed are insufficient to power the peak luminosity. We instead favour energy deposition by newborn magnetars as the power source for these objects. A semi-analytical diffusion model with energy input from the spindown of a magnetar reproduces the extensive lightcurve data well. The model predictions of ejecta velocities and temperatures which are required are in reasonable agreement with those determined from our observations. We derive magnetar energies of 0.4 . E(10 51 erg) . 6.9 and ejecta masses of 2.3 . Mej(M⊙) . 8.6. The sample of five SL-SNe Ic presented here, combined with SN 2010gx - the best sampled SL-SNe Ic so far - point toward an explosion driven by a magnetar as a viable explanation for all SL-SNe Ic. Subject headings: supernovae: general - supernovae: individual (PTF10hgi, SN 2011ke, PTF11rks, SN 2011kf, SN 2012il) - stars: magnetars
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
M. Nicholl; S. J. Smartt; A. Jerkstrand; C. Inserra; J. P. Anderson; Charles Baltay; Stefano Benetti; T.-W. Chen; N. Elias-Rosa; U. Feindt; M. Fraser; Avishay Gal-Yam; E. Hadjiyska; D. A. Howell; R. Kotak; A. Lawrence; G. Leloudas; S. Margheim; Seppo Mattila; M. McCrum; R. McKinnon; Alexander Mead; Peter E. Nugent; D. Rabinowitz; Armin Rest; K. W. Smith; Jesper Sollerman; M. Sullivan; F. Taddia; S. Valenti
We present optical spectra and light curves for three hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae followed by the Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey of Transient Objects (PESSTO). Time series spectroscopy from a fewdays aftermaximum light to 100 d later shows them to be fairly typical of this class, with spectra dominated by Ca II, MgII, FeII, and Si II, which evolve slowly over most of the post-peak photospheric phase. We determine bolometric light curves and apply simple fitting tools, based on the diffusion of energy input by magnetar spin-down, Ni-56 decay, and collision of the ejecta with an opaque circumstellar shell. We investigate how the heterogeneous light curves of our sample (combined with others from the literature) can help to constrain the possible mechanisms behind these events. We have followed these events to beyond 100-200 d after peak, to disentangle host galaxy light from fading supernova flux and to differentiate between the models, which predict diverse behaviour at this phase. Models powered by radioactivity require unrealistic parameters to reproduce the observed light curves, as found by previous studies. Both magnetar heating and circumstellar interaction still appear to be viable candidates. A large diversity is emerging in observed tail-phase luminosities, with magnetar models failing in some cases to predict the rapid drop in flux. This would suggest either that magnetars are not responsible, or that the X-ray flux from the magnetar wind is not fully trapped. The light curve of one object shows a distinct rebrightening at around 100 d after maximum light. We argue that this could result either from multiple shells of circumstellar material, or from a magnetar ionization front breaking out of the ejecta.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
Stefano Benetti; M. Nicholl; E. Cappellaro; Andrea Pastorello; S. J. Smartt; N. Elias-Rosa; Andrew J. Drake; L. Tomasella; M. Turatto; A. Harutyunyan; S. Taubenberger; S. Hachinger; A. Morales-Garoffolo; Ting-Wan Chen; S. G. Djorgovski; M. Fraser; Avishay Gal-Yam; C. Inserra; Paolo A. Mazzali; M. L. Pumo; Jesper Sollerman; S. Valenti; D. R. Young; M. Dennefeld; Laure Guillou; M. Fleury; P. F Leget
We present optical photometry and spectra of the superluminous Type II/IIn supernova (SN) CSS121015:004244+132827 (z = 0.2868) spanning epochs from −30 d (rest frame) to more than 200 d after maximum. CSS121015 is one of the more luminous SNe ever found and one of the best observed. The photometric evolution is characterized by a relatively fast rise to maximum (∼40 d in the SN rest frame), and by a linear post-maximum decline. The light curve shows no sign of a break to an exponential tail. A broad Hα is first detected at ∼+40 d (rest frame). Narrow, barely resolved Balmer and [O III] 5007 A lines, with decreasing strength, are visible along the entire spectral evolution. The spectra are very similar to other superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) with hydrogen in their spectrum, and also to SN 2005gj, sometimes considered Type Ia interacting with H-rich circumstellar medium. The spectra are also similar to a subsample of H-deficient SLSNe. We propose that the properties of CSS121015 are consistent with the interaction of the ejecta with a massive, extended, opaque shell, lost by the progenitor decades before the final explosion, although a magnetar-powered model cannot be excluded. Based on the similarity of CSS121015 with other SLSNe (with and without H), we suggest that the shocked-shell scenario should be seriously considered as a plausible model for both types of SLSN.
Nature Astronomy | 2016
G. Leloudas; M. Fraser; Nicholas C. Stone; S. van Velzen; P. G. Jonker; I. Arcavi; C. Fremling; Justyn R. Maund; S. J. Smartt; T. Krìhler; J. C. A. Miller-Jones; Paul M. Vreeswijk; Avishay Gal-Yam; Paolo A. Mazzali; A. De Cia; D. A. Howell; C. Inserra; Ferdinando Patat; A. de Ugarte Postigo; Ofer Yaron; C. Ashall; I. Bar; H. Campbell; Ting-Wan Chen; Michael J. Childress; N. Elias-Rosa; J. Harmanen; G. Hosseinzadeh; Joel Johansson; T. Kangas
When a star passes within the tidal radius of a supermassive black hole, it will be torn apart1. For a star with the mass of the Sun (M ⊙) and a non-spinning black hole with a mass 108 M ⊙ 12,13, a star with the same mass as the Sun could be disrupted outside the event horizon if the black hole were spinning rapidly14. The rapid spin and high black hole mass can explain the high luminosity of this event.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
M. Nicholl; Edo Berger; S. J. Smartt; Raffaella Margutti; Atish Kamble; K. D. Alexander; T.-W. Chen; C. Inserra; I. Arcavi; P. K. Blanchard; R. Cartier; K. C. Chambers; Michael J. Childress; Ryan Chornock; P. S. Cowperthwaite; Maria Rebecca Drout; H. Flewelling; M. Fraser; Avishay Gal-Yam; L. Galbany; J. Harmanen; T. W.-S. Holoien; G. Hosseinzadeh; D. A. Howell; M. Huber; A. Jerkstrand; E. Kankare; C. S. Kochanek; Z.-Y. Lin; R. Lunnan
We present observations of SN 2015bn (= PS15ae = CSS141223-113342+004332 = MLS150211-113342+004333), a Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN) at redshift
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
S. J. Smartt; K. C. Chambers; K. W. Smith; M. Huber; D. R. Young; E. Cappellaro; D. Wright; M. W. Coughlin; A. S. B. Schultz; Larry Denneau; H. Flewelling; A. Heinze; Eugene Magnier; N. Primak; Armin Rest; A. Sherstyuk; B. Stalder; Christopher W. Stubbs; John L. Tonry; C. Waters; M. Willman; J. P. Anderson; Charles Baltay; M. T. Botticella; H. Campbell; M. Dennefeld; T.-W. Chen; M. Della Valle; N. Elias-Rosa; M. Fraser
z=0.1136
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
M. Nicholl; S. J. Smartt; A. Jerkstrand; S. A. Sim; C. Inserra; J. P. Anderson; Charles Baltay; Stefano Benetti; K. C. Chambers; T.-W. Chen; N. Elias-Rosa; U. Feindt; H. Flewelling; M. Fraser; Avishay Gal-Yam; L. Galbany; M. E. Huber; T. Kangas; E. Kankare; R. Kotak; T. Krühler; K. Maguire; R. McKinnon; D. Rabinowitz; S. Rostami; S. Schulze; K. W. Smith; M. Sullivan; John L. Tonry; S. Valenti
. As well as being one of the closest SLSNe I yet discovered, it is intrinsically brighter (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Raffaella Margutti; Edo Berger; W. Fong; C. Guidorzi; K. D. Alexander; Brian D. Metzger; P. K. Blanchard; P. S. Cowperthwaite; Ryan Chornock; T. Eftekhari; M. Nicholl; V. A. Villar; Peter K. G. Williams; J. Annis; D. A. Brown; Hsiao-Wen Chen; Z. Doctor; Joshua A. Frieman; Daniel E. Holz; Masao Sako; Marcelle Soares-Santos
M_U\approx-23.1
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Raffaella Margutti; C. Guidorzi; K. D. Alexander; V. A. Villar; Dimitrios Giannios; Ryan Chornock; A. Kathirgamaraju; Andrew I. MacFadyen; Xiaoyi Xie; T. Eftekhari; M. Nicholl; Edo Berger; Lorenzo Sironi; P. K. Blanchard; A. Hajela; J. Zrake; P. S. Cowperthwaite; William. Fong; Peter K. G. Williams; Brian D. Metzger
) and in a fainter galaxy (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
A. Jerkstrand; S. J. Smartt; C. Inserra; M. Nicholl; T.-W. Chen; T. Krühler; Jesper Sollerman; Stefan Taubenberger; Avishay Gal-Yam; E. Kankare; K. Maguire; M. Fraser; S. Valenti; M. Sullivan; R. Cartier; D. R. Young
M_B\approx-16.0