Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. V. Ivanushkina is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. V. Ivanushkina.


Space Science Reviews | 2005

The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope

Peter W. A. Roming; Thomas E. Kennedy; Keith O. Mason; John A. Nousek; Lindy Ahr; Richard E. Bingham; Patrick S. Broos; Mary J. Carter; Barry K. Hancock; Howard E. Huckle; Sally D. Hunsberger; Hajime Kawakami; Ronnie Killough; T. Scott Koch; Michael K. McLelland; Kelly Smith; Philip J. Smith; Juan Carlos Soto; Patricia Therese Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Stephen T. Holland; M. V. Ivanushkina; Michael S. Pryzby; Martin D. Still; Joseph Stock

The Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments flying aboard the Swift Gamma-ray Observatory. It is designed to capture the early (∼1 min) UV and optical photons from the afterglow of gamma-ray bursts in the 170–600 nm band as well as long term observations of these afterglows. This is accomplished through the use of UV and optical broadband filters and grisms. The UVOT has a modified Ritchey–Chrétien design with micro-channel plate intensified charged-coupled device detectors that record the arrival time of individual photons and provide sub-arcsecond positioning of sources. We discuss some of the science to be pursued by the UVOT and the overall design of the instrument.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2007

Photometric calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope

T. S. Poole; Alice A. Breeveld; M. J. Page; Wayne B. Landsman; S. T. Holland; P. W. A. Roming; N. P. M. Kuin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; Sally D. Hunsberger; S. Koch; K. O. Mason; Patricia Schady; D. E. Vanden Berk; Alexander J. Blustin; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; Margaret Chester; A. Cucchiara; Bruce R. Hancock; H. E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; F. E. Marshall; Adam N. Morgan; S. B. Pandey; M. De Pasquale; Penelope Smith

We present the photometric calibration of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) which includes: optimum photometric and background apertures, effective area curves, colour transformations, conversion factors for count rates to flux and the photometric zero-points (which are accurate to better than 4 per cent) for each of the seven UVOT broad-band filters. The calibration was performed with observations of standard stars and standard star fields that represent a wide range of spectral star types. The calibration results include the position-dependent uniformity, and instrument response over the 1600‐8000 A operational range. Because the UVOT is a photon-counting instrument, we also discuss the effect of coincidence loss on the calibration results. We provide practical guidelines for using the calibration in UVOT data analysis. The results presented here supersede previous calibration results.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2010

Further calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope

Alice A. Breeveld; P. A. Curran; Erik Andrew Hoversten; S. Koch; Wayne B. Landsman; F. E. Marshall; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; Penelope Smith; Martin D. Still; V. Yershov; A. J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; N. P. M. Kuin; Katherine E. McGowan; S. Rosen; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; M. M. Chester; Bruce R. Hancock; H. E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; K. O. Mason; Adam N. Morgan

The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large-scale variations in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System. We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case, we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are recommended.


web science | 2006

Very Early Optical Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for Relative Paucity of Detection

Peter W. A. Roming; Patricia Schady; Derek B. Fox; Bing Zhang; En-Wei Liang; Keith O. Mason; E. Rol; David N. Burrows; Alex J. Blustin; Patricia Therese Boyd; Peter J. Brown; Stephen T. Holland; Katherine E. McGowan; Wayne B. Landsman; Kim L. Page; James E. Rhoads; S. R. Rosen; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; S. D. Barthelmy; Alice A. Breeveld; Antonino Cucchiara; Massimiliano De Pasquale; Edward E. Fenimore; Neil Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; Dirk Grupe; Michael R. Goad; M. V. Ivanushkina; Cynthia H. James; J. A. Kennea

Very early observations with the Swift satellite of γ-ray burst (GRB) afterglows reveal that the optical component is not detected in a large number of cases. This is in contrast to the bright optical flashes previously discovered in some GRBs (e.g., GRB 990123 and GRB 021211). Comparisons of the X-ray afterglow flux to the optical afterglow flux and prompt γ-ray fluence is used to quantify the seemingly deficient optical, and in some cases X-ray, light at these early epochs. This comparison reveals that some of these bursts appear to have higher than normal γ-ray efficiencies. We discuss possible mechanisms and their feasibility for explaining the apparent lack of early optical emission. The mechanisms considered include, foreground extinction, circumburst absorption, Lyα blanketing and absorption due to high-redshift, low-density environments, rapid temporal decay, and intrinsic weakness of the reverse shock. Of these, foreground extinction, circumburst absorption, and high redshift provide the best explanations for most of the nondetections in our sample. There is tentative evidence of suppression of the strong reverse shock emission. This could be because of a Poynting flux-dominated flow or a pure nonrelativistic hydrodynamic reverse shock.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

ULTRAVIOLET, OPTICAL, AND X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF THE TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA 2005am WITH SWIFT

Peter J. Brown; S. T. Holland; Cynthia H. James; Peter A. Milne; Pwa Roming; K. O. Mason; Kim L. Page; A. P. Beardmore; David N. Burrows; Adam N. Morgan; Caryl Gronwall; Alexander J. Blustin; P. T. Boyd; Martin D. Still; Alice A. Breeveld; M. De Pasquale; Sally D. Hunsberger; M. V. Ivanushkina; Wayne B. Landsman; Katherine E. McGowan; T. S. Poole; S. R. Rosen; Patricia Schady; N. Gehrels

We present ultraviolet and optical light curves in six broadband filters and grism spectra obtained by Swifts Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope for the Type Ia supernova SN 2005am. The data were collected beginning about 4 days before the B-band maximum, with excellent coverage of the rapid decline phase and later observations extending out to 69 days after the peak. The optical and near-UV light curve match well those of SN 1992A. The other UV observations constitute the first set of light curves shorter than 2500 A and allow us to compare the light curve evolution in three UV bands. One interesting feature is that the decay in the intermediate UVM2 band is shallower than in the filters on either side and may result from the bump in the interstellar extinction curve. The UV behavior of this and other low-redshift supernovae can be used to constrain theories of progenitor evolution or to interpret optical light curves of high-redshift supernovae. Using Swifts X-Ray Telescope, we also report the upper limit to SN 2005ams X-ray luminosity to be 6 × 1039 ergs s-1 in the 0.3-10 keV. This result is derived from 58 ks of exposure time spread out over 7 weeks beginning 4 days before the B-band maximum.


arXiv: Astrophysics | 2004

The Swift ultra-violet/optical telescope

Peter W. A. Roming; Thomas E. Kennedy; Keith O. Mason; John A. Nousek; Lindy Ahr; Richard E. Bingham; Patrick S. Broos; Mary J. Carter; Barry K. Hancock; Howard E. Huckle; Sally D. Hunsberger; Hajime Kawakami; Ronnie Killough; T. Scott Koch; Michael K. McLelland; Kelly Smith; Philip J. Smith; Juan Carlos Soto; Patricia Therese Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Stephen T. Holland; M. V. Ivanushkina; Michael S. Pryzby; Martin D. Still; Joseph Stock

The UV/optical telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments flying aboard the Swift Gamma-ray Observatory. It is designed to capture the early (~1 minute) UV and optical photons from the afterglow of gamma-ray bursts as well as long term observations of these afterglows. This is accomplished through the use of UV and optical broadband filters and grisms. The UVOT has a modified Ritchey-Chretien design with micro-channel plate intensified charged-coupled device detectors that provide sub-arcsecond imaging. Unlike most UV/optical telescopes the UVOT can operate in a photon-counting mode as well as an imaging mode. We discuss some of the science to be pursued by the UVOT and the overall design of the instrument.


The Astronomical Journal | 2007

Optical, Infrared, and Ultraviolet Observations of the X-Ray Flash XRF 050416A

S. T. Holland; P. T. Boyd; J. Gorosabel; J. Hjorth; Patricia Schady; Bjarne Thomsen; T. Augusteijn; Alexander J. Blustin; Alice A. Breeveld; M. De Pasquale; J. P. U. Fynbo; N. Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; Sally D. Hunsberger; M. V. Ivanushkina; Wayne B. Landsman; P. Laursen; K. E. McGowan; Vanessa Mangano; Craig B. Markwardt; F. E. Marshall; K. O. Mason; A. Moretti; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; S. Rosen; Martin D. Still

We present ultraviolet, optical, and infrared photometry of the afterglow of the X-ray flash XRF 050416A taken between approximately 100 s and 36 days after the burst. We find an intrinsic spectral slope between 1930 and 22200 ? of ? = -1.14 ? 0.20 and a decay rate of ? = -0.86 ? 0.15. There is no evidence for a change in the decay rate between approximately 0.7 and 4.7 days after the burst. Our data imply that there is no spectral break between the optical and X-ray bands between 0.7 and 4.7 days after the burst and are consistent with the cooling break being redward of the Ks band (22200 ?) at 0.7 days. The combined ultraviolet/optical/infrared spectral energy distribution shows no evidence for a significant amount of extinction in the host galaxy along the line of sight to XRF 050416A. Our data suggest that the extragalactic extinction along the line of sight to the burst is only approximately AV = 0.2 mag, which is significantly less than the extinction expected from the hydrogen column density inferred from X-ray observations of XRF 050416A assuming a dust-to-gas ratio similar to what is found for the Milky Way. The observed extinction, however, is consistent with the dust-to-gas ratio seen in the Small Magellanic Cloud. We suggest that XRF 050416A may have a two-component jet similar to what has been proposed for GRB 030329. If this is the case, the lack of an observed jet break between 0.7 and 42 days is an illusion due to emission from the wide jet dominating the afterglow after approximately 1.5 days.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

Prompt optical observations of GRB 050319 with the Swift UVOT

K. O. Mason; Alexander J. Blustin; P. T. Boyd; S. T. Holland; M. J. Page; Pwa Roming; Martin D. Still; Bing Zhang; Alice A. Breeveld; M. De Pasquale; N. Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; Sally D. Hunsberger; M. V. Ivanushkina; Wayne B. Landsman; Katherine E. McGowan; John A. Nousek; T. S. Poole; James E. Rhoads; S. Rosen; Patricia Schady

The UVOT telescope on the Swift observatory has detected optical afterglow emission from GRB 050319. The flux declined with a power-law slope of alpha = -0.57 between the start of observations some 230 s after the burst onset (90 s after the burst trigger) until it faded below the sensitivity threshold of the instrument after similar to 5 x 10(4) s. There is no evidence for the rapidly declining component in the early light curve that is seen at the same time in the X-ray band. The afterglow is not detected in UVOT shortward of the B band, suggesting a redshift of about 3.5. The optical V-band emission lies on the extension of the X-ray spectrum, with an optical-to-X-ray slope of beta = 0.8. The relatively flat decay rate of the burst suggests that the central engine continues to inject energy into the fireball for as long as a few x 10(4) s after the burst.


arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics | 2010

Paper II: Calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope

Alice A. Breeveld; P. A. Curran; Erik Andrew Hoversten; S. Koch; Wayne B. Landsman; F. E. Marshall; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; Penelope Smith; V. Yershov; Alexander J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; N. P. M. Kuin; Katherine E. McGowan; S. Rosen; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; M. M. Chester; Bruce R. Hancock; Howard E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; K. Mason; Adam N. Morgan; S. R. Oates

The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large-scale variations in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System. We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case, we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are recommended.


In: Fenimore, EE and Galassi, M, (eds.) GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: 30 YEARS OF DISCOVERY. (pp. 651 - 654). AMER INST PHYSICS (2004) | 2004

The Swift Ultra‐Violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT)

Peter W. A. Roming; Sally D. Hunsberger; John A. Nousek; M. V. Ivanushkina; Keith O. Mason; Alice A. Breeveld

The Ultra‐Violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT), one of three telescopes to fly on the Swift Gamma‐ray Burst Observatory, is capable of detecting the early UV/optical photons and performing long‐term UV/optical observations of GRB afterglows. The UVOT is a Ritchey‐Chretien telescope with MCP intensified CCD detectors which operate in either a photon‐timing or an imaging mode while providing sub‐arcsecond resolution. A filter wheel accommodates broadband UV and visual filters for photometric studies including determination of photometric redshifts. UV and visual grisms for low‐resolution spectroscopy are also housed in the filter wheel. We present a brief overview of the UVOT, calibration results, and science to be carried out.

Collaboration


Dive into the M. V. Ivanushkina's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sally D. Hunsberger

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. S. Poole

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin D. Still

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caryl Gronwall

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. T. Holland

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wayne B. Landsman

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge