Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Madalyn S. Blondes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Madalyn S. Blondes.


Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment | 2013

Aggregation of carbon dioxide sequestration storage assessment units

Madalyn S. Blondes; John H. Schuenemeyer; Ricardo A. Olea; Lawrence J. Drew

The U.S. Geological Survey is currently conducting a national assessment of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage resources, mandated by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Pre-emission capture and storage of CO2 in subsurface saline formations is one potential method to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the negative impact of global climate change. Like many large-scale resource assessments, the area under investigation is split into smaller, more manageable storage assessment units (SAUs), which must be aggregated with correctly propagated uncertainty to the basin, regional, and national scales. The aggregation methodology requires two types of data: marginal probability distributions of storage resource for each SAU, and a correlation matrix obtained by expert elicitation describing interdependencies between pairs of SAUs. Dependencies arise because geologic analogs, assessment methods, and assessors often overlap. The correlation matrix is used to induce rank correlation, using a Cholesky decomposition, among the empirical marginal distributions representing individually assessed SAUs. This manuscript presents a probabilistic aggregation method tailored to the correlations and dependencies inherent to a CO2 storage assessment. Aggregation results must be presented at the basin, regional, and national scales. A single stage approach, in which one large correlation matrix is defined and subsets are used for different scales, is compared to a multiple stage approach, in which new correlation matrices are created to aggregate intermediate results. Although the single-stage approach requires determination of significantly more correlation coefficients, it captures geologic dependencies among similar units in different basins and it is less sensitive to fluctuations in low correlation coefficients than the multiple stage approach. Thus, subsets of one single-stage correlation matrix are used to aggregate to basin, regional, and national scales.


Open-File Report | 2016

Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources—Southern Rocky Mountain Basins: Chapter M in Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources

Matthew D. Merrill; Ronald M. Drake; Marc L. Buursink; William H. Craddock; Joseph A. East; Ernie R. Slucher; Peter D. Warwick; Sean T. Brennan; Madalyn S. Blondes; Philip A. Freeman; Steven M. Cahan; Christina A. DeVera; Celeste D. Lohr

The U.S. Geological Survey has completed an assessment of the potential geologic carbon dioxide storage resources in the onshore areas of the United States. To provide geological context and input data sources for the resources numbers, framework documents are being prepared for all areas that were investigated as part of the national assessment. This report is the geologic framework document for the Uinta and Piceance, San Juan, Paradox, Raton, Eastern Great, and Black Mesa Basins, and subbasins therein of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. In addition to a summary of the geology and petroleum resources of studied basins, the individual storage assessment units (SAUs) within the basins are described and explanations for their selection are presented. Although appendixes in the national assessment publications include the input values used to calculate the available storage resource, this framework document provides only the context and source of the input values selected by the assessment geologists. Spatial-data files of the boundaries for the SAUs, and the well-penetration density of known well bores that penetrate the SAU seal, are available for download with the release of this report.


Open-File Report | 2014

Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: U.S. Gulf Coast: Chapter H in Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources

Tina L. Roberts-Ashby; Sean T. Brennan; Marc L. Buursink; Jacob A. Covault; William H. Craddock; Ronald M. Drake; Matthew D. Merrill; Ernie R. Slucher; Peter D. Warwick; Madalyn S. Blondes; Mayur A. Gosai; Philip A. Freeman; Steven M. Cahan; Christina A. DeVera; Celeste D. Lohr

This report presents 27 storage assessment units (SAUs) within the United States (U.S.) Gulf Coast. The U.S. Gulf Coast contains a regionally extensive, thick succession of clastics, carbonates, salts, and other evaporites that were deposited in a highly cyclic depositional environment that was subjected to a fluctuating siliciclastic sediment supply and transgressive and regressive sea levels. At least nine major depositional packages contain porous strata that are potentially suitable for geologic carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration within the region. For each SAU identified within these packages, the areal distribution of porous rock that is suitable for geologic CO2 sequestration is discussed, along with a description of the geologic characteristics that influence the potential CO2 storage volume and reservoir performance. These characteristics include reservoir depth, gross thickness, net-porous thickness, porosity, permeability, and groundwater salinity. Additionally, a characterization of the overlying regional seal for each SAU is presented. On a case-by-case basis, strategies for estimating the pore volume existing within structurally and (or) stratigraphically closed traps are also presented. Geologic information presented in this report has been employed to calculate potential storage capacities for CO2 sequestration in the SAUs that are assessed herein, although complete assessment results are not contained in this report.


Open-File Report | 2014

Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: Denver Basin, Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska: Chapter G in Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources

Ronald M. Drake; Sean T. Brennan; Jacob A. Covault; Madalyn S. Blondes; Philip A. Freeman; Steven M. Cahan; Christina A. DeVera; Celeste D. Lohr

This is a report about the geologic characteristics of five storage assessment units (SAUs) within the Denver Basin of Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska. These SAUs are Cretaceous in age and include (1) the Plainview and Lytle Formations, (2) the Muddy Sandstone, (3) the Greenhorn Limestone, (4) the Niobrara Formation and Codell Sandstone, and (5) the Terry and Hygiene Sandstone Members. The described characteristics, as specified in the methodology, affect the potential carbon dioxide storage resource in the SAUs. The specific geologic and petrophysical properties of interest include depth to the top of the storage formation, average thickness, net-porous thickness, porosity, permeability, groundwater quality, and the area of structural reservoir traps. Descriptions of the SAU boundaries and the overlying sealing units are also included. Assessment results are not contained in this report; however, the geologic information included here will be used to calculate a statistical Monte Carlo-based distribution of potential storage volume in the SAUs.


Open-File Report | 2014

Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah, and Wyoming-Idaho-Utah Thrust Belt

Marc L. Buursink; Ernie R. Slucher; Sean T. Brennan; Colin A. Doolan; Ronald M. Drake; Matthew D. Merrill; Peter D. Warwick; Madalyn S. Blondes; P.A. Freeman; Steven M. Cahan; Christina A. DeVera; Celeste D. Lohr

The 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act (Public Law 110–140) directs the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to conduct a national assessment of potential geologic storage resources for carbon dioxide (CO2). The methodology used by the USGS for the national CO2 assessment follows up on previous USGS work. The methodology is non-economic and intended to be used at regional to subbasinal scales. This report identifies and contains geologic descriptions of 14 storage assessment units (SAUs) in Ordovician to Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks within the Greater Green River Basin (GGRB) of Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah, and eight SAUs in Ordovician to Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks within the Wyoming-Idaho-Utah Thrust Belt (WIUTB). The GGRB and WIUTB are contiguous with nearly identical geologic units; however, the GGRB is larger in size, whereas the WIUTB is more structurally complex. This report focuses on the characteristics, specified in the methodology, that influence the potential CO2 storage resource in the SAUs. Specific descriptions of the SAU boundaries, as well as their sealing and reservoir units, are included. Properties for each SAU, such as depth to top, gross


Open-File Report | 2013

National assessment of geologic carbon dioxide storage resources: methodology implementation

Madalyn S. Blondes; Sean T. Brennan; Matthew D. Merrill; Marc L. Buursink; Peter D. Warwick; Steven M. Cahan; Margo D. Corum; Troy A. Cook; William H. Craddock; Christina A. DeVera; Ronald M. Drake; Lawrence J. Drew; Philip A. Freeman; Celeste D. Lohr; Ricardo A. Olea; Tina L. Roberts-Ashby; Ernie R. Slucher; Brian A. Varela


Journal of Geochemical Exploration | 2014

Linking compositional data analysis with thermodynamic geochemical modeling: Oilfield brines from the Permian Basin, USA

Mark A. Engle; Madalyn S. Blondes


Energy Procedia | 2013

Probabilistic Aggregation of Individual Assessment Units in the U.S. Geological Survey National CO2 Sequestration Assessment

Madalyn S. Blondes; John H. Schuenemeyer; Lawrence J. Drew; Peter D. Warwick


Energy Procedia | 2013

U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Resource Assessment of the United States

Peter D. Warwick; Madalyn S. Blondes; Sean T. Brennan; Margo D. Corum; Matthew D. Merrill


Journal of Geochemical Exploration | 2018

The isometric log-ratio (ilr)-ion plot: A proposed alternative to the Piper diagram

Jenna L. Shelton; Mark A. Engle; Antonella Buccianti; Madalyn S. Blondes

Collaboration


Dive into the Madalyn S. Blondes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Celeste D. Lohr

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christina A. DeVera

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew D. Merrill

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter D. Warwick

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip A. Freeman

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William H. Craddock

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sean T. Brennan

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald M. Drake

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacob A. Covault

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence J. Drew

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge