Mads H. Haugen

Cystatin E/M suppresses legumain activity and invasion of human melanoma

BackgroundHigh activity of cysteine proteases such as legumain and the cathepsins have been shown to facilitate growth and invasion of a variety of tumor types. In breast cancer, several recent studies have indicated that loss of the cysteine protease inhibitor cystatin E/M leads to increased growth and metastasis. Although cystatin E/M is normally expressed in the skin, its role in cysteine protease regulation and progression of malignant melanoma has not been studied.MethodsA panel of various non-melanoma and melanoma cell lines was used. Cystatin E/M and C were analyzed in cell media by immunoblotting and ELISA. Legumain, cathepsin B and L were analyzed in cell lysates by immunoblotting and their enzymatic activities were analyzed by peptide substrates. Two melanoma cell lines lacking detectable secretion of cystatin E/M were transfected with a cystatin E/M expression plasmid (pCST6), and migration and invasiveness were studied by a Matrigel invasion assay.ResultsCystatin E/M was undetectable in media from all established melanoma cell lines examined, whereas strong immunobands were detected in two of five primary melanoma lines and in two of six lines derived from patients with metastatic disease. Among the four melanoma lines secreting cystatin E/M, the glycosylated form (17 kD) was predominant compared to the non-glycosylated form (14 kD). Legumain, cathepsin B and L were expressed and active in most of the cell lines, although at low levels in the melanomas expressing cystatin E/M. In the melanoma lines where cystatin E/M was secreted, cystatin C was generally absent or expressed at a very low level. When melanoma cells lacking secretion of cystatin E/M were transfected with pCST6, their intracellular legumain activity was significantly inhibited. In contrast, cathepsin B activity was not affected. Furthermore, invasion was suppressed in cystatin E/M over-expressing melanoma cell lines as measured by the transwell Matrigel assay.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the level of cystatin E/M regulates legumain activity and hence the invasive potential of human melanoma cells.

Nuclear Legumain Activity in Colorectal Cancer

The cysteine protease legumain is involved in several biological and pathological processes, and the protease has been found over-expressed and associated with an invasive and metastatic phenotype in a number of solid tumors. Consequently, legumain has been proposed as a prognostic marker for certain cancers, and a potential therapeutic target. Nevertheless, details on how legumain advances malignant progression along with regulation of its proteolytic activity are unclear. In the present work, legumain expression was examined in colorectal cancer cell lines. Substantial differences in amounts of pro- and active legumain forms, along with distinct intracellular distribution patterns, were observed in HCT116 and SW620 cells and corresponding subcutaneous xenografts. Legumain is thought to be located and processed towards its active form primarily in the endo-lysosomes; however, the subcellular distribution remains largely unexplored. By analyzing subcellular fractions, a proteolytically active form of legumain was found in the nucleus of both cell lines, in addition to the canonical endo-lysosomal residency. In situ analyses of legumain expression and activity confirmed the endo-lysosomal and nuclear localizations in cultured cells and, importantly, also in sections from xenografts and biopsies from colorectal cancer patients. In the HCT116 and SW620 cell lines nuclear legumain was found to make up approximately 13% and 17% of the total legumain, respectively. In similarity with previous studies on nuclear variants of related cysteine proteases, legumain was shown to process histone H3.1. The discovery of nuclear localized legumain launches an entirely novel arena of legumain biology and functions in cancer.

Intra- and extracellular regulation of activity and processing of legumain by cystatin E/M

Legumain, an asparaginyl endopeptidase, is up-regulated in tumour and tumour-associated cells, and is linked to the processing of cathepsin B, L, and proMMP-2. Although legumain is mainly localized to the endosomal/lysosomal compartments, legumain has been reported to be localized extracellularly in the tumour microenvironment and associated with extracellular matrix and cell surfaces. The most potent endogenous inhibitor of legumain is cystatin E/M, which is a secreted protein synthesised with an export signal. Therefore, we investigated the cellular interplay between legumain and cystatin E/M. As a cell model, HEK293 cells were transfected with legumain cDNA, cystatin E/M cDNA, or both, and over-expressing monoclonal cell lines were selected (termed M38L, M4C, and M3CL, respectively). Secretion of prolegumain from M38L cells was inhibited by treatment with brefeldin A, whereas bafilomycin A1 enhanced the secretion. Cellular processing of prolegumain to the 46 and 36 kDa enzymatically active forms was reduced by treatment with either substance alone. M38L cells showed increased, but M4C cells decreased, cathepsin L processing suggesting a crucial involvement of legumain activity. Furthermore, we observed internalization of cystatin E/M and subsequently decreased intracellular legumain activity. Also, prolegumain was shown to internalize followed by increased intracellular legumain processing and activation. In addition, in M4C cells incomplete processing of the internalized prolegumain was observed, as well as nuclear localized cystatin E/M. Furthermore, auto-activation of secreted prolegumain was inhibited by cystatin E/M, which for the first time shows a regulatory role of cystatin E/M in controlling both intra- and extracellular legumain activity.

Proteolysis mediated by cysteine cathepsins and legumain—recent advances and cell biological challenges

Proteases play essential roles in protein degradation, protein processing, and extracellular matrix remodeling in all cell types and tissues. They are also involved in protein turnover for maintenance of homeostasis and protein activation or inactivation for cell signaling. Proteases range in function and specificity, with some performing distinct substrate cleavages, while others accomplish proteolysis of a wide range of substrates. As such, different cell types use specialized molecular mechanisms to regulate the localization of proteases and their function within the compartments to which they are destined. Here, we focus on the cysteine family of cathepsin proteases and legumain, which act predominately within the endo-lysosomal pathway. In particular, recent knowledge on cysteine cathepsins and their primary regulator legumain is scrutinized in terms of their trafficking to endo-lysosomal compartments and other less recognized cellular locations. We further explore the mechanisms that regulate these processes and point to pathological cases which arise from detours taken by these proteases. Moreover, the emerging biological roles of specific forms and variants of cysteine cathepsins and legumain are discussed. These may be decisive, pathogenic, or even deadly when localizing to unusual cellular compartments in their enzymatically active form, because they may exert unexpected effects by alternative substrate cleavage. Hence, we propose future perspectives for addressing the actions of cysteine cathepsins and legumain as well as their specific forms and variants. The increasing knowledge in non-canonical aspects of cysteine cathepsin- and legumain-mediated proteolysis may prove valuable for developing new strategies to utilize these versatile proteases in therapeutic approaches.

High expression of the cysteine proteinase legumain in colorectal cancer – Implications for therapeutic targeting

BACKGROUND The cysteine proteinase legumain is highly expressed in cancer. Legumain is a potential biomarker and has been suggested to be utilised for prodrug activation in cancer therapy. However, to define the suitability of legumain for such purposes, detailed knowledge of cell type-specific and subcellular expression together with proteolytic activity patterns in tumour tissue is necessary. METHODS Expression of legumain was examined in a panel of 277 primary tumours from colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using immunohistochemistry. Tumour (cytoplasmic diffuse, cytoplasmic granulated, and nuclear) and stromal cell expression of legumain was quantified, and associations with clinicopathological parameters and outcome were analysed. Additionally, normal colon tissue and spontaneous mouse tumours were stained for legumain. RESULTS Legumain was highly expressed in tumour and stromal cells. Nuclear legumain was detected in 30% of the tumours. In colon cancer patients, high legumain expression was associated with overall and metastasis-free survival (OS; MFS) in uni- and multivariate analysis. Nuclear legumain was associated with poor OS, but not MFS in the colon cancer subgroup. Cytoplasmic granulated or diffuse expression was not associated with OS or MFS. Normal epithelial cells exhibited granulated legumain mainly at the apical pole, and legumain was highly expressed in CD68 positive macrophages. CONCLUSIONS Legumain is a highly expressed proteinase in CRC and associated with poor outcome in colon cancer. Diversified localisation of legumain expression in tumour and stromal cells suggests multiple functions in CRC, representing both a challenge and an opportunity for use in therapeutic targeting.

Nuclear cathepsin L activity is required for cell cycle progression of colorectal carcinoma cells.

Prominent tasks of cysteine cathepsins involve endo-lysosomal proteolysis and turnover of extracellular matrix constituents or plasma membrane proteins for maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. Here we report on enhanced levels and altered subcellular localization of distinct cysteine cathepsins in adenocarcinoma tissue in comparison to adjacent normal colon. Immunofluorescence and immunoblotting investigations revealed the presence of cathepsin L in the nuclear compartment in addition to its expected endo-lysosomal localization in colorectal carcinoma cells. Cathepsin L was represented as the full-length protein in the nuclei of HCT116 cells from which stefin B, a potent cathepsin L inhibitor, was absent. Fluorescence activated cell sorting analyses with synchronized cell cultures revealed deceleration of cell cycle progression of HCT116 cells upon inhibition of cathepsin L activity, while expression of cathepsin L-enhanced green fluorescent protein chimeras accelerated S-phase entry. We conclude that the activity of cathepsin L is high in the nucleus of colorectal carcinoma cells because of lacking stefin B inhibitory activity. Furthermore, we hypothesize that nuclear cathepsin L accelerates cell cycle progression of HCT116 cells thereby supporting the notion that cysteine cathepsins may play significant roles in carcinogenesis due to deregulated trafficking.

The metastasis-associated protein S100A4 exists in several charged variants suggesting the presence of posttranslational modifications

BackgroundS100A4 is a metastasis-associated protein which has been linked to multiple cellular events, and has been identified extracellularly, in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus of tumor cells; however, the biological implications of subcellular location are unknown. Associations between a variety of posttranslational protein modifications and altered biological functions of proteins are becoming increasingly evident. Identification and characterization of posttranslationally modified S100A4 variants could thus contribute to elucidating the mechanisms for the many cellular functions that have been reported for this protein, and might eventually lead to the identification of novel drugable targets.MethodsS100A4 was immuoprecipitated from a panel of in vitro and in vivo sources using a monoclonal antibody and the samples were separated by 2D-PAGE. Gels were analyzed by western blot and silver staining, and subsequently, several of the observed spots were identified as S100A4 by the use of MALDI-TOF and MALDI-TOF/TOF.ResultsA characteristic pattern of spots was observed when S100A4 was separated by 2D-PAGE suggesting the presence of at least three charge variants. These charge variants were verified as S100A4 both by western immunoblotting and mass spectrometry, and almost identical patterns were observed in samples from different tissues and subcellular compartments. Interestingly, recombinant S100A4 displayed a similar pattern on 2D-PAGE, but with different quantitative distribution between the observed spots.ConclusionEndogenously expressed S100A4 were shown to exist in several charge variants, which indicates the presence of posttranslational modifications altering the net charge of the protein. The different variants were present in all subcellular compartments and tissues/cell lines examined, suggesting that the described charge variants is a universal phenomenon, and cannot explain the localization of S100A4 in different subcellular compartments. However, the identity of the specific posttranslational modification and its potential contribution to the many reported biological events induced by S100A4, are subject to further studies.

Enrichment of nuclear S100A4 during G2/M in colorectal cancer cells: possible association with cyclin B1 and centrosomes

Abstract S100A4 promotes metastasis in several types of cancer, but the involved molecular mechanisms are still incompletely described. The protein is associated with a wide variety of biological functions and it locates to different subcellular compartments, including nuclei, cytoplasm and extracellular space. Nuclear expression of S100A4 has been associated with more advanced disease stage as well as poor outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study was initiated to investigate the nuclear function of S100A4 and thereby unravel potential biological mechanisms linking nuclear expression to a more aggressive phenotype. CRC cell lines show heterogeneity in nuclear S100A4 expression and preliminary experiments revealed cells in G2/M to have increased nuclear accumulation compared to G1 and S cells, respectively. Synchronization experiments validated nuclear S100A4 expression to be most prominent in the G2/M phase, but manipulating nuclear levels of S100A4 using lentiviral modified cells failed to induce changes in cell cycle distribution and proliferation. Proximity ligation assay did, however, demonstrate proximity between S100A4 and cyclin B1 in vitro, while confocal microscopy showed S100A4 to localize to areas corresponding to centrosomes in mitotic cells prior to chromosome segregation. This might indicate a novel and uncharacterized function of the metastasis-associated protein in CRC cells.

Glycosylation is important for legumain localization and processing to active forms but not for cystatin E/M inhibitory functions

The asparaginyl endopeptidase legumain and its inhibitor cystatin E/M are endogenously glycosylated. However, little is known about the nature of the carbohydrate groups and whether they affect the functions of these proteins. In this study both glycosylated and unglycosylated forms of legumain and cystatin E/M were studied. HEK293 cell lines stably over-expressing legumain or cystatin E/M, and HCT116 cells were used as cell models, and mature legumain was purified from bovine kidneys. To obtain unglycosylated proteins, cells were treated with tunicamycin, an inhibitor of N-linked glycosylation, whereas PNGase F and Endo H were used to characterize the glycosylation types. Cells were incubated with glycosylated, unglycosylated proteins and/or legumain selective activity-based probe, and legumain and/or cystatin E/M was studied by activity measurement, ELISA or immunoblotting in cell lysates or conditioned media. Legumain and probe in whole cells were studied by immunofluorescence. The carbohydrates on legumain were shown to be of the hybrid or high mannose type, whereas cystatin E/M was characterized as complex mannose-linked. While glycosylated prolegumain was able to autoactivate, the unglycosylated form was not, and addition of glycosaminoglycans did not facilitate autoactivation of unglycosylated prolegumain. Glycosylated prolegumain was internalized and processed to the mature active form, but no internalization of unglycosylated prolegumain was observed. A Cy5-labelled legumain specific activity-based probe (MP-L09) was synthesized and shown to be a novel tool to study intracellular legumain. Also, internalization of mature legumain (36 kDa) was visualized both alone and complexed with probe. Contrary to the importance of legumain glycosylation, both glycosylated and unglycosylated cystatin E/M showed similar capacity to inhibit legumain. In conclusion, glycosylation of prolegumain is necessary for correct processing to active forms and internalization, whereas the inhibitory property of cystatin E/M is independent of the glycosylation status.

TD-11 workshop report: characterization of monoclonal antibodies to S100 proteins

Fourteen monoclonal antibodies with specificity against native or recombinant antigens within the S100 family were investigated with regard to immunoreactivity. The specificities of the antibodies were studied using ELISA tests, Western blotting epitope mapping using competitive assays, and QCM technology. The mimotopes of antibodies against S100A4 were determined by random peptide phage display libraries. Antibody specificity was also tested by IHC and pair combinations evaluated for construction of immunoradiometric assays for S100B. Out of the 14 antibodies included in this report eight demonstrated specificity to S100B, namely MAbs 4E3, 4D2, S23, S53, 6G1, S21, S36, and 8B10. This reactivity could be classified into four different epitope groups using competing studies. Several of these MAbs did display minor reactivity to other S100 proteins when they were presented in denatured form. Only one of the antibodies, MAb 3B10, displayed preferential reactivity to S100A1; however, it also showed partial cross-reactivity with S100A10 and S100A13. Three antibodies, MAbs 20.1, 22.3, and S195, were specific for recombinant S100A4 in solution. Western blot revealed that MAb 20.1 and 22.3 recognized linear epitopes of S100A4, while MAb S195 reacted with a conformational dependent epitope. Surprisingly, MAb 14B3 did not demonstrate any reactivity to the panel of antigens used in this study.