Marc-Antoine Valantin

Historical HIV-RNA resistance test results are more informative than proviral DNA genotyping in cases of suppressed or residual viraemia

BACKGROUND Resistance genotyping is often requested due to residual HIV viraemia or for treatment optimization, but may be unsuccessful if plasma RNA levels are too low or undetectable. Analyses of proviral HIV-DNA can provide information about the viral reservoir, because integrated DNA reflects both actively and latently infected cells. OBJECTIVES To determine whether proviral DNA is a potential relevant alternative to HIV-RNA for resistance genotyping in this context. METHODS The resistance mutations harboured by the proviral DNA were compared with the cumulative data for all plasma RNA genotypes previously obtained for the patient concerned. We also investigated whether various parameters, such as CD4 count, level of viraemia or drug pressure, affected the results. RESULTS We collected 134 and 141 DNA genotypes with 443 and 462 corresponding RNA sequences for the reverse transcriptase and protease genes, respectively. The mean rates of concordance between DNA and RNA genotypes were 46.7% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 26.3% for non-NRTIs and 43.7% for protease inhibitors (PIs). Mixtures were detected for most DNA mutations. The rate of concordant PI mutations was significantly higher for patients taking PIs at the time of DNA genotyping (48% versus 26%; P=0.004). The other factors studied had no impact. CONCLUSIONS In the context of low or undetectable viraemia, it is difficult to reach the archived mutated DNA. Classical RNA genotyping during previous periods of virological failure remains the gold standard for documenting resistance mutations and for the monitoring of future treatments.

Telaprevir for HIV/Hepatitis C Virus–Coinfected Patients Failing Treatment With Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (ANRS HC26 TelapreVIH): An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Trial

BACKGROUND Retreatment with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) results in poor sustained virological response (SVR) rates in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. There are limited data regarding the use of telaprevir plus peg-IFN/RBV in this population. METHODS HIV type 1-infected patients who previously failed ≥12 weeks of peg-IFN/RBV for HCV genotype 1 coinfection were enrolled in a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Patients with cirrhosis and previous null response were excluded. Authorized antiretrovirals were tenofovir, emtricitabine, efavirenz, atazanavir, and raltegravir. All patients received peg-IFN alfa-2a (180 µg/week) plus RBV (1000-1200 mg/day) for 4 weeks, followed by telaprevir (750 mg or 1125 mg every 8 hours with efavirenz) plus peg-IFN/RBV for 12 weeks and peg-IFN/RBV for 32-56 weeks according to virological response at week 8. The primary endpoint was the SVR rate at 24 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR24). RESULTS Sixty-nine patients started treatment; SVR24 was achieved in 55 (80% [95% confidence interval, 68%-88%). SVR24 was not influenced by baseline fibrosis stage, IL28B genotype, antiretroviral regimen, HCV subtype, CD4 cell count, previous response to HCV treatment, HCV RNA level, or HCV RNA decline at week 4. HCV treatment was discontinued for adverse events (AEs) in 20% of patients, including cutaneous (4%), psychiatric (4%), hematological (6%), and other AEs (6%). Peg-IFN or RBV dose reduction was required in 23% and 43% of patients, respectively. Seventy percent of patients required erythropoietin, blood transfusions, or RBV dose reduction for anemia. Two patients died during the study. No HIV breakthrough was observed. CONCLUSIONS Despite a high discontinuation rate related to toxicity, a substantial proportion of treatment-experienced HIV-coinfected patients achieved SVR24 with a telaprevir-based regimen. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01332955.

Maraviroc plus raltegravir failed to maintain virological suppression in HIV-infected patients with lipohypertrophy: results from the ROCnRAL ANRS 157 study

BACKGROUND Novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- and protease inhibitor-sparing strategies are needed in long-term-treated patients with lipohypertrophy. Given their potency and their excellent metabolic profile, maraviroc and raltegravir appear to be good candidates for such an approach. METHODS This single-arm study enrolled lipohypertrophic HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia and an R5 tropic virus in HIV DNA; they switched from suppressive antiretroviral treatment to maraviroc plus raltegravir. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment success at week 24, defined as no virological failure or treatment discontinuation. To ensure a success rate of at least 80%, a maximum of 10 failures were allowed for 90 patients enrolled. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01420523. RESULTS A total of 44 patients were enrolled; their median age was 55 years, median nadir CD4 cell count was 210 cells/mm(3), median time on antiretroviral treatment was 15 years and median duration of viral suppression was 5.2 years. Seven patients failed maraviroc/raltegravir therapy: five had virological failure and two discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events (one had hepatitis B virus reactivation and one had hypersensitivity syndrome). At failure, raltegravir resistance mutations were detected in 3/5 patients and CXCR4 tropic virus in 2/5. Upon DSMB recommendation, the study was prematurely discontinued on 3 September 2012. Lipid profile and bone mineral density improved with a decrease from baseline values in total cholesterol (-0.56 ± 0.95 mmol/L; P = 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.31 ± 0.81 mmol/L; P = 0.039) and triglycerides (-0.59 ± 1.12 mmol/L; P = 0.001) and an increase in total hip bone mineral density (+0.9 ± 1.5%; P = 0.013) CONCLUSIONS: In long-term-experienced patients, maraviroc/raltegravir therapy lacks virological robustness despite a benefit in lipid profile and bone density.

Factors associated with a low HIV reservoir in patients with prolonged suppressive antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES The relevance of low-level HIV DNA in patients who have undergone prolonged therapy is not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine factors that influence the establishment of low-level HIV DNA in long-term treated patients (excluding treatment since acute infection). METHODS This was a cross-sectional study involving 243 patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for ≥6 months (median: 9 years of treatment) with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at the study timepoint, for whom total DNA measurements were performed. Patients treated since early acute infection or receiving cancer chemotherapeutic/immunosuppressive agents were excluded from the study. RESULTS Overall, the median HIV DNA was 372 copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Forty-seven patients had levels of HIV DNA below the limit of detection and 58 patients had low-level HIV DNA (<100 copies/10(6) PBMCs). In multivariate analysis, a low total HIV DNA in HAART-treated patients was clearly associated with a low HIV RNA pre-therapeutic viral load (P < 0.0001), regardless of the cut-off used. CONCLUSIONS These results may be helpful to identify candidates for future trials aiming at a functional cure of HIV infection, since low total HIV DNA levels will most likely be a prerequisite of successful immunological control of HIV replication.

Determinants of a Low CD4/CD8 Ratio in HIV-1–Infected Individuals Despite Long-term Viral Suppression

BACKGROUND A low CD4/CD8 ratio in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals despite effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) reflects ongoing immune activation and has been linked to a higher risk of non-AIDS morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to describe the proportion of individuals with a persistent CD4/CD8 ratio <1 despite long-term viral suppression and to determine associated risk factors. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012 in a single clinical center. HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals were eligible if they had a plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL for at least 2 years on a stable ART regimen. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for a persistent CD4/CD8 ratio <1. RESULTS We enrolled 719 individuals with a median CD4/CD8 ratio of 0.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.6-1.1), CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts of 565 (IQR, 435-742) cells/µL and 727 (IQR, 530-991) cells/µL respectively, and viral suppression for 5.4 (IQR, 3.3-9.1) years. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology was positive in 564 of 645 individuals (87%). Persistent CD4/CD8 ratio <1 was observed in 471 patients (66%). The following factors were independently associated with a CD4/CD8 ratio <1: CMV seropositivity (odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.1-3.1]), ART initiation before 1997 (OR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2-3.0] compared with 2002 or later), a lower CD4 T-cell nadir (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, .7-.8] per log2 increment), and shorter duration of viral suppression (OR, 0.6 [95% CI, .5-.8] per 5 years). CONCLUSIONS Most HIV-infected individuals with long-term viral suppression still had a CD4/CD8 ratio <1. Early initiation and long-term effective ART appear to improve this ratio. CMV coinfection, which represents a potential target for therapeutic intervention, was strongly associated with a persistently suboptimal CD4/CD8 ratio.