Marc D. Jones
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marc D. Jones.
Nature | 2015
Nicola Waddell; Marina Pajic; Ann-Marie Patch; David K. Chang; Karin S. Kassahn; Peter Bailey; Amber L. Johns; David Miller; Katia Nones; Kelly Quek; Michael Quinn; Alan Robertson; Muhammad Z.H. Fadlullah; Timothy J. C. Bruxner; Angelika N. Christ; Ivon Harliwong; Senel Idrisoglu; Suzanne Manning; Craig Nourse; Ehsan Nourbakhsh; Shivangi Wani; Peter J. Wilson; Emma Markham; Nicole Cloonan; Matthew J. Anderson; J. Lynn Fink; Oliver Holmes; Stephen Kazakoff; Conrad Leonard; Felicity Newell
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal of malignancies and a major health burden. We performed whole-genome sequencing and copy number variation (CNV) analysis of 100 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Chromosomal rearrangements leading to gene disruption were prevalent, affecting genes known to be important in pancreatic cancer (TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A, ARID1A and ROBO2) and new candidate drivers of pancreatic carcinogenesis (KDM6A and PREX2). Patterns of structural variation (variation in chromosomal structure) classified PDACs into 4 subtypes with potential clinical utility: the subtypes were termed stable, locally rearranged, scattered and unstable. A significant proportion harboured focal amplifications, many of which contained druggable oncogenes (ERBB2, MET, FGFR1, CDK6, PIK3R3 and PIK3CA), but at low individual patient prevalence. Genomic instability co-segregated with inactivation of DNA maintenance genes (BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2) and a mutational signature of DNA damage repair deficiency. Of 8 patients who received platinum therapy, 4 of 5 individuals with these measures of defective DNA maintenance responded.
Annals of Oncology | 2012
Jeremy L. Humphris; David K. Chang; Amber L. Johns; Christopher J. Scarlett; Marina Pajic; Marc D. Jones; Emily K. Colvin; Adnan Nagrial; Venessa T. Chin; Lorraine A. Chantrill; Jaswinder S. Samra; Anthony J. Gill; James G. Kench; Neil D. Merrett; Amitabha Das; Elizabeth A. Musgrove; Robert L. Sutherland; Andrew V. Biankin
Background Current staging methods for pancreatic cancer (PC) are inadequate, and biomarkers to aid clinical decision making are lacking. Despite the availability of the serum marker carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) for over two decades, its precise role in the management of PC is yet to be defined, and as a consequence, it is not widely used. Methods We assessed the relationship between perioperative serum CA19.9 levels, survival and adjuvant chemotherapeutic responsiveness in a cohort of 260 patients who underwent operative resection for PC. Results By specifically assessing the subgroup of patients with detectable CA19.9, we identified potential utility at key clinical decision points. Low postoperative CA19.9 at 3 months (median survival 25.6 vs 14.8 months, P = 0.0052) and before adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Patients with postoperative CA 19.9 levels >90 U/ml did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.7194) compared with those with a CA19.9 of ≤90 U/ml (median 26.0 vs 16.7 months, P = 0.0108). Normalization of CA19.9 within 6 months of resection was also an independent favorable prognostic factor (median 29.9 vs 14.8 months, P = 0.0004) and normal perioperative CA19.9 levels identified a good prognostic group, which was associated with a 5-year survival of 42%. Conclusions Perioperative serum CA19.9 measurements are informative in patients with detectable CA19.9 (defined by serum levels of >5 U/ml) and have potential clinical utility in predicting outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Future clinical trials should prioritize incorporation of CA19.9 measurement at key decision points to prospectively validate these findings and facilitate implementation.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2015
Lorraine A. Chantrill; Adnan Nagrial; Clare Watson; Amber L. Johns; Mona Martyn-Smith; Skye Simpson; Scott Mead; Marc D. Jones; Jaswinder S. Samra; Anthony J. Gill; Nicole Watson; Venessa T. Chin; Jeremy L. Humphris; Angela Chou; Belinda Brown; Adrienne Morey; Marina Pajic; Sean M. Grimmond; David K. Chang; David Thomas; Lucille Sebastian; Katrin Marie Sjoquist; Sonia Yip; Nick Pavlakis; Ray Asghari; Sandra Harvey; Peter Grimison; John Simes; Andrew V. Biankin
Purpose: Personalized medicine strategies using genomic profiling are particularly pertinent for pancreas cancer. The Individualized Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy (IMPaCT) trial was initially designed to exploit results from genome sequencing of pancreatic cancer under the auspices of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) in Australia. Sequencing revealed small subsets of patients with aberrations in their tumor genome that could be targeted with currently available therapies. Experimental Design: The pilot stage of the IMPaCT trial assessed the feasibility of acquiring suitable tumor specimens for molecular analysis and returning high-quality actionable genomic data within a clinically acceptable timeframe. We screened for three molecular targets: HER2 amplification; KRAS wild-type; and mutations in DNA damage repair pathways (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM). Results: Tumor biopsy and archived tumor samples were collected from 93 patients and 76 were screened. To date 22 candidate cases have been identified: 14 KRAS wild-type, 5 cases of HER2 amplification, 2 mutations in BRCA2, and 1 ATM mutation. Median time from consent to the return of validated results was 21.5 days. An inability to obtain a biopsy or insufficient tumor content in the available specimen were common reasons for patient exclusion from molecular analysis while deteriorating performance status prohibited a number of patients from proceeding in the study. Conclusions: Documenting the feasibility of acquiring and screening biospecimens for actionable molecular targets in real time will aid other groups embarking on similar trials. Key elements include the need to better prescreen patients, screen more patients, and offer more attractive clinical trial options. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2029–37. ©2015 AACR.
International Journal of Cancer | 2014
Katia Nones; Nic Waddell; Sarah Song; Ann Marie Patch; David Miller; Amber L. Johns; Jianmin Wu; Karin S. Kassahn; David L. A. Wood; Peter Bailey; Lynn Fink; Suzanne Manning; Angelika N. Christ; Craig Nourse; Stephen Kazakoff; Darrin Taylor; Conrad Leonard; David K. Chang; Marc D. Jones; Michelle Thomas; Clare Watson; Mark Pinese; Mark J. Cowley; Ilse Rooman; Marina Pajic; Giovanni Butturini; Anna Malpaga; Vincenzo Corbo; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi
The importance of epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation in tumorigenesis is increasingly being appreciated. To define the genome‐wide pattern of DNA methylation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), we captured the methylation profiles of 167 untreated resected PDACs and compared them to a panel of 29 adjacent nontransformed pancreata using high‐density arrays. A total of 11,634 CpG sites associated with 3,522 genes were significantly differentially methylated (DM) in PDAC and were capable of segregating PDAC from non‐malignant pancreas, regardless of tumor cellularity. As expected, PDAC hypermethylation was most prevalent in the 5′ region of genes (including the proximal promoter, 5′UTR and CpG islands). Approximately 33% DM genes showed significant inverse correlation with mRNA expression levels. Pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of aberrantly methylated genes involved in key molecular mechanisms important to PDAC: TGF‐β, WNT, integrin signaling, cell adhesion, stellate cell activation and axon guidance. Given the recent discovery that SLIT‐ROBO mutations play a clinically important role in PDAC, the role of epigenetic perturbation of axon guidance was pursued in more detail. Bisulfite amplicon deep sequencing and qRT‐PCR expression analyses confirmed recurrent perturbation of axon guidance pathway genes SLIT2, SLIT3, ROBO1, ROBO3, ITGA2 and MET and suggests epigenetic suppression of SLIT‐ROBO signaling and up‐regulation of MET and ITGA2 expression. Hypomethylation of MET and ITGA2 correlated with high gene expression, which was associated with poor survival. These data suggest that aberrant methylation plays an important role in pancreatic carcinogenesis affecting core signaling pathways with potential implications for the disease pathophysiology and therapy.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013
David K. Chang; Nigel B. Jamieson; Amber L. Johns; Christopher J. Scarlett; Marina Pajic; Angela Chou; Mark Pinese; Jeremy L. Humphris; Marc D. Jones; Christopher W. Toon; Adnan Nagrial; Lorraine A. Chantrill; Venessa T. Chin; Andreia V. Pinho; Ilse Rooman; Mark J. Cowley; Jianmin Wu; R. Scott Mead; Emily K. Colvin; Jaswinder S. Samra; Vincenzo Corbo; Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Rita T. Lawlor; Stefano Crippa; Nicola Sperandio; Samantha Bersani; Euan J. Dickson; Mohamed Mohamed; Karin A. Oien
PURPOSE Individuals with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater demonstrate a broad range of outcomes, presumably because these cancers may arise from any one of the three epithelia that converge at that location. This variability poses challenges for clinical decision making and the development of novel therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed the potential clinical utility of histomolecular phenotypes defined using a combination of histopathology and protein expression (CDX2 and MUC1) in 208 patients from three independent cohorts who underwent surgical resection for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. RESULTS Histologic subtype and CDX2 and MUC1 expression were significant prognostic variables. Patients with a histomolecular pancreaticobiliary phenotype (CDX2 negative, MUC1 positive) segregated into a poor prognostic group in the training (hazard ratio [HR], 3.34; 95% CI, 1.69 to 6.62; P < .001) and both validation cohorts (HR, 5.65; 95% CI, 2.77 to 11.5; P < .001 and HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.25 to 7.17; P = .0119) compared with histomolecular nonpancreaticobiliary carcinomas. Further stratification by lymph node (LN) status defined three clinically relevant subgroups: one, patients with histomolecular nonpancreaticobiliary (intestinal) carcinoma without LN metastases who had an excellent prognosis; two, those with histomolecular pancreaticobiliary carcinoma with LN metastases who had a poor outcome; and three, the remainder of patients (nonpancreaticobiliary, LN positive or pancreaticobiliary, LN negative) who had an intermediate outcome. CONCLUSION Histopathologic and molecular criteria combine to define clinically relevant histomolecular phenotypes of adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater and potentially represent distinct diseases with significant implications for current therapeutic strategies, the ability to interpret past clinical trials, and future trial design.
Gastroenterology | 2017
Jeremy L. Humphris; Ann-Marie Patch; Katia Nones; Peter Bailey; Amber L. Johns; Skye McKay; David K. Chang; David Miller; Marina Pajic; Karin S. Kassahn; Michael Quinn; Timothy J. C. Bruxner; Angelika N. Christ; Ivon Harliwong; Senel Idrisoglu; Suzanne Manning; Craig Nourse; Ehsan Nourbakhsh; Andrew Stone; Peter J. Wilson; Matthew Anderson; J. Lynn Fink; Oliver Holmes; Stephen Kazakoff; Conrad Leonard; Felicity Newell; Nick Waddell; Scott Wood; Ronald S. Mead; Qinying Xu
Pancreatic cancer is molecularly diverse, with few effective therapies. Increased mutation burden and defective DNA repair are associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in several other cancer types. We interrogated 385 pancreatic cancer genomes to define hypermutation and its causes. Mutational signatures inferring defects in DNA repair were enriched in those with the highest mutation burdens. Mismatch repair deficiency was identified in 1% of tumors harboring different mechanisms of somatic inactivation of MLH1 and MSH2. Defining mutation load in individual pancreatic cancers and the optimal assay for patient selection may inform clinical trial design for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer.
Oncotarget | 2015
Kim Moran-Jones; Brian S. Gloss; Rajmohan Murali; David K. Chang; Emily K. Colvin; Marc D. Jones; Samuel Yuen; Viive M. Howell; Laura M. Brown; Carol Wong; Suzanne M. Spong; Christopher J. Scarlett; Neville F. Hacker; Sue Ghosh; Samuel C. Mok; Michael J. Birrer; Goli Samimi
Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death among women with gynecologic cancer. We examined molecular profiles of fibroblasts from normal ovary and high-grade serous ovarian tumors to identify novel therapeutic targets involved in tumor progression. We identified 2,300 genes that are significantly differentially expressed in tumor-associated fibroblasts. Fibroblast expression of one of these genes, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. CTGF protein expression in ovarian tumor fibroblasts significantly correlated with gene expression levels. CTGF is a secreted component of the tumor microenvironment and is being pursued as a therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer. We examined its effect in in vitro and ex vivo ovarian cancer models, and examined associations between CTGF expression and clinico-pathologic characteristics in patients. CTGF promotes migration and peritoneal adhesion of ovarian cancer cells. These effects are abrogated by FG-3019, a human monoclonal antibody against CTGF, currently under clinical investigation as a therapeutic agent. Immunohistochemical analyses of high-grade serous ovarian tumors reveal that the highest level of tumor stromal CTGF expression was correlated with the poorest prognosis. Our findings identify CTGF as a promoter of peritoneal adhesion, likely to mediate metastasis, and a potential therapeutic target in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. These results warrant further studies into the therapeutic efficacy of FG-3019 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Cancer Research | 2009
Kim Moran-Jones; Joan Grindlay; Marc D. Jones; Ross Smith; Jim C. Norman
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Stephan Dreyer; Nigel B. Jamieson; Lisa Evers; Marc D. Jones; Sancha Martin; Fraser Duthie; Liz Musgrove; Susie Cooke; Peter Bailey; Colin J. McKay; David K. Chang; Andrew V. Biankin