Maria Cristina Cassatella

Changes of HER2 Status in Circulating Tumor Cells Compared With the Primary Tumor During Treatment for Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND HER2/neu status of tumor cells at metastatic sites in patients with advanced disease may differ from that of the primary tumor. Assessing the presence of target antigens on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) might affect treatment choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 2007 to October 2008, we collected 23 mL of blood from each of the 76 consecutive patients before and during chemotherapy to determine CTC numbers and HER2 overexpression. CTCs were isolated with the CellSearch System® (Veridex, LLC; Raritan, NJ) and fluorescently stained with the Epithelial Cell Kit®. Tumor Phenotyping Reagent® was used to investigate HER2/neu overexpression. RESULTS Concordance of HER2 status between the primary tumor and CTCs was 86% (49 out of 57 patients) at baseline and 82% (50 out of 61 patients) in the treatment samples. HER2 overexpression in CTCs was acquired in 8 out of 45 patients (18%) and lost in 3 out of 16 patients (19%) during a treatment containing trastuzumab. The overall discordance rate between the primary tumor and CTCs was 18% (11 out of 61 patients). Patients with HER2 overexpression in CTCs had poorer progression-free survival compared with those without CTCs or with HER2- CTCs (log-rank P =.036). CONCLUSION Information on the presence or absence of HER2 overexpression can be obtained in CTCs. Larger trials are needed to evaluate the activity of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with acquired HER2 overexpression in CTCs.

International study on inter-reader variability for circulating tumor cells in breast cancer

IntroductionCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) have been studied in breast cancer with the CellSearch® system. Given the low CTC counts in non-metastatic breast cancer, it is important to evaluate the inter-reader agreement.MethodsCellSearch® images (N = 272) of either CTCs or white blood cells or artifacts from 109 non-metastatic (M0) and 22 metastatic (M1) breast cancer patients from reported studies were sent to 22 readers from 15 academic laboratories and 8 readers from two Veridex laboratories. Each image was scored as No CTC vs CTC HER2- vs CTC HER2+. The 8 Veridex readers were summarized to a Veridex Consensus (VC) to compare each academic reader using % agreement and kappa (κ) statistics. Agreement was compared according to disease stage and CTC counts using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsFor CTC definition (No CTC vs CTC), the median agreement between academic readers and VC was 92% (range 69 to 97%) with a median κ of 0.83 (range 0.37 to 0.93). Lower agreement was observed in images from M0 (median 91%, range 70 to 96%) compared to M1 (median 98%, range 64 to 100%) patients (P < 0.001) and from M0 and <3CTCs (median 87%, range 66 to 95%) compared to M0 and ≥3CTCs samples (median 95%, range 77 to 99%), (P < 0.001). For CTC HER2 expression (HER2- vs HER2+), the median agreement was 87% (range 51 to 95%) with a median κ of 0.74 (range 0.25 to 0.90).ConclusionsThe inter-reader agreement for CTC definition was high. Reduced agreement was observed in M0 patients with low CTC counts. Continuous training and independent image review are required.

Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells According to Immunohistochemically Defined Molecular Subtypes in Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration might be useful to identify different risk categories within each molecular subtype. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 203 consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer with baseline CTC enumeration performed with CellSearch (Veridex Corp, Warren, NJ) between March 2005 and July 2011. Patients were categorized into 3 prognostic groups based on the number of CTCs (0, 1-4, and ≥ 5) and into 5 categories based on tumor biological characteristics: luminal-A (estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR] > 1%, grade 1/2, human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2]-negative [HER2(-)], Ki67 value < 14%); luminal-B (ER and/or PR > 1%, grade 3, HER2(-), Ki67 value > 14%); luminal-B HER2-positive [HER2(+)] (ER and/or PR > 1%, any grade, HER2(+), Ki-67 value any); HER2(+) (HER2 overexpressed/fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH] amplified, ER and PR absent); triple negative (TN) (ER and PR 0%, HER2 not overexpressed/FISH not amplified). RESULTS Median age was 57 years (range 31-78 years). Twenty-seven patients (13.3%) had luminal-A category, 105 (51.7%) patients had luminal-B, 29 (14.3%) patients had luminal-B HER2(+), 24 patients (11.8%) had HER2(+), and 18 patients (8.9%) had TN. CTCs were mostly found in patients with luminal-A/luminal-B HER2(-) subtype. At multivariable analysis, CTC count was a significant predictive factor for overall survival (OS) in all molecular subtypes (log-rank P < .01). Patients with 0 CTCs/7.5 mL blood and all subtypes, except HER2(+), seem to perform better compared with other categories. CONCLUSION These findings confirm CTCs as an important prognostic factor for metastatic breast cancer in all molecular subtypes. Larger studies could help identify metastatic breast cancer subgroups in which CTC analysis would be particularly useful.

Comparison of three distinct methods for the detection of circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer patients

The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has considerable utility in the clinical management of patients with solid cancers. However, the phenotypic heterogeneity of CTCs and their low numbers in the bloodstream of patients means that no standardized detection method currently exists for these cells. This, together with differences in pre-analytical sample processing, has led to the collection and accumulation of inconsistent data among independent studies. Here, we compare the ability of three methods to detect CTCs in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. Specifically, different aliquots of the same blood sample were screened for the presence of CTCs by a multimarker RT-PCR assay, the standardized CellSearch assay and dHPLC-based gene mutation analysis. In the population tested, none of the blood samples analysed appeared to be positive by all three methods. Of the samples, 75% were positive for the presence of CTCs by the RT-PCR method. Only 20% were positive by the CellSearch assay, while 14.3% of samples displayed gene mutations consistent with the presence of CTCs when the dHPLC method was applied. The samples which were positive for CTCs by the CellSearch assay did not overlap with those that were positive by dHPLC. Interestingly, however, all of these samples were positive when assessed by RT-PCR. Conversely, of the samples that resulted negative by RT-PCR analysis, none appeared to be positive by either of the other methods. These data, therefore, indicate that of the three methods tested, the multimarker RT-PCR assay provides maximal probability of CTC detection. Here, we present the preliminary results of an ongoing clinical study. Future follow-up involving detection of CTCs in the blood of colorectal cancer patients using these three distinct methods will allow us to verify whether either a single method, or a combination of different assays, is necessary to uncover further prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells.

The Pitfalls of CA19-9 Routine Testing and Comparison of Two Automated Immunoassays in a Reference Oncology Center

We evaluated CA19-9 as a marker of various malignancies and compared the results of 2 commercial immunoassays. The Abbott ARCHITECT i2000 and Roche cobas 410 immunoassays were used on 500 consecutive samples to evaluate the frequency of positive results by cancer type and the correlation between assays. The patients were tested before or after surgery and/or during chemotherapy. The rate of results exceeding conventional thresholds was 92.3% in pancreatic cancer, 36.8% in gastric cancer, and ranged from 3.0% to 35.9% in other tumors. Agreement (90.6%) and correlation (R(2) = 0.865) between the 2 assays were good and the frequency of highly discordant results was low (6/500). In some cases, interference by heterophilic antibodies was demonstrated. The 2 methods were comparable in diagnostic accuracy and had good correlation but are not interchangeable. Patients should always be monitored for CA19-9 with the same method and it should be indicated in the report.

Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in primary and metastatic breast cancer

In patients with breast cancer, there is evidence correlating the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with disease-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival. The detection of CTCs may be useful in gaining a better understanding of the mechanisms of tumor growth and in the improvement of patient management. This review analyzes the prognostic and predictive relevance of CTCs through the principal published studies, cytometric techniques and nucleic acid-based approaches to detect CTCs, phenotypic expression of specific receptors, molecular pathways and genetic signatures for potential tailored therapies.

Atrial fibrillation after thoracic surgery for lung cancer: use of a single cut-off value of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide to identify patients at risk

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-known complication occurring after thoracic surgery. B-type natriuretic peptide has recently been investigated as a predictive marker of postoperative AF after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate a definite cut-off for N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in predicting postoperative AF in lung cancer patients. NT-proBNP was determined before and after surgery in 400 patients. Cardiac function was monitored by continuous postoperative ECG and clinical cardiological evaluation. AF occurred in 18% of the patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified a cut-off of 182.3 ng l−1 as the one with the highest sensitivity and specificity. Perioperative increased levels of NT-proBNP seem to predict postoperative AF in patients undergoing thoracic surgery, and a single cut-off of 182.3 ng l−1 can be used to select high-risk patients who could receive preventive therapy, leading to a considerable decrease in the total costs associated with the management of this complication.

TnI-Ultra assay measurements in cancer patients: Comparison with the conventional assay and clinical implication

Abstract The serial monitoring of cardiac troponin represents an effective approach for the early identification, assessment, and monitoring of chemotherapy-induced cardiac injury. Over the last few years new generations of troponin assays, referred to as sensitive and high sensitivity assays, able to detect very low concentrations of troponin, have been progressively released on different platforms. Some studies have assessed the comparability of the cTnI measurements with the new assays versus the conventional ones, but none of these in the oncological population. We compared the cTnI results determined on Stratus CS and ADVIA Centaur CP System in 70 breast cancer patients, for a total of 327 samples collected during different cycles of treatment. Correlation (Spearman = 0.732) and agreement (91.4%) between the assays were good (244 concordant negatives and 55 concordant positives), with a frequency of 8.6% discordant results among the cTnI measurements. Despite the well-known lack in the harmonization and standardization of the currently commercially available cTnI methods, we found a good clinical concordance of cTnI determination on both systems.

Recovery and time to growth of isolates in blood culture bottles: comparison of BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and BD Bactec Plus Anaerobic/F bottles.

Abstract Background: This study was done to compare the growth of pathogens in paired aerobic/anaerobic blood culture bottles versus the use of only aerobic bottles, and to analyze the time to growth in both atmospheres. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the results of all blood cultures collected over a 2-y period for the diagnosis of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections or other severe infections in oncology patients. Results: Among the 487 isolates, 174 (35.7%), all aerobic, grew only in the aerobic bottle; 250 (51.3%), all aerobic, grew in both bottles; and 63 (12.9%) grew only in the anaerobic bottle, of which 24 were anaerobic and 39 were aerobic microorganisms (8% of positive blood cultures). Of these 39 aerobic microorganisms, 12 were Gram-negative, 17 staphylococci (4 were Staphylococcus aureus), 5 streptococci, 2 Gram-positive bacilli, and 3 mixed growth. Though the mean time to positivity of pathogens grown in both atmospheres was significantly lower in the aerobic bottle than in the anaerobic bottle, in 71 cases (28.4%) the pathogens developed earlier in the anaerobic bottle than in the aerobic bottle – in 36 of these cases at least 1 h earlier, which is significant for starting targeted therapy. Conclusions: The use of paired aerobic/anaerobic blood culture bottles allowed the diagnosis of a percentage of bacteraemia due to either anaerobic or aerobic pathogens that would have been missed, as they grew only in the anaerobic atmosphere. Moreover in 8% of bacteraemia we identified a significant decrease in the time to detection, resulting in the opportunity to better manage the infections without an increase in costs.

Transition from Hybrid Capture 2 to Cobas 4800 in Hpv detection: sensitivity and specificity for Cin2+ in two time periods

Abstract Background: High-risk (HR) Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Tests for HPV detection differ in sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the HC2 HR HPV Test and the Cobas 4800 HPV Test in consecutive cervical samples collected from a referral population with a high prevalence of disease, using CIN2+ histology as clinical outcome. Methods: Ten thousand two-hundred and thirteen consecutive cervical samples were assayed for HR-HPV in the Laboratory Medicine Division of IEO: 5140 from January 2012 to June 2013 with HC2 and 5073 from July 2013 to December 2014 with the Cobas HPV Test. These two assays differ in terms of target genes and testing methods. Results: The test positivity rates for HC2 and Cobas 4800 were 29.5% (1515/5135, 95% CI 28.3–30.8%) and 23.9% (1212/5069, 95% CI 22.7–25.1%), respectively. The detection rates of CIN2+ in the two time periods were 2.8% (145/5140, 95% CI 2.4–3.3%) and 1.6% (79/5073, 95% CI 1.2–1.9%), respectively. The sensitivity for CIN2+ for HC2 and Cobas 4800 was 95.2% (138/145, 95% CI 91.7–98.7%) and 93.7% (74/79, 95% CI 88.3–99.0%), respectively. The specificity for CIN2+ for HC2 and Cobas 4800 was 72.4% (3613/4990, 95% CI 71.2–73.6%) and 77.2% (3852/4990, 95% CI 76.0–78.4%), respectively. There were 23 cases of cancer in each of the two time periods. HC2 detected 100% (23/23). Cobas 4800 detected 82.6% (19/23). Conclusions: The detection rate of CIN2+ was higher in the first period than in the second period. There was no significant difference in sensitivity of HC2 and Cobas 4800 in women with CIN2+. The specificity of CIN2+ using Cobas 4800 in the second period was higher than HC2 in the first period, probably due to the lower prevalence of CIN2+ in the second period.