Maria L. Nute
Loughborough University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maria L. Nute.
British Journal of Nutrition | 2005
Emma Stevenson; Clyde Williams; Maria L. Nute
The present study investigated the effects of mixed high-carbohydrate (CHO) meals (breakfast and lunch) with different glycaemic indices (GI) on substrate metabolism during rest throughout the postprandial periods and during subsequent exercise. Nine recreationally active males completed two trials, high glycaemic index (HGI) and low glycaemic index (LGI), separated by 7 d in a randomised crossover design. In each trial, participants consumed breakfast and lunch, both of which were followed by a 3 h resting postprandial period. Following this, participants completed a 60 min run at 70 % of V O2max. The plasma glucose and serum insulin concentrations following both meals were significantly higher in the HGI trial than in the LGI trial (P<0.05). Serum insulin concentrations remained higher throughout the postprandial period following lunch in the HGI trial compared with the LGI trial (P<0.05). The total amount of fat oxidised was higher during the 3 h rest following lunch in the LGI trial than in the HGI trial (P<0.01) and subsequently CHO oxidation was lower (P<0.005). No significant differences in substrate utilisation were observed throughout the subsequent run. At 45 and 60 min, plasma glucose concentrations were higher in the LGI trial v. the HGI trial (P<0.05). The results of the present study provide further support that the GI concept can be successfully applied to mixed meals. The results also suggest that meals composed of LGI CHO may be more beneficial for maintaining a favourable metabolic milieu during the postprandial periods. Furthermore, during subsequent exercise, plasma glucose concentrations were better maintained following the LGI CHO meals.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2007
Susan H. Backhouse; Clyde Williams; Emma Stevenson; Maria L. Nute
Objective:The aim of this study was to examine the metabolic responses during 1 h of brisk walking, 3 h after ingesting high glycemic index (HGI) and moderate glycemic index (MGI) breakfasts.Design and subjects:Six females completed three treadmill walking trials (∼50% [Vdot ]O2 max), separated by at least 1 month. Three hours before walking, they ingested either water or a HGI or MGI breakfast. The MGI breakfast consisted of a mixture of an HGI breakfast cereal and low GI carbohydrate (CHO) foods. The GI values of the HGI and MGI meals were 77 and 51, respectively.Setting:The study took place in the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences at Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.Results:In the HGI and MGI trials, plasma glucose and serum insulin concentrations peaked 15 min into the postprandial period. At the onset of exercise, plasma insulin concentrations were twofold higher in the HGI (31.5±7.7 μl U l−1) than in the MGI trial (15.2±1.9 μl U l−1) (P<0.05). However, there were no differences in substrate utilization between the two CHO trials.Conclusion:These results suggest that although the addition of LGI CHO foods to an HGI breakfast cereal reduces the overall GI of the meal, the metabolic response to exercise is similar to that following a breakfast comprised entirely of HGI foods.
British Journal of Nutrition | 2017
Simon B. Cooper; Karah J. Dring; John G. Morris; Ben E. W. Cousins; Maria L. Nute; Mary E. Nevill
During puberty young people undergo significant hormonal changes which affect metabolism and, subsequently, health. Evidence suggests there is a period of transient pubertal insulin resistance, with this effect greater in girls than boys. However, the response to everyday high and low glycaemic index (GI) meals remains unknown. Following ethical approval, forty adolescents consumed a high GI or low GI breakfast, in a randomised cross-over design. Capillary blood samples were taken during a 2-h postprandial period, examining the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses. Maturity offset and homoeostatic model assessment (HOMA) were also calculated. The glycaemic response to the breakfasts was similar between boys and girls, as shown by similar peak blood glucose concentrations and incremental AUC (IAUC) following both high and low GI breakfasts (all P>0·05). Girls exhibited a higher peak plasma insulin concentration 30 min post-breakfast following both high GI (P=0·043, g=0·69) and low GI (P=0·010, g=0·84) breakfasts, as well as a greater IAUC following high GI (P=0·041, g=0·66) and low GI (P=0·041, g=0·66) breakfasts. HOMA was positively correlated with the insulinaemic responses (all P<0·0005) and maturity offset (P=0·037). The findings of the present study suggest that pubertal insulin resistance affects the postprandial insulinaemic responses to both high and low GI meals. Specifically, girls exhibit a greater insulinaemic response than boys to both meals, despite similar glycaemic responses. This study is the first to report the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to everyday meals in boys and girls, supporting the recommendation for young people to base their diet on low GI carbohydrates.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2006
Emma Stevenson; Clyde Williams; Laura E Mash; Beth Phillips; Maria L. Nute
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism | 2008
Ian Rollo; Clyde Williams; Nicholas Gant; Maria L. Nute
British Journal of Nutrition | 2012
Simon B. Cooper; Stephan Bandelow; Maria L. Nute; John G. Morris; Mary E. Nevill
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism | 2005
Emma Stevenson; Clyde Williams; Maria L. Nute; Peter Swaile; Monica Tsui
Mental Health and Physical Activity | 2012
Simon B. Cooper; Stephan Bandelow; Maria L. Nute; John G. Morris; Mary E. Nevill
Physiology & Behavior | 2015
Simon Cooper; Stephan Bandelow; Maria L. Nute; Jg Morris; Me Nevill
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering | 2013
Simon B. Cooper; Stephan Bandelow; Maria L. Nute; John G. Morris; Mary E. Nevill